scholarly journals Overcoming endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer: Current evidence and future directions

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Milani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Directions

The association of HER2 low expression with the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in hormone receptor positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1052-1052
Author(s):  
Kelvin K H Bao ◽  
Leone Sutanto ◽  
Shirley S W Tse ◽  
Ka Man Cheung ◽  
Jeffrey C H Chan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Potential Marker ◽  
Low Expression

1052 Background: Markers for the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer are limited. The bidirectional crosstalks that exist between ER and HER2 pathways contribute to endocrine resistance. We investigated the association between low levels of HER2 expression and the clinical outcome of patients with ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with ER+ HER2- MBC who received CDK4/6 inhibitor plus either letrozole or fulvestrant between Mar 2017 - Jun 2020 from an institutional cancer registry. HER2-low expression was defined as IHC score 1+, or 2+ with a negative ISH. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the initiation of CDK4/6 inhibitor to the date of radiological or clinical progression, or death. The relationship between HER2 expression levels and PFS was evaluated using log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression modelling. Results: 106 women with MBC were eligible for analysis. Median age at treatment was 58 (23.0-91.4). The majority received palbociclib (84%) while the rest received ribociclib. CDK4/6 inhibitor was used as first-line treatment in 50.9% of cases. Most tumors were of ductal histology (83%) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (84.9%), and 22.6% of the patients had bone-only disease. 77.3% of cases were considered HER2-low expressing. HER2-low expression was associated with a significantly shorter PFS compared with HER2 IHC 0 counterpart (median, 8.9 vs 18.8 months, p= 0.014). In multivariate analysis, HER-2 low expression remained significantly associated with an inferior PFS (HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.03-3.75, p= 0.041) after adjusting for the line of treatment, PgR status and disease extent (bone only vs extra-osseous disease). Conclusions: In patients with ER+ HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, HER2-low expression was associated with an inferior PFS, and may serve as a potential marker candidate for CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy. As novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates demonstrated efficacy in HER2-low expressing MBC, coupled with the emerging evidence for the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with anti-HER2 agents, this HER2-low expression subgroup warrants prospective evaluations in future trials.

Hormono-biological therapy in metastatic breast cancer: preclinical evidence, clinical studies and future directions

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Tonini ◽  
Gaia Schiavon ◽  
Maria Elisabetta Fratto ◽  
Bruno Vincenzi ◽  
Daniele Santini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Future Directions

Prospective assessment of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity in breast cancer (HOR 02) and questionnaire survey of physicians’ perspectives

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6619-6619
Author(s):  
K. Kuroi ◽  
K. Shimozuma ◽  
Y. Ohashi ◽  
A. Takeuchi ◽  
T. Aranishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Average Response Rate ◽  
Prospective Assessment ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Valid Instrument

6619 Background: Physician-based instruments (e.g., NCI-CTC) are widely used to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). However, current evidence suggests that physician-based assessments under-report the incidence and severity of CIPN. To overcome this limitation, a patient-based questionnaire, patient neurotoxicity questionnaire (PNQ) was developed, and a phase III randomized adjuvant trial of breast cancer (N-SAS BC 02; AC followed by PAC/DOC vs. PAC/DOC alone) has demonstrated that PNQ is reliable and sensitive and responsive instrument to assess CIPN (Shimozuma et al., SABCS 2004; #6037). We prospectively evaluated the reliability and sensitivity of PNQ in advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated by weekly administration of paclitaxel. Moreover, a questionnaire survey was conducted on physician perspectives regarding the assessment of CPIN in Japan. Methods: CIPN and QOL were prospectively assessed in thirty-five patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer who received weekly paclitaxel (80–100 mg/m2/w). PNQ and FACT-Ntx subscale were compared to NCI-CTC. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 8 wk, 16 wk after starting treatments. A questionnaire was sent to physician who participated in N-SAS BC 02 to clarify their perspectives regarding the CPIN. Results: Average response rate of the instruments was 89%. Sensory PNQ scores correlated with sensory FACT-Ntx scores (r=0.51), and NCI-CTC scores (r=0.58). NCI-CTC scores mainly distributed between 0 and 1, while PNQ scores widely distributed. Follow-up study revealed that sensory CIPN assessed by PNQ appeared to be sensitive as compared to NCI-CTC. In clinician survey, 47 out of 61 physicians (77%) responded, and majority of them considered neurosensory symptoms as diagnostic hallmark for CIPN. However, for the justification for treatment delay, dose modification, or treatment cessation, most laid weight on functional impairment in patients with CIPN. Most (80%) rated PNQ is helpful in management of patients at risk for CIPN. Conclusions: This study confirmed that physicians tended to underestimate CIPN, and PNQ was a more reliable and valid instrument to assess CIPN with high acceptability in physicians. [Table: see text]

What is the evidence for rechallenging with anthracyclines or taxanes in metastatic breast cancer? A review of the data

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1072-1072
Author(s):  
J. Krell ◽  
C. Harper-Wynne ◽  
D. Miles ◽  
V. Misra ◽  
S. Cleator ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Optimal Sequence ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Current Evidence Base

1072 Background: Anthracyclines and taxanes are widely used in the adjuvant setting for high risk, early stage breast cancer. This raises the issue of what is the optimal therapy for those patients who relapse, and what the potential role, if any, there is for rechallenge with these agents. The current evidence base for rechallenging with anthracyclines/anthracediones and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is examined in this study. Methods: Medline/Pubmed database searches were performed upto October 2008 to identify studies in which patients (pts) were rechallenged with anthracyclines/anthracediones or taxanes in MBC. Results: The efficacy data, as well as the safety data relating to neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity from these studies, are summarized in the Table. Twenty-seven studies were identified (20=anthracycline/anthracedione, 7= taxane) of which only two were prospective studies. Both were small (n= 74 & 51) and related to anthracycline rechallenging. Conclusions: Evidence exists to support rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes. However, there are few prospective data on reexposure to taxanes and no data comparing anthracyclines versus taxanes following adjuvant exposure to both agents, supporting the need for clinical trials in this area. Such trials should ideally incorporate a cross-over design at treatment failure, which would shed light on the optimal sequence in which these agents should be administered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The effect of trastuzumab therapy on clinical benefit from fulvestrant treatment for metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Charif ◽  
Elyse E. Lower ◽  
Diane Kennedy ◽  
Harriet Kumar ◽  
Shugufta Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Her 2

155 Background: Overexpression of HER2/neu is associated with tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer (Osborne CK et al. J Natl Canc Inst 2003; 95:353-361). However pts may present with both estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2/neu + tumors. The benefit of adding fulvestrant to trastuzumab is unclear. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of trastuzumab on fulvestrant therapy. Methods: This was an IRB approved record review of patients (pts) from three medical oncologists with biopsy-proven ER+ metastatic breast cancer treated with fulvestrant who also had their primary tumor tested for HER2/neu. Demographic data collected included age at diagnosis, type and stage of cancer, original and metastatic ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and HER-2/neu biomarkers, and site(s) of metastasis, and primary local and systemic treatment. All pts with HER-2/neu + primary tumors received trastuzumab. The duration of fulvestrant therapy was calculated. Time to clinical disease progression on fulvestrant was measured as a surrogate for duration of clinical benefit. Results: Eighty-five metastatic ER+ fulvestrant treated breast cancer pts with known primary tumor HER2/neu status were identified and the duration of therapy calculated. All eleven (13%) pts with documented HER2/neu + primary tumors received trastuzumab. The duration of therapy for HER2/neu + pts (772 (51-1911) days (median (range)) was longer than HER2/neu negative pts (360 (60-2,739) days, p=0.059). The median duration of fulvestrant therapy was 425 days. Pts with HER2/neu + tumors were more likely to be treated beyond the median fulvestrant therapy with an odds ratio of 6.2 (1.26 to 30.92 95% confidence interval, p=0.0249). Conclusions: Trastuzumab plus fulvestrant therapy was associated with a more prolonged clinical response than fulvestrant alone in pts with metastatic breast cancer. This synergism may be due to the effect of trastuzumab inhibiting the activation of transcriptional coactivator MED1, a recently discovered key crosstalk point between HER2/neu and ER signaling pathways in mediating endocrine resistance (Cancer Res 2012;72(21):5625;PLoS One 2013; 8:e70641).

scholarly journals Self-renewal of CD133hi cells by IL6/Notch3 signalling regulates endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Sansone ◽  
Claudio Ceccarelli ◽  
Marjan Berishaj ◽  
Qing Chang ◽  
Vinagolu K. Rajasekhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Self Renewal

scholarly journals Liquid Biopsy: New Tool to Overcome CDKi Resistance Mechanism in Luminal Metastatic Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam González-Conde ◽  
Celso Yanez ◽  
Rafael López-López ◽  
Clotilde Costa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Luminal Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately, 70 % of breast cancer patients express hormone receptors (HR) (Luminal subtype). Adjuvant endocrine treatments are the standard of care in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Over time, about 50% of those patients develop endocrine resistance and metastatic breast cancer. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant have demonstrated superior efficacy increasing progression-free survival, with a safe toxicity profile, in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients. CDKi blocks kinases 4/6 ATP-binding domain preventing G1/S cell cycle transition. Despite this, not all patients respond to CDKi and those who respond, finally develop resistance to combination therapy. Different studies, in tumour tissue or cell lines, have tried to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this progression, but there are still no conclusive data. In the last few years, liquid biopsy has contributed relevant information to this knowledge. Liquid biopsy can be performed in real-time, non-invasively and be repeated whenever needed. Circulating tumour material are potential prognostic markers in metastatic luminal breast cancer to determine patient prognosis, monitor disease and treatment selection. The objective of this review is to outline the different studies carried out in HR+ metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKi plus endocrine therapy using liquid biopsy approaches looking for possible resistance mechanisms.

scholarly journals The PI3K/AKT/mTOR and CDK4/6 Pathways in Endocrine Resistant HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: Biological Mechanisms and New Treatments

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Presti ◽  
Erica Quaquarini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Response Predictors ◽  
New Treatments

Endocrine-based treatments are the normal standard-of-care in women with hormone receptor-positive/Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Despite the well-known efficacy of these drugs as first-line therapies, about 50% of women develop endocrine resistance and disease progression. The treatment of these patients has represented one of the most important research fields in the last few years, with several multicenter phase II/III trials published or still ongoing. Novel therapies, such as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, have significantly changed the prognosis of patients progressing to a previous endocrine treatment, allowing a great benefit in terms of progression-free survival and, in some cases, of overall survival. However, identifying response predictors is essential for the rational use of these drugs to avoid unnecessary toxicity and costs, and to ensure the optimal therapeutic sequence is used. In this review, we analyze the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and CDK4/6 pathways and their roles in endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. We then focus on the new treatments developed and the roles of these drugs in overcoming endocrine resistance, describing the latest clinical trials that led to the approval of the drugs in clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document