Cure odontoiatriche e cisti mucose del seno mascellare

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 171-172
Author(s):  
Rocco Oliveto
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Watchful Waiting ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Therapeutic Attitude

During dental treatment it is not uncommon to find the presence of asymptomatic mucous cysts of the maxillary sinus on dental panoramic radiography. The aetiology is still little known. Watchful waiting still seems to be the most suitable therapeutic attitude.

scholarly journals Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Constantine ◽  
Bruce Clark ◽  
Andreas Kiermeier ◽  
Professor Peter Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Sinus Disease

scholarly journals Orofacial Impactions: A Common Rarity

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-101
Author(s):  
Freny Karjodkar ◽  
Sunali Khanna ◽  
Darshana Patil
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Maxillofacial Region ◽  
Orofacial Region ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Mobile Tongue

ABSTRACT Impactions of the orofacial region are rare but impactions of the mobile tongue are unique. Hence, very limited literature is available. Foreign bodies embedded in the maxillofacial region frequently result from trauma and dental treatment. This is a compilation of cases of tongue impaction, tooth in maxillary sinus and watch battery impacted in tooth. A brief insight into the incidence of orofacial impactions, radiographic investigations and management is also provided.

scholarly journals Accuracy of panoramic radiography in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wentian Sun ◽  
Kai Xia ◽  
Li Tang ◽  
Chenlu Liu ◽  
Ling Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Display Type ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Root Tips ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Good Ability

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the accuracy of panoramic radiography (PR) in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationships (SRRs). Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CBM, Baidu Scholar, and SIGLE were searched. The studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of PR and computed tomography/cone-beam computed tomography (CT/CBCT) for SRR were included. Results: Eleven studies were included. Meta-analyses showed that, for type I SRR, PR had the highest specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), with a high sensitivity and a low negative LR (−LR). For type IV, PR had a high DOR and AUC, with the highest sensitivity but a low +LR, the lowest –LR, and the lowest specificity. For type II, PR had the lowest AUC, with a low sensitivity, +LR, and DOR and a high −LR. For type III, PR had the lowest sensitivity, +LR, and DOR and the highest −LR. The distance from root tips to the maxillary sinus floor on PR was significantly longer (mean difference: −1.88 mm; 95% confidence interval: −2.19 to −1.57; P < .0001) than that on CT/CBCT. Conclusions: Currently available evidence suggests PR could be reliable for detecting type I SRR. PR has a good ability to confirm true type IV SRR but a poor ability to rule out false type IV SRR. For type II and III SRR, PR shows poor accuracy and tends to overestimate the extent of protrusion of the roots into the maxillary sinus. When PRs display type II, III, or IV SRR and related treatment is needed, CBCT should be used for further examinations.

scholarly journals Three-dimensional CBCT based evaluation of the inferior part of the maxillary sinus: Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hyun Lee ◽  
Won-Jeong Han ◽  
Jong-Tae Park
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Anatomical Structure ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Using Data

AbstractThe maxillary sinus is the largest of the four paranasal sinuses in humans, and its close proximity to the teeth means that caution is required during dental treatment. In particular, implant surgeries involving the maxillary posterior teeth should include evaluating the inferior part of the maxillary sinus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences by comparing the inferior part of the maxillary sinus based on the nasal cavity floor (NCF) between patients (male 30, female 30) genders through the use of the three-dimensional (3-D) program that can facilitate 3-D visualizations. The present study results obtained from 3-D visualizations using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data showed that the inferior part of the maxillary sinus was mostly larger in males than in females. In addition, the utilization of 3-D visualization data was more likely to assure accuracy than when using data obtained by two-dimensional (2-D) imaging. Therefore, 3-D visualizations of the inferior part of the maxillary sinus will contribute to accurate analyses of its anatomical structure during implant surgery and other operations. Further studies utilizing 3-D visualization will yield useful fundamental data and guidelines for future research.

scholarly journals Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 20160043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana J Lopes ◽  
Thiago O Gamba ◽  
João V J Bertinato ◽  
Deborah Q Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography

scholarly journals Depression of the maxillary sinus anterior wall and its influence on panoramic radiography appearance

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 20170126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhito Yoshida ◽  
Motoki Fukuda ◽  
Kenichi Gotoh ◽  
Eiichiro Ariji
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Anterior Wall

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Accuracy of Panoramic Radiograph in the Definition of Maxillary Sinus Septa

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Kasabah ◽  
Radovan Slezák ◽  
Antonín Šimůnek ◽  
Jiří Krug ◽  
Miguel Cevallos Lecaro
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Panoramic Radiograph ◽  
The Other ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Septa ◽  
False Diagnosis ◽  
Definition Of

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of panoramic radiography in identification of maxillary sinus septa. Out of 68 sinuses were radiographically examined using both panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs (CT scan). Using CT scan, 24 (35.9 %) out of 68 cases maxillae showed at least one septum, 22 sinuses (32.3 %) showed one septum, whereas two sinuses (2.9 %) exhibited two septa. Panoramic radiograph led to a false diagnosis regarding the presence or absence of sinus septa in 18 of 68 sinuses (26.5 %). On the other hand, they gave negative diagnosis of sinus septa in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). There was fully agreement between the two methods (positive septa) only in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). We cannot depend on panoramic radiograph for the detection of sinus septa because it can lead to false or negative results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document