Compare the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1742-1744
Author(s):  
Aqeel Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Hammad Muzaffar ◽  
Mumtaz Ahmad Khan ◽  
Arshid Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Pak Red Crescent Medical and Dental college, Dina Nath, during from Jan 2020 to March 2021. Methods: In this study 240 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients demographic including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 120 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 120 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 23.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 140 (58.3%) patients (70 Group I, 70 Group II) were male with mean age 25.7+6.54 years while 100 (41.7%) patients (50 Group I, 50 Group II) were females with mean age 26.9+3.12 years. No significant difference regarding BMI between both groups p=>0.05. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 48.24+9.59 minutes Vs 35.74+6.86 minutes; P=0.001. No significant difference observed in term of hospital stay (p=0.345). 11 (9.2%) patients in Group II in which 5.83% had Superficial SSI and 3.7% had Deep SSI. 9 (7.5%) patients 5% superficial and 2.5% Deep SSI in Group I had developed surgical site infection with no significant difference (p=0.41). Conclusion: We concluded in this study that open appendectomy is better in term of operative time as compared to laparoscopic appendectomy. We found no significant difference regarding surgical site infection and hospital stay. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Open, Outcomes

scholarly journals Compare Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Terms of Surgical Site Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2375-2377
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yousaf ◽  
Shahid Khan Afridi ◽  
Gul Sharif ◽  
Wasim Ahmad ◽  
Shoaib Muhammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar for duration of six months from January 2021 to June 2021. Methods: In this study 200 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients’ demographics including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 100 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 100 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 120 (60%) patients (60 Group I, 60 Group II) were males while 80 (40%) patients (40 Group I, 40 Group II) were females. Mean age in group I was 27.9+4.45 years and in group II mean age was 28.5+4.21 years. Mean BMI in group I was 24.08+8.22 kg/m2 and in group II mean BMI was 25.03+6.17 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 42.88+13.75 minutes Vs 33.35+9.55 minutes; P=0.003.Hospital stay was greater in group II 6.03+3.12 days as compared to group I 4.07+6.13 days. Post operatively less SSI was found among laparoscopic group 6 (6%) in which 4% had superficial SSI and 2% had deep SSI as compared to group II 12 (12%) SSI was found among in which 8% had superficial SSI and 4% had deep SSI. Conclusion: We concluded in this study that laparoscopic appendectomy is better in terms of less hospital stay with less surgical site infection as compared to open appendectomy. We found that less operative time was observed in open appendectomy as compared to laparoscopic. Keywords: Appendectomy, Outcomes, Laparoscopic, Open, Acute appendicitis

COMPARISION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION BETWEEN OPEN APPENDECTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
J. Sudhakar ◽  
Manoj Karthik Gera
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Health Care Associated Infection

Appendectomy is most common surgical procedure in emergency surgery. Inamed appendix can be removed laparoscopically (laparoscopic appendectomy) or openly (open appendectomy). Surgical site infection is representative of health care associated infection in which it may effect on patients' morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to compare laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. The frequency of 60 patients who underwent appendectomy open appendectomy-40;laparoscopic appendectomy-20 between September 2019- march2020 which were retrospectively reviewed for demographic and pathological characteristic, recovery of bowel movements, length of hospital stay and post-operative complications. The frequency of purulent/gangrenous or perforated appendix were Laparoscopic appendectomy-10% and in open appendectomy 20%. The time of rst atus after surgery were 2.9 days and in open appendectomy were 2.97 days in laparoscopic appendectomy. Length of hospital stay were relatively short in laparoscopic appendectomy group and in open appendectomy group The frequency of overall surgical site infection were not that difference between the two groups laparoscopic appendectomy -15% open appendectomy group were22%But that of supercial surgical site infection was signicantly lower in laparoscopic appendectomy group5% open appendectomy group 15%.

scholarly journals Comparative study of single incision versus conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Rometra ◽  
Rahil Rometra ◽  
Neeraj Koul ◽  
R. K. Chrungoo
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Appendicitis is primarily a disease of adolescents and young adults with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life. Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency operation in the world.For more than a century, open appendectomy remained the gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis.  Laparoscopic surgery has become popular universally during the last couple of decades.   Efforts are still being made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after laparoscopy.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new innovation allowing minimal access surgery to be performed through a single umbilical incision.Methods: It was a prospective study carried out on 50 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. They were divided into two groups of 25 each. One group underwent Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy (CLA) and other group underwent Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS).  Results were compared with regard to mean operative time,   complications, post-operative pain and discomfort (vas score at 12 hours), post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay and condition at discharge and cosmesis.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the parameters like postoperative pain, hospital stay and complication profile. However, operative time for SILS appendectomy were found to be significantly higher compared to conventional group.Conclusions: Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments is safe and effective, feasible surgery with better cosmetic results.

scholarly journals A comparative study on surgical site infection in cases of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3309
Author(s):  
Priyansh Pandey ◽  
Manish M. Swarnkar ◽  
S. C. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Site Infection

Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mostly based on clinical features pointing towards appendicitis. Several biochemical parameters, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil percentage, are currently used to aid clinical diagnosis.  Without immediate surgery, appendicitis may progress to perforation of the appendix. This study was carried out to determine rate of SSI in open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and to identify independent risk factors for SSI.Methods: Appendicitis is a common cause of pain in right iliac fossa worldwide. The present study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, from August 2015 to July 2017. This study was conducted after the due clearance from Institutional Ethical committee. Total 132 patients admitted to the surgery ward with acute lower abdominal pain with clinical features of acute appendicitis on clinical examination, were studied prospectively.Results: In the present study, maximum patients were seen in less than 20 years of age and next commonest age group of presentation was 21-30 years. The male to female sex ratio was 1:1.3 in the laparoscopic appendectomy group while in the open appendectomy group was 1.81:1. The incidence of complicated intra-operative findings and mean white blood cell count was more in the open appendectomy group. The mean operative time, days for use of analgesics, time taken to return to soft diet and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy group was less than the open appendectomy group. There were more cases of surgical site infection in the patients operated by open approach than laparoscopic approach.Conclusions: Wound class II versus III and NNIS index were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Surgical Site Infection between Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Md Salim ◽  
Jashim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Nur Hossain Bhuyian ◽  
Mahmudur Rahman ◽  
Monirul Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Wound Infection Rate ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
College Hospital

Surgical site infection (SSI) is defined as infection at surgical site within 01 month after surgery (or within a year in case of implant). Surgical-site infection requires microbial contamination of the surgical wound to occur. LA provides considerable benefits over OA, including a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, earlier postoperative recovery, and a lower complication rate. This was a prospective observational study conducted inpatient department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital and private hospitals and clinics in Chittagong city. The patients were interviewed face to face by the researcher for the purpose of collection of data and were examined by the researcher for certain signs recorded in the fixed protocol. Collected data was classified, edited, coded and entered into the computer for statistical analysis by using SPSS-22. Out of 200 cases mean age was found 33.76 ± 23.35 years in OA group and 32.21 ± 16.51 years in LA group. Male was found 58% in OA group and 53% in LA group. Female was found 42% and 47% in OA and LA group respectively. Mean operative time was found 41.2±8.5 minutes in OA group and 49.3±8.9 minutes in LA group. Alternate pathology were more frequently detected in LA due to wide area of vision. Superficial incisional SSI was found 10% in OA group and 5% in LA group. Deep incisional SSI was found 2% in OA group and 2% in LA group. Organ/space SSI was 2% and 3% in OA group and LA group respectively. Staphylococcus aureus is the commonest organism isolated form the surgical wounds from 41.34% followed by Pseudomonas 21.26%, no growth 11.1%, E.coli 9.6%, others 9.4%, Klebsiella 7.0%. Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy with respect to wound infection rate, postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay and return to normal activities.Medicine Today 2017 Vol.29(1): 6-11

scholarly journals ACUTE APPENDICITIS: DELAYED SURGERY DOES NOT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Romualdas Riauka ◽  
Povilas Ignatavičius ◽  
Žygimantas Tverskis ◽  
Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Perforation Rate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Introduction. Historically appendicitis is tending to be operated as soon as possible to prevent future complications. Recent discussions show, that urgent operation does not always reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Immediate appendectomy can be delayed in some cases. Methods. Retrospective, non-randomized, single center, cohort study was performed. During one-year period 167 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups according to the time from the onset of the symptoms to the operation. Group I (≤ 24 hours) - 74 patients and Group II (≥ 24 hours) – 93 patients. Primary (postoperative complications) and secondary (operating time, length of hospital stay and perforation rate at the final pathology report) endpoints were evaluated and compared. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications when comparing both groups. In Group I – 21.9% patients (87.5% Grade I) and in Group II – 25.8% patients (83% Grade I) had postoperative complications. Operating time was similar between the groups (72.97±29.1 (Group I) vs 79.95±35.4 minutes (Group II)). Length of hospital stay was longer in Group II, but no statistically significant difference was found (2.85±2.3 vs 3.34±4.88 days accordingly). Perforation rate at the final pathology report was twice higher in Group II (8 (10.8%) vs 17 (18.3%)), but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusions. This study findings support earlier reports showing that delayed appendectomy is safe surgical procedure without higher rate of postoperative complications and may be applied in certain cases.

Compare the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection after Appendectomy Wound Irrigation with Normal Saline and Imipenem Solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2184-2186
Author(s):  
Ahmad Shah ◽  
Nazeer Ahmad Sasoli ◽  
Farrukh Sami
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Abscess Formation ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Wound Irrigation ◽  
Group I ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Objective: To compare the incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy wound irrigation with regular saline solution and imipenem solution. Study Design: Comparative randomized control trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery Unit-1, Sandeman Provincial Hospital Quetta from 1st September 2020 to 30th April 2021. Methodology: Eighty patients of both genders were presented in this study. Patients detailed demographics age, sex and body mass index were recorded after taking informed written consent. Patients underwent for appendectomy wound irrigation were included. Patients were equally divided into two equal groups, I and II. Group I had 40 patients and received imipenem and group II irrigated with saline solution with 40 patients. Outcomes were surgical site infection, deep abscess formation was observed post-operatively. Results: The mean age of the patients in group I was 26.11±2.03 years with mean BMI 23.61±3.32 kg/m2 and in group II mean age was 25.14±3.12 years with mean BMI 22.14±4.88 kg/m2. In group I, 32 (80%) patients had inflamed appendix, perforated appendix was in 7 (17.5%) and gangrenous appendix in 1 (2.5%) while in group II inflamed appendix in 34 (85%), perforated appendix in 4 (10%) and gangrenous appendix 2 (5%). Surgical site infection in group I was 3 (7.5%) and abscess formation in 2 (5%) cases while in group II SSI in 6 (15%) and abscess formation in 3 (7.5%) cases. Conclusion: Imipenem irrigation after appendectomy reduces wound infection. Healthcare costs and patient suffering due to infection can be reduced. Keywords: Imipenem solution, Wound irrigation with saline, Appendectomy wound infection

scholarly journals Hospitalization time after open appendectomy by three different surgical techniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agláia Moreira Garcia XIMENES ◽  
Fernando Salvo Torres MELLO ◽  
Zailton Bezerra de LIMA-JÚNIOR ◽  
Cícero Faustino FERREIRA ◽  
Amanda Dantas Ferreira CAVALCANTI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Hospitalization Time ◽  
Contingency Coefficient ◽  
Appendicular Stump

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical technique to approach the appendicular stump depends mostly on skill and personal preference of the surgeon or on the protocol used in the service, and the influence of this choice in hospitalization time is not evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the relation between surgical technique and postoperative hospitalization time in patients presenting with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 180 patients who underwent open appendectomy. These where divided into three groups according to surgical technique: conventional appendectomy (simple ligation of the stump), tobacco pouch suture and Parker-Kerr suture. Data where crossed with hospitalization time (until three days, from four to six days and over seven days). RESULTS: A hundred and eighty patients with age from 15 to 85 years where included. From these, 95 underwent conventional technique, had an average hospitalization time of 3,9 days and seven had complications (surgical site infection, seroma, suture dehiscence and evisceration). In 67 patients, tobacco pouch suture was chosen and had average hospitalization time of 3,7 days and two complications (infection and seroma). In 18 Parker-Kerr suture was made, with average hospitalization time of 2,6 days, with no complication. Contingency coefficient between the variables hospitalization time and technique was 0,255 and Cramér's V was 0,186. CONCLUSION: There was tendency to larger hospitalization time and larger number of complications in conventional appendectomy, whereas in patients where Parker-Kerr suture was performed, hospitalization time was significantly smaller.

scholarly journals Assessment of risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4518
Author(s):  
Aditi Sangwan ◽  
Vani Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Group I ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Wound Discharge ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Assessment of surgical site infection is an important factor to determine the functioning of the health care system. Objectives of this study was to estimate the incidence of surgical site infection among caesarean section cases and to determine the risk factors associated with surgical site infection and comparison with patients having healthy wounds.Methods: One thousand pregnant women who underwent caesarean section were divided into two groups: Group 1 (cases): Those who had SSI within 30 days of caesarean section and Group 2 (controls): Those who didn’t have SSI.Results: Mean age of group I was 25.35±4.40 and 21.12±3.60 years in group II (p >0.05). Mean gestational age of group I cases was 38.07±1.88 weeks and in group II, it was 38.17±2.06 weeks (p >0.05). A total of 37 (82.5%) women in group I and 931 (96.98%) women in group II underwent emergency caesarean section (p <0.05). In group I, mean duration of surgery was 1.0±0.13 hours and 1.02±0.21 hours in group II (p <0.05). Maximum number of patients i.e. 22 (55%) had wound discharge between 4-7 days followed by 11 (27.5%) between 8-10 days. Mean wound discharge was 7.32±3.45 days in group I. Majority of women, i.e. 27 (67%) found to be sterile in the present study followed by 7 (17.5%) women were found to have staphylococcus aureus.      Mean duration of resuturing was 17.42±6.98 days.  Mean baby weight in group I was 2.72±0.53 kg and in group II it was 2.95±0.53 kg (p <0.001).Conclusions: Risk of developing SSI after caesarean section is multi-factorial and found to be influenced by emergency surgery, PROM, pre-operative anaemia, multiple vaginal examinations, interrupted skin suturing, raised BMI, nulliparity, emergency caesarean, duration of surgery.

Changes in Incidence and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children—A Population-Based Study in the Period 2000–2015

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grith Laerkholm Hansen ◽  
Jakob Kleif ◽  
Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Anders Paerregaard
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Registration System

Abstract Introduction Recent studies suggest that the epidemiology and management of appendicitis have changed during the last decades. The purpose of this population-based study was to examine this in the pediatric population in Denmark. Materials and Methods Data were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Civil Registration System, and the Statbank Denmark. Patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with appendicitis and appendectomized during the period 2000 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was the annual incidences of appendicitis. Secondary outcomes were the annual percent of patients with appendicitis having a laparoscopic appendectomy, delay from admission to surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results A total of 24,046 pediatric cases of appendicitis were identified. The annual incidence steadily declined until 2008 (–29%, all ages) and then remained stable. The surgical approach of choice changed from being open appendectomy in 2000 (97%) to laparoscopic appendectomy in 2015 (94%). Simultaneously, the duration of postoperative hospital stay declined from 41 hours (median) to 17 hours. Delay from admission until surgery did not change during the period. Only one child died within the 30-day postoperative period. Conclusion In accordance with other recent studies from Western countries, we found significant changes in the incidence of acute appendicitis including a decline in all age groups except those below 5 years of age, a shift toward laparoscopic appendectomy, and decreasing time spent in the hospital during the years 2000 to 2015.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document