scholarly journals Comparative study of single incision versus conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Rometra ◽  
Rahil Rometra ◽  
Neeraj Koul ◽  
R. K. Chrungoo
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Appendicitis is primarily a disease of adolescents and young adults with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life. Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency operation in the world.For more than a century, open appendectomy remained the gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis.  Laparoscopic surgery has become popular universally during the last couple of decades.   Efforts are still being made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after laparoscopy.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new innovation allowing minimal access surgery to be performed through a single umbilical incision.Methods: It was a prospective study carried out on 50 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. They were divided into two groups of 25 each. One group underwent Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy (CLA) and other group underwent Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS).  Results were compared with regard to mean operative time,   complications, post-operative pain and discomfort (vas score at 12 hours), post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay and condition at discharge and cosmesis.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the parameters like postoperative pain, hospital stay and complication profile. However, operative time for SILS appendectomy were found to be significantly higher compared to conventional group.Conclusions: Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments is safe and effective, feasible surgery with better cosmetic results.

scholarly journals A retrospective study on laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1144
Author(s):  
P. Senthil Kumar ◽  
S. Edwin Kin’s Raj ◽  
Saranya Nagalingam
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Early Return

Background: Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Open appendectomy is the “gold standard” for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy though widely practiced has not gained universal approval. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a retrospective study.Methods: The study was done as a retrospective study among 387 patients diagnosed with appendicitis for a period of 18 months in the Dept of General Surgery. All patients included were 16 years and above and followed up for 3 weeks. In this study, 130 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis - underwent open appendectomy and 257 patients diagnosed as sub-acute cases of appendicitis - underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. These two groups (open & laparoscopic) were compared for operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate, early return to normal activity.Results: Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (around 4.5 days), with a less need for analgesia and with an early return to daily activities (around 11.5 days). Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group (35 mins), when compared with laparoscopic group (around 59 mins). Total number of complications was less in the Laparoscopic group with a significantly lower incidence of post-op pain and complications.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach is a safe and efficient operative procedure and it provides clinically beneficial advantages over open appendectomy (including shorter hospital stay, an early return to daily activities and less post-op complications).

scholarly journals The single-incision laparoscopic surgery technique has questionable advantages in colorectal surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Bernd Schneider ◽  
Anne Catharina Brockhaus ◽  
Marcos Gelos ◽  
Claudia Rudroff
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Colorectal Disease ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Technique ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractBackground:Laparoscopic procedures have increasingly been accepted as standard in surgical treatment of benign and malignant entities, resulting in a continuous evolution of operative techniques. Since one of the aims in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is to reduce access trauma, one possible way is to further reduce the surgical site by the single-incision laparoscopic surgery technique (SLS). One of the main criticisms concerning the use of SLS is its questionable benefit combined with its technical demands for the surgeon. These questions were addressed by comparing SLS versus conventional laparoscopic multitrocar surgery (LMS) in benign and malignant conditions with respect to technical operative parameters and early postoperative outcome of the patients.Methods:Between 2010 and 2013, we performed SLS for colorectal disease. Of the 111 patients who underwent colorectal resection, 47 patients were operated by SLS and 31 using the LMS technique. The collected data for our patients were compared according to operating time, postoperative morbidity and mortality, pain score numeric rating scale on day 1 and day 5 postoperatively and postoperative hospital stay. To complement the pain scores, the required pain medication for adequate pain relief on these days was given.Results:There was no significant difference in age, BMI or sex ratio between the two groups. The intraoperative and early postoperative course was comparable as well. Postoperative hospital stay was the only parameter with a significant difference, showing an advantage for SLS.Conclusion:SLS is a feasible surgical method and a technical option in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, we were not able to identify substantial advantages of SLS that would favor this technique.

Financial Impact of Surgical Technique in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Children

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 857-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristen Litz ◽  
Paul D. Danielson ◽  
Jay Gould ◽  
Nicole M. Chandler
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Direct Costs ◽  
Financial Impact ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supply Costs

Appendicitis is the most common emergent problem encountered by pediatric surgeons. Driven by improved cosmetic outcomes, many surgeons are offering pediatric patients single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. We sought to investigate the financial impact of different surgical approaches to appendectomy. A retrospective study of patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy from February 2010 to September 2011 was conducted. Based on surgeon preference, patients underwent open appendectomy (OA), laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), or single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). Demographic information, surgical outcomes, surgical supply costs, and total direct costs were recorded. A total of 465 patients underwent appendectomy during the study. The mean age of all patients was 11.2 years (range, 1 to 18 years). There were no conversions in the LA or SILA groups. There was a significant difference among surgical technique in regard to surgical supply costs (OA $159 vs LA $650 vs SILA $814, P < 0.01) and total direct costs (OA $2129 vs LA $2624 vs SILA $2991, P < 0.01). In our institution, both multiport laparoscopic and SILA carry higher costs when compared with OA, largely as a result of the cost of disposable instrumentation. Cost efficiency should be considered by surgeons when undertaking a minimally invasive approach to appendectomy.

scholarly journals Single incision multiport laparoscopic appendectomy using a 2 mm alligator forceps: our experience of 60 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2714
Author(s):  
Srikant Patro ◽  
Ashish K. Sahoo ◽  
Nikhil Muduli ◽  
Ashish K. Mishra ◽  
Tapan Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
A Prospective Study

Single incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging branch of minimally assess surgery to reduce scar and post-operative pain. Appendicitis is a common general surgical problem encountered in day to day practice. Different methods of appendectomy have been described by different surgeons from open to laparoscopic and now single incision laparoscopic surgery has been practised. This is a prospective study carried out in our Department of General Surgery SCB Medical College, Cuttack from February 2019 to March 2020; 60 patients had undergone the procedure and the results are published noted under headings of post-operative pain at (6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours), post-operative requirement of analgesia (diclofenac) at (6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours), operative time, days to resume bowel activity, days of hospital stay, post-operative complication in accordance to Clavien-Dindo classification.

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3685
Author(s):  
Jawahar K. ◽  
Sharanya R. ◽  
Sanjay Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Satisfaction Score ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Lower Pain Score

Background: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a new technique of minimally invasive surgery using a single incision to minimize all ports to one site, hence a single scar that can be strategically placed in the umbilicus for a perceived scar less abdomen.Methods: We report this study evaluating the possible advantages of SILS versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy through a randomized controlled trial. The study population includes patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. A total of 50 patients underwent appendectomy, patients were randomly assigned to either SILS appendectomy or conventional appendectomy in 1:1 ratio. Primary end points were operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, post-operative hospital stay and patient satisfaction.Results: The pain scores measured at 48 hours were significantly lower in SILS group than conventional Lap appendectomy group. Patients had significant satisfaction score and lower pain score in SILS group than Lap appendectomy group measured at 6 weeks after appendectomy. However, the post-operative stay was similar in both the groups. There was no conversion to open appendectomy in both the groups. Patient satisfaction score in SILA was found to be higher than CLA. Operating times were similar and post-operative stay was apparently lower.Conclusions: SIL appendectomy is as safe and effective as conventional lap appendectomy.

Compare the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1742-1744
Author(s):  
Aqeel Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Hammad Muzaffar ◽  
Mumtaz Ahmad Khan ◽  
Arshid Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Pak Red Crescent Medical and Dental college, Dina Nath, during from Jan 2020 to March 2021. Methods: In this study 240 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients demographic including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 120 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 120 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 23.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 140 (58.3%) patients (70 Group I, 70 Group II) were male with mean age 25.7+6.54 years while 100 (41.7%) patients (50 Group I, 50 Group II) were females with mean age 26.9+3.12 years. No significant difference regarding BMI between both groups p=>0.05. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 48.24+9.59 minutes Vs 35.74+6.86 minutes; P=0.001. No significant difference observed in term of hospital stay (p=0.345). 11 (9.2%) patients in Group II in which 5.83% had Superficial SSI and 3.7% had Deep SSI. 9 (7.5%) patients 5% superficial and 2.5% Deep SSI in Group I had developed surgical site infection with no significant difference (p=0.41). Conclusion: We concluded in this study that open appendectomy is better in term of operative time as compared to laparoscopic appendectomy. We found no significant difference regarding surgical site infection and hospital stay. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Open, Outcomes

scholarly journals P496 Feasibility and safety of single incision laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex Crohn’s disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S433-S433
Author(s):  
Y LI ◽  
B Liu ◽  
D Yao ◽  
L Zheng ◽  
Z Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Simple Group ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Complex Group

Abstract Background Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers excellent cosmetic results compared with conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. Recently, this technique has been applied to Crohn’s disease (CD); however, the application of a laparoscopic approach for complex CD, which involves abscess formation, fistula formation, and recurrent CD, is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of SILS for patients with the complex disease and to compare its clinical results in patients with complex disease. Methods We investigated the feasibility and safety of SILS in sixty patients who underwent SILS for CD were divided into two groups: those with the complex disease (complex group, n = 30), and those with a simple disease (simple group, n = 30). The perioperative data were analysed and compared between the groups. Results The mean operative time and blood loss were 130.5 ± 28.3 min (range 105–166 min) and 230 ± 58 ml (range 116–410 ml) in the complex group, and 113.4 ± 21.5 min (range 95–151 min) and 72 ± 19ml (range 58–115 ml) in the simple group. There were no significant differences in the operative time between the two groups (p = 0.083, &gt;0.05), but the blood loss was significantly greater in the cases of complex group (p = 0.025, &lt;0.05). Two patients in the complex group required conversion to open surgery for a retroperitoneal fistula and recurrent CD disease. There were no conversions in the simple group. The frequency of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups. The length of the hospital stay was also similar in the two groups. Although the rate of conversion tended to be higher in the complex group, the rate of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.061, &gt;0.05). Conclusion SILS may be feasible and safe for carefully selected patients with complex CD.

scholarly journals Compare Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Terms of Surgical Site Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2375-2377
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yousaf ◽  
Shahid Khan Afridi ◽  
Gul Sharif ◽  
Wasim Ahmad ◽  
Shoaib Muhammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar for duration of six months from January 2021 to June 2021. Methods: In this study 200 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients’ demographics including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 100 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 100 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 120 (60%) patients (60 Group I, 60 Group II) were males while 80 (40%) patients (40 Group I, 40 Group II) were females. Mean age in group I was 27.9+4.45 years and in group II mean age was 28.5+4.21 years. Mean BMI in group I was 24.08+8.22 kg/m2 and in group II mean BMI was 25.03+6.17 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 42.88+13.75 minutes Vs 33.35+9.55 minutes; P=0.003.Hospital stay was greater in group II 6.03+3.12 days as compared to group I 4.07+6.13 days. Post operatively less SSI was found among laparoscopic group 6 (6%) in which 4% had superficial SSI and 2% had deep SSI as compared to group II 12 (12%) SSI was found among in which 8% had superficial SSI and 4% had deep SSI. Conclusion: We concluded in this study that laparoscopic appendectomy is better in terms of less hospital stay with less surgical site infection as compared to open appendectomy. We found that less operative time was observed in open appendectomy as compared to laparoscopic. Keywords: Appendectomy, Outcomes, Laparoscopic, Open, Acute appendicitis

Changes in Incidence and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children—A Population-Based Study in the Period 2000–2015

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grith Laerkholm Hansen ◽  
Jakob Kleif ◽  
Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Anders Paerregaard
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Registration System

Abstract Introduction Recent studies suggest that the epidemiology and management of appendicitis have changed during the last decades. The purpose of this population-based study was to examine this in the pediatric population in Denmark. Materials and Methods Data were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Civil Registration System, and the Statbank Denmark. Patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with appendicitis and appendectomized during the period 2000 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was the annual incidences of appendicitis. Secondary outcomes were the annual percent of patients with appendicitis having a laparoscopic appendectomy, delay from admission to surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results A total of 24,046 pediatric cases of appendicitis were identified. The annual incidence steadily declined until 2008 (–29%, all ages) and then remained stable. The surgical approach of choice changed from being open appendectomy in 2000 (97%) to laparoscopic appendectomy in 2015 (94%). Simultaneously, the duration of postoperative hospital stay declined from 41 hours (median) to 17 hours. Delay from admission until surgery did not change during the period. Only one child died within the 30-day postoperative period. Conclusion In accordance with other recent studies from Western countries, we found significant changes in the incidence of acute appendicitis including a decline in all age groups except those below 5 years of age, a shift toward laparoscopic appendectomy, and decreasing time spent in the hospital during the years 2000 to 2015.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document