scholarly journals ACUTE APPENDICITIS: DELAYED SURGERY DOES NOT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Romualdas Riauka ◽  
Povilas Ignatavičius ◽  
Žygimantas Tverskis ◽  
Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Perforation Rate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Introduction. Historically appendicitis is tending to be operated as soon as possible to prevent future complications. Recent discussions show, that urgent operation does not always reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Immediate appendectomy can be delayed in some cases. Methods. Retrospective, non-randomized, single center, cohort study was performed. During one-year period 167 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups according to the time from the onset of the symptoms to the operation. Group I (≤ 24 hours) - 74 patients and Group II (≥ 24 hours) – 93 patients. Primary (postoperative complications) and secondary (operating time, length of hospital stay and perforation rate at the final pathology report) endpoints were evaluated and compared. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications when comparing both groups. In Group I – 21.9% patients (87.5% Grade I) and in Group II – 25.8% patients (83% Grade I) had postoperative complications. Operating time was similar between the groups (72.97±29.1 (Group I) vs 79.95±35.4 minutes (Group II)). Length of hospital stay was longer in Group II, but no statistically significant difference was found (2.85±2.3 vs 3.34±4.88 days accordingly). Perforation rate at the final pathology report was twice higher in Group II (8 (10.8%) vs 17 (18.3%)), but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusions. This study findings support earlier reports showing that delayed appendectomy is safe surgical procedure without higher rate of postoperative complications and may be applied in certain cases.

scholarly journals Delayed appendicectomy in patients with non-perforated acute appendicitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 2766
Author(s):  
Anandaravi B. N. ◽  
Krishna S. R. ◽  
Pradeep Kumar H. D. ◽  
Mayank Garg
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Perforation Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Group ◽  
Delayed Group

Background: Appendicitis remains one of the most common diseases encountered by the surgeon in practice. Appendicectomy is the most common urgent or emergency general surgical operation performed. Emergency appendicectomy is believed to be the standard treatment protocol for patients with acute appendicitis. This study was conducted to verify whether acute non-perforated appendicitis requires immediate surgery or can be delayed to be taken up on elective basis.Methods: This is a retrospective study of all the cases undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis over the period of January 2016 to December 2016 in K. R. hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. The cases were divided into two comparison groups: emergency group (operated within 12 hours of admission) and delayed group (operated between 12-72 hours). Parameters like age, sex, duration of symptoms, total leucocytes count, temperature, haemoglobin, radiological investigations, operative procedure, operative time, length of hospital stay, length of post-operative stay were collected and the end points for comparison were: Operative time, perforation rate, post-operative complication, length of hospital stay, readmission rate. Cases of perforated appendicitis in preoperative diagnosis, interval appendicectomy and appendicectomy done in association with other abdominal conditions were excluded from the study.Results: During this one-year period 283 patients have undergone appendicectomy. Out of this 189 (66.8%) patients have undergone surgery within 12 hours of admission and 94 (33.2%) have undergone surgery between 12 to 72 hours of admission. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, per operative perforation rate, post-operative complication rate, readmission rate. Length of the hospital stay was greater in delayed group as compared to emergency group. But there was no significant difference between the post-operative length of hospital stay.Conclusions: Acute appendicitis can be treated surgically in a delayed elective basis without increasing morbidity.  

scholarly journals Managing bilateral inguinal hernia laparoscopically: is it gold standard?

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Kalpesh H. Patel ◽  
Jayesh B. Gohel ◽  
Bhumika J. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bilateral Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background:Even after many studies done in recent years, no consensus has been achieved on the surgical technique of inguinal hernia repair. It was believed that in bilateral inguinal hernia cases laparoscopic surgery is very much advantageous as it can be done through same incisions as unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (no additional incision required), whereas in open surgery for bilateral case separate groin incision for each side required. Aim of this study is to evaluate and compare results of bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated by laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) or open (lichenstein) repair.Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over the period of two years. 60 patients with bilateral inguinal hernia were taken up and randomly divided into two groups. Group I (study group) includes patients operated by bilateral laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) and Group II (control group) includes patients operated by open hernia repair (lichenstein tension free hernioplasty). All patients were followed up for 18 months post-operatively. All patients of both groups were monitored for operative time, conversion rate, length hospital stay, post-operative complications and recurrence, time to return to work.Results:Statistically there was significant difference between both groups in terms of length of hospital stay and time to return to work. Group I patients where TAPP surgery performed, 22 patients (73.33%) were discharged within 36 hours of surgery, whereas in Group II patients - control group where open surgery performed, only 4 patients (13.33%) discharged within 36 hours. All 30 patients (100%) in group I had joined their routine work within 10 days of surgery; whereas in Group II patients only 4 cases (13.33%) joined duties on or before 10 days and most of the patients 26 (86.67%) had taken more than 10 days to resume their duties. But there was no significant difference between operative time, complication rates and recurrence rates. All cases in group I were completed laparoscopically (no conversion to open repair).Conclusions:Simultaneous bilateral inguinal hernia repair laparoscopically does not increase the risk for the patient and has an equal morbidity compared with unilateral repair, length of hospital stay, and return to normal work and over all recovery after laparoscopic repair is faster than after open bilateral simultaneous repair. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair of bilateral hernias should be recommended as the gold standard.

scholarly journals Randomized comparative study of conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm) versus modern minilaparoscopy (2.9mm) in patients of infertility

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1539
Author(s):  
Kallol Kumar Roy ◽  
Nandini Joshi nee Jahagirdar ◽  
Murali Subbaiah ◽  
Sunesh Kumar Jain ◽  
J. B. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background: To compare diagnostic conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm) with diagnostic modern minilaparoscopy (2.9mm) in patients of infertility in terms of operating time, post-operative pain, hospital stay.Methods: A prospective randomized comparative study was done in a tertiary care centre involving eighty patients of infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy was done using 5mm laparoscope (Conventional minilaparoscope-Group I) in 40 patients and using 2.9mm laparoscope (Modern minilaparoscope-Group II) in 40 patients. Operating time was measured from the point of skin incision to closure, post op pain was assessed with VAS scoring system, total hours of hospital stay from shifting to day care recovery ward till discharge was noted.Results: Both conventional minilaroscope and modern minilaparoscopes were comparable to each other. Operating time in both groups was similar (7.7min in Group I vs 8.7min in Group II). In both groups, there was no statistically significant difference in post-operative pain as assessed by VAS scoring System (39 in Group I vs 38 in Group II had mild post-op pain and 1 in Group I vs 2 in Group II had moderate pain). The difference in duration of post-op hospital stay in both Group I and group II was not statistically significant (3.5 hours vs 3.3 hours).Conclusions: Both conventional minilaparoscopy (5mm laparoscope) and modern miniaparoscopy (2.9mm laparoscope) are comparable with respect operating time, post-op pain, hospital stay. Modern minilaparoscope is no better than conventional minilaparoscope.

Compare the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1742-1744
Author(s):  
Aqeel Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Hammad Muzaffar ◽  
Mumtaz Ahmad Khan ◽  
Arshid Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Pak Red Crescent Medical and Dental college, Dina Nath, during from Jan 2020 to March 2021. Methods: In this study 240 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients demographic including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 120 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 120 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 23.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 140 (58.3%) patients (70 Group I, 70 Group II) were male with mean age 25.7+6.54 years while 100 (41.7%) patients (50 Group I, 50 Group II) were females with mean age 26.9+3.12 years. No significant difference regarding BMI between both groups p=>0.05. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 48.24+9.59 minutes Vs 35.74+6.86 minutes; P=0.001. No significant difference observed in term of hospital stay (p=0.345). 11 (9.2%) patients in Group II in which 5.83% had Superficial SSI and 3.7% had Deep SSI. 9 (7.5%) patients 5% superficial and 2.5% Deep SSI in Group I had developed surgical site infection with no significant difference (p=0.41). Conclusion: We concluded in this study that open appendectomy is better in term of operative time as compared to laparoscopic appendectomy. We found no significant difference regarding surgical site infection and hospital stay. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Open, Outcomes

scholarly journals Compare Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy in Terms of Surgical Site Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2375-2377
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yousaf ◽  
Shahid Khan Afridi ◽  
Gul Sharif ◽  
Wasim Ahmad ◽  
Shoaib Muhammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. Study Design: Prospective/ Observational Place & Duration: Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar for duration of six months from January 2021 to June 2021. Methods: In this study 200 patients of both genders with ages >10 years presented with acute appendicitis were included. Patients’ demographics including age, sex and body mass index were recorded after written consent. Patients were equally divided into two groups. Group I consist of 100 patients and received laparoscopic appendectomy and Group II with 100 patients received open appendectomy. Outcomes such as surgical site infection, hospital stay and time duration of procedure were examined and compare the results between both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0. P-value <0.05 was set as significant. Results: There were 120 (60%) patients (60 Group I, 60 Group II) were males while 80 (40%) patients (40 Group I, 40 Group II) were females. Mean age in group I was 27.9+4.45 years and in group II mean age was 28.5+4.21 years. Mean BMI in group I was 24.08+8.22 kg/m2 and in group II mean BMI was 25.03+6.17 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in term of surgery time duration between both groups 42.88+13.75 minutes Vs 33.35+9.55 minutes; P=0.003.Hospital stay was greater in group II 6.03+3.12 days as compared to group I 4.07+6.13 days. Post operatively less SSI was found among laparoscopic group 6 (6%) in which 4% had superficial SSI and 2% had deep SSI as compared to group II 12 (12%) SSI was found among in which 8% had superficial SSI and 4% had deep SSI. Conclusion: We concluded in this study that laparoscopic appendectomy is better in terms of less hospital stay with less surgical site infection as compared to open appendectomy. We found that less operative time was observed in open appendectomy as compared to laparoscopic. Keywords: Appendectomy, Outcomes, Laparoscopic, Open, Acute appendicitis

scholarly journals Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Spinal Surgeries? A Retrospective Study in a Specialized Orthopedic Spine Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hasan Ghandhari ◽  
◽  
Ebrahim Ameri ◽  
Mohsen Motalebi ◽  
Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Obese Group ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of Fournier gangrene

2021 ◽  
pp. 1
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Vac Therapy ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Closure Method

Background and objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in the treatment of Fournier gangrene (FG). Material and methods: Forty-eight male patients treated for Fournier gangrene were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups (Group I: conventional dressing, Group II: VAC therapy). Characteristics of the patients, laboratory parameters, number of debridement procedures, daily number of dressings, visual analogue scale (VAS) during dressing, analgesic requirement, colostomy requirement, time from the first debridement to wound closure, wound closure method, length of hospital stay, and mortality rates were compared. Results: Group I comprised 33 patients and Group II comprised 15 patients. The number of dressings, VAS score and daily analgesic requirement were statistically significantly lower in Group II (p < 0.05) than in Group I. The number of debridement procedures, colostomy requirement, orchiectomy rate, time from first debridement to wound closure, length of hospital stay, wound closure method and mortality rate were similar between these two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical results of conventional dressing and VAC therapy were similar for treating FG. VAC therapy is an effective postoperative wound care method that offers less requirement for dressing changes, less pain, less analgesic requirement and more patient satisfaction compared to conventional dressing.

scholarly journals Nighttime Appendectomy is Safe and has Similar Outcomes as Daytime Appendectomy: A Study of 1198 Appendectomies

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692093860
Author(s):  
T. Mönttinen ◽  
H. Kangaspunta ◽  
J. Laukkarinen ◽  
M. Ukkonen
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed, it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs. In this study, we sought to study whether the time of day influences the outcomes among patients operated on for acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at Tampere University Hospital between 1 September 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. Primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and amount of intraoperative bleeding. Appendectomies were divided into daytime and nighttime operations. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 65% were operated during daytime and 35% during nighttime. Patient and disease-related characteristics were similar in both groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. No time categories were associated with risk of complications or complication severity. Neither was there difference in operation time and clinically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding. Patients undergoing surgery during night hours had a shorter hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, only complicated appendicitis was associated with worse outcomes. Discussion: We have shown that nighttime appendectomy is associated with similar outcomes than daytime appendectomy. Subsequently, appendectomy should be planned for the next available slot, minimizing delay whenever possible.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline versus 0.9% Normal Saline in Children with Acute Bronchiolitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khandaker Tarequl Islam ◽  
Abid Hossan Mollah ◽  
Abdul Matin ◽  
Mahmuda Begum
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is leading cause of hospitalization in infants below 2 years of age. Bronchiolitis being a viral disease, there is no effective treatment. 3% nebulized hypertonic saline and 0.9% nebulized normal saline are often used, although there is disagreement over their efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline in children with acute bronchiolitis in reducing clinical severity and length of hospital stay. Methodology: A randomized control trial carried out in the Department of Pediatrics, Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January 2013 to December 2013.Ninty children from 1 month to 2 years of age hospitalized with clinical bronchiolitis were randomized to receive 3% nebulized hypertonic saline(Group-I) or 0.9% nebulized normal saline (Group-II). Nebulization was done 8 hourly until discharge. Outcome variable were clinical severity score, duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay. Results: Baseline clinical severity score and O2 saturation were in group-I 9.0±1.0 and 94.9±1.7 and in group- II 9.3±1.8 and 94.6±2.6 respectively (p>0.05). At 72 hours, the mean severity score for the group-I was 1.64±0.99 and that for the group-II was 3.0 ± 1.48 (95% CI -2.17 to - 0.53, p=0.002). The cases of group-I required a shorter duration of oxygen therapy compared to those of group-II (15.0±6.0 hours vs 26.4±5.37 hours, 95% CI -20.35 to -2.44, p<0.05). Forty two (93.3%) of the group-I children recovered by the end of72 hours and discharged whereas 26 (57.8%) of the group-II children recovered during the same period (p<0.05). Length of hospital stay was shorter in group-I compared to group-II (58.1±22.0 hours vs 74.7±27.2 hours, 95% CI -26.89 to- 6.17, p=0.002). None of the cases encountered any side-effects. Conclusion: Nebulization with 3% hypertonic saline significantly reduced clinical severity, length of hospital stay and duration of oxygen therapy in case of acute bronchiolitis in comparison to 0.9% normal saline and was safe. Bangladesh J Child Health 2018; VOL 42 (3) :130-137

Transcervical Drainage for Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis May Be Sufficient

2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruey-Fen Hsu ◽  
Pei-Yin Wu ◽  
Chi-Kung Ho
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mediastinal Drainage ◽  
Group Ii

Objective. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a serious form of mediastinitis with a high mortality rate. It is caused by the downward spread of an oropharyngeal or cervicofascial infection. The optimal surgical approach for this often fatal disease is controversial. This article describes the authors’ experience and characterizes the surgical strategies and treatment outcomes of patients with DNM. Study Design. Case series with chart review. Setting. A tertiary referral medical center. Subjects and Methods. This study conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with deep neck infections treated at a medical center from 1994 to 2007 and identified 29 patients with DNM. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients treated with transcervical drainage alone (group I) and those with both cervical and thoracic drainage (group II). Results. There were 20 patients in group I and 9 patients in group II. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%. The mean duration of the hospital stay was 29.3 ± 15.5 days. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex distribution, or duration from the appearance of symptoms to hospital admission between the 2 groups. The duration of hospital stay, tracheotomy rate, and mortality rate also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the numbers of surgeries were significantly higher in group II than in group I. Conclusion. Transthoracic mediastinal drainage is not a compulsory therapy, but timely, aggressive, transcervical mediastinal drainage with extensive debridement is very important for a good outcome when treating DNM patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document