Rapid and direct DNA extraction from saliva for personalized medicine

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoi-chu Yung
1995 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 3972-3976 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Volossiouk ◽  
E J Robb ◽  
R N Nazar

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 2716-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bjorn-Mortensen ◽  
J. Zallet ◽  
T. Lillebaek ◽  
A. B. Andersen ◽  
S. Niemann ◽  
...  

Culturing before DNA extraction represents a major time-consuming step in whole-genome sequencing of slow-growing bacteria, such asMycobacterium tuberculosis. We report a workflow to extract DNA from frozen isolates without reculturing. Prepared libraries and sequence data were comparable with results from recultured aliquots of the same stocks.


2003 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara R. Allen ◽  
Tony Millar ◽  
Shannon M. Berch ◽  
Mary L. Berbee

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Al-Mariri ◽  
Nermeen Haj-Mahmoud

This study compares milk ring test and three different polymerase chain reaction techniques (direct DNA extraction by column purification system, alkaline DNA extraction, and filtrated milk), in order to identifyBrucella abortusinfection in bovine milk. Milk ring test sensitivity and specificity were 72% and 80%, respectively. While specificity of the three polymerase chain reaction techniques was 100%; sensitivity was 92%, 88% and 100%, respectively, for the three polymerase chain reaction procedures. We conclude that the filtered animal’s milk polymerase chain reaction is the best procedure to make the diagnosis ofB. abortusinfections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document