scholarly journals Design Style Analysis of Jeju Naewotdang Musindo Folk 10 God's Paintings

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 61-71
Author(s):  
Younsim Kang ◽  
Youngwon Park
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Daina Ģibiete

Research idea – on the basis of the folklore research materials to promote development of ethnographic style and its inclusion in Latvian clothing culture. Aim of the research: to study Kurzeme folk costumes from different perspectives and based on insights from the research to create a set of dress variants with ethnographic elements, colour combinations/compositions, interesting elements/components of clothing and today’s needs. It could be one way of promoting the the sense of belonging to Latvians. Methods: cultural-historical material research, ancient and Kurzeme region folk costume analysis, choice and selection of interesting elements, modern dressing style analysis, and costume design creation, practical work. Result: creation of one’s own design style, based on ethnographic-style options.


1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Riding ◽  
Eugene Sadler-Smith

Author(s):  
Silas DENZ ◽  
Wouter EGGINK

Conventional design practices regard gender as a given precondition defined by femininity and masculinity. To shift these strategies to include non-heteronormative or queer users, queer theory served as a source of inspiration as well as user sensitive design techniques. As a result, a co-design workshop was developed and executed. Participants supported claims that gender scripts in designed artefacts uphold gender norms. The practice did not specify a definition of a queer design style. However, the co-design practice opened up the design process to non-normative gender scripts by unmasking binary gender dichotomies in industrial design.


2002 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
YOHICHI SEINO ◽  
RYUKO ITO ◽  
ICHIRO SUZUKI ◽  
KEIJI ENZAN ◽  
HIDEO INABA

Author(s):  
Kristján Kristjánsson

Chapter 6 proceeds via a critical review of recent writings about jealousy in philosophy and psychology. Although Aristotle himself did not explore this emotion, it is easily amenable to an Aristotle-style analysis. It turns out, however, that although Aristotelian conceptual and moral arguments about the necessary conceptual features of jealousy qua specific emotion, and the intrinsic value or disvalue of a stable trait of jealousy for eudaimonia, do carry philosophical mileage, they may fail to cut ice with psychologists who tend to focus on jealousy as a broad dimension of temperament. The chapter reveals a disconcerting lack of cross-disciplinary work on jealousy: the sort of work that has moved the discourse on various other emotions forward in recent years. It explains how the best way to ameliorate this lacuna is, precisely, through an Aristotelian analysis, where jealousy is (perhaps counter-intuitively) accorded a place as a potentially virtuous emotion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document