PRACTICE OF APPLICATION OF THE LAW “ON PERSONAL DATA” AND ITS PLACE IN THE PENAL SYSTEM

Author(s):  
Кирилл Викторович Косарев

Закон «О персональных данных», принятый 27 июня 2006 г., является одним из важнейших в современной системе российского права. Данный закон призван регламентировать защиту персональных данных граждан и является неотъемлемой частью системы охраны частной жизни граждан. При этом закон содержит в себе некоторые спорные положения, которые не позволяют в полной мере достичь тех целей, которые возлагает на данный нормативный акт законодатель. Автором предпринята попытка выделения некоторых спорных положений данного закона и предложены пути по их устранению. При написании статьи автором проанализировано значительное количество судебных актов, которые и легли в основу данной статьи. Применение Федерального закона от 27.07.2006 № 152-ФЗ «О персональных данных» занимает важное место в деятельности учреждений и органов уголовно-исполнительной системы. Практически любой аспект деятельности в уголовно-исполнительной системе, так или иначе, связан с обработкой персональных данных, более того, учреждения уголовно-исполнительной системы становятся участниками судебных споров в сфере защиты персональных данных. The Law “On Personal Data” adopted on June 27, 2006 is one of the most important in the modern system of Russian law. This law is designed to regulate the protection of personal data of citizens and is an integral part of the system of protecting the privacy of citizens. At the same time, the law contains some controversial provisions that do not allow to fully achieve the goals that the legislator entrusts with this normative act. The author has attempted to highlight some controversial provisions of this law and suggest ways to address them. When writing the article, the author analyzed a significant number of judicial acts, which formed the basis of this article. It is worth noting that the application of the Federal Law of July 27, 2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” occupies an important place in the penal system. Almost any aspect of the activity in the penitentiary system is somehow related to the processing of personal data, moreover, as it will be indicated later in the article, the institutions of the penitentiary system become parties to judicial disputes in the field of personal data protection.

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44
Author(s):  
Dawid Zadura

Abstract In the review below the author presents a general overview of the selected contemporary legal issues related to the present growth of the aviation industry and the development of aviation technologies. The review is focused on the questions at the intersection of aviation law and personal data protection law. Massive processing of passenger data (Passenger Name Record, PNR) in IT systems is a daily activity for the contemporary aviation industry. Simultaneously, since the mid- 1990s we can observe the rapid growth of personal data protection law as a very new branch of the law. The importance of this new branch of the law for the aviation industry is however still questionable and unclear. This article includes the summary of the author’s own research conducted between 2011 and 2017, in particular his audits in LOT Polish Airlines (June 2011-April 2013) and Lublin Airport (July - September 2013) and the author’s analyses of public information shared by International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), International Air Transport Association (IATA), Association of European Airlines (AEA), Civil Aviation Authority (ULC) and (GIODO). The purpose of the author’s research was to determine the applicability of the implementation of technical and organizational measures established by personal data protection law in aviation industry entities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1308
Author(s):  
Jie (Jeanne) Huang

AbstractThe recent COVID-19 outbreak has pushed the tension of protecting personal data in a transnational context to an apex. Using a real case where the personal data of an international traveler was illegally released by Chinese media, this Article identifies three trends that have emerged at each stage of conflict-of-laws analysis for lex causae: (1) The EU, the US, and China characterize the right to personal data differently; (2) the spread-out unilateral applicable law approach comes from the fact that all three jurisdictions either consider the law for personal data protection as a mandatory law or adopt connecting factors leading to the law of the forum; and (3) the EU and China strongly advocate deAmericanization of substantive data protection laws. The trends and their dynamics provide valuable implications for developing the choice of laws for transnational personal data. First, this finding informs parties that jurisdiction is a predominant issue in data breach cases because courts and regulators would apply the law of the forum. Second, currently, there is no international treaty or model law on choice-of-law issues for transnational personal data. International harmonization efforts will be a long and difficult journey considering how the trends demonstrate not only the states’ irreconcilable interests but also how states may consider these interests as their fundamental values that they do not want to trade off. Therefore, for states and international organizations, a feasible priority is to achieve regional coordination or interoperation among states with similar values on personal data protection.


Significance Once finalised and promulgated, probably sometime in late 2021 or 2022, it will be China’s first comprehensive piece of legislation to govern the collection, processing and use of personal data. There are significant ramifications for domestic and foreign businesses. Impacts Security inspection requirements for cross-border transfers of personal data could have considerable importance for foreign firms. The law may be used to sanction foreign firms or retaliate against foreign governments. The law aims to settle a long-running turf war between regulators, to eliminate duplicate licensing, enforcement and inspection regimes.


2022 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-118
Author(s):  
Miral-Sabry AlAshry

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the Egyptian Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 for 2020, as well as its implications for journalistic practice. More specifically, the focal point of this study was to explore how Egyptian journalists interpret the law and its implication for press freedom in Egypt. The underpinning theoretical framework was informed by the Authoritarian school of thought. Questionnaires were distributed to 199 journalists from both independent and semi-governmental representing thirteen official newspapers of Egypt, while in-depth interviews were done with (3) Editors, (4) journalists, and (3) human rights lawyers. The finding of the study indicated that the government placed restrictions on journalists by using Data Protection Law relating to the media. That law is negatively impacting journalists and media houses. It was clear from the findings that the journalists see the law as an obstacle to media independence, as it allows the government to exercise greater information control through digital policy and puts rules of regulation against journalists.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rock Liu

BACKGROUND The Diamond Princess Cruise outbreak of new corona virus (COVID-19) infection on 2nd February, and more than 2,000 passengers have entered Taiwan, causing concern. The government uses a lot of information to complete the electronic map of cruise passengers within a day, and sends a cell message to the 620,000 people who have contacted the cruise passengers, followed by more than one tracking, if there are respiratory symptoms or pneumonia; then go for an inspection. Chen [1] et al.’s paper has two main points. One is to use the online signal between the mobile phone and the base station to find out the people who have contacted the Princess Diamond passenger. The second is to the 620,000 people who have contacted the Princess Diamond passenger. Use the health insurance database for follow-up health tracking. OBJECTIVE Disease control and prevention sometimes conflict with personal data protection and privacy [6-7, 10]. Science and technology and law always come from human nature [8-9]. How make the balances of both, we needs people's wisdom [11]. METHODS Although the effectiveness of Taiwan’s control against the new coronavirus epidemic is very good, it has taken the lead in violating the law in this practice. The paper by Chen et al. claimed that in the face of new epidemic diseases such as the new coronavirus, it is possible to directly access personal data without obtaining personal consent. According to the investigation, there are currently three laws in Taiwan: 1) Communicable Disease Control Act [3]. 2) The Communication Security and Surveillance Act [4]. 3) Personal Data Protection Act [5]. Those are not mentioned that the government directly calls individuals without personal authorization under special circumstances, such as the new coronavirus epidemic. Therefore, the government violated the law in this case. On the other hand, the paper also emulates South Korea’s policies [2] and practices in the new coronavirus epidemic, such as cell phone positioning, electronic medical records, swipe records, and monitors. South Korea’s laws do not satisfy to Taiwan. Here is another wrong example. RESULTS We know that the world is fighting against the new coronavirus, but this cannot allow the Taiwan government to use it as a reasonable excuse for infringing on personal privacy. Although the other countries have serious new coronavirus epidemics, they seal the city or limit the people’s social distance, and do not violate personal privacy. How to strike a balance between controlling the epidemic situation and protecting personal data and privacy, it is the direction we need to work hard in the future. CONCLUSIONS How to strike a balance between controlling the epidemic situation and protecting personal data and privacy, it is the direction we need to work hard in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-36
Author(s):  
Bayu Sujadmiko ◽  
Iskardo P Panggar ◽  
Ade Sofyansah ◽  
Intan Fitri Meutia

The development of technology has made transformation in the world; one of them is the implementation of e-voting systems in general elections. This research aims to dig deeper into the utilization of e voting in Indonesia's general election according to the Law on General Election, and research on the e-voting safety aspect in Indonesia's general election with the Law on ITE, government regulation on One Data Indonesia, and the Bill of Personal Data Protection Law. The research method is normative, which is delivered with an analytic-descriptive method. The results show that Indonesia has arranged elections with e-voting mechanisms for multiples of times, for example, in Jembrana Regency. Based on the General Election Law, e voting could be implemented in Indonesia. However, there are still considerations in terms of technology and preparation that should prevent unwanted burden. There needs to be a regulation for voters' data management to prevent violations against human rights. Data management must pay attention to safety aspects guided by the Law on ITE, government regulation on One Data Indonesia, and the Bill of Personal Data Protection Law


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-07
Author(s):  
Shafagat Jabrayil Mahmudova

The paper highlights the personal data and the stages of its protection. Some provisions of the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the personal data are reviewed. The protection of personal data through programs is explored. The studies in this area are reviewed. Data protection methods through programs are studied and analyzed. Some recommendations for the further developments in this field are provided.


2019 ◽  
pp. 73-94
Author(s):  
RAÚL VÁSQUEZ RODRÍGUEZ

Este trabajo analiza la interacción entre el tratamiento de información crediticia de las personas naturales a cargo de las centrales de riesgo, debido a su importancia para los agentes de mercado, y el derecho fundamental a la protección de los datos personales, profundizando en el trasfondo constitucional de los derechos involucrados, en las interpretaciones del Tribunal Constitucional y en la compatibilidad de objetivos respecto de la privacidad y la confidencialidad que existe entre la Ley N.° 27489, Ley que regula las Centrales Privadas de Información de Riesgos y de Protección al Titular de la Información y la Ley N.° 29733, Ley de Protección de Datos Personales y su reglamento; interacción analizada por la Autoridad Nacional de Protección de Datos Personales en sus resoluciones directorales. This work researchs the interaction between the personal credit data processing of natural people in charge of the Credit Risks Agencies, because of its relevance for stakeholders and the fundamental right for the personal data protection, deepening in the constitutional background of the involved rights, in the Constitutional Court statements and the compatibility whith the privacy and confidentiality targets that exists between the Law N.° 27489, which regulates the Credit Risk Information Private Center and the Data Holder Protection Act, and the Law N.° 29733, law for the Personal Data Protection and its rulement; which is analyzed by Personal Data Protection Agency in its directoral judgments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document