scholarly journals One size doesn’t fit all!

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Kees Braun

Precision medicine, personalized medicine en targeted treatment: termen met een deels overlappende betekenis, allen verwijzend naar een groeiend besef in de geneeskunde: one size doesn’t fit all. Wat betekent dit voor onze epilepsiezorg?

Author(s):  
Albrecht Stenzinger ◽  
Anders Edsjö ◽  
Carolin Ploeger ◽  
Mikaela Friedman ◽  
Stefan Fröhling ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Ann Hoeben ◽  
Elbert A. J. Joosten ◽  
Marieke H. J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen

Personalized medicine (PM) or precision medicine in oncology is an emerging approach for tumor treatment and prevention that takes into account inter- and intra-tumor variability in genes, tumor (immune) environment, and lifestyle and morbidities of each person diagnosed with cancer [...]


Author(s):  
Fredrik Schjesvold ◽  
Albert Oriol

A large number of novel treatments for myeloma have been developed and approved, however alkylating drugs continue to be part of standard regimens, additionally, novel alkylators are currently being developed. We performed a non-systematized literary search for relevant papers and communications at large conferences, as well as exploiting the authors knowledge of the field to review the history, current use and novel concepts around traditional alkylators cyclophosphamide, bendamustine and melphalan and current data on the newly developed pro-drug melflufen. Even in the era of targeted treatment and personalized medicine, alkylating drugs continue to be part of standard-of-care in myeloma, and new alkylators are coming to the market.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunpeng Cai ◽  
Shruti Mankar ◽  
Taiga Ajiri ◽  
Kentaro Shirai ◽  
Tasuku Yotoriyama

There is an increasing need for the enrichment of rare cells in the clinical environments of precision medicine, personalized medicine, and regenerative medicine. With the possibility of becoming the next-generation...


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Étienne Richer ◽  
Rachel Syme ◽  
Stephen M. Robbins ◽  
Paul Lasko

Personalized (or precision) medicine approaches are currently being introduced in healthcare delivery following the development of new technologies and of novel ways to integrate and analyze various data sources. This editorial describes the efforts invested since 2012 by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to foster the development and implementation of personalized medicine in Canada. Success stories from past investments as well as future developments are presented from a Canadian perspective.


Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Eran Zittan ◽  
Ian M. Gralnek ◽  
Marc S. Berns

The proactive approach to Crohn’s disease (CD) management advocates moving toward algorithmic tight-control scenarios that are designed for each CD phenotype to guide remission induction, maintenance therapy, active monitoring, and multidisciplinary care to manage the complexities of each inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient. This requires accurate initial clinical, laboratory, radiological, endoscopic, and/or tissue diagnosis for proper phenotypic stratification of each CD patient. A substantial proportion of patients in symptomatic remission have been reported to demonstrate evidence of active disease, with elevated fecal calprotectin(FC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a hallmark for mucosal inflammation. Active mucosal inflammation, and elevated CRP and fecal calprotectin (FC) have been shown to be good predictors of clinical relapse, disease progression, and complications in IBD patients. The next frontier of treatment is personalized medicine or precision medicine to help solve the problem of IBD heterogeneity and variable responses to treatment. Personalized medicine has the potential to increase the efficacy and/or reduce potential adverse effects of treatment for each CD phenotype. However, there is currently an unmet need for better elucidation of the inflammatory biopathways and genetic signatures of each IBD phenotype, so personalized medicine can specifically target the underlying cause of the disease and provide maximal efficacy to each patient.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Fraguas ◽  
C. M. Díaz-Caneja ◽  
M. W. State ◽  
M. C. O'Donovan ◽  
R. E. Gur ◽  
...  

Personalized or precision medicine is predicated on the assumption that the average response to treatment is not necessarily representative of the response of each individual. A commitment to personalized medicine demands an effort to bring evidence-based medicine and personalized medicine closer together. The use of relatively homogeneous groups, defined using a priori criteria, may constitute a promising initial step for developing more accurate risk-prediction models with which to advance the development of personalized evidence-based medicine approaches to heterogeneous syndromes such as schizophrenia. However, this can lead to a paradoxical situation in the field of psychiatry. Since there has been a tendency to loosely define psychiatric disorders as ones without a known aetiology, the discovery of an aetiology for psychiatric syndromes (e.g. 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in some cases of schizophrenia), while offering a path toward more precise treatments, may also lead to their reclassification away from psychiatry. We contend that psychiatric disorders with a known aetiology should not be removed from the field of psychiatry. This knowledge should be used instead to guide treatment, inasmuch as psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and other treatments can all be valid approaches to mental disorders. The translation of the personalized clinical approach inherent to psychiatry into evidence-based precision medicine can lead to the development of novel treatment options for mental disorders and improve outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Dutfield

AbstractThis article reviews current trends in patent claims regarding personalised, stratified and precision medicine. These trends are not particularly well understood by policymakers, even less by the public, and are quite recent. Consequently, their implications for the public interest have hardly been thought out. Some see personalised and other secondary drug patent claims as promoting better targeted treatment. Others are inclined to see them as \manifestations of ‘evergreening’ whereby companies are, in some cases quite cynically, trying to extend market monopolies in old products or creating new monopolies based on supposedly improved versions of such earlier drugs. The article claims that the relaxation of ‘novelty’ is a privilege unavailable to inventions in other fields and that on balance the patent systemdoesprivilege this industry and that no adequate case has yet been made thus far to prove the public benefits overall.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document