scholarly journals IPEC’s core competency 2 roles and responsibilities: What more do we need to implement these?

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joann C. Harper
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Barriers To Learning ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Specific Content ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Value Ethics

The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) has published guidelines to promote interprofessional collaboration. These guidelines are encompassed in four core competency sets. The core competencies are: Core 1: Value/Ethics, Core 2: Roles and Responsibilities, Core 3: Interprofessional Communication and Core 4: Teams and Teamwork. IPEC has outlined sub-competencies for each, which can be interpreted as a compilation of principles, behaviors, precepts and competencies. Together they serve to promote direction for interprofessional collaboration amongst health care professionals. However, the compilation may need more explanation to guide education and practice. Though the sub-competencies described in each core overlap in their application, specifically, Core 2: Roles and Responsibilities is explored for its underpinnings. The literature to date reflects educational delivery modes, but specific content is sparse, and not in the totality of the representative sub-competencies. Much of the literature omits the background that creates the context, and the content for, our deeper understanding of the principles. Therefore, important information is missing that underpins the competency statement set to teach and to learn these sub-competencies. The aim was to identify principles and applicable content to both support learning and to address barriers to learning, which may be essential to implement the sub-competency statements. The sub-competencies independent of further elucidation are unlikely to yield the comprehension needed for implementation and discernible actions that prompt interprofessional collaborative success.

scholarly journals Interprofessional communication: How do we do it?

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Joann C. Harper ◽  
Mary D. Kracun
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Professional Associations ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Methodical Approach ◽  
The Uk

Interprofessional education in preparation for the skills to execute teams and teamwork through interprofessional collaboration has been publicized and mandated by several professional associations through accreditation standards. The prerequisite is emphasized by the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) as a mantra for successful healthcare outcomes. In response, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (known as IPEC) published core competencies in 2011 with an update in 2016. While these statements are not each independently expressed in measurable terms, they stand as a compendium to guide interprofessional collaboration. To date, the literature does not reflect a comprehensive approach to explicating or interpreting these to be embraced more readily. Further, the literature to enlighten student education outstrips the literature to illuminate faculty education, though we acknowledge the work of the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education to inspire faculty education through a variety of platforms. Though the IPEC publications represent seminal work in the US, built on earlier work from the UK and others, its translation for faculty education applying a straight-forward, orderly, and methodical approach has not been done. Our attempt was to take one of the four (“4”) IPEC core competencies, Core Competency 3: Interprofessional Communication, and describe its underpinnings in a systematic way as another tool for faculty education. It may open the door to further expound on each competency statement to employ IPEC competencies within a healthcare community that includes students, faculty and post graduate professionals.

scholarly journals Getting underneath IPEC competencies: Core Competency 4: Teams and teamwork

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Joann C. Harper
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Structural Characteristics ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Teams And Teamwork

The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) formed in 2009 provided significant guidance to advance interprofessional collaboration in its publication of the IPEC competencies in 2011, which described Four Domains and associated competencies to address interprofessional education and practice. Its updated publication in 2016 included public health and the care of populations and clarified its intent that interprofessional collaboration is the overarching theme of the now renamed 4 Core Domains to 4 Core Competencies. The article examines the literature that correlates with the sub competency statements represented within Core Competency 4: Teams and Teamwork (TT) to identify the underpinnings that support their fulfillment. The TT core statement is broad: “Apply relationship-building values and the principles of team dynamics to perform effectively in different team roles…”. There is also considerable overlap between the sub-competency statements. Though the existing literature describes structural characteristics and behavioral elements of good functioning teams, the repertoire is not collectively accessible and assimilated into a whole, but is fragmented, embedded in multiple sources. The article integrates and assembles the qualities of teams and team-members likely to be successful while getting underneath the competency statements to identify the mechanisms and dispositions that drive those competencies. The exploration begins with the structural components of teams and then proceeds to key attributes of teams and team members. The article provides a nexus to correlate IPEC’s TT’s sub-competencies to yield favorable team functioning from which academic institutions, and health care professionals might enrich their knowledge about what works.

scholarly journals Attitudes and Behavior towards Interprofessional Collaboration among Healthcare Professionals in a Large Academic Medical Center

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Benjamin E. Ansa ◽  
Sunitha Zechariah ◽  
Amy M. Gates ◽  
Stephanie W. Johnson ◽  
Vahé Heboyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Academic Medical

The increasing rates of comorbidities among patients and the complexity of care have warranted interprofessional collaboration (IPC) as an important component of the healthcare structure. An initial step towards assessing the effectiveness of collaboration requires the exploration of the attitudes and experience of healthcare professionals towards IPC. This online survey aimed to examine the attitudes of healthcare professionals working in a large public academic medical center toward IPC in patient care and the healthcare team, and their behavior and experience regarding IPC. The rankings, according to the perceived importance among the respondents, of the four Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies (values/ethics, roles/responsibilities, interprofessional communication, teams/teamwork) were assessed. There were strong but varying levels of consensus among healthcare professionals (N = 551) that IPC facilitates efficient patient care, improves patient problem-solving ability, and increases better clinical outcomes for patients. They acknowledged that IPC promotes mutual respect within the healthcare team and providers’ ability to make optimal patient care decisions. However, overall more than 35% of the respondents did not attend multidisciplinary education sessions (grand rounds, seminars, etc.), and about 23% did not participate in bedside patient care rounds. Interprofessional communication was ranked as the most important IPEC core competence. Although the attitude towards IPC among healthcare professionals is strongly positive, many healthcare professionals face challenges in participating in IPC. Institutional policies that facilitate interprofessional learning and interactions for this group of healthcare professionals should be formulated. Online distance learning and interactions, and simulation-enhanced interprofessional education, are options for addressing this barrier. Hospital administrators should facilitate conducive work environments that promote IPC, based on IPEC core competencies, and promote programs that address the challenges of IPC.

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and School Nursing: A Model for Improved Health Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Fleming ◽  
Mayumi Willgerodt
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
School Nurse ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice

Effective communication, teamwork, and interprofessional collaboration, or teams of health and non-health professionals working together, are critical to improving the patient experience of care; improving population health; and reducing healthcare costs (i.e., the Triple Aim). In 2016, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Expert Panel updated its Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. As health professionals who collaborate with an extensive network of health and non-health professionals, school nurses embody the aims of interprofessional collaboration (IPC). This article briefly reviews the background of interprofessional collaboration and describes ways that school nurse practice aligns with IPC core competencies to incorporate interprofessional collaboration. We discuss successes, such as case management and care coordination, and include challenges to IPC in the school setting. In conclusion, through case management and collaborative care, school nurse expertise in effective IPC fosters knowledge through which core competencies can be strengthened, with benefits for both patients and other healthcare providers.

scholarly journals Interprofessional Pharmacokinetics Simulation: Pharmacy and Nursing Students’ Perceptions

Pharmacy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Cropp ◽  
Jennifer Beall ◽  
Ellen Buckner ◽  
Frankie Wallis ◽  
Amanda Barron
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Survey Responses

Interprofessional practice between pharmacists and nurses can involve pharmacokinetic dosing of medications in a hospital setting. This study describes student perceptions of an interprofessional collaboration pharmacokinetics simulation on the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) 2016 Core Competencies. The investigators developed a simulation activity for senior undergraduate nursing and second-year pharmacy students. Nursing and pharmacy students (n = 54, 91 respectively) participated in the simulation using medium-fidelity manikins. Each case represented a pharmacokinetic dosing consult (vancomycin, tobramycin, phenytoin, theophylline, or lidocaine). Nursing students completed head-to-toe assessment and pharmacy students gathered necessary information and calculated empiric and adjusted doses. Students communicated using SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation). Students participated in debrief sessions and completed an IRB-approved online survey. Themes from survey responses revealed meaningful perceptions in all IPEC competencies as well as themes of safety, advocacy, appreciation, and areas for improvement. Students reported learning effectively from the simulation experience. Few studies relate to this type of interprofessional education experience and this study begins to explore student perceptions of interprofessional education (IPE) in a health sciences clinical context through simulation. This real-world application of nursing and pharmacy interprofessional collaboration can positively affect patient-centered outcomes and safety.

Improving diagnosis by improving education: a policy brief on education in healthcare professions

Diagnosis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. Graber ◽  
Joseph Rencic ◽  
Diana Rusz ◽  
Frank Papa ◽  
Pat Croskerry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Safety Concern ◽  
Diagnostic Error ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Specific Content ◽  
And Training

Abstract Diagnostic error is increasingly recognized as a major patient safety concern. Efforts to improve diagnosis have largely focused on safety and quality improvement initiatives that patients, providers, and health care organizations can take to improve the diagnostic process and its outcomes. This educational policy brief presents an alternative strategy for improving diagnosis, centered on future healthcare providers, to improve the education and training of clinicians in every health care profession. The hypothesis is that we can improve diagnosis by improving education. A literature search was first conducted to understand the relationship of education and training to diagnosis and diagnostic error in different health care professions. Based on the findings from this search we present the justification for focusing on education and training, recommendations for specific content that should be incorporated to improve diagnosis, and recommendations on educational approaches that should be used. Using an iterative, consensus-based process, we then developed a driver diagram that categorizes the key content into five areas. Learners should: 1) Acquire and effectively use a relevant knowledge base, 2) Optimize clinical reasoning to reduce cognitive error, 3) Understand system-related aspects of care, 4) Effectively engage patients and the diagnostic team, and 5) Acquire appropriate perspectives and attitudes about diagnosis. These domains echo recommendations in the National Academy of Medicine’s report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. The National Academy report suggests that true interprofessional education and training, incorporating recent advances in understanding diagnostic error, and improving clinical reasoning and other aspects of education, can ultimately improve diagnosis by improving the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of all health care professionals.

Communication, Respect, and Leadership: Interprofessional Collaboration in Hospitals of Rural Ontario

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Morris ◽  
June Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Rural Hospitals ◽  
Interprofessional Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Teams ◽  
Northern Areas ◽  
Constant Comparative Method

Purpose: Health care professionals are expected to work collaboratively across diverse settings. In rural hospitals, these professionals face different challenges from their urban colleagues; however, little is known about interprofessional practice in these settings. Methods: Eleven health care professionals from 2 rural interprofessional teams were interviewed about collaborative practice. The data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. Results: Common themes included communication, respect, leadership, benefits of interprofessional teams, and the assets and challenges of working in small or rural hospitals. Differences between the cases were apparent in how the members conceptualized their teams, models of which were then compared with an “Ideal Interprofessional Team”. Conclusions: These results suggest that many experienced health care professionals function well in interprofessional teams; yet, they did not likely receive much education about interprofessional practice in their training. Providing interprofessional education to new practitioners may help them to establish this approach early in their careers and build on it with additional experience. Finally, these findings can be applied to address concerns that have arisen from other reports by exploring innovative ways to attract health professionals to communities in rural, remote, and northern areas, as there is a constant need for dietitians and other health care professionals in these practice settings.

scholarly journals Interprofessional Education and Practice: Perspectives from Students in Speech-Language Pathology and Recreational Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hajjar ◽  
Jan Elich-Monroe ◽  
Susan Durnford
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Recreational Therapy ◽  
Discussion Forums ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Professional Students ◽  
Collaborative Therapy ◽  
Language Pathology

Interprofessional education and practice (IPE/IPP) are important components for undergraduate and graduate students to experience during their programs of study in speech-language pathology and related health professions. The American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) is a member organization of the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) which promotes four core competencies required for effective practice: values/ethics, roles/responsibilities, interprofessional communication, and teams and teamwork. The purpose of this study was to gather the lived experiences from eight pre-professional students, four from speech-language pathology (SLP) and four from recreational therapy(RT), during focus groups and discussion forums conducted before, during, and after a 14-week IPE/IPP clinical experience. Students shared perspectives about providing collaborative therapy services as part of a team supporting adults with stroke or other acquired neurological conditions. Thematic analysis conducted from pre and post focus group transcripts revealed six primary themes: roles and responsibilities; interprofessional communication; collaborative teamwork; values and mutual respect; challenges to IPE/IPP; and benefits & impact of IPE/IPP. Students shared their clinical experiences engaging with students from SLP and RT, but also working with students from physical and occupational therapy. The qualitative data from this study provides important information to assist future students, educators, and clinical supervisors how to effectively access and engage in IPE/IPP learning experiences with a specific focus in the areas of teamwork, leadership, and conflict resolution.

Interprofessional Education and Practice: A Primer for Training Future Clinicians

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Zraick ◽  
Ana Claudia Harten ◽  
Fran Hagstrom
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health And Wellness ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Collaborative Learning Opportunities

Speech-language pathologists and audiologists often share roles and responsibilities with other professionals as they contribute to the health and wellness of clients/patients in educational and medical settings. Emerging changes in the educational and health care landscapes in the United States are increasing the demand for interprofessional collaboration to improve treatment outcomes. Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders need to be responsive to health care and educational reforms and expose students to collaborative learning opportunities with those outside their professions. This introductory-level article reviews terminology and concepts related to two approaches to training tomorrow's clinicians today, Interprofessional Education (IPE) and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPP). The article also discusses the challenges and opportunities related to IPE and IPP, and makes a call to action for both approaches to address educational and health care changes in the United States.

Improving Patient Care Through Interprofessional Education

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4764-4764
Author(s):  
Linda M. Ritter ◽  
Susan A. Berry ◽  
Stephanie A. Gregory ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Sean T. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Annual Series ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Oncology Nurse

Abstract Abstract 4764 For interprofessional healthcare teams to succeed, collaborative learning should foster an understanding of the value of each profession for improving patient outcomes. Center of Excellence Media, LLC is conducting independent follow-up research to investigate how barriers to optimal patient care can be addressed through comprehensive education with interprofessional-targeted application directives. In addition, it is examining whether activities that recognize each team member's roles and responsibilities can foster interprofessional communication. Considerations in Multiple Myeloma™ and Considerations in Lymphoma™ are two annual series of CME/CE accredited activities that provide clinicians with information they need to make up-to-date and appropriate treatment decisions for their patients, and are simultaneously made available as supplements to the professional publications The Oncology Nurse-APN/PA®, The Oncology Pharmacist®, and Value-Based Cancer Care®. The faculty panel for each activity is comprised of a hematologist-oncologist, a midlevel provider (a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant), and a pharmacist from a leading cancer institution, which allows added insight into an interprofessional approach to care. Following a successful didactic series in 2009, in which faculty members discussed their professional perspectives of evidence and data, the 2010 series was case-based and contained commentary from faculty describing their individual roles in patient management. The 2011 series, entitled “Ask the Experts,” poses frequently asked questions regarding the management of myeloma or lymphoma to faculty panels. Preliminary findings have shown that participants have become more aware of the roles and responsibilities of other healthcare professionals (98.5%), and are more comfortable interacting with other members of their practice after participating in these activities (97.8%). They are also collaborating more with other professionals involved in the treatment of their patients (89.3%). Not only were participants individually better able to care for patients after participating in these activities (98.2%), they also acknowledged that interprofessional patient care had been enhanced (97.8%). We continue to collect follow-up data as new activities in this series are released; comprehensive data will be presented at the ASH Annual Meeting. Disclosures: Gregory: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech (Roche): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Kaufman:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Keryx: Protocol Review Committee; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document