Update from the Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors

CAND Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Mark Fontes ◽  
Shawn O'Reilly
Keyword(s):  
Canadian Association

scholarly journals Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Raymond Geis ◽  
Adrian Brady ◽  
Carol C. Wu ◽  
Jack Spencer ◽  
Erik Ranschaert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
European Society ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Autonomous Systems ◽  
Codes Of Ethics ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Imaging Informatics ◽  
Financial Gain ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Ultimate Responsibility

Abstract This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.

scholarly journals Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Pancreatic Findings in Adults by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group

2021 ◽  
pp. 084653712110210
Author(s):  
Christopher I. Fung ◽  
David L. Bigam ◽  
Clarence K. W. Wong ◽  
Casey Hurrell ◽  
Jeffery R. Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Incidental Findings ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Pancreatic Cysts ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Pancreatic Calcifications ◽  
Fatty Atrophy ◽  
Anatomic Variants

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspecialty and general radiologists and is tasked with adapting and expanding upon the American College of Radiology incidental findings white papers to more closely apply to Canadian practice patterns, particularly more comprehensively dealing with the role of ultrasound and pursuing more cost-effective approaches to the workup of incidental findings without compromising patient care. Presented here are the 2021 Canadian guidelines for the management of pancreatic incidental findings. Topics covered include anatomic variants, fatty atrophy, pancreatic calcifications, ductal ectasia, and management of incidental pancreatic cysts.

scholarly journals Acting as change agents: Insight into Québec occupational therapists’ current practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 000841742199436
Author(s):  
Annie Carrier ◽  
Alexandra Éthier ◽  
Michaël Beaudoin ◽  
Anne Hudon ◽  
Denis Bédard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Communication ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Change Agent ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Change Agents ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Change Agency ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Academic Degrees

Background. Change agents’ actions have been studied mainly from a theoretical perspective. Purpose. This study aimed to empirically identify occupational therapists’ actual change agent actions. Method. As part of a research partnership with the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists-Québec chapter, we conducted this cross-sectional pilot study using an online survey. Findings. The change agent practices of our 103 participants involve many types of actions but show underinvestment in mass communication. Mass communication actions are more frequent when participants have greater experience, additional academic degrees, and training in change agency. Also, occupational therapists with additional academic degrees and change agency training tend to use a wider variety of actions. Finally, our participants’ actions principally target actors in the clinical context, rarely political actors. Implications. Our results suggest that occupational therapists can and will invest in the full range of change agent actions provided they can acquire the necessary knowledge and skills.

scholarly journals Recommendations for patient engagement in patient-oriented emergency medicine research

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Archambault ◽  
Colleen McGavin ◽  
Katie N. Dainty ◽  
Shelley L. McLeod ◽  
Christian Vaillancourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Translation Strategies ◽  
Medicine Research ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Knowledge Translation Strategies ◽  
National Patient

AbstractObjectiveTo make pragmatic recommendations on best practices for the engagement of patients in emergency medicine (EM) research.MethodsWe created a panel of expert Canadian EM researchers, physicians, and a patient partner to develop our recommendations. We used mixed methods consisting of 1) a literature review; 2) a survey of Canadian EM researchers; 3) qualitative interviews with key informants; and 4) feedback during the 2017 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium.ResultsWe synthesized our literature review into categories including identification and engagement, patients’ roles, perceived benefits, harms, and barriers to patient engagement; 40/75 (53% response rate) invited researchers completed our survey. Among respondents, 58% had engaged patients in research, and 83% intended to engage patients in future research. However, 95% stated that they need further guidance to engage patients. Our qualitative interviews revealed barriers to patient engagement, including the need for training and patient partner recruitment.Our panel recommends 1) an overarching positive recommendation to support patient engagement in EM research; 2) seven policy-level recommendations for CAEP to support the creation of a national patient council, to develop, adopt and adapt training material, guidelines, and tools for patient engagement, and to support increased patient engagement in EM research; and 3) nine pragmatic recommendations about engaging patients in the preparatory, execution, and translational phases of EM research.ConclusionPatient engagement can improve EM research by helping researchers select meaningful outcomes, increase social acceptability of studies, and design knowledge translation strategies that target patients’ needs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document