Analysis The Role of Law in Protecting Intellectual Rights and Their Relationship to Social Welfare

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Wandi Subroto

This study aims to analyze the role of law in protecting intellectual rights and their relationship to social welfare. This research belongs to the research that uses the juridical-normative method. The legal sources used in this study are secondary legal sources, which based on their legally binding power, consist of primary legal materials in the form of theories, norms, rules, and opinions of legal experts related to the intellectual property protection legal system associated with community welfare issues, and the role of strategy that the state can play besides the use of secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the study of legal sources, it can be seen that regarding the definition, recognition, and protection of intellectual property rights in Indonesia, it is regulated in the law and further regulated in Government Regulations. Intellectual property rights recognized and protected in Indonesia are Copyright and Industrial Property Rights, which consist of trademarks, patents, trade secrets, integrated circuit layout designs, and protection of plant varieties. This is very important to be maintained by the state, and the goal is to improve social welfare as mandated in the constitution.

Author(s):  
Yoyon M Darusman ,

<p>Abstract<br />Intellectual Property Rights as a part of property rights which belongs to human. The word property means ideas, creations, imaginations and thought. One of the intellectual property rights involves the field of industry (industrial property rights), especially related to technology which is called Invention, Based on legal perspective, it called as Patent. Patent is the exclusive rights which is given by the state to the inventor as the results of its invention in the field of technology, is given for a periode of time done by himself or appointed to other parties to do it. Then “Invention” is Inventor idea which is applicated in one activity of problem solving which specific in the field of technology, as a product, process, or improvement and development product or process. Then the Patent as one of the other Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has the importance position to the respective holder and getting protection on national and international law.<br /><em>Keywords: Position, Protection, Patent Holder</em></p><p>Abstrak<br />Hak Kekayaan Intelektual merupakan bagian dari pada hak kekayaan yang dimiliki oleh manusia. Kekayaan tersebut lahir karena adanya ide, kreasi, imajinasi dan pikiran. Salah satu kekayaan intelektual tersebut dapat dilihat dibidang industri. Khususnya yang berkaitan dengan teknologi yang dalam hal ini disebut dengan paten. Paten merupakan hak ekslusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada Inventor atas hasil invensinya di bidang teknologi, yang untuk selama waktu tertentu melaksanakan sendiri invensinya tersebut atau memberikan persetujuannya kepada pihak lain untuk melaksanakannya. Selanjutnya invensi adalah ide inventor yang dituangkan ke dalam suatu kegiatan pemecahan permasalahan yang spesifik di bidang teknologi, dapat berupa produk atau proses, atau penyempurnaan dan pengembangan produk atau proses. Sebagai salah satu dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), paten memeliki kedudukan yang<br />sangat penting bagi pemiliknya serta mendapatkan perlindungan dalam kerangka nasional maupun internasional.<br /><em>Kata Kunci: Kedudukan, Perlindungan, Pemegang Hak Paten</em></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoyon M Darusman

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Intellectua</em><em>l Property Rights as a part of property rights which belongs to human. The word property means ideas, creations, imaginations and thought. One of the intellectual property  rights involves the field of industry (industrial property rights), especially related to technology which is called Invention, Based on legal perspective, it called as Patent. Patent is the exclusive rights which is given by the state to the inventor as the results of its invention in the field of technology, is given for a periode of time  done by   himself or appointed to other parties to do it. Then “Invention” is Inventor idea which is applicated in one activity of problem solving which specific in the  field of technology, as a product, process, or improvement and development product or process. Then the Patent as one of the other Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has the importance position to the respective holder and getting protection on national and international law.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Position, Protection, Patent Holder</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Hak Kekayaan Intelektual merupakan bagian dari pada hak kekayaan yang dimiliki oleh manusia. Kekayaan tersebut lahir karena adanya ide, kreasi, imajinasi dan pikiran. Salah satu kekayaan intelektual tersebut dapat dilihat dibidang industri. Khususnya yang berkaitan dengan teknologi yang dalam hal ini disebut dengan paten. Paten merupakan hak ekslusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada Inventor atas hasil invensinya di bidang teknologi, yang untuk selama waktu tertentu melaksanakan sendiri invensinya tersebut atau memberikan persetujuannya kepada pihak lain untuk melaksanakannya. Selanjutnya invensi adalah ide inventor yang dituangkan ke dalam suatu kegiatan pemecahan permasalahan yang spesifik di bidang teknologi, dapat berupa produk atau proses, atau penyempurnaan dan pengembangan produk atau proses. Sebagai salah satu dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), paten memeliki kedudukan yang sangat penting bagi pemiliknya serta mendapatkan perlindungan dalam kerangka nasional maupun internasional.</p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Kedudukan, Perlindungan, Pemegang Hak Paten


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Lathifah Hanim

Globalization is nothing but capitalism in its most recent form. Strong and rich countries practically control the world economy and smaller countries are increasingly powerless because they are unable to compete through Intellectual Property Protection including trademarks. The purpose of this research is to examine and to analyze the role of the State in providing legal protection Against trademarks, and factors that influence and formulate their legal protection policies. The approach method in this research is empirical juridical. The data used were primary and secondary data. The results of the research were analyzed analytical descriptively. The results of the study found that the role of the State in providing legal protection for trademarks of business people was not optimal, this was due to several factors including the low understanding of the importance of trademark intellectual property rights protection for businesses and society as consumers. Government policies globally through the Asean Economic Community Blueprint, which contains four main pillars, including the economic competitiveness of Intellectual Property Rights integrated with the global economy.


Author(s):  
Professor Adebambo Adewopo ◽  
Dr Tobias Schonwetter ◽  
Helen Chuma-Okoro

This chapter examines the proper role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in achieving access to modern energy services in Africa as part of a broader objective of a pro-development intellectual property agenda for African countries. It discusses the role of intellectual property rights, particularly patents, in consonance with pertinent development questions in Africa connected with the implementation of intellectual property standards, which do not wholly assume that innovation in Africa is dependent on strong intellectual property systems. The chapter examines how existing intellectual property legal landscapes in Africa enhance or impede access to modern energy, and how the law can be directed towards improved energy access in African countries. While suggesting that IPRs could serve an important role in achieving modern energy access, the chapter calls for circumspection in applying IP laws in order not to inhibit access to useful technologies for achieving access to modern energy services.


Author(s):  
Danai Christopoulou ◽  
Nikolaos Papageorgiadis ◽  
Chengang Wang ◽  
Georgios Magkonis

AbstractWe study the role of the strength of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) law protection and enforcement in influencing horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms in host countries. While most WTO countries adopted strong IPR legislation due to exogenous pressure resulting from the signing of the Trade-Related Aspects of IPR (TRIPS) agreement, public IPR enforcement strength continues to vary significantly between countries. We meta-analyse 49 studies and find that public IPR enforcement strength has a direct positive effect on horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms and a negative moderating effect on the relationship between IPR law protection strength and horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms.


2021 ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Svetlana I. Krupko

This article analyzes the choice-of-law interests of specific and potential participants in the relations of intellectual property rights and the state in order to establish the closest connection of the above type of relation with the state, whose law should be applied. Taking into account the directionality of significant choice-of-law interests, advantages and disadvantages of territorial and universal approaches, a theoretically based solution is proposed for the formation of a general choice-of-law rule on the law to be applied to the relation of intellectual property rights. It was revealed in the study that the diversity of the relations of intellectual property rights (their obligatory and non-obligatory, property and personal non-property nature, other differences in legal features) does not automatically generate a multidirectionality of significant choice-of-law interests that should be taken into account when establishing a close connection of the above type of the relation with the state for determination of applicable law, does not prevent the formation of a general choice-of-law rule for the relations of intellectual property rights in general and does not unequivocally testify in favor of the specialization of its binding. However, the diversity of the relations of intellectual property rights should be examined and evaluated for the feasibility and limits of exceptions from the general choice-of-law rule and the development of special rules for resolving certain private of the relations of intellectual property rights.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document