scholarly journals The burden of prostate cancer in Canada

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-S2) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Fradet ◽  
Laurence Klotz ◽  
John Trachtenberg ◽  
Alexandre Zlotta

The clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer in Canada is substantial,and is rising. Studies indicate that 1 in 7 men will develop prostate cancer duringtheir lifetime, and another 1 in 27 will die because of it. It is estimated that4300 Canadian men will die of prostate cancer in 2008. Age, family history, raceand diet are all risks associated with the development of prostate cancer. A diagnosisof cancer carries a significant burden and like other cancers is a cause ofsignificant anxiety and depression. Uncertainty regarding the value of screeningfor prostate cancer has been, and continues to be, a challenge for primarycare physicians and urologists.

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 172-173
Author(s):  
Kathleen Herkommer ◽  
Juergen E. Gschwend ◽  
Martina Kron ◽  
Richard E. Hautmann ◽  
Thomas Paiss

Author(s):  
Kathryn M. Wilson ◽  
Lorelei Mucci

Prostate cancer is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers among men, ranking second in cancer globally and first in Western countries. There are marked variations in incidence globally, and its incidence must be interpreted in the context of diagnostic intensity and screening. The uptake of prostate-specific antigen screening since the 1990s has led to dramatic increases in incidence in many countries, resulting in an increased proportion of indolent cancers that would never have come to light clinically in the absence of screening. Risk factors differ when studying prostate cancer overall versus advanced disease. Older age, African ancestry, and family history are established risk factors for prostate cancer. Obesity and smoking are not associated with risk overall, but are associated with increased risk of advanced prostate cancer. Several additional lifestyle factors, medications, and dietary factors are now emerging as risk factors for advanced disease.


1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Sarantidis ◽  
A Thomas ◽  
K Iphantis ◽  
N Katsaros ◽  
J Tripodianakis ◽  
...  

SummaryIn this study we investigated 1) the changes in anxiety, depression and denial from admission to discharge in patients admitted to the intensive care unit following an acute myocardial infarction and 2) the effect of smoking habits, time lapsed from the appearance of symptoms to seeking help behavior, presence of a person that motivated the patient to seek help, previous myocardial infarction (MI) and family history of MI, on these changes. The results indicated that 1) the levels of both anxiety and depression increased from admission to discharge, while denial decreased; 2) positive family history of MI was associated with lower difference of denial between admission and discharge.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher F. Sharpley ◽  
David R. H. Christie ◽  
Vicki Bitsika

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S1395
Author(s):  
H. Ni Raghallaigh ◽  
M.N. Brook ◽  
E.J. Saunders ◽  
P. Kumar ◽  
S. Hazell ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-607
Author(s):  
Aimee L. Lucas ◽  
Aliye Z. Bill ◽  
Caroline Hwang ◽  
Elizabeth Verna ◽  
Nicole Goetz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chethan Ramamurthy ◽  
Eric W. Stutz ◽  
Martin Goros ◽  
Jonathan Gelfond ◽  
Teresa L. Johnson-Pais ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Tolksdorf ◽  
Michael W. Kattan ◽  
Stephen A. Boorjian ◽  
Stephen J. Freedland ◽  
Karim Saba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Online clinical risk prediction tools built on data from multiple cohorts are increasingly being utilized for contemporary doctor-patient decision-making and validation. This report outlines a comprehensive data science strategy for building such tools with application to the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group prostate cancer risk prediction tool. Methods We created models for high-grade prostate cancer risk using six established risk factors. The data comprised 8492 prostate biopsies collected from ten institutions, 2 in Europe and 8 across North America. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic (HLS) for calibration and the clinical net benefit at risk threshold 15%. We implemented several internal cross-validation schemes to assess the influence of modeling method and individual cohort on validation performance. Results High-grade disease prevalence ranged from 18% in Zurich (1863 biopsies) to 39% in UT Health San Antonio (899 biopsies). Visualization revealed outliers in terms of risk factors, including San Juan VA (51% abnormal digital rectal exam), Durham VA (63% African American), and Zurich (2.8% family history). Exclusion of any cohort did not significantly affect the AUC or HLS, nor did the choice of prediction model (pooled, random-effects, meta-analysis). Excluding the lowest-prevalence Zurich cohort from training sets did not statistically significantly change the validation metrics for any of the individual cohorts, except for Sunnybrook, where the effect on the AUC was minimal. Therefore the final multivariable logistic model was built by pooling the data from all cohorts using logistic regression. Higher prostate-specific antigen and age, abnormal digital rectal exam, African ancestry and a family history of prostate cancer increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer, while a history of a prior negative prostate biopsy decreased risk (all p-values < 0.004). Conclusions We have outlined a multi-cohort model-building internal validation strategy for developing globally accessible and scalable risk prediction tools.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document