scholarly journals World Rabies Research Output: A Scientometric Assessment of Publication Output during 2006-15

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-229
Author(s):  
Ritu Gupta ◽  
Dhawan SM ◽  
Gupta BM
Keyword(s):  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Scientometric Assessment

scholarly journals A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publication Output on RFID with Reference to India During 2006-15

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Ritu Gupta ◽  
B.M. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Business Management ◽  
The World ◽  
Publication Share ◽  
Scopus Database ◽  
Scientometric Assessment

The present paper attempts to study the performance of India in RFID research using a series of bibliometric indicators. As seen from SCOPUS database, India’s research output cumulated to 632 publications in 10 years during 2006-15. Indiais ranked13thtop country in the world in RFID research; it accounted for 2.58 % global publication. India showed faster growth rate of 20.69 % CAGR compared to -0.42 % by the world in RFID research during 2006-15. India’s citation impact was low, 1.32 citations per paper; its output in terms of international collaborative publications was also low, accounting for just 9.81 % during 2006-15.The top 15 most productive Indian organisations in RFID research together contributed 35.60 % publications share and 38.18 % citation share during 2006-15. The top 15 most productive journals together accounted for 47.44% share of total country output in RFID research during 2006-15. Computer science accounted for the largest publication share (57.44 %) in RFID research output, followed by engineering (49.21 %), social sciences (7.28 %), mathematics (6.01 %), materials science (5.85 %), business, management & accounting (5.54 %) and physics & astronomy (4.75 %) during 2006-15.

Mapping the Research Output of University of Kashmir

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asifa Jan ◽  
Suhail Ahmed ◽  
Nahida Tun Nisa ◽  
Asiya Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Biological Sciences ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Regional Research Laboratory ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Document Type ◽  
H Index ◽  
Search Feature ◽  
Sciverse Scopus

The study maps the research output from University of Kashmir, one of the premier higher education institutes of Jammu&Kashmir state, India. Elseviers SciVerse Scopus one of the leading indexing abstracting services was queried for a period of 1963- February 2015 using the affiliation search feature for University of Kashmir. The works of the authors affiliated with University of Kashmir have been analyzed. Statistical analysis of the retrieved data was performed. The publication output from University of Kashmir has shown a promising growth expect for some years in 1990s which can be attributed to the political instability in the state. The highest contributing authors are from Science disciplines with authors from Chemistry, Botany, Electronics, Biochemistry, and Centre of Research for Development departments having a higher rate of h-Index. Majority of papers are published in Indian sources followed by the sources from US, Germany and China. Majority of the authors are affiliated with University of Kashmir followed by Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (Earlier Regional Research Laboratory, Sanat Nagar), Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) and Aligarh Muslim University. Articles have remained a prime document type for publishing by the authors from University of Kashmir followed by conference proceedings and review articles. Agricultural and Biological Sciences outscore other disciplines followed by Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology and Medicine. Future emphasis on joint research, international collaboration, and publishing in indexed journals is needed.

scholarly journals A Bibliometric Investigation of Flipped Classroom Research during 2000-2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lie Yang ◽  
Tiantian Sun ◽  
Yanli Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hot Spots ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Classroom Research ◽  
Growth Trend ◽  
Research Education ◽  
Subject Categories ◽  
Sharp Growth ◽  
Global Growth

The paper analyzed the global growth and development of flipped classroom research productivity in terms of publication output as reflected in SCI/SSCI for the period 2000-2015. Publication types and languages, characteristics of articles outputs, countries, subject categories and journals, and the frequency of keywords were analyzed using bibliometric methods. There are 149 articles in 78 journals listed in 41 SCI/SSCI subject categories. A sharp growth trend of publication output was observed during 2011-2015. USA played a predominant role in flipped classroom research. Education educational research, chemistry and medical were the top 3 categories and “active learning” and “blended learning” recent major topics of flipped classroom research during the past 16 years. The results could help researchers understand the characteristics of research output and search hot spots of flipped education field.

scholarly journals Assessing the Coronavirus Research Output: A Bibliometric Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092097511
Author(s):  
Asifa Ali ◽  
Irfan Ahmad Hakak ◽  
Faseeh Amin
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
Subject Field ◽  
The Subject

The aim of this article is to examine the bibliometric analysis of global publication output on coronavirus, as covered in Web of Science during the period from 2000 to 2019. A total of 10,861 documents were found during a 20-year period spanning from 2000 to 2019 published in the ISI Web of Science. The study analyses annual productivity, most productive source titles, prolific countries, eminent institutions, linguistic analysis and productivity of authors and their contribution in the subject area. The findings reveal that the most productive year of publication was 2004 that included 782 publications with the majority published in the Journal of Virology. The result further indicates that the USA, China and Germany are the most productive countries in the field of Coronavirus research output. In terms of institutional output, University of Hong Kong emerged as the most productive institution; Yuen KY from Hong Kong is the most prolific author. In the subject category type, the most prominent subject field is Virology, Infectious Disease and Veterinary Science. The findings of the study are limited to the data harvested from ‘Web of Science’. This study is of immense relevance to researchers and academicians who are searching for answers to this pandemic. This will provide insights to academicians to collaborate with other researchers based on the quality of the research produced by other countries and institutes. The study is useful for researchers, immunologists and epidemiologists who are interested in the field of Coronavirus and serves as a base for future research.

Global Research Output in Occupational Health From 1998–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. 121-140
Author(s):  
Senthamilselvi A.
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Health ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Online Database ◽  
Global Research

An analysis of 12,317 publications published by Research Productivity on Occupational Health during 1998-2018 and indexed by Web of Science online database indicates the publication output in the global level research productivity of the publication. The highest numbers of papers were published during the year 2018 with 1,237 records followed by the year 2016 with 1,189 records. Overall, 31,498 authors contributed 2,866 publications in the journal and global cited scores with 149,345 records of the articles. A total of 138 countries have contributed in publications of the output of total research productivity. In this research, it is found that articles have been written using 25 languages.

Research Output on Paddy (Oryza Sativa): A Scientometric Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
L. Rajendran
Keyword(s):  
Oryza Sativa ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Southern States ◽  
Indian Country ◽  
Paddy Crop ◽  
Scientometric Study ◽  
Specific Country

This paper attempts to analyse quantitatively the growth and development of Paddy (Oryza Sativa) Cereal Crop research in India in terms of publication output as reflected in CAB Direct Online Database. During the period 1951-2017 a total of 1,80,675 papers were published by the scientists of India respectively on Paddy Crop analysis. India is the top country in Agricultural research with its contribution of 29,038 papers which is nearly (15.9%) of the global research output of Agricultural research followed by the specific country are in China with 17,266 papers (9.4%). The most preferred journals where the International Rice Research Newsletter with 3693 papers (6.5%) followed by the Chinese Journal of Rice Science with 2069 papers (3.6%). The study revealed that out of the world India has the highest range the production of paddy. It covers India is a top level in the field of agricultural research as a part of the Indian country are ranked higher position of Tamil Nadu in southern states.

scholarly journals Can research quality be measured quantitatively? On quality of scholarship, numerical research indicators and academic publishing - experiences from Norway

2017 ◽  
Vol 195 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Richard Handley Jones
Keyword(s):  
Public Management ◽  
New Public Management ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Publication Output ◽  
Research Quality ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Academic Publishing ◽  
New Public ◽  
Assess Quality

In this article I reflect on ways in which the neoliberal university and its administrative counterpart, new public management (NPM), affect academic publishing activity. One characteristic feature of NPM is the urge to use simple numerical indicators of research output as a tool to allocate funding and, in practice if not in theory, as a means of assessing research quality. This ranges from the use of journal impact factors (IF) and ranking of journals to publication points to determine what types of work in publishing is counted as meritorious for funding allocation. I argue that it is a fallacy to attempt to assess quality of scholarship through quantitative measures of publication output. I base my arguments on my experiences of editing a Norwegian geographical journal over a period of 16 years, along with my experiences as a scholar working for many years within the Norwegian university system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document