scholarly journals Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-61
Author(s):  
Fatih Demirci ◽  
Samet Tekin
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Scanning Electron

Aim: In this in vitro study, the effect of two adhesive systems applied to surfaces of different polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a composite resin was compared. Methodology: Eighty PEEK specimens were divided into four groups (n=20): Unfilled PEEK (UF), carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR), glass-fiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR), and ceramic-reinforced PEEK (CR). Each group was further divided into two subgroups (n=10): Visio.link (VL) and Single Bond Universal (SB). The specimens with 8-mm diameter and 5-mm thickness were prepared. SBS was examined using a universal testing machine. Results were statistically analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification. Surface properties were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The surface properties of the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).  Results: Effect of different PEEK and adhesive systems on SBS was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). SBS values for CFR-VL and UF-VL groups were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and UF-SB groups (p=0.001). SBS values for the GFR-VL group were statistically more significant than that for the UF-VL group (p=0.001). SBS values for the CF-SB group were statistically more significant than those for CFR-SB and CFR-SB groups (p=0.001). Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope at 20× magnification, and adhesive and mixed failure modes were observed. Conclusion: PEEK composites with different contents and properties can be used in fixed prosthetic restorations. However, additional experimental and clinical studies are required to investigate different PEEK frameworks and composite veneers.   How to cite this article: Demirci F, Tekin S. Comparison of two adhesive systems of various polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites on the shear bond strength. Int Dent Res 2021;11(2):54-61. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.1   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

scholarly journals In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index comparing light curing and self-curing composites

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Gaby Neves ◽  
Gustavo Antônio Martins Brandão ◽  
Haroldo Amorim de Almeida ◽  
Ana Maria Martins Brandão ◽  
Dário Ribeiro de Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Scanning Electron

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in vitro, the shear bond strength of self-curing (ConciseTM - 3M and Alpha Plast - DFL) and light-curing composites (TransbondTM XT - 3M and Natural Ortho - DFL) used in orthodontics bonding, associated to Morelli metal brackets, with further analysis of adhesive remnant index (ARI) and enamel condition in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS: Forty human premolars, just extracted and stored in physiologic solution 0.9 % were used. Randomly, these samples were divided in four groups: G1 group, the brackets were bonded with ConciseTM - 3M composite; in G2 group, Alpha Plast - DFL composite was used; in G3 group, TransbondTM XT - 3M was used; in G4 group, Natural Ortho - DFL composite was used. These groups were submitted to shear strength tests in universal testing machine, at 0.5 mm per minute speed. RESULTS: Statistical difference between G3 and G4 groups was recorded, as G4 showing higher strength resistance than G3. In the other hand, there were no statistical differences between G1, G2 and G3 and G1, G2 and G4 groups. ARI analysis showed that there was no statistical difference between the groups, and low scores were recorded among then. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed the debonding spots and the enamel surface integrity. CONCLUSIONS: Shear bond strength was satisfactory and similar between the composites, however Natural Ortho - DFL revealed best comparing to TransbondTM XT - 3M.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Rebonded with a Fluoride-Releasing and -Recharging Adhesive System

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Endo ◽  
Rieko Ozoe ◽  
Koichi Shinkai ◽  
Makiko Aoyagi ◽  
Hiroomi Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Objective: To ascertain the effects of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with a self-etching primer in comparison with two other types of adhesive system. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 premolars were collected and divided equally into three groups of 16. Each group was assigned one of three adhesive systems: Transbond XT, Transbond Plus, or a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system, Beauty Ortho Bond. Shear bond strength was measured 24 hours after bracket bonding, with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated twice after the first debonding. A universal testing machine was used to determine shear bond strengths, and bracket/adhesive failure modes were evaluated with the adhesive remnant index after each debonding. Results: At every debonding sequence, all of these three adhesive systems had a shear bond strength of 6 MPa, which is a minimum requirement for clinical use. Transbond XT and Transbond Plus had significantly higher mean shear bond strengths than did Beauty Ortho Bond at each debonding. No significant differences in mean bond strength were observed between the three debondings in each adhesive system. Bond failure at the enamel/adhesive interface occurred more frequently in Beauty Ortho Bond than in Transbond XT or Transbond Plus. Conclusions: The fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with the self-etching primer (Beauty Ortho Bond) had clinically sufficient shear bond strength in repeated bracket bonding; this finding can help orthodontists to decrease the risk of damage to enamel at debonding.

scholarly journals Reparability of Aged Silorane With Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite: Micro-Shear Bond Strength and Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Giachetti ◽  
D Scaminaci Russo ◽  
M Baldini ◽  
C Goracci ◽  
M Ferrari
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Intermediate Layer ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation ◽  
Scanning Electron

Clinical Relevance Aged silorane composite restorations can be repaired with a methacrylate-based resin composite by using a phosphate-methacrylate–based adhesive as the intermediate layer.

scholarly journals Antibacterial and Bonding Properties of Universal Adhesive Dental Polymers Doped with Pyrogallol

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1538
Author(s):  
Naji Kharouf ◽  
Ammar Eid ◽  
Louis Hardan ◽  
Rim Bourgi ◽  
Youri Arntz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
The Other ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Bonding Properties ◽  
Morphological Differences ◽  
Scanning Electron

This study investigated the antibacterial activity, bond strength to dentin (SBS), and ultra-morphology of the polymer–dentin interface of experimental adhesive systems doped with pyrogallol (PY), which is a ubiquitous phenolic moiety that is present in flavonoids and polyphenols. A universal adhesive containing 4-META and 10-MDP was used in this study. PY behaves as an antioxidant and anti-cancerogenic agent and it was incorporated into the adhesive at different concentrations (0.5 and 1 wt.%). The antibacterial activity and SBS were analyzed and the results were statistically analyzed. The ultra-morphology of the polymer–dentin interface was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At 24 h, a lower antibacterial activity was observed for the control adhesive compared to those with 0.5% and 1% PY. No difference was seen in SBS between the three groups at 24 h. After 6 months, the SBS of the 0.5% PY adhesive was significantly lower than the other tested adhesives. The specimens created with 1% PY adhesive presented a higher bond strength at six months compared with that found at 24 h. No morphological differences were found at the polymer–dentin interfaces of the tested adhesives. Pyrogallol may be incorporated into modern universal adhesive systems to preserve the polymer–dentin bonding interface and confer a certain degree of antibacterial activity.

scholarly journals Effect of Bleaching and Ca(OH)2 Dressing on the Bond Strength of Fiberglass Posts to Root Dentine

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 335-342
Author(s):  
Iane Souza Nery-Silva ◽  
Gabriela Rover ◽  
Maybell Tedesco ◽  
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ◽  
Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Multiple Comparison Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Frequent Failure ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Scanning Electron

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the intracoronary bleaching and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) dressing use, on the bond strength (BS) of fiberglass posts to root dentine. Materials and Methods After root canal filling of 40 bovine incisors, a 2-mm thick cervical plug was fabricated 2 mm below the cementum–enamel junction. Seven days later, teeth were randomly distributed into four groups (n = 10), as follows: G1 no bleaching, followed by immediate post cementation; G2 bleaching and immediate post cementation; G3 bleaching, dressing with Ca(OH)2 for 7 days, and post cementation; and G4 bleaching, no dressing, and post cementation after 7 days. The roots were transversally cut into 1-mm thick slices to perform the push-out test (0.5 mm/min). Failure modes were assessed under scanning electron microscopy. Statistical Analysis The analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was performed, followed by the supplementary Tukey multiple comparison test (a = 5%). Results No significant difference for BS was observed among groups. Considering the different root thirds, G1 had higher BS values for the cervical third in comparison with the apical one (p < 0.05). The most frequent failure modes were adhesive between cement/dentine (G1); cohesive at the post (G2 and G3), and mixed (G4). Conclusions The BS of the fiberglass posts to root dentine was not affected by the intracoronary bleaching and the use of Ca(OH)2 dressing.

scholarly journals Surface Characteristics, Fluoride Release and Bond Strength Evaluation of Four Orthodontic Adhesives

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 3578
Author(s):  
Mihaela Pastrav ◽  
Andrea Maria Chisnoiu ◽  
Ovidiu Pastrav ◽  
Codruta Sarosi ◽  
Doina Pordan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Atomic Force Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Orthodontic Adhesives ◽  
Atomic Force ◽  
Scanning Electron

Orthodontic adhesives have similar properties in terms of fluoride release, roughness, shear bond strength or cement debris for specific clinical conditions. Three commercial consecrated orthodontic adhesives (Opal Seal®, Blugloo®, Light Bond®) were compared with an experimental orthodontic material (C1). Brackets were bonded to enamel using a self-etch technique followed by adhesive application and then de-bonded 60 days later. Share bond strength evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and fluoride release analysis were performed. The highest amount of daily and cumulative fluoride release was obtained for the experimental material, while the lowest value was observed for Opal Seal®. The materials evaluated in the current study presented adequate shear bond strength, with the experimental material having a mean value higher than Opal Seal and Blugloo. The atomic force microscopy measurements indicated that the smoothest initial sample is Opal Seal® followed by Light Bond®. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation indicated different aspects of cement debris on the enamel and/or bracket surface, according to the type of adhesive. The experimental material C1 presented adequate properties in terms of shear bond strength, fluoride release, roughness and enamel characteristics after de-bonding, compared to the commercial materials. Under these circumstances, it can be considered for clinical testing.

scholarly journals Resistance to Dislodgement of REBILDA® Post System to Intraradicular Dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Daphne Ross DDS ◽  
Carlos E. Filloy Esna DDS ◽  
Juan Carlos Ramírez-Barrantes DDS, MSD, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Root Reinforcement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Group 1

Currently there is controversy in the literature about clinical and adhesive effectiveness with respect to adhesive systems aimed to  root reinforcement. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the Push-Out bond strength between the Rebilda® post system and the intraradicular dentine. Thus, 28 unirradicular teeth were used, cut and standardized in 16 mm. The root segments were submitted to endodontic treatment; and then randomly divided into two groups, Group 1 (n = 14): Rebilda® DC + Futurabond DC; Group 2 (n = 14): RelyX ARC + Adper Scothbond Multipurpose Plus. Ten specimens from each group were submitted  to the Push-Out Test. The remaining 4 specimens from each group were prepared for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in order to evaluate the formation of resinous extensions at the post-cement-dentin interface. Group 2 showed better results when compared to Group 1 regarding bond strength and in formation of resinous extensions or tags, but there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). It was concluded that the REBILDA® Post System promotes adequate bond strength to intraradicular dentin.

Bonding performance of different adhesive systems to deproteinized dentin: Microtensile bond strength and scanning electron microscopy

2005 ◽  
Vol 75B (1) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Barbosa de Souza ◽  
Cláudio Heliomar Vicente Silva ◽  
Regina Guenka Palma Dibb ◽  
Carina Sincler Delfino ◽  
Lúcia Carneiro de Souza Beatrice
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Performance ◽  
Scanning Electron
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document