scholarly journals Comperative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest Methods with the Referance Broth Microdilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Colistin Among Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-527
Author(s):  
Selin Uğraklı ◽  
Metin Doğan
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Vitek 2

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Clinical Systems for Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Gram-Negative Bacteria in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhu ◽  
Peiyao Jia ◽  
Menglan Zhou ◽  
Jingjia Zhang ◽  
Ge Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Vitek 2 ◽  
Clinical Systems

ObjectivesThe performance of mainstream commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems on polymyxins has not been well evaluated in China. In this study, three antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems were evaluated for polymyxin B and colistin.MethodsThe MICs of 257 Gram-negative strains collected from clinical cases and livestock were determined and analyzed. Using Broth Microdilution as the gold standard, the performance of VITEK 2® COMPACT, PhoenixTM M50, and Bio-kont AST System were evaluated. Essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) were calculated for comparison. The results of mcr-1 positive strains were separately discussed.ResultsThe EA, CA, VME, and ME to polymyxin B for Bio-kont were 83.5, 95.6, 13.1, and 0.6%, respectively. The EAs, CAs, VMEs, and MEs to colistin were as follows: Bio-kont, 86.7%/96.5%/7.2%/1.7%; Vitek 2, 64.2%/86.8%/41.0%/0%, and Phoenix M50, 92.9%/92.9%/21.7%/0%. The performance of Bio-kont to polymyxin B and colistin for Pseudomonas spp. (EA, CA < 90%, VME > 1.5%, ME = 5.6%/10%) and Enterobacter spp. (EA, CA < 90%, VME > 1.5% and ME = 0%), Vitek to colistin for most genera, and Phoenix to colistin for Enterobacter spp. (EA, CA < 90%, VME > 1.5%, ME = 0%) were unsatisfactory compared with other genera. The performance of Bio-kont to polymyxins for Escherichia spp. and Phoenix to colistin for Citrobacter spp., Escherichia spp., and Klebsiella spp., which all met the CLSI standard, were satisfactory. When the susceptibility of mcr-1 positive E. coli was tested, Bio-kont and Phoenix M50 presented excellent performance with no category errors, while Vitek 2 performed a high VME (25.5%).ConclusionWith relatively more accurate results for polymyxin B and colistin and lower VME, Bio-kont has an advantage in polymyxin antimicrobial susceptibility testing, especially for Escherichia spp., Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp. and Acinetobacter spp.

Occurrence of Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli and Their In Vitro Susceptibility Pattern by Vitek 2 at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital – An Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 429-434
Author(s):  
Atit Dineshchandra Shah ◽  
Urvashi Natubhai Limbachia ◽  
Bhavin K. Prajapati ◽  
Lata Patel ◽  
Dharati Tusharbhai Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Vitek 2

BACKGROUND Non fermenting gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) are a group of heterogenous, aerobic and non-sporing saprophytic bacteria, found as commensals in humans and other animals primarily causing opportunistic healthcare-associated infections. They are innately resistant to many antibiotics and are known to acquire resistance by various mechanisms. They pose a particular difficulty for the healthcare community because multidrug resistance is common and increasing among them and a number of strains have now been identified that exhibit pan drug resistance. This study was conducted to isolate and identify various non-fermenter gram negative bacilli (NFGNB), to study their antibiotic sensitivity pattern and their clinical significance from various clinical samples. METHODS A study was undertaken from March 2019 to February 2020 to isolate NFGNB from various clinical samples received for culture and sensitivity in the department of microbiology in a tertiary care hospital, Ahmedabad. Non lactose fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar plates were further processed by Vitek 2 to identify them and to study their antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). RESULTS A total of 2010 NFGNB were isolated from various clinical samples and their AST was evaluated by Vitek 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (52.7 %) and Acinetobacter baumannii (36.5 %) were the most common NFGNB isolated. Carbapenem resistance was 93 % for Acinetobacter species and 61 % for Pseudomonas species. CONCLUSIONS Accurate and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of NFGNB help in early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and proper management of patients thereby help in reducing emergence of MDR strains of NFGNB, mortality and overall hospital stay. KEYWORDS NFGNB – Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli, Multidrug Resistance, Pan Drug Resistance, Carbapenem Resistance

scholarly journals Comparative performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Rampacci ◽  
Michele Trotta ◽  
Caterina Fani ◽  
Serenella Silvestri ◽  
Valentina Stefanetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius ◽  
Cutaneous Infections ◽  
Vitek 2

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the primary cause of canine cutaneous infections and sporadically isolated as pathogen from humans. Rapidly emerging antibiotic-resistant strains are creating serious health concern so that accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial for patient care. Here, the performances of AST methods Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion (DD) and Broth Microdilution (BMD) were compared for the determination of susceptibility of 79 S. pseudintermedius isolates from canine cutaneous infections and one from human pyoderma to oxacillin (OXA), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), gentamicin (GEN), enrofloxacin (ENR), doxycycline (DOX), clindamycin (CLI), inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), mupirocin (MUP) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Overall, the agreement of DD and Vitek-2 using veterinary AST-GP80 card with reference BMD was ≥ 90%, suggesting reliable AST performances. While DD generated mainly minor errors and one major error for OXA, Vitek-2 produced one very major error for GEN and it failed in identifying one ICR-positive isolate. Moreover, five bacteria were diagnosed as ICR-positive by Vitek-2 but they showed a non-induction resistance phenotype by manual methods. All S. pseudintermedius were interpreted as susceptible or intermediately susceptible to DOX using CLSI breakpoints for human staphylococci that match the DOX concentration range included in AST-GP80. However, this could lead to inappropriate antimicrobial prescription for S. pseudintermedius infections in companion animals. Considering the clinical and epidemiological importance of S. pseudintermedius , we encourage updating action by the system manufacturer to address AST for this bacterium.

scholarly journals Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Zappavigna ◽  
Enrica Cavatorta ◽  
Rossana Chiarabini ◽  
Roberta Schiavo ◽  
Daniela Padrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

scholarly journals Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison of Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01649-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paul Morris ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Tsigedera Tekle ◽  
John A. Fissel ◽  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Alternative Approach

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of cefiderocol poses challenges because of its unique mechanism of action (i.e., requiring an iron-depleted state) and due to differences in interpretative criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Our objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for AST of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol AST was performed on consecutive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; 58 isolates) and non-glucose-fermenting GNB (50 isolates) by BMD (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and DD (30 μg; research-use-only [RUO] MASTDISCS and FDA-cleared HardyDisks). Results were interpreted using FDA (prior to 28 September 2020 update), EUCAST, and investigational CLSI breakpoints (BPs). Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were calculated for DD methods. The susceptibilities of all isolates by BMD were 72% (FDA), 75% (EUCAST) and 90% (CLSI). For DD methods, EUCAST BPs demonstrated lower susceptibility at 65% and 66%, compared to 74% and 72% (FDA) and 87% and 89% (CLSI) by HardyDisks and MASTDISCS, respectively. CA ranged from 75% to 90%, with 8 to 25% mE, 0 to 19% ME, and 0 to 20% VME and varied based on disk, GNB, and BPs evaluated. Both DD methods performed poorly for Acinetobacter baumannii complex. There is considerable variability when cefiderocol ASTs are interpreted using CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints. DD offers a convenient alternative approach to BMD methods for cefiderocol AST, with the exception of A. baumannii complex isolates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document