Poetry and Philosophy: Four Pillars of Tradition
– A Comparative Study of Discourses
It is now a very well known truth that poetry and philosophy are not, and have never been, linked through a stable algorithm1. Any discussion of the two must, then, inevitably start with the historical and synchronic diversity of poetic output, on the one hand, and with the diversity of philosophical concepts, languages, and world models, on the other. Other forms of poetry and philosophy have developed outside Europe and the Mediterranean world – in Islamic, Eastern, and Native American cultures – and must be also taken into account, with all their different rules and relations. It is also necessary to remember that poetry shapes its attitude towards philosophy by shaping its own relation to itself, while philosophy does a similar thing: it shapes its attitude towards poetry by shaping a relation to itself. In other words we can say that in poetry philosophy functions most often as a poetical argument, while in philosophy poetry works as a philosophical argument. The author of the article focuses on relations between literature and philosophy, and their tradiotions such as Plato's ideas, Giambattista Vico's concepts, Frierdich Schlegel's and Novalis's practice, Hegel's convictions and Wilhelm Dilthay works.