scholarly journals Introduction and preparation of an objective structured clinical examination in family medicine for undergraduate students at the University of Split

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Irena Zakarija-Grković
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
The University

scholarly journals Impact of a Hands-on Knee Exam Workshop on Medical Student Clinical Examination Scores

PRiMER ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Miniato ◽  
Paul Schaefer ◽  
David Weldy
Keyword(s):  
Medical Student ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Techniques ◽  
Hands On ◽  
The Family ◽  
The University

Introduction: The goal of this research project was to retrospectively evaluate the effect of a voluntary hands-on musculoskeletal knee exam workshop, presented to medical students in the family medicine rotation at the University of Toledo, on the outcomes of a required objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Methods: We analyzed student OSCE scores for both knee and back exams before (July 2011 to June 2012) and after (August 2013 to June 2015) the workshop was offered. The analysis was based on those who attended the voluntary knee exam workshop and those who did not. We compared scores between the two groups of students using two-tailed t testing and χ2 testing, and assessed the correlation of attending the workshop to passing the knee OSCE. Results: One hundred eighty-seven students attended the workshop and 279 did not. During the period when the workshop was offered, the overall mean score on the knee OSCE was 59.5% for the 187 who attended the workshop and 35.9% for the 116 who did not, which was significantly different (P<.001). A χ2 test with α=0.05 showed that attending the workshop correlated with completing at least 70% of maneuvers acceptably during the knee OSCE (P<.001). Conclusions: Our study yielded positive outcomes on OSCE scores, comparable to other studies that investigated the effect of similar teaching techniques. Comparison of the scores of those who attended the knee workshop on the simpler back exam OSCE, in which no workshop was offered, demonstrated the efficacy of the workshop.

scholarly journals The Effect of Psychology Objective Structured Clinical Examination Scenarios Presentation Order on Students Autonomic Stress Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bellido-Esteban ◽  
Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco ◽  
Pablo Ruisoto-Palomera ◽  
Pantelis T. Nikolaidis ◽  
Beat Knechtle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Response ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Presentation Order ◽  
Bachelor's Degree ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Autonomic Response ◽  
Psychology Programs

The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a method for assessment clinical competencies and skills. However, there is a need to improve its design in psychology programs. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the different scenario's presentation order with different complexity/difficulty on the autonomic stress response of undergraduate students undergoing a Psychology OSCE. A total of 32 students of Psychology Bachelor's Degree (23.4 ± 2.5 years) were randomly selected and assigned to two OSCE scenarios of different complexity. While undergoing the scenarios, participants heart rate variability was analyzed as an indicator of participant's stress autonomic response. Results indicate that the order of presentation of different complexity/difficulty scenarios affects the autonomic stress response of undergraduate Psychology students undergoing an OSCE. Students who underwent the high-complexity scenario (difficult) first, reported significantly higher autonomic stress response than students who began the OSCE with the low-complexity scenario (easy). Highly complex or difficult scenarios require good executive functions or cognitive control, very sensitive to autonomic stress responses. Therefore, OSCE design will benefit from placing easy scenarios first.

A ‘Fair Play’? Comparison of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination of Final Year Medical Students Training in Psychiatry and their Supervisors' Appraisals

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Melding ◽  
John Coverdale ◽  
Elizabeth Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Good Method ◽  
Previous Method ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Written Test ◽  
Method Of Evaluation ◽  
The University

Objective: Expected standards for student performance in psychiatry can vary between supervisors and institutions. Recently, the University of Auckland required its academic departments to have an objective standard assessment or test for each student on a clinical attachment. We aimed to compare an objective structured clinical examination of final year medical students training in psychiatry and their supervisors' appraisals. Method: Assessment in psychiatry initially consisted of a two-hour written test. Subsequently, the test in psychiatry changed to a standardised, modified, objective, structured, clinical examination (OSCE) using simulated patients. The clinical supervisor rated each student on a set of clinical parameters using a scale of 1-6. In addition, members of the academic department of psychiatry separately tested the students with a modified OSCE on the last day of their clinical attachment. The results of the OSCE are compared with clinical attachment assessments and the previous method of evaluation, the written test. Results: There was no correlation between the written test and the supervisor's assessment for the clinical attachment indicating that the written test was not a good method of evaluating student performance. The correlation between the clinical attachment grading and the OSCE for year 1 was 0.4 (p=0.002) and for year 2 was 0.5 (p=0.001). However, marks for the OSCE were consistently lower than those given for the clinical attachment. Conclusions: The introduction of the modified OSCE had the desired outcome of changing students' focus from the pursuit of theoretical knowledge to the attainment of practical skills.

Assessing Nursing Students’ Clinical Competencies Using a Problem-Focused Objective Structured Clinical Examination

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuemei Zhu ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Ping Lin ◽  
Guizhi Lu ◽  
Ningning Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Standardized Patients ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Competencies ◽  
Graduation Examination ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Technical Operation

The objectives of this study were to develop, implement, and evaluate an innovative modified Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) model, and to compare students’ performance of different clinical skills as assessed by standardized patients and OSCE examiners. Data were obtained from final year undergraduate students undergoing the modified OSCE as a graduation examination. Seventy-seven students rotated through four stations (nine substations). Standardized patients scored students higher than examiners in history taking (9.14 ± 0.92 vs. 8.42 ± 0.85), response to emergency event (8.88 ± 1.12 vs. 7.62 ± 1.54), executive medical orders (8.77 ± 0.96 vs. 8.25 ± 1.43), technical operation (18.21 ± 1.26 vs. 16.91 ± 1.35), nursing evaluation (4.53 ± 0.28 vs. 4.29 ± 0.52), and health education stations (13.79 ± 1.31 vs. 11.93 ± 2.25; p < .01). In addition, the results indicated that the difference between standardized patient and examiner scores for physical examination skills was nonsignificant (8.70 ± 1.18 vs. 8.80 ± 1.27; p > .05). The modified, problem-focused, and nursing process–driven OSCE model effectively assessed nursing students’ clinical competencies, and clinical and critical thinking.

scholarly journals Examining validity and reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students: a descriptive study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Kolivand ◽  
Marzieh Esfandyari ◽  
Sousan Heydarpour
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Practical Skills ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation is one of the main pillars of medical education. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination is one of the commonly adopted practical tools to evaluate clinical and practical skills of medical students. Validity and reliability of the tool to evaluate clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students in Kermanshah Midwifery Nursing School were examined. METHODS: Seven clinical skills were evaluated in this descriptive correlative study using a performance checklist. Thirty-two midwifery students performed the skills at seven stations each monitored by an observer using an evaluation checklist. Criterion-related validity was obtained through determining the correlation between the clinical courses point and the Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation score. The collected data was analyzed in SPSS (v.20) and logistic regression test. RESULTS: The correlation score of Objective Structured Clinical Examination was significantly related to the mean score of clinical course “Normal Pregnancy I” (0.319, p=0.075), the mean score of clinical course “Normal and Abnormal delivery I” (0.399, p=0.024), the mean score of clinical course “gynaecology “ (0.419, p=0.017) and total average scores(0.23, p=0.200). The correlation between the total score and mean score of students at the stations showed that out of the seven stations, the correlations of the stations three (communication and collecting medical history) and four (childbirth) were not significant. CONCLUSION: Although it appeared that Objective Structured Clinical Examination was one of the effective and efficient ways to evaluate clinical competencies and practical skills of students, the tool could not evaluate all the aspects.

scholarly journals Assessment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine Clinical Practice Using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-226
Author(s):  
Eunbyul Cho ◽  
Ju-Hyun Lee ◽  
O Sang Kwon ◽  
Jiseong Hong ◽  
Nam Geun Cho
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Auricular Acupuncture ◽  
Flipped Learning ◽  
Acupuncture And Moxibustion

Background: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a widely used method to assess the clinical performance of students in clinical practice. Although OSCE has been used for undergraduate students of Korean medicine, this has not been widely reported. Methods: In 2020, the practical course for acupuncture and moxibustion medicine (acupuncture, electroacupuncture, pharmacopuncture, auricular acupuncture, and burning acupuncture) was taught using flipped learning, according to clinical practice guidelines, and assessed by the OSCE. The appropriateness of this model of education and its evaluation using OSCE were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, and the results were analyzed. Results: Of the respondents, 67% reported that the OSCE accurately reflected their competency, and 82% reported that online video lectures helped them to improve their clinical skills. The average adequacy score of the model was > 3.7/5, and the average adequacy score of the checklist used in the OSCE was > 4.1/5 for all 5 clinical application skills. The difference in the mean self-efficacy score between students who had taken the OSCE and those students who had not taken the OSCE, was highest in the burning acupuncture group (0.923). Conclusion: This study showed that students’ satisfaction with the OSCE was high and flipped learning was an effective education model. In the future, models representing the human body or simulated patients should be used to evaluate students’ skills and attitude.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document