scholarly journals Recent Perspectives in Radiation-Mediated DNA Damage and Repair: Role of NHEJ and Alternative Pathways

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Sharma ◽  
Priyanka Shaw ◽  
Aman Kalonia ◽  
M.H. Yashavarddhan ◽  
Pankaj Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Alternative Nhej

Radiation is one of the causative agents for the induction of DNA damage in biological systems. There is various possibility of radiation exposure that might be natural, man-made, intentional, or non-intentional. Published literature indicates that radiation mediated cell death is primarily due to DNA damage that could be a single-strand break, double-strand breaks, base modification, DNA protein cross-links. The double-strand breaks are lethal damage due to the breakage of both strands of DNA. Mammalian cells are equipped with strong DNA repair pathways that cover all types of DNA damage. One of the predominant pathways that operate DNA repair is a non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) that has various integrated molecules that sense, detect, mediate, and repair the double-strand breaks. Even after a well-coordinated mechanism, there is a strong possibility of mutation due to the flexible nature in joining the DNA strands. There are alternatives to NHEJ pathways that can repair DNA damage. These pathways are alternative NHEJ pathways and single-strand annealing pathways that also displayed a role in DNA repair. These pathways are not studied extensively, and many reports are showing the relevance of these pathways in human diseases. The chapter will very briefly cover the radiation, DNA repair, and Alternative repair pathways in the mammalian system. The chapter will help the readers to understand the basic and applied knowledge of radiation mediated DNA damage and its repair in the context of extensively studied NHEJ pathways and unexplored alternative NHEJ pathways.

scholarly journals ATM antagonizes NHEJ proteins assembly and DNA-ends synapsis at single-ended DNA double strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9710-9723
Author(s):  
Sébastien Britton ◽  
Pauline Chanut ◽  
Christine Delteil ◽  
Nadia Barboule ◽  
Philippe Frit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Strand ◽  
Dna Ends

Abstract Two DNA repair pathways operate at DNA double strand breaks (DSBs): non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), that requires two adjacent DNA ends for ligation, and homologous recombination (HR), that resects one DNA strand for invasion of a homologous duplex. Faithful repair of replicative single-ended DSBs (seDSBs) is mediated by HR, due to the lack of a second DNA end for end-joining. ATM stimulates resection at such breaks through multiple mechanisms including CtIP phosphorylation, which also promotes removal of the DNA-ends sensor and NHEJ protein Ku. Here, using a new method for imaging the recruitment of the Ku partner DNA-PKcs at DSBs, we uncover an unanticipated role of ATM in removing DNA-PKcs from seDSBs in human cells. Phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs on the ABCDE cluster is necessary not only for DNA-PKcs clearance but also for the subsequent MRE11/CtIP-dependent release of Ku from these breaks. We propose that at seDSBs, ATM activity is necessary for the release of both Ku and DNA-PKcs components of the NHEJ apparatus, and thereby prevents subsequent aberrant interactions between seDSBs accompanied by DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation and detrimental commitment to Lig4-dependent end-joining.

scholarly journals DROSHA is recruited to DNA damage sites by the MRN complex to promote non-homologous end-joining

2021 ◽  
pp. jcs.249706
Author(s):  
Matteo Cabrini ◽  
Marco Roncador ◽  
Alessandro Galbiati ◽  
Lina Cipolla ◽  
Antonio Maffia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade that recognizes DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and promotes their resolution via the DNA repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) or Homologous Recombination (HR). We and others have shown that DDR activation requires DROSHA. However, whether DROSHA exerts its functions by associating with damage sites, what controls its recruitment and how DROSHA influences DNA repair, remains poorly understood. Here we show that DROSHA associates to DSBs independently from transcription. Neither H2AX, nor ATM nor DNA-PK kinase activities are required for its recruitment to break site. Rather, DROSHA interacts with RAD50 and inhibition of MRN by Mirin treatment abolishes this interaction. MRN inactivation by RAD50 knockdown or mirin treatment prevents DROSHA recruitment to DSB and, as a consequence, also 53BP1 recruitment. During DNA repair, DROSHA inactivation reduces NHEJ and boosts HR frequency. Indeed, DROSHA knockdown also increase the association of downstream HR factors such as RAD51 to DNA ends. Overall, our results demonstrate that DROSHA is recruited at DSBs by the MRN complex and direct DNA repair toward NHEJ.

The Leukemic Fusion Gene NUP98-HOXD13 Suppresses Non-Homologous End Joining Factors and Impairs DNA Double Strand Break Repair

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
David L. Caudell ◽  
Abdul Gafoor A. Puthiyaveetil
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
B Lymphocytes ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Class Switch ◽  
Induction Pattern ◽  
Dna Break ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract Abstract 521 Chromosomal translocations are hallmark features of hematologic malignancies that often require collaborating mutations for malignant transformation. These secondary mutations can occur spontaneously, or rather, be induced by the primary translocation. Mutations can occur as a result of DNA damage and misrepair with DNA double strand breaks being one of the most serious types of cell damage. Double strand breaks are classically repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mechanism and impaired NHEJ has been shown to promote mutagenesis. Transgenic mice expressing the myeloid leukemic fusion gene NUP98-HOXD13 (NHD13) develop Myelodysplastic syndrome and progress to acute leukemia after acquiring secondary mutations. Our studies have shown that B lymphocyte development and class switch recombination are impaired in stimulated B lymphocytes from NHD13 mice. Based on this, we used in vitro class switch recombination (CSR) to delineate the DNA break induction and repair mechanisms in NHD13 B lymphocytes. Naïve B lymphocytes were harvested from wild type (WT) and NHD13 spleens and cultured in the presence of E.coli Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IL-4 to induce CSR. The DNA break induction pattern was determined using phosphorylated H2AX labeling combined with confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Our results showed that NHD13 B lymphocytes had a comparable break induction pattern, but significantly reduced DNA repair. Analysis of the cell cycle pattern of stimulated B cells at 24 hour intervals showed cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase at 72 hours following stimulation—a hallmark feature of impaired DNA break repair. We analyzed the expression of classical NHEJ and alternative end joining factors including Ku70, Ku80, DNA Protein Kinase catalytic subunit (DNAPKcs), Xrcc4, DNA ligase 4, Ligase 1, and Ligase 3. Our results showed reduced expression of DNAPKcs, Ligase 4 and Xrcc4 in NHD13 B lymphocytes at 72 hours following stimulation, suggesting that cells failed to initiate NHEJ-mediated DNA repair. Our results suggest that a myeloid leukemic gene can impair the DNA repair mechanism and may indirectly promote mutations necessary for malignant transformation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Telomeric Double Strand Breaks in G1 Human Cells Facilitate Formation of 5′ C-Rich Overhangs and Recruitment of TERRA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Nelson ◽  
Taghreed M. Alturki ◽  
Jared J. Luxton ◽  
Lynn E. Taylor ◽  
David G. Maranon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Alternative Lengthening ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
G1 Cells

Telomeres, repetitive nucleoprotein complexes that protect chromosomal termini and prevent them from activating inappropriate DNA damage responses (DDRs), shorten with cell division and thus with aging. Here, we characterized the human cellular response to targeted telomeric double-strand breaks (DSBs) in telomerase-positive and telomerase-independent alternative lengthening of telomere (ALT) cells, specifically in G1 phase. Telomeric DSBs in human G1 cells elicited early signatures of a DDR; however, localization of 53BP1, an important regulator of resection at broken ends, was not observed at telomeric break sites. Consistent with this finding and previously reported repression of classical non-homologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) at telomeres, evidence for c-NHEJ was also lacking. Likewise, no evidence of homologous recombination (HR)-dependent repair of telomeric DSBs in G1 was observed. Rather, and supportive of rapid truncation events, telomeric DSBs in G1 human cells facilitated formation of extensive tracks of resected 5′ C-rich telomeric single-stranded (ss)DNA, a previously proposed marker of the recombination-dependent ALT pathway. Indeed, induction of telomeric DSBs in human ALT cells resulted in significant increases in 5′ C-rich (ss)telomeric DNA in G1, which rather than RPA, was bound by the complementary telomeric RNA, TERRA, presumably to protect these exposed ends so that they persist into S/G2 for telomerase-mediated or HR-dependent elongation, while also circumventing conventional repair pathways. Results demonstrate the remarkable adaptability of telomeres, and thus they have important implications for persistent telomeric DNA damage in normal human G1/G0 cells (e.g., lymphocytes), as well as for therapeutically relevant targets to improve treatment of ALT-positive tumors.

scholarly journals SIRT6 is a DNA Double-Strand Break Sensor

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lior Onn ◽  
Miguel Portillo ◽  
Stefan Ilic ◽  
Gal Cleitman ◽  
Daniel Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Road ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractDNA double strand breaks are the most deleterious type of DNA damage. In this work, we show that SIRT6 directly recognizes DNA damage through a tunnel-like structure, with high affinity for double strand breaks. It relocates to sites of damage independently of signalling and known sensors and activates downstream signalling cascades for double strand break repair by triggering ATM recruitment, H2AX phosphorylation and the recruitment of proteins of the Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining pathways. Our findings indicate that SIRT6 plays a previously uncharacterized role as DNA damage sensor, which is critical for initiating the DNA damage response (DDR). Moreover, other Sirtuins share some DSB binding capacity and DDR activation. SIRT6 activates the DDR, before the repair pathway is chosen, and prevents genomic instability. Our findings place SIRT6 at the top of the DDR and pave the road to dissect the contributions of distinct double strand break sensors in downstream signalling.

scholarly journals Persistent DNA Repair Signaling and DNA Polymerase Theta Promote Broken Chromosome Segregation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E Clay ◽  
Heidi S Bretscher ◽  
Erin Jezuit ◽  
Korie Bush ◽  
Donald T Fox
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Alternative End Joining ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Cycling cells must respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Mis-segregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early-acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) to DSBs. This machinery persists as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a step-wise manner during mitosis. Repair signaling kinetics at DSBs depends on both monoubiquitination of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 and the alternative end- joining protein DNA Polymerase Theta. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.

scholarly journals The Determinant of DNA Repair Pathway Choices in Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Chengyu Bao ◽  
Yuxuan Shang ◽  
Xinye He ◽  
Chiyuan Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ionising Radiation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Pathways

Ionising radiation- (IR-) induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the deleterious DNA lesions that pose a serious threat to genomic stability. The major DNA repair pathways, including classical nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing, and alternative end joining, play critical roles in countering and eliciting IR-induced DSBs to ensure genome integrity. If the IR-induced DNA DSBs are not repaired correctly, the residual or incorrectly repaired DSBs can result in genomic instability that is associated with certain human diseases. Although many efforts have been made in investigating the major mechanisms of IR-induced DNA DSB repair, it is still unclear what determines the choices of IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanisms of IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices can operate in irradiated cells. We first briefly describe the main mechanisms of the major DNA DSB repair pathways and the related key repair proteins. Based on our understanding of the characteristics of IR-induced DNA DSBs and the regulatory mechanisms of DSB repair pathways in irradiated cells and recent advances in this field, We then highlight the main factors and associated challenges to determine the IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices. We conclude that the type and distribution of IR-induced DSBs, chromatin state, DNA-end structure, and DNA-end resection are the main determinants of the choice of the IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathway.

scholarly journals Altered DNA ligase activity in human disease

Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan E Tomkinson ◽  
Tasmin Naila ◽  
Seema Khattri Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ligase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ligases ◽  
Ligase Iv ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract The joining of interruptions in the phosphodiester backbone of DNA is critical to maintain genome stability. These breaks, which are generated as part of normal DNA transactions, such as DNA replication, V(D)J recombination and meiotic recombination as well as directly by DNA damage or due to DNA damage removal, are ultimately sealed by one of three human DNA ligases. DNA ligases I, III and IV each function in the nucleus whereas DNA ligase III is the sole enzyme in mitochondria. While the identification of specific protein partners and the phenotypes caused either by genetic or chemical inactivation have provided insights into the cellular functions of the DNA ligases and evidence for significant functional overlap in nuclear DNA replication and repair, different results have been obtained with mouse and human cells, indicating species-specific differences in the relative contributions of the DNA ligases. Inherited mutations in the human LIG1 and LIG4 genes that result in the generation of polypeptides with partial activity have been identified as the causative factors in rare DNA ligase deficiency syndromes that share a common clinical symptom, immunodeficiency. In the case of DNA ligase IV, the immunodeficiency is due to a defect in V(D)J recombination whereas the cause of the immunodeficiency due to DNA ligase I deficiency is not known. Overexpression of each of the DNA ligases has been observed in cancers. For DNA ligase I, this reflects increased proliferation. Elevated levels of DNA ligase III indicate an increased dependence on an alternative non-homologous end-joining pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks whereas elevated level of DNA ligase IV confer radioresistance due to increased repair of DNA double-strand breaks by the major non-homologous end-joining pathway. Efforts to determine the potential of DNA ligase inhibitors as cancer therapeutics are on-going in preclinical cancer models.

scholarly journals Bacterial DNA repair genes and their eukaryotic homologues: 5. The role of recombination in DNA repair and genome stability.

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anetta Nowosielska
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Immune System Development

Recombinational repair is a well conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all living organisms. Repair by homologous recombination is generally accurate as it uses undamaged homologous DNA molecule as a repair template. In Escherichia coli homologous recombination repairs both the double-strand breaks and single-strand gaps in DNA. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) can be induced upon exposure to exogenous sources such as ionizing radiation or endogenous DNA-damaging agents including reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as during natural biological processes like conjugation. However, the bulk of double strand breaks are formed during replication fork collapse encountering an unrepaired single strand gap in DNA. Under such circumstances DNA replication on the damaged template can be resumed only if supported by homologous recombination. This functional cooperation of homologous recombination with replication machinery enables successful completion of genome duplication and faithful transmission of genetic material to a daughter cell. In eukaryotes, homologous recombination is also involved in essential biological processes such as preservation of genome integrity, DNA damage checkpoint activation, DNA damage repair, DNA replication, mating type switching, transposition, immune system development and meiosis. When unregulated, recombination can lead to genome instability and carcinogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document