Effect of using black plastic film as mulch on soil temperature and moisture and potato yield

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
王红丽 WANG Hongli ◽  
张绪成 ZHANG Xucheng ◽  
于显枫 YU Xianfen ◽  
马一凡 MA Yifan ◽  
侯慧芝 HOU Huizhi
2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 2071-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sha Lu ◽  
Hongchao Zuo

AbstractPlastic mulch is a technology used worldwide to inhibit soil evaporation and increase crop yield. The properties of plastic film are significantly different from those of the soil. Plastic mulch not only significantly alters the physical attributes of the underlying surface, but also blocks the energy and mass exchanges between the land surface and the atmosphere. This latter situation has not been depicted in current land-surface models. This study develops a detailed new model, known as CoLM-mulch, by incorporating a plastic mulch–layer submodel and a dynamic parameterization scheme of surface albedo into the Common Land Model (CoLM) land-surface process model. The updated model elements are based on data collected from an experiment that examined land–atmosphere interaction at a plastic-film-covered cropland site in an arid region of northwestern China. Results suggest that the improved CoLM-mulch could reasonably simulate the diurnal variations of soil temperature and moisture, together with radiation, water, heat, and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes, on the cropland underlying a surface with a plastic film covering. The CoLM-mulch efficiency is higher, the deviations between the simulations and observations are minor, and the dynamic parameterization scheme for surface albedo is more reasonable and appropriate. Relative to CoLM simulations, the inclusion of plastic mulch with special optical properties in the model shows slight improvements in the simulations of the surface albedo and the radiation balance. By limiting the underlying soil evaporation and changing the aerodynamic resistances, plastic mulch in the model has influences on the turbulent exchanges between the atmosphere and the land surface. The soil temperature and moisture are improved by the inclusion of transparent plastic mulch in the model, which not only suppresses the CO2 generated by soil respiration, but also alters the CO2 exchange process between the canopy and the atmosphere as a result of the vegetation net assimilation controlled by the soil water and heat conditions.


HortScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 1014-1021
Author(s):  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Lisa Wasko DeVetter ◽  
Edward Scheenstra ◽  
Carol Miles

A soil-biodegradable mulch (BDM) is designed to be tilled into the soil at the end of the growing season, and is a successful alternative to polyethylene (PE) mulch if it suppresses weeds and improves soil temperature and moisture, crop yield, and fruit quality. This study compared one clear plastic BDM (COX), two black plastic BDMs (BOX and BFO), and two paper BDMs (WGP and AMX) to clear and black plastic PE mulch (CPE and BPE, respectively) for weed control, yield, and mulch adhesion of ‘Cinnamon Girl’ pie pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) in a Mediterranean climate where increased soil temperature from mulch is desirable. BDMs in this study are advertised as soil-biodegradable, and we tested functionality but not biodegradability. Mulch deterioration during the growing season was measured as percent soil exposure (PSE), and remained low at the end of the growing season for all BDM and PE treatments both years (5% on average) except COX (68%). Weed number and biomass were low early, mid, and late season for all treatments except COX in 2018 and COX and CPE in 2019. Soil temperature with PE mulches (20.7 °C on average) was similar or slightly higher than with plastic BDMs (19.8 °C on average), which was higher than with paper BDMs (18.9 °C on average). Total fruit number and yield were similar for PE mulches (19.3 and 24.5 kg, respectively) and black plastic BDMs (17.3 and 21.2 kg, respectively), which were higher than COX and paper BDMs (15.7 and 19.8 kg, respectively). Mulch adhesion occurred on fruit in all BDM treatments, with more mulch adhesion in BFO in 2018 and WGP in 2019 than in other BDM treatments each year. The number of wipes is a proxy for the impact on harvest labor and can influence overall on-farm profitability. The number of wipes to remove adhered mulch (1.2 wipes on average) was similar for fruit harvested at four times of day (0800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 hr), but more wipes were needed to remove adhered mulch when fruit were stored up to 4 hours postharvest (5.4 wipes). Number of wipes to remove adhered mulch was negatively correlated to the amount of moisture on the fruit surface (R2 = 0.31). Overall, these findings demonstrate that all black plastic and paper BDMs remained intact throughout the growing season and controlled weeds as well as black PE mulch, while clear BDM had higher weed pressure because it degraded during the growing season. Pumpkin yield was similar for black plastic BDMs and PE mulches and lower for clear and paper BDMs. However, all BDMs in this study adhered to the fruit surface and their removal became more difficult as the fruit surface dried.


1961 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. Chipman

Black plastic and sawdust mulches were applied to ridged and flat rows in a 2-year (1956–1957) study of their effect on tomato culture. Records were taken of soil temperature and moisture levels, ripe fruit to August 31, and total crop (ripe and green fruit).The highest early yield was obtained from the unmulched and sawdust plots but the heaviest total yield came from the black plastic plots. Highest soil temperature and lowest moisture readings were recorded under the black plastic, and lowest so 1 temperature and highest moisture under the sawdust.The earliest ripe fruits came from the flat rows, but the total crop was significantly higher on the ridge rows. There was no significant interaction for mulches and row type.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Manies ◽  
Jennifer Harden ◽  
William Cable ◽  
Jamie Hollingsworth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document