Findings to Date From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS)

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 946-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Schiffman ◽  
Diane Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Controversy exists in the United States regarding the proper evaluation and management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and equivocal (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS, now ASC-US]) cervical cytologic interpretations. To address this issue, the National Cancer Institute initiated the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS). ALTS is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate 3 alternative methods of management, namely, immediate colposcopy, cytologic follow-up, and triage by human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. This article summarizes the major findings of ALTS that have been published to date. Patients with ASCUS (n = 3488) or LSIL (n = 1572) were randomly assigned to research arms between November 1996 and December 1998, and were monitored for 2 years. The disease outcome was histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3/cancer. The prevalence of oncogenic HPV was too high to permit effective triage of LSIL using HPV DNA testing by Hybrid Capture 2. However, for the women referred with a cytologic interpretation of ASCUS, HPV triage proved useful, with sensitivity equivalent to immediate colposcopy and a halving of colposcopic referrals. Among older women with ASCUS, HPV testing remained sensitive for detecting CIN 3 and cancer, but the referral percentage was dramatically lower compared to younger women. ALTS yielded insight into the performance of cytology and histopathology; experienced pathologists differed significantly in their interpretations of cervical abnormalities, especially histologic CIN 1 and cytologic ASCUS. Nonetheless, it was possible to distinguish a relatively uncommon type of ASCUS, equivocal for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, that has a high positive predictive value for identifying women with underlying high-grade CIN. Many additional analyses are underway.

scholarly journals Should LSIL with ASC-H (LSIL-H) in cervical smears be an independent category? A study on SurePath™ specimens with review of literature

CytoJournal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod B Shidham ◽  
Nidhi Kumar ◽  
Raj Narayan ◽  
Gregory L Brotzman
Keyword(s):  
Current Evidence ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Cervical Smears ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
The Status ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Background Cervical smears exhibiting unequivocal features of ‘low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion’ (LSIL) are occasionally also admixed with some cells suspicious for, but not diagnostic of, ‘high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion’ (HSIL). Only a few studies, mostly reported as abstracts, have evaluated this concurrence. In this study, we evaluate the current evidence that favors a distinct category for “LSIL, cannot exclude HSIL” (LSIL-H), and suggest a management algorithm based on combinations of current ASCCP guidelines for related interpretations. Methods We studied SurePath™ preparations of cervical specimens from various institutions during one year period. Cytohisto correlation was performed in cases with cervical biopsies submitted to our institution. The status of HPV DNA testing was also noted in some LSIL-H cases with biopsy results. Results Out of 77,979 cases 1,970 interpreted as LSIL (1,523), LSIL-H (146), ‘atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL’ (ASC-H) (109), and HSIL (192) were selected. Concurrent biopsy results were available in 40% (Total 792 cases: 557 LSIL, 88 LSIL-H, 38 ASCH, and 109 HSIL). Biopsy results were grouped into A. negative for dysplasia (ND), B. low grade (HPV, CIN1, CIN1 with HPV), and C. high grade (CIN 2 and above). The positive predictive values for various biopsy results in relation to initial cytopathologic interpretation were: a. LSIL: (557 cases): ND 32% (179), low grade- 58% (323), high grade- 10% (55); b. LSIL-H: (88 cases): ND 24% (21), low grade- 43% (38), high grade- 33% (29); c. ASCH: (38 cases): ND 32% (12), low grade- 37% (14), high grade- 31% (12); d. HSIL (109 cases): ND 5% (6), low grade 26% (28), high grade 69% (75). The patterns of cervical biopsy results in cases reported as LSIL-H were compared with that observed in cases with LSIL, ASC-H, and HSIL. 94% (32 of 34) of LSIL-H were positive for high risk (HR) HPV, 1 was negative for HR HPV but positive for low risk (LR), and 1 LSIL-H was negative for HR and LR both. Conclusion LSIL-H overlapped with LSIL and ASC-H, but was distinct from HSIL. A management algorithm comparable to ASC-H and HSIL appears to be appropriate in LSIL-H cases.

Adjunctive Human Papillomavirus Testing in the 2-Year Follow-up of Women With Low-Grade Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities: A Randomized Trial and Economic Evaluation

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (9) ◽  
pp. 1169-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Lytwyn ◽  
John W. Sellors ◽  
James B. Mahony ◽  
Dean Daya ◽  
William Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Context.—Although human papillomavirus (HPV) testing may aid in managing low-grade abnormality on screening cervical cytology, patient compliance with repeat testing programs requires consideration. Objectives.—To determine effectiveness and costs of repeated Papanicolaou (Pap) test and oncogenic HPV testing for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. Design.—We conducted a randomized controlled trial of combined Pap test and cervical HPV testing by Hybrid Capture 1 test compared with Pap test alone; tests were performed every 6 months for up to 2 years. The study end point was colposcopic examination performed on all women at 2 years, or earlier if an HPV test was positive or if a Pap test showed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Setting.—Sixty-six community family practices. Participants.—Two hundred fifty-seven women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on screening cervical cytology. Main Outcome Measures.—Detection of histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3, fully allocated costs, and loss to follow-up. Results.—Combined Pap test and HPV testing detected 11 (100%) of 11 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3, whereas Pap test alone detected 7 (63.6%) of these 11 cases (P = .14); corresponding specificities were 39 (46.4%) of 84 and 45 (71.4%) of 63 (P = .005). The cost-effectiveness ratio was Can $4456 per additional case of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sixty-nine (26.8%) of the 257 women (24.6% combined group vs 29.1% Pap test only group, P = .41) defaulted from testing or from colposcopy when referred with an abnormal result. Conclusions.—Combined testing was more costly but may detect more cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 than Pap test alone. However, poor adherence limits usefulness of a management strategy that requires repeated follow-up.

scholarly journals Colposcopic triage methods for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 after cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a systematic review on diagnostic tests

2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia de Miranda Corrêa ◽  
Fábio Bastos Russomano ◽  
Caroline Alves de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oncogenic Hpv

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The age-stratified performance of the oncogenic HPV-DNA (human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid) test for triage of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) requires investigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the age-stratified performance (cutoff point: 35 years) of oncogenic HPV-DNA testing and repeated cytological tests, for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), in order to triage for LSIL. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review. Studies were identified in nine electronic databases and in the reference lists of the articles retrieved. METHODS: The eligibility criteria consisted of initial cytological findings of LSIL; subsequent oncogenic HPV-DNA testing and repeated cytological tests; and CIN3 detection. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) guidelines were used for quality assessment. Qualitative information synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Out of 7,776 studies, 284 were identified as pertinent and three fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The CIN3 prevalence ranged from 6% to 12%. The HPV-DNA positivity rate ranged from 64% to 83%; sensitivity for CIN3 detection ranged from 95.2% to 100%; and specificity was available in two studies (27% and 52%). The sensitivity of repeated cytological tests, in relation to the threshold for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), was available in two studies (33% and 90.8%); and specificity was available in one study (53%). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is no scientific evidence available that would prove that colposcopic triage using oncogenic HPV-DNA testing to detect CIN3 performs better than repeated cytological tests, among women with LSIL aged 35 years and over.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Zhe Wu ◽  
Shiyu Wang ◽  
Min Zheng ◽  
Li-Xiang Tian ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Diagnostic Utility ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Cervical Cells ◽  
Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
P16 Overexpression

Cervical liquid-based cytology plays an important role in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). However, cytological evaluation alone has a relatively low sensitive. To overcome this problem, HPV DNA testing or HPV DNA combined with cytology has been applied. HPV DNA testing significantly improved the sensitivity, but the specificity is low, especially in cancer and high-grade SIL (HSIL) cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of p16 overexpression in cervical cells of patients with HSIL and cancer. The expression of p16 was detected by immunostaining in liquid-based cells from cervical brushing in 278 patients which including: Cancer ( n = 13), HSIL ( n = 112), low-grade SIL (LSIL) ( n = 45), and Benign ( n = 108). The expression levels of p16 were significantly higher in the cancer and HSIL groups when compared with the LSIL and Benign groups ( P < 0.01). The accurate diagnostic rates of cancer and HSIL were significantly increased by p16 immunostaining plus cytology than that by cytology alone ( P < 0.01). The false negative or false positive of p16 immunostaining occurred with a unicellular pattern. With sensitivity of 96.0% and accuracy of 91.7%, the diagnostic performance of p16 immunostaining was much better than that of cytology alone with sensitivity of 36.0% and accuracy of 70.9% ( P < 0.01). p16 immunostaining in cervical brushing cells may not only be used as an ancillary tool to cytological diagnosis of cervical neoplasia but also help to distinguish HSIL from LSIL and the triage of transient infection.

Effects of Implementing the Dual Papanicolaou Test Interpretation of ASC-H and LSIL Following Bethesda 2014

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-558
Author(s):  
Abha Goyal ◽  
Ami P Patel ◽  
Thomas L Dilcher ◽  
Susan A Alperstein
Keyword(s):  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade ◽  
Hpv Test ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the impact of implementing the dual interpretation of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) after the Bethesda System 2014 and to compare it with other indeterminate interpretations. Methods Rates of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity and histologic follow-up and the proportion of women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on histologic follow-up were compared for the combined interpretation of ASC-H and LSIL (ASCHL) and the categories of LSIL, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) and ASC-H. Results The percentage of ASCHL HPV-positive cases (86.0%) was similar to that of LSIL-H but significantly higher in comparison to that of ASC-H. The rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN 2+) and CIN 3+ for ASCHL (29.6% and 3.6%, respectively) were similar to those of LSIL-H and ASC-H. When stratified by HPV test results, the proportions of patients with CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ remained statistically similar to those with ASCHL and with LSIL-H and ASC-H. Conclusions Considering the similar risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ for ASCHL and ASC-H, having a separate category of ASCHL for reporting cervical cytology appears to be redundant.

scholarly journals Kanker serviks dan gen Fas-promoter-670

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 90-91
Author(s):  
ML Edy Parwanto
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Kanker serviks merupakan keganasan pada serviks. Jenis kanker tersebut terjadi pada perempuan dan masih menjadi masalah di Indonesia. Indonesia merupakan negara urutan ke 4 di Asia Tenggara dengan insiden kanker serviks terbesar setelah Kamboja, Myanmar dan Thailand. Berdasar data statistik tahun 2012, tingkat insidensi (incidence rate) kanker serviks di Indonesia 17 per 100.000 perempuan per tahun.(1) Telah terbukti bahwa penyebab primer terjadinya kanker serviks yaitu virus papilloma atau yang lebih dikenal dengan istilah “human papillomavirus (HPV)”. Terdapat beberapa jenis serotype HPV, tetapi tidak semua jenis serotype bersifat progesif menjadikan kanker serviks. Salah satu serotype yang bersifat progesif menjadikan kanker serviks yaitu HPV serotype 16. HPV serotype 16 mampu mengubah sel epitel squamosa serviks (cervical-squamous-epithelial cells=CSEC) normal menjadi lesi intraepitelial squamosa tingkat rendah (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion=LSIL) atau neoplasia intraepitel serviks (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia=CIN) 1. Selanjutnya, LSIL atau CIN 1 berkembang menjadi lesi intraepitelial squamosa tingkat tinggi (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion=HSIL) atau CIN 2, dan akhirnya menjadi kanker serviks yang invasif (invasive cervical cancer=CIN3).(2)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document