Trends and Costs Associated With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infantile Spasms: A 10-Year Multicenter Retrospective Review

OBJECTIVE Early treatment of infantile spasms (IS) may be imperative for improvement of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Existing studies have led to inconclusive recommendations with variation in treatment. Our objective was to determine the national average cost, initial diagnostic workup, treatments, and hospital length of stay for patients with IS. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was designed to review data of patients < 2 years from 43 non-profit institutions. Data obtained included patient demographics, length of stay, admission cost, and treatments used from 2004 to 2014. Cost data were collected and adjusted to 2014 dollars, the year data were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 6183 patients met study criteria (n = 3382, 55% male). Three-quarters of patients (n = 4684, 76%) had an electroencephalogram, 56.4% had brain imaging (n = 3487), and 17% (n = 1050) underwent a lumbar puncture. Medication for IS was initiated during inpatient hospital stay in two-thirds of all patients (n = 4139, 67%). Most patients were initiated on corticotropin (n = 2066, 33%) or topiramate (n = 1804, 29%). Average length of stay was 5.8 days with an average adjusted cost of $18,348. Over time there was an 86.6% increase in cost from an average $12,534.54 (2004) to $23,391.20 (2014), a significant change (p < 0.01). This correlated with an increase in average length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Variability exists in diagnostic workup and pharmacotherapy initiated for IS, which may lead to differences in the cost of hospital stay. Further studies may help determine contributing factors to increased cost and improve health care utilization for IS patients.

Download Full-text

The Cost of Hospital Stay for Operable Breast Cancer

Tumori Journal ◽

10.1177/030089169207800601 ◽

1992 ◽

Vol 78 (6) ◽

pp. 359-362 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Stefano Capri ◽

Edoardo Majno ◽

Maurizio Mauri

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Average Length ◽

Operable Breast Cancer ◽

Cost Component ◽

Homogeneous Groups ◽

Total Cost ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

The Cost

The cost of the first hospital stay for operable breast cancer was deducted by analysing a random sample of 100 admissions to the National Institute of Cancer during the period January-December 1989. The aims of the study were: (1) to describe and calculate the cost component of the stay; (2) to analyse whether any procedure, service rended or stage of the pathology might explain differences in the total costs of the stay; and (3) to acquire a better knowledge of the organizational aspects to be improved. With an average length of stay of 14.1 days, the overall total cost observed was 4.9 million lira (US $ 3.800, 1989 US dollars). A significant correlation between total cost and duration of stay was found (R2 = 0.982), while no or very little correlation was found between cost and the anatomical extent of disease (TNM stage) and different cost items (laboratory, imaging tests, operating room, etc.). Two homogeneous groups of cases were found: patients with quadrantectomy and patients with mastectomy. The cost of the latter was 40% greater than that of the former (P < 0.001) with a length of stay 52% longer (p < 0.001). This study does not concern the costs immediately following the stay, which namely are higher for the quadrantectomy because the radiotherapy outpatient procedures. Attention should be paid to reducing the length of stay, keeping waiting time for organizational procedures to a minimum during the stay.

Download Full-text

Relationship between nutritional status and length of hospital stay in oncological surgery.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e13591 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e13591-e13591

Author(s):

Carl Meissner ◽

Ronny Otto ◽

Joerg Fahlke ◽

Mathias Mueller ◽

Karsten Ridwelski

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Nutritional Status ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Bioelectrical Impedance ◽

Impedance Analysis ◽

Nutritional Therapy ◽

Albumin Level ◽

Average Length Of Stay

e13591 Background: In Germany, a serious illness is the main cause of malnutrition. Various studies have already shown that the length of time in hospital for various diseases and operations in malnourished patients increases. This leads to a deterioration in the quality of life of the patient and results in considerable costs for the health care system. Methods: In order to investigate the relationship between nutritional status and length of hospital stay, a patient group of 363 patients who had a tumor with the primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract was first identified. All patients had an NRS score of 3 or greater and a meaningful laboratory with regard to protein and albumin levels and / or results of a bioelectrical impedance analysis. The average length of stay for these patients was determined depending on the various parameters. Results: The present study shows that malnourished patients have to stay in the hospital for between 2 and 11.1 days longer. When evaluating the NRS score, the protein and albumin level as well as the BCM and the ECM / BCM index, a longer hospital stay of malnourished patients compared to those who were not malnourished was demonstrated. The BMI is an insufficient parameter to describe the nutritional status. An extension of the length of hospital stay cannot be demonstrated only on the basis of the BMI. Conclusions: Since an inadequate nutritional status obviously affects the length of hospital stay in oncological patients, they should be examined early for malnutrition. The length of stay can be shortened through nutritional therapy measures, which also leads to a significant reduction in costs.

Download Full-text

Early Ambulation in Hip Replacement Patients Regarding Length of Hospital Stay

Journal of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery ◽

10.29245/2767-5130/2021/2.1137 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 30-34

Author(s):

Jayme Bristol

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Total Hip Replacement ◽

Hip Replacement ◽

Research Study ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Early Ambulation ◽

Total Hip ◽

Average Length Of Stay

Background: Total hip replacement surgeries are one of the most common orthopedic surgeries performed today1. This number continues to rise. One way to accommodate the growing need for inpatient orthopedic beds is through high hospital turnover. High turnover can possibly be accomplished through early ambulation. The goal of the study is to see if standing or walking before eight hours post-operative decreased overall length of hospital stay. Methods: This research study is a retrospective chart review that looked at 92 randomly selected general anesthesia total hip replacement patients from Nebraska Medicine in Omaha, NE from August 2017 to August 2018. This research study makes a clear definition of early ambulation after total hip replacement surgery: standing or walking within eight hours of surgery. Results: From the analyzed research the average length of stay for all 92 total hip replacement patients was 4.23 days. For those total hip replacement patients who were ambulated within eight hours of surgery completion the average length of stay was 2.83 days. For the total hip replacement patients who were ambulated after eight hours of surgery completion the average length of stay was 5.14 days. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay for total hip replacement patients at Nebraska Medicine who were ambulated within eight hours of surgery completion compared to those who were not.

Download Full-text

Reducing the length of hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty: influence of femoral and sciatic nerve block

Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira ◽

10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.040 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 61 (1) ◽

pp. 40-43 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Lúcio Honório de Carvalho Júnior ◽

Eduardo Frois Temponi ◽

Vinícius Oliveira Paganini ◽

Lincoln Paiva Costa ◽

Luiz Fernando Machado Soares ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Sciatic Nerve ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Nerve Block ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Total Knee

Objective: the aim of this study is to evaluate the change in length of hospital stay postoperatively for Total Knee Arthroplasty after using femoral and sciatic nerve block. Materials and methods: the medical records of 287 patients were evaluated, taking into account the number of hours of admission, the percentage and the reason for re-hospitalization within 30 days, as well as associated complications. All patients were divided into two groups according or not to whether they were admitted to ICU or not. During the years 2009 and 2010, isolated spinal anesthesia was the method used in the procedure. From 2011 on, femoral and sciatic nerve blocking was introduced. Results: between the years 2009 and 2012, the average length of stay ranged from 74 hours in 2009 to 75.2 hours in 2010. The average length of stay in 2011 was 56.52 hours and 53.72 hours in 2012, all in the group of patients who did not remain in the ICU postoperatively. In the same period, among those in the group that needed ICU admission, the average length of stay was 138.7 hours in 2009, 90.25 hours in 2010, 79.8 hours in 2011, and 52.91 hours in 2012. During 2009 and 2010, the rate of re-hospitalization was 0%, while in 2011 and 2012, were 3.44% and 1%, respectively. Conclusion: according to this study, the use of femoral and sciatic nerve blocking after total knee arthroplasty allowed significant reduction in hospital stay.

Download Full-text

Length of Stay of Orthopaedic Inpatients at a Teaching Hospital in Eastern Part of Nepal

Journal of Nepal Medical Association ◽

10.31729/jnma.2787 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 53 (199) ◽

pp. 180-183 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bibhuti Nath Mishra ◽

Anuja Jha ◽

Era Maharjan ◽

Mahima Limbu ◽

Sanjaya Sah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Epidemiological Study ◽

Average Length ◽

Care Center ◽

Third Party ◽

Tertiary Level ◽

Health Care Center ◽

Average Length Of Stay

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the average length of stay of all inpatients in the department of Orthopaedics and to compare the variations in hospital stay between age, gender, traumatic and non-traumatic co-morbidities and modality of payment. Methods: This hospital based retrospective descriptive epidemiological study was based on patients discharged from a tertiary level health care center of eastern Nepal. Registry data of 1 year was used to calculate length of stay and analyze the variations. Results: Average length of stay was 10.5 days. It was 10.7 days for males and 10.1 days for females. It was 10.12 days for patients paying themselves for their treatment whereas 14.98 days for patients receiving reimbursement (third party payment). Conclusions: Average length of stay was more in elderly and patients of trauma (longest in pelvis injury). It was 1.5 times longer for patients receiving reimbursement for treatment. Keywords: length of stay; non-traumatic co-morbidities; trauma; third party payment.

Download Full-text

Colonization and Infection With MRSA and CRKP and Its Result in an Increased Mortality Rate Within the Intensive Care and High-Dependency Units in Barbados

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.703 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s173-s174

Author(s):

Keisha Gustave

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

High Mortality ◽

Average Length ◽

Cohort Analysis ◽

Health Concern ◽

Queen Elizabeth Hospital ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

High Dependency

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are a growing public health concern in Barbados. Intensive care and critically ill patients are at a higher risk for MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection. MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection are associated with a high mortality and morbidly rate in the intensive care units (ICUs) and high-dependency units (HDUs). There is no concrete evidence in the literature regarding MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in Barbados or the Caribbean. Objectives: We investigated the prevalence of MRSA and CRKP colonization and infection in the patients of the ICU and HDU units at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital from 2013 to 2017. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients admitted to the MICU, SICU, and HDU from January 2013 through December 2017. Data were collected as part of the surveillance program instituted by the IPC department. Admissions and weekly swabs for rectal, nasal, groin, and axilla were performed to screen for colonization with MRSA and CRKP. Follow-up was performed for positive cultures from sterile isolates, indicating infection. Positive MRSA and CRKP colonization or infection were identified, and patient notes were collected. Our exclusion criteria included patients with a of stay of <48 hours and patients with MRSA or CRKP before admission. Results: Of 3,641 of persons admitted 2,801 cases fit the study criteria. Overall, 161 (5.3%) were colonized or infected with MRSA alone, 215 (7.67%) were colonized or infected with CRKP alone, and 15 (0.53%) were colonized or infected with both MRSA and CRKP. In addition, 10 (66.6%) of patients colonized or infected with MRSA and CRKP died. Average length of stay of patients who died was 50 days. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that MRSA and CRKP cocolonization and coinfection is associated with high mortality in patients within the ICU and HDU units. Patients admitted to the ICU and HDU with an average length of stay of 50 days are at a higher risk for cocolonization and coinfection with MRSA and CRKP. Stronger IPC measures must be implemented to reduce the spread and occurrence of MRSA and CRKP.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

Temporal Changes in Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Time Between Events, 2017–2018 Versus 2015–2016

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.1051 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s403-s404

Author(s):

Jonathan Edwards ◽

Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽

Daniel Pollock

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Patient Care ◽

Average Length ◽

Bloodstream Infections ◽

Central Line ◽

Significant Shift ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Period 2 ◽

Hospital Bed

Background: The CDC NHSN surveillance coverage includes central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in acute-care hospital intensive care units (ICUs) and select patient-care wards across all 50 states. This surveillance enables the use of CLABSI data to measure time between events (TBE) as a potential metric to complement traditional incidence measures such as the standardized infection ratio and prevention progress. Methods: The TBEs were calculated using 37,705 CLABSI events reported to the NHSN during 2015–2018 from medical, medical-surgical, and surgical ICUs as well as patient-care wards. The CLABSI TBE data were combined into 2 separate pairs of consecutive years of data for comparison, namely, 2015–2016 (period 1) and 2017–2018 (period 2). To reduce the length bias, CLABSI TBEs were truncated for period 2 at the maximum for period 1; thereby, 1,292 CLABSI events were excluded. The medians of the CLABSI TBE distributions were compared over the 2 periods for each patient care location. Quantile regression models stratified by location were used to account for factors independently associated with CLABSI TBE, such as hospital bed size and average length of stay, and were used to measure the adjusted shift in median CLABSI TBE. Results: The unadjusted median CLABSI TBE shifted significantly from period 1 to period 2 for the patient care locations studied. The shift ranged from 20 to 75.5 days, all with 95% CIs ranging from 10.2 to 32.8, respectively, and P < .0001 (Fig. 1). Accounting for independent associations of CLABSI TBE with hospital bed size and average length of stay, the adjusted shift in median CLABSI TBE remained significant for each patient care location that was reduced by ∼15% (Table 1). Conclusions: Differences in the unadjusted median CLABSI TBE between period 1 and period 2 for all patient care locations demonstrate the feasibility of using TBE for setting benchmarks and tracking prevention progress. Furthermore, after adjusting for hospital bed size and average length of stay, a significant shift in the median CLABSI TBE persisted among all patient care locations, indicating that differences in patient populations alone likely do not account for differences in TBE. These findings regarding CLABSI TBEs warrant further exploration of potential shifts at additional quantiles, which would provide additional evidence that TBE is a metric that can be used for setting benchmarks and can serve as a signal of CLABSI prevention progress.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic

Annals of Intensive Care ◽

10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Nathanael Lapidus ◽

Xianlong Zhou ◽

Fabrice Carrat ◽

Bruno Riou ◽

Yan Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Average Length ◽

Parametric Method ◽

Estimation Methods ◽

Unbiased Estimation ◽

Bed Occupancy ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Discharged Patients ◽

First Admission

Abstract Background The average length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU_ALOS) is a helpful parameter summarizing critical bed occupancy. During the outbreak of a novel virus, estimating early a reliable ICU_ALOS estimate of infected patients is critical to accurately parameterize models examining mitigation and preparedness scenarios. Methods Two estimation methods of ICU_ALOS were compared: the average LOS of already discharged patients at the date of estimation (DPE), and a standard parametric method used for analyzing time-to-event data which fits a given distribution to observed data and includes the censored stays of patients still treated in the ICU at the date of estimation (CPE). Methods were compared on a series of all COVID-19 consecutive cases (n = 59) admitted in an ICU devoted to such patients. At the last follow-up date, 99 days after the first admission, all patients but one had been discharged. A simulation study investigated the generalizability of the methods' patterns. CPE and DPE estimates were also compared to COVID-19 estimates reported to date. Results LOS ≥ 30 days concerned 14 out of the 59 patients (24%), including 8 of the 21 deaths observed. Two months after the first admission, 38 (64%) patients had been discharged, with corresponding DPE and CPE estimates of ICU_ALOS (95% CI) at 13.0 days (10.4–15.6) and 23.1 days (18.1–29.7), respectively. Series' true ICU_ALOS was greater than 21 days, well above reported estimates to date. Conclusions Discharges of short stays are more likely observed earlier during the course of an outbreak. Cautious unbiased ICU_ALOS estimates suggest parameterizing a higher burden of ICU bed occupancy than that adopted to date in COVID-19 forecasting models. Funding Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900097 to Dr. Zhou) and the Emergency Response Project of Hubei Science and Technology Department (2020FCA023 to Pr. Zhao).

Download Full-text

Times of change in complex environments - Evaluating hospital co-payments in Palestine refugee camps

European Journal of Public Health ◽

10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1252 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽

Author(s):

S V Valente de Almeida ◽

H Ghattas ◽

G Paolucci ◽

A Seita

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Policy Change ◽

Negative Binomial ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Average Length ◽

Lessons Learned ◽

Policy Impact ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Ex Post ◽

The Impact

Abstract We measure the impact introducing a of 10% co-payment component on hospitalisation costs for Palestine refugees from Lebanon in public and private hospitals. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand and supply for healthcare. The data was collected by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and include episode level information from all public, private and Red Crescent Hospitals in Lebanon, between April 2016 and October 2017. This is a complete population episode level dataset with information from before and after the policy change. We use multinomial logit, negative binomial and linear models to estimate the policy impact on demand by type of hospital, average length of stay and treatment costs for the patient and the provider. After the new policy was implemented patients were 18% more likely to choose a (free-of-charge) PRCS hospital for secondary care, instead of a Private or Public hospital, where the co-payment was introduced. This impact was stronger for episodes with longer stays, which are also the more severe and more expensive cases. Average length of stay decreased in general for all hospitals and we could not find a statistically significant impact on costs for the provider nor the patient. We find evidence that the introduction of co-payments is hospital costs led to a shift in demand, but it is not clear to what extent the hospitals receiving this demand shift were prepared for having more patients than before, also because these are typically of less quality then the others. Regarding costs, there is no evidence that the provider managed to contain costs with the new policy, as the demand adapted to the changes. Our findings provide important information on hospitalisation expenses and the consequences of a policy change from a lessons learned perspective that should be taken into account for future policy decision making. Key messages We show that in a context of poverty, the introduction of payment for specific hospital types can be efficient for shifting demand, but has doubtable impact on costs containment for the provider. The co-payment policy can have a negative impact on patients' health since after its implementation demand increased at free-of-charge hospitals, which typically have less resources to treat patients.

Download Full-text

P17 An audit of Trakcare discharge times for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

BJS Open ◽

10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.016 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jacob Rapier ◽

Steven Hornby ◽

Jacob Rapier

Keyword(s):

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Initial Data ◽

Best Practice ◽

Average Length ◽

Accurate Data ◽

Day Case ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract Introduction Nationally 61,220 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies are carried out annually. Those carried out as day-cases reduce providers’ costs and increase income through the best practice tariff. The system in our trust to record discharges is ‘Trakcare’. The aim of this audit was to accurately measure the discharge times of patients undergoing elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies, to try and reduce the number of patients recorded as having an overnight stay by accurate data collection. Methods Initial data was collected for all elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy discharge times on Trakcare, over a 1 month period. This data was then re-audited prospectively both from Trakcare and discharges reported by nurses/patients. A comparison was then made of Trakcare against reported discharge times. Results Initially 54 operations were recorded, with 30 completed as day cases (55.6%). The re-audited data (on Trakcare) recorded 47 operations, with 15 completed as day cases (37.91%). Of these discharges we were able to capture 26 (55.32%) manually, and 11 were completed as day cases (42.31%). Measuring these 26 with the same operations on Trakcare we were unable to show a difference in the number of cases completed as a day case (11 vs 11), with only a 33 minute decrease in the average length of stay. Conclusion Trakcare is a reliable tool for measuring the date of discharge for patients. The recommendations in are: scheduling surgery for a time pre-13:00 shows a higher proportion of patients discharged the same day, and continue to use Trakcare to record discharge times.

Download Full-text