Reading Texts and Writing Problems to Improve Problem Solving

2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-455
Author(s):  
Ariana Stanca P. Vacaretu

Lessons for helping students translate the grammar and structure of application problems into math operations. Two instructional activities carried out in a ninth-grade Romanian classroom are described and a number of reading and writing strategies suggested that can be used to assist students in understanding and solving mathematics problems.

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Ahmad Muradi ◽  
Hasbullah Hasbullah

This research is a case against of departement of Arabic education of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin to learn Arabic. The data source of this research is the student of 2012/2013, 2013/2014, and six lecturers that administer of linguistic subject or language skills. This study aims to collect information on students learning Arabic strategies in departement of Arabic education. While the data extracted is information about: the form of difficulty students learning Arabic, the cause and degree of difficulty, the type of student learning in departement of arabic education, the efforts and strategies by departement of arabic education students in problem solving learning Arabic, and the outcome of the efforts/strategies they are doing. Based on the survey results revealed that students have difficulty in learning Arabic in the matter of language and language skills. Difficulties in linguistic materials include use nahwu and sharf in reading and writing, the meaning of a sentence or a word, sentence or word and pronunciation. While the difficulties in aspects of language skills include: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. But the difficulties they feel it, both aspects of alkalinity or their skills can be overcome by evaluating their learning, the dominant use of memory strategies, affective, cognitive, and social strategies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Purnama Sari ◽  
M Ikhsan ◽  
Saminan Saminan

[Bahasa]: Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses berpikir kreatif siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan model Wallas (1926). Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 6 siswa kelas VII, masing-masing dua siswa memiliki kemampuan matematika tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses berpikir kreatif siswa kategori tinggi yaitu siswa memahami permasalahan dan informasi yang diberikan dengan menuliskan apa yang diketahui maupun yang ditanyakan (persiapan), siswa tidak membutuhkan waktu yang lama untuk memikirkan solusi dari permasalahan yang dihadapi dengan mengingat soal yang sudah diajarkan (inkubasi), siswa mendapatkan ide untuk memecahkan masalah (Iluminasi), dan siswa menguji ide dan memeriksa kembali pemecahan masalah sebelum mengambil kesimpulan yang tepat (verifikasi). Proses berpikir kreatif siswa kategori sedang yaitu siswa mencoba untuk memahami permasalahan akan tetapi kurang memahami informasi atau petunjuk yang diberikan (persiapan), siswa diam megingat kembali rumus yang digunakan untuk memecahkan masalah (Inkubasi), siswa menghasilkan ide berdasarkan pemahamannya terhadap soal untuk memecahkan masalah (Iluminasi), dan siswa menguji ide dihasilkan dan tidak memeriksa kembali proses pemecahan masalah (verifikasi). Proses berpikir kreatif siswa kategori rendah yaitu siswa tidak memahami permasalahan dan informasi yang diberikan (persiapan), siswa membutuhkan waktu yang lama untuk memikirkan solusi dari permasalahan (Inkubasi), siswa gagal dalam menemukan ide untuk memecahkan permasalahan (Iluminasi), dan siswa menguji ide yang dihasilkan dan tidak memeriksa kembali jawaban yang telah diujikan (verifikasi). Kata kunci: Berpikir Kreatif; Model Wallas; Pemecahan Masalah; Kemampuan Siswa  [English]: This qualitative research aims at getting insight on students’ creative thinking in solving mathematics problems based on Wallas’ model (1926). The subjects are six students in 7th grade, each two students respectively have high, medium and low mathematics ability.  Data is collected through test and interview. This research shows that the students in high category can understand the problem and given information by writing what is known and asked (preparation), can easily think the solution of the problem by remembering the previous problem (incubation), get the ideas to solve the problem (illumination), and examine the ideas and re-check the solution before drawing the proper conclusion (verification). The students in medium category try to understand the problem but they are less in understanding the given information or hint (preparation), remember the formula to solve the problem (incubation), generate the ideas from their understanding to solve the problem (illumination), and examine the ideas and do not check the solution again (verification). For students in low category, they do not understand the problem and the given information (preparation), have a while to think the solution (incubation), fail to find any ideas to solve the problem (illumination), and examine the generated ideas and do not re-check the solution (verification).     Keywords: Creative Thinking; Walla’s Model; Problem Solving; Students’Ability


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-40
Author(s):  
Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono ◽  
Ahmad Wachidul Kohar ◽  
Ika Kurniasari ◽  
Sugi Hartono

This is a case study investigating a primary teacher’s beliefs, knowledge, and teaching practice in mathematical problem solving. Data was collected through interview of one primary teacher regarding his beliefs on the nature of mathematics, mathematics teaching, and mathematics learning as well as knowledge about content and pedagogy of problem solving. His teaching practice was also observed which focused on the way he helped his students solve several different mathematics problems in class based on Polya’s problemsolving process: understand the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back. Findings of this study point out that while the teacher’s beliefs, which are closely related to his problem solving view, are consistent with his knowledge of problem solving, there is a gap between such beliefs and knowledge around his teaching practice. The gap appeared primarily around the directive teaching which corresponds to instrumental view he held in most of Polya’s process during his teaching practice, which is not consistent with beliefs and knowledge he professed during the interview. Some possible causes related to several associate factors such as immediate classroom situation and teaching practice experience are discussed to explain such inconsistency. The results of this study are encouraging, however, further studies still need to be conducted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1539-1549
Author(s):  
Joy Frandero Yoni Astra Pasaribu ◽  
Louise M Saija

Introduction: Mathematical problem solving ability is very important in mathematic learning, because is can help students to solve daily life problems better. But the students mathematical problem solve ability is not high yet, one of the factor is because many students only know the standard procedures of solving mathematics problems, and when the given problem are different from the examples they tend to give up easily. This comparative design study aims to find out the improvement of students mathematical problem solving ability using Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model with individual assignments and small group assignments, and to find out whether there are differences between those two. Method: The sample in this study was VII grade students at SMP Advent Cimindi and SMP Advent II Bandung, Bandung. The instruments used in the study are mathematical problem solving test and questionnaire for response toward the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model as the non-test instrument. Result: The results showed that the improvement of mathematical problem solving abilities of students who obtained the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model with individual assignments and students who obtained the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model by assigning small groups was categorized as high. Statistically, there is a significant difference in the students mathematical problem solving improvement after being taught using Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model, between students who get individual assignments and small group assignments. The response questionnaire result shows that students who acquire individual assignments like the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model, more further the students who acquire group assignments really like the Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) learning model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sintha Sih Dewanti

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan profil berpikir kritis mahasiswa PGMI UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dalam memecahkan masalah matematika dasar. Pemecahan masalah merupakan proses mental tingkat tinggi dan memerlukan proses berpikir yang lebih kompleks termasuk berpikir kritis. Pemecahan masalah juga mempunyai hubungan timbal balik dengan berpikir kritis. Berpikir kritis pada penelitian ini mengacu pada berpikir kritis dengan kriteria FRISCO. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pada penelitian ini diambil 9 subjek penelitian, yaitu 3 subjek pada kemampuan matematika dasar tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pemberian soal pemecahan masalah dan wawancara. Ada 5 tipe masalah yang digunakan dalam soal pemecahan masalah yaitu: simple translation problem, complex translation problem, process problem, applied problem, dan puzzle problem. Profil berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika dasar menurut kriteria FRISCO pada setiap langkah pemecahan Polya sebagai berikut: a) Mahasiswa dengan KPM tinggi mengetahui fokus, alasan, situasi dan kejelasan dalam setiap tahap pemecahan masalah juga menjelaskan inferensinya pada setiap tahap pemecahan masalah Polya pada simple translation problem, complex translation problem, dan applied problem, tetapi belum dapat untuk 2 masalah lainnya; b) Mahasiswa dengan KPM sedang, mengetahui fokus, alasan, situasi dan kejelasan dalam setiap tahap pemecahan masalah juga menjelaskan inferensinya pada setiap tahap pemecahan masalah Polya pada simple translation problem dan applied problem tetapi belum dapat untuk 3 masalah lainnya; dan c) Mahasiswa dengan KPM rendah, mengetahui fokus, alasan, inferensi, situasi, klarifikasi dan memeriksa kembali pada setiap langkah pemecahan masalah Polya pada masalah simple translation problem, dan belum dapat pada puzzle problem, sedangkan untuk 3 masalah lainnya mengetahui fokus dan alasan hanya sampai pada langkah melaksanakan strategi, tetapi belum dapat mengetahui inferensinya. Kata kunci: berpikir kritis, pemecahan masalah, kemampuan matematika dasar Abstract The purpose of this research is to describe the critical thinking profile of PGMI UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta students in solving basic mathematics problems. Problem solving is a high level mental process and requires a more complex thinking process including critical thinking. Problem solving also has a reciprocal relationship with critical thinking. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with the FRISCO criteria. The type of this research is descriptive research with qualitative approach. In this study, 9 subjects taken, that is 3 subject to the ability of high-basic mathematic, medium, and low. Data was collected by way of tests and interviews. There are 5 types of problems used in problem solving tests: simple translation problem, complex translation problem, problem process, applied problem, and puzzle problem. The profile of critical thinking of students in solving basic mathematics problems according to FRISCO criteria at each polya solving step as follows: a) Students with high problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, situation and clarity in every problem solving step also explain the inferences at each stage of solving Polya problem on simple translation problem, complex translation problem, and applied problem, but not yet for 2 other problems; b) Students with medium problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, situation and clarity in each stage of problem solving also explain the inferences at each stage of polya problem solving on simple translation problem and applied problem but not yet for the other 3 problems; and c) Students with low problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, inference, situation, clarification and re-examine each step Polya problem solving on the problem of simple translation problem, and not yet in the puzzle problem, while for 3 other problems know the focus and reason only to the step of implementing the strategy, but not yet know the inferences. Keywords: critical thinking, problem solving, basic math ability


2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Irena Kuzborska

This article is based on the plenary talk given at the inaugural UHAMKA International Conference on English Language Teaching (ELT) and Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) (UICELL 2018) in Jakarta, Indonesia, 23 November 2018, and focuses on the explanation of reading as a communicative rhetorical act. Outlining the key features of such reading, it then considers the benefits of reading texts rhetorically. A specific focus is given to the role of rhetorical reading in writing. While the article acknowledges the limited research on the relationship, it provides some evidence that reading texts rhetorical can lead to both more effective reading and more effective writing. A specific technique on how to teach students to read texts rhetorically is also presented in this article.


Author(s):  
Ifada Novikasari ◽  
Slamet Pamuji ◽  
Muhammad Arsy Maulana

The ability to solve mathematics problems is an ability needed in the learning process. Mathematic anxiety and student learning styles are among the factors that influence the success of mathematics problem-solving ability. By paying attention to mathematics anxiety and learning styles possessed by students, it is expected that the ability to solve mathematics problems will increase. This research is a field research type with an Ex Post Facto method and multiple linear regression statistical data analysis techniques. Data was collected through mathematics anxiety questionnaires, student learning style questionnaires, and mathematics problem-solving skills of students at Madrasah Aliyah level. The results show that (1) there is no significant effect of mathematics anxiety on the ability to solve mathematics problems with the tcount is 1.537 and the significance level is 0.126 ≥ 0.05. (2) there is a positive and significant effect of learning styles on the ability to solve mathematics problems with the value of tcount is 2.457 and a significance level of 0.015 <0.05.


Author(s):  
Kamiya Abdulkhakimova

The chapter explores and describes the use of flipping the classroom approach in a Kazakhstani university language class. Flipping the classroom means that students gain first exposure to new material outside of class, depending on the preferred learning style it happens via reading or lecture videos, and then use class time to do the harder work of assimilating that knowledge, perhaps through problem solving, discussion, or debates. The idea that lies behind this approach is not new. However, the access to these reading and writing materials using digital technology is relatively new. The research question of this study was, How does flipping the classroom work in the language classroom? In law schools, for example, the approach was a traditional way of teaching in which students prepared ahead of time to participate in Socratic seminars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document