Coloring Formulas for Growing Patterns

2005 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 472-475
Author(s):  
Kay I. Meeks Roebuck

Recognition and extension of patterns is a recurrent theme in the algebra strand of Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000). Work with repeating patterns begins as early as prekindergarten, with students learning to extend patterns. Later, they recognize that the same pattern may be shown in different ways, and they translate patterns from one form to another, for example, changing ABABAB to * ∧ * ∧ * ∧. Such pattern activities allow students to develop logical reasoning skills, make conjectures, and test their ideas about them. As children become older, work with repeating patterns continues; but experiences with growing patterns, in which each element of the pattern is an extension of previous elements, become increasingly important. Geometric growing patterns can often be translated into number relationships and can thus be used to introduce ideas related to functions. A common method of introducing

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 428-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Lee ◽  
Viktor Freiman

Pattern exploration is A pivotal activity in all mathematics, indeed in all the scientific disciplines. Children who are attempting to express perceived patterns mathematically are in an excellent position to learn algebraic language and engage in algebraic activity. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000) acknowledges the relationship of pattern exploration and algebraic thinking by placing pattern work within the Algebra strand. Yet one can undertake considerable pattern exploration without engaging students in any algebraic thinking whatsoever and teachers may, themselves, be unclear about how patterns can be used to further algebraic thinking. Work with repeating patterns in the early grades, or teaching patterns as a “topic” in the middle grades, may not foster the development of algebraic thinking in students. In this article, we will address this question: How can teachers exploit pattern work to further algebraic thinking and introduce the formal study of algebra in middle school?


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-215
Author(s):  
Jeffery J. Boats ◽  
Nancy K. Dwyer ◽  
Sharon Laing ◽  
Mark P. Fratella

TO DEVELOP STUDENTS' REASONING SKILLS, the NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) recommends that students make generalizations and evaluate conjectures. In particular, middle school mathematics students should be engaged in activities involving pattern recognition as a means of formulating such conjectures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-149
Author(s):  
Lijuan Gan ◽  
Tommy Tanu Wijaya

This study aims to develop an evaluation tool to evaluate the overall logical reasoning core literacy skill and understand the differences in logical reasoning skills between students of different classes and genders. The quality of the developed evaluation tool is tested and optimized based on the Rasch model. The measured sample data are processed and analyzed by winsteps software and SPSS software. 122 senior three students from different classes were evaluated by the developed logical reasoning literacy level evaluation tool with good reliability and validity. It was found that the overall logical reasoning skills of senior high school students was concentrated in Level II, and some students could reach Level III; there are obvious differences in the level of logical reasoning skills between the experimental class and the ordinary class. The overall level of the experimental class is higher than that of the ordinary class; there is little difference in the distribution of male and female at the low level, but compared with male, female' literacy Level Is obviously limited after reaching a certain level, so it is difficult to break through and rise to the third level.


2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-395
Author(s):  
Judith T. Sowder

The new NCTM Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) were presented to the public with great fanfare at the NCTM Annual Meeting in Chicago in April of this year. The mood was celebratory, perhaps even more so than when the 1989 Standards were presented. How will these new Principles and Standards be accepted? What influence will they have? Are there messages here to which the research community ought to be attending?


2018 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt M. Bixby

Almost twenty years ago, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) published Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000), which recommended that teachers should incorporate more writing into their math lessons, claiming that writing helps students “consolidate their thinking” (p. 402) by causing them to reflect on their work. In recent years, various studies point to the many benefits that can be gained by writing in mathematics class (e.g., O'Connell et al. 2005; Goldsby and Cozza 2002). Much research suggests that writing activities, if implemented effectively, can help students enjoy class more (Burns 2005) and can also help them deepen their understanding of the content (Baxter et al. 2002). In addition to benefiting students, student writing benefits teachers as well by providing a clear picture of what their students understand and even deepening understanding of the content for teachers themselves (Burns 2005; Pugalee 1997).


2008 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-305
Author(s):  
Michael Edwards ◽  
Michael Meagher ◽  
S. Asli Özgün-Koca

In Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) acknowledges the importance of exploring mathematical ideas from multiple points of view: “Different representations often illuminate different aspects of a complex concept or relationship…. The importance of using multiple representations should be emphasized throughout students' mathematical education” (2000, p. 68). In particular, NCTM notes that the introduction of technology in school mathematics classrooms provides new ways for teachers and their students to explore connections among representations: “Computers and calculators change what students can do with conventional representations and expand the set of representations with which they can work” (2000, p. 68). In this article, we discuss an interesting finding that our students made as they explored linear regression with a teacher-constructed TI-Nspire calculator document. The calculator's capability to link variables across two or more pages in the same document led students to findings that are important yet rarely discussed in school mathematics textbooks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document