scholarly journals Complications of thrombolysis in an intensive care unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
Živilė Deimantavičienė ◽  
Nerijus Klimas ◽  
Aurimas Pečkauskas ◽  
Giedrė Bakšytė ◽  
Andrius Macas ◽  
...  

Background. Thrombolysis is often the only way in treating people with life-threatening conditions, like acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Complications of thrombolytic therapy are not rare and have clear influence in the quality of life, hospital stay, outcomes and mortality. Most common complications are intracranial hemorrhage, severe injection site, nose, vaginal bleeding and peripheral hematomas. Methods and materials. A retrospective study took place in the Department of Intensive Care, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics. Medical data of 83 patients, who underwent treatment with thrombolytic drugs in the period of 2007–2011, were analyzed. All patients were treated with intravenous infusion of Alteplase. Inclusion criteria were as follows: • AMI, AIS or PE treatable with thrombolytic therapy. Results. 72.3% (n = 60) of patients experienced massive PE, 13.3% (n  =  11) AMI and 14.4% (n  =  12) AIS. There were 8.43% (n  =  7) of patients who had bleeding complications – 2.4% (n = 2) experienced nose bleed during or shortly after thrombolytic therapy, 3.6% (n = 3) had injection site bleeding and 1.2% (n = 1) experienced multiple skin hemorrhages. 11.7% (n = 7) of patients in the group of massive PE were thrombolised during CPR and only one of them experienced bleeding to the pleural cavity. There were no internal or external bleeding observed neither in AMI nor in AIS groups. In-hospital mortality after thrombolytic therapy was 20.5% (n = 17). Conclusions. Thrombolytic therapy very often is the only way in treating acute, life-threatening diseases, like acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism or acute ischemic stroke. Intracranial hemorrhage, injection site, nose, vaginal bleeding and peripheral hematomas are the most common complications of thrombolysis. Risk factors should be evaluated before starting the thrombolytic therapy. Data of our hospital experience do not dramatically differ from worldwide data.

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (50) ◽  
pp. e13347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Mirabela Manea ◽  
Dorin Dragoş ◽  
Emanuel Stoica ◽  
Adrian Bucşa ◽  
Ioana Marinică ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-200
Author(s):  
Roger L White

The current status of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke is reviewed in relation to early work and to the use of thrombolytic agents in acute myocardial infarction. The case of a patient treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke is described to illustrate the improvement in outcome that can be achieved with this therapy in selected patients. A number of recommendations are included for cardiologists on the use of plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke regarding the timing, dosage, selection, and monitoring of patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Proctor ◽  
Massoud A. Leesar ◽  
Arka Chatterjee

Thrombolytic therapy kick-started the era of modern cardiology but in the last few decades it has been largely supplanted by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the go-to treatment for acute myocardial infarction. However, these agents remain important for vast populations without access to primary PCI and acute ischemic stroke. More innovative uses have recently come up for the treatment of a variety of conditions. This article summarizes the history, evidence base and current use of thrombolytics in cardiovascular disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Lun Lai ◽  
Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo ◽  
Ting-Chuan Wang ◽  
K. Arnold Chan

Abstract Background Several studies have found a so-called weekend effect that patients admitted at the weekends had worse clinical outcomes than patients admitted at the weekdays. We performed this retrospective cohort study to explore the weekend effect in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan. Methods The Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database between 2005 and 2015 was used. We extracted 3811 incident cases of ruptured aortic aneurysm, 184,769 incident cases of acute myocardial infarction, 492,127 incident cases of ischemic stroke, and 15,033 incident cases of pulmonary embolism from 9,529,049 patients having at least one record of hospitalization in the NHI claims database within 2006 ~ 2014. Patients were classified as weekends or weekdays admission groups. Dates of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry. Results We found no difference in in-hospital mortality between weekend group and weekday group in patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm (45.4% vs 45.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.17, p = 0.93), patients with acute myocardial infarction (15.8% vs 16.2%, adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.00, p = 0.10), patients with ischemic stroke (4.1% vs 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.03, p = 0.71), and patients with pulmonary embolism (14.6% vs 14.6%, adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92–1.15, p = 0.66). The results remained for 1 year in all the four major cardiovascular emergencies. Conclusions We found no difference in either short-term or long-term mortality between patients admitted on weekends and patients admitted on weekdays in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 3572-3575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rastislav Kucinsky ◽  
Samuel Goldhaber ◽  
Morton E. Tavel

2016 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Islam Y. Elgendy ◽  
Ahmed N. Mahmoud ◽  
Hend Mansoor ◽  
Mohammad K. Mojadidi ◽  
Anthony A. Bavry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document