scholarly journals Venous tromboembolism treatment: budget impact analysis of rivaroxaban in Italy

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 113-127
Author(s):  
Daniela Paola Roggeri ◽  
Alessandro Roggeri ◽  
Vittorio Pengo
Keyword(s):  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Complete Replacement ◽  
Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently leading to severe complications, particularly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and requires high cost healthcare intevention. Rivaroxaban, a novel oral factor Xa inhibitor approved for treatment of DVT, PE and reduction of the risk of recurrence, may represent a cost‑effective anticoagulant choice.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the economic impact of the use of rivaroxaban for preventing DVT and PE in Italy.METHODS: We conducted a budget impact analysis to estimate clinical outcomes and economic consequences associated to rivaroxaban vs. standard therapy (low molecular weight heparin + vitamin K antagonists) in the prevention of DVT and PE, over a three‑year time horizon. In the analysis we performed two hypothesis: complete replacement of LMWH/VKA with rivaroxaban (hypothesis 1) and partial and progressive replacement of LMWH/VKA in the first three years of reimbursement (hypothesis 2). Only direct healthcare costs have been considered.RESULTS: Total replacement of LMWH/VKA with rivaroxaban in DVT and PE is associated to a reduction of recurrent symptomatic thromboembolism, major bleeding, vascular events and mortality, with an expenditure saving of about € 11.3 mln (DVT) and € 6.6 mln (PE), corresponding to an average savings per patient treated with rivaroxaban amounted to € 112.9 and € 123,3, respectively. In hypothesis 2 it is estimated that 22%, 25%, and 27% of DVT patients and 12%, 16%, and 20% of PE patients, would be treated with rivaroxaban over the first three years. This would translate into a total saving on healthcare expenditure of € 8.4 mln for DVT and € 3.2 mln for PE and reduction of length of stay with a slight increase in pharmaceutical expenditure.CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban provides significant advantages in terms of events avoided and related costs that would result in a reduction in the total expenditure on the Italian NHS.

scholarly journals Adding Rituximab to Chemotherapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Indonesia: A Cost Utility and Budget Impact Analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Septiara Putri ◽  
Ery Setiawan ◽  
Siti Rizny F. Saldi ◽  
Levina Chandra ◽  
Euis Ratna Sari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) compared to CHOP for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Indonesia. Methods We conducted a cost utility analysis using Markov model over a lifetime horizon, from a societal perspective. Clinical evidence was derived from published clinical trials. Direct medical costs were gathered from hospital data. Direct non-medical costs, indirect costs, and utility data were primarily gathered by interviewing the patients. We applied 3% discount rate for both costs and effect. All monetary data are converted into USD (1 USD = IDR 14,000, 2019). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. In addition, from a payer perspective, budget impact analysis was estimated using price reduction scenarios. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of R-CHOP was USD 4,674/LYG and 9,280/QALY. If we refer to the threshold three times the GDP per capita (USD 11,538), R-CHOP could thus be determined as a cost-effective therapy. Its significant health benefit has contributed to the considerable ICER result. Although the R-CHOP has been considered a cost-effective intervention, the financial consequence of R-CHOP if remain in benefit package under National Health Insurance (NHI) system in Indonesia is considerably substantial, approximately USD 66 million with 75% price reduction scenario. Conclusions As a favorable treatment for DLBCL, R-CHOP ensures value for money in Indonesia. Budget impact analysis provides results which can be used as further consideration for decision-makers in matters related to benefit packages.

scholarly journals Budget impact analysis of apixaban to treat and prevent venous thromboembolism in Italy

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Bellone ◽  
Roberto Di Virgilio ◽  
Paolo Di Rienzo
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Treatment And Prevention

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a collective term for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious vascular condition associated to high economic and clinical burden. Apixaban, a Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) has shown non-inferiority efficacy versus the current standard of care (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH]/vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) in the acute treatment and prevention of VTE and a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding.AIM: Evaluate the economic impact of the use of apixaban for treatment and prevention of DVT and PE from the perspective of the Italian National Health System (NHS).METHODS: A budget impact model was adapted in order to compare clinical outcomes and economic consequences associated to apixaban vs. LMWH/VKA and others NOACs over a three-year time horizon in the Italian setting. In the analysis two scenario were compared: status quo scenario without apixaban and an alternative scenario with apixaban. Only direct healthcare costs have been considered.RESULTS: Assuming a population of patients receiving apixaban over the first 3 years equal to 20,957, the introduction of apixaban is associated to an incremental saving of € 821,748 in the first years, € 1,250,454 in the second year, and € 1,866,466 in the third year. The total net saving over the 3-year period is € 3,938,668, which is a 2.47% decrease from the total budget for the status quo scenario without apixaban. This saving is mainly due to reduced VTE events and bleeds by apixaban. Indeed apixaban is associated with less VTE events (both fatal and non-fatal), less major bleeding and less Clinical Relevant Non Major (CRNM) bleeding with a total of 52 fatal events avoided.CONCLUSIONS: The listing of apixaban for the treatment of VTE (both DVT and PE) and the prevention of recurrent VTE provides both significant clinical advantages, in terms of deaths and events avoided, and economical advantages, consisting in a reduction in the total expenditure on the Italian NHS.

scholarly journals Budget impact analysis resulting from the use of dabigatran etexilate in preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Italy

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Francesco Mennini ◽  
Sergio Russo ◽  
Andrea Marcellusi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis ◽  
Cumulative Number ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Human Cost

Background: atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of alteration in cardiac rhythm and associated with more severe episodes of stroke. Treatment with oral anticoagulants vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin, is nowadays the therapy of choice for stroke prevention in patients with AF, but dabigatran etexilate (DE) 150 mg twice daily was more clinically effective than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke and vascular mortality whereas DE 110 mg twice daily was non-inferior to warfarin.Aim: to assess the affordability of the use of DE for the Italian NHS, in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) through a budget impact analysis (BIA).Methods: the BIA in a timeframe of 5 years was divided into 3 scenarios (1: current management of patients with NVAF; 2: all patients with NVAF treated with VKA; 3: all patients with NVAF treated with DE). The population considered is the one with indication for anticoagulation. Analysis is from the NHS perspective: therefore, indirect costs are excluded.Results: the underuse of oral anticoagulation, associated with the difficulty in keeping the patients treated with VKA within an acceptable therapeutic range, results in an enormous social and human cost, represented by a total of more than 63,000 strokes cumulated in the 5-year period considered. The cumulative cost for the scenario 1 over the 5-year period is over € 2.3 billion. In the scenario 2 the number of strokes avoided per year increases by -5,219 compared to no treatment (-2,368 compared to scenario 1), although the number of events remains high (about 10,000 events/year). In the 5-year observation period the scenario 2 would result in a reduction in the total number of strokes (-12,323 events vs. scenario 1), and savings for the NHS of around 95 million Euros compared to scenario 1. In the Scenario 3 there is a reduction of more than 38,600 of the total cumulative number of strokes vs. the scenario 1 and over 26,200 vs. scenario 2, and savings for the NHS at the fifth year of observation of circa 174 million Euros vs. scenario 1 and 123 million Euros vs. scenario 2.Conclusion: DE in Italy is economically sustainable, as it allows savings for the NHS in the management of patients with NVAF from the second year vs. no treatment and vs. treatment with VKA

scholarly journals PIN150 Economic VALUE of Treatment and Vaccine Technologies to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cost-Effectiveness and Budget IMPACT Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S568
Author(s):  
W. Padula ◽  
S. Malaviya ◽  
N. Reid ◽  
F. Chingcuanco ◽  
J. Ballreich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis

scholarly journals AB0634 BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS TREATMENT, IN A FOURTH LEVEL HOSPITAL IN BOGOTA COLOMBIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1612.2-1613
Author(s):  
J. M. Bello-Gualtero ◽  
O. J. Calixto ◽  
G. Salguedo ◽  
Y. M. Chamorro-Melo ◽  
C. A. Camargo Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Annual Cost ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Budget Impact Analysis ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background:Spondyloarthritis refers to a family of diseases, of which ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis are responsible for axial impairment. Previously, the only treatment available were NSAIDs, which control activity and stop radiological progression, but at the expense of increased adverse effects, such as cardiovascular risk, dyspepsia and chronic renal failure. For the past 2 decades, biological therapy has been available, which means an increase in care costs.Objectives:The objective of this study is to perform a budget impact analysis of biologic therapy.Methods:To do a budget impact analysis from the perspective of the payer, comparing biological therapy with coventional therapy for the treatment of spondyloarthritis. Demographic characterization of the population attended at the Central Military Hospital. Time horizon from 2012 to 2018, taking the activity count according to the hospital’s billing and the prices of the activities of the state body SISMED. Exchange rates at the end of 2018.Results:The patients attended were 117, mostly men (63, 25%), average age 46, 4 years (SD 13), with disease diagnosis time of 9, 8 years (SD 9, 6). In the budget impact analysis, it is observed that 25% of patients were on DMARDs therapy, 22% with NSAIDs and 96% with biologic therapy. The average year/patient cost with NSAIDs alone would be EUR 381, with DMARDs only EUR 9,318 and, if only biological therapy was used, EUR 423. Within the total number of patients, the average annual cost, including the possibility of combining these drugs, amounted to EUR 5,403Conclusion:Including biological therapy in the care of patients with spondyloarthritis can increase up to 24 times the annual cost per patient. This increase is not only due to higher market value, it also relates to the need for more medical procedures and diagnostic follow-up tests.References:[1]Strömbeck, et al. Cost of Illness from the Public Payers’ Perspective in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis in Rheumatological Care. J Rheumatol 2010;37;2348-2355.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document