scholarly journals Self-assessment as an Autonomous Learning Tool in an Interpretation Classroom

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Hyang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Graduate School ◽  
Autonomous Learning ◽  
Learning Tool ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Assessment Report ◽  
English Program

Abstract This paper explores the usefulness of self-assessment in an interpretation classroom. Students of the Korean-English Program in a two-year graduate school of translation and interpretation were asked to analyze and assess their interpretation performances and submit a self-assessment report to the instructor. Later, a survey was conducted to find out what aspects of self-assessment the students found positive or negative. Based on the responses of the student and the teacher, selfassessment was found to be positive in identifying students’ weaknesses and strengths, enable targeted practice, and allow them to monitor their own progresses. But students also found selfassessment to be time-consuming and emotionally draining. However, all students and the instructor agreed that self-assessment was conducive to students. learning in an interpretation classroom.

Utilization of Internet for Autonomous Learning in Speaking

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-115
Author(s):  
Witri Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Internet Use ◽  
Autonomous Learning ◽  
Classroom Setting ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Direct Supervision

Internet use for promoting students’ autonomy in language learning has been a great phenomenon to discuss. Many researches have been conducted about this issue. Now the tendency is pointed out specifically for improving students’ competency in speaking. Speaking is normally learned in the classroom setting in which learners have interlocutor as their speaking partner and under direct supervision from the lecturer. The discussion bellow will concern about some internet links that can be used for speaking study. The learners can study by using these internet links independently and record their own voice and video for their own self- assessment. They choose their own target and links to access and determine their own learning target. In the meantime, they also collect the recording to their teacher for assessment purpose.

Self-Assessment Reports

2022 ◽  
pp. 269-285
Author(s):  
Nithya Ramachandran ◽  
Madhusmita Indian Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Education Institution ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Regulatory Body ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Assessment Report ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Expert Team ◽  
The Government ◽  
Body Self

Quality assurance has gained momentum in the education sector also after its recognition in the industry. Quality has become a part of service providers like healthcare and education. The field of education has undergone tremendous change since the word quality penetrated into it. Choosing a higher education institution puts in many criteria of which quality assurance and accreditation also has a vital role. The process of accreditation differs from one country to another. The process depends on the outcomes expected by the accrediting agency along with the guidelines of the government regulatory body. Self-assessment report is a self-evaluation made by an institution which is prepared in a report form and submitted to accrediting agency. An expert team evaluates the application for awarding accreditation to a HEI. The role of self-assessment report is to understand the strength and weakness of the HEI.

scholarly journals IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hasman
Keyword(s):  
Health Informatics ◽  
One Health ◽  
The Self ◽  
Site Visit ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Assessment Report ◽  
First Impression ◽  
A Site

SummaryTo develop a procedure for accrediting health informatics programs.Development of a procedure for accreditation. Test of the accreditation procedure via a trial including four or five health informatics programs. A site visit committee consisting of three members evaluates the program based on a self-assessment report written by the program and the experiences and observations of the site visit committee during the site visit.A procedure for accreditation has been developed. The instructions for health informatics programs have been written and a checklist for the site visit committee members is available. In total six subjects are considered, each one consisting of one or more facets. Each facet is judged using its corresponding criterion. Five health informatics programs volunteered. One health informatics program in Finland has already been visited and a report has been produced by the site visit committee. The next site visits are in June and July 2012. The site visit in Finland showed that English summaries of master theses are not enough to get a first impression of the methods used in the thesis. A table of contents is also needed. This information then can be used to select theses written in a language other than English for discussion.The accreditation procedure document with instructions about writing the self-assessment report was very well structured and the instructions were clear according to the Finnish program. The site visit team could work well with the checklist. Self-assessment report model was very well structured and the instructions were clear.

scholarly journals Empowering Student Learning Through Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment*

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua He ◽  
Anne Canty
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Learning Tool ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Chiropractic Students ◽  
Assessment Results

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of rubric-referenced self-assessment on performance of anatomy assignments in a group of chiropractic students. Methods: Participants (N = 259) were first-quarter students who were divided into a treatment group (n = 130) and a comparison group (n = 129). The intervention for both groups involved the use of rubrics to complete the first draft of assignments. General feedback was given by the instructor, and then the students had the opportunity to amend the assignments before resubmission (second draft). The treatment group, however, was also asked to perform rubric-referenced self-assessment of their assignments during their second draft. Although the comparison group was also provided with the identical rubrics for the assignments, the students in this group did not perform rubric-referenced self-assessment. Results: The results revealed that the students in the treatment group who used a rubric-referenced self-assessment learning tool received statistically significant higher scores than the comparison group, who did not use this rubric-referenced self-assessment tool. Conclusion: This study suggests that practicing rubric-referenced self-assessment enhances student performance on assignments. However, educators continue to face the challenge of developing practical and useful rubric tools for student self-assessment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document