scholarly journals Applying the RE-AIM Framework to Inform the Development of a Multiple Sclerosis Falls-Prevention Intervention

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Finlayson ◽  
Davide Cattaneo ◽  
Michelle Cameron ◽  
Susan Coote ◽  
Patricia N. Matsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Practice Change ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Large Group Discussion ◽  
Widespread Dissemination

Successfully addressing the problem of falls among people with multiple sclerosis (MS) will require the translation of research findings into practice change. This process is not easy but can be facilitated by using frameworks such as RE-AIM during the process of planning, implementing, and evaluating MS falls-prevention interventions. RE-AIM stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Since its initial publication in 1999, the RE-AIM framework has become widely recognized across a range of disciplines as a valuable tool to guide thinking about the development and evaluation of interventions intended for widespread dissemination. For this reason, it was selected by the International MS Falls Prevention Research Network to structure initial discussions with clinicians, people with MS, and representatives of professional and MS societies about the factors we need to consider in the development of an MS falls-prevention intervention for multisite testing that we hope will someday be disseminated widely. Through a combination of small-group work and large-group discussion, participants discussed four of the five RE-AIM elements. A total of 17 recommendations were made to maximize the reach (n = 3), adoption (n = 5), implementation (n = 4), and maintenance (n = 5) of the intervention the Network is developing. These recommendations are likely to be useful for any MS rehabilitation researcher who is developing and testing interventions that he or she hopes will be widely disseminated.

scholarly journals Fall Incidence as the Primary Outcome in Multiple Sclerosis Falls-Prevention Trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 178-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Coote ◽  
Jacob J. Sosnoff ◽  
Hilary Gunn
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Prevention Research ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Prevention Trials ◽  
Definition Of

The aim of this article is to provide recommendations on behalf of the International MS Falls Prevention Research Network (IMSFPRN) for the primary outcome measure for multiple sclerosis (MS) falls-prevention interventions. The article will consider the definition of a fall, methods of measuring falls, and the elements of falls that should be recorded, as well as how these elements should be presented and analyzed. While this information can be used to inform the content of falls-prevention programs, the primary aim of the article is to make recommendations on how the outcome of these programs should be captured.

scholarly journals Targeting Dynamic Balance in Falls-Prevention Interventions in Multiple Sclerosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Cattaneo ◽  
Johanna Jonsdottir ◽  
Susan Coote
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Balance Deficits ◽  
Prevention Trials

Balance deficits are common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and are associated with past and future falls. People with MS tend to fall during activities of daily living and recreation that involve transitions between body positions and during walking and turning. The evident deficits in dynamic balance may be partly due to impairment in the collection or integration of sensory inputs or the execution of appropriate movements in moments of distraction. There is growing evidence that dynamic balance is modifiable and that improvements in dynamic balance are associated with reduction in falls. Consequently, it is imperative that balance measures be appropriate to capture changes in components of dynamic balance. There are numerous ways to measure dynamic balance. When selecting the appropriate dynamic balance measure for an MS falls-prevention trial, the inclusion criteria and content of intervention will inform the choice of measure. The International MS Falls Prevention Research Network (IMSFPRN) suggests that measures of dynamic balance be included as an outcome measure for use in falls-prevention trials.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of interventions to prevent falls for people with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: an umbrella review

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola O’Malley ◽  
Amanda M. Clifford ◽  
Mairéad Conneely ◽  
Bláthín Casey ◽  
Susan Coote
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Falls Risk ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Evidence Table

Abstract Background The implementation of condition-specific falls prevention interventions is proving challenging due to lack of critical mass and resources. Given the similarities in falls risk factors across stroke, Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the development of an intervention designed for groups comprising of people with these three neurological conditions may provide a pragmatic solution to these challenges. The aims of this umbrella review were to investigate the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in MS, PD and stroke, and to identify the commonalities and differences between effective interventions for each condition to inform the development of an intervention for mixed neurological groups. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using 15 electronic databases, grey literature searches and hand-screening of reference lists. Systematic reviews of studies investigating the effects of falls prevention interventions in MS, PD and stroke were included. Methodological quality of reviews was assessed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. A matrix of evidence table was used to assess the degree of overlap. The Grading of Recommendations Assessments, Development and Evaluation framework was used to rate the quality of evidence. Findings were presented through narrative synthesis and a summary of evidence table. Results Eighteen reviews were included; three investigating effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in MS, 11 in PD, three in stroke, and one in both PD and stroke. Exercise-based interventions were the most commonly investigated for all three conditions, but differences were identified in the content and delivery of these interventions. Low to moderate quality evidence was found for the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions at reducing falls in PD. Best available evidence suggests that exercise is effective at reducing falls in stroke but no evidence of effect was identified in MS. Conclusions The findings suggest that exercise-based interventions are effective at reducing falls in PD, however, the evidence for MS and stroke is less conclusive. A strong theoretical rationale remains for the use of exercise-based interventions to address modifiable physiological falls risk factors for people with MS, PD and stroke, supporting the feasibility of a mixed-diagnosis intervention. Given the high overlap and low methodological quality of primary studies, the focus should be on the development of high-quality trials investigating the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions, rather than the publication of further systematic reviews.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke: protocol for an umbrella review

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Nicola O'Malley ◽  
Amanda M. Clifford ◽  
Laura Comber ◽  
Susan Coote
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Background: Falls are common among people with neurological diseases and are associated with many negative physical, psychosocial and economic consequences. Implementation of single diagnosis falls prevention interventions is currently problematic due to lack of participants and resources. Given the similarities in falls risk factors across stroke, Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the development of an intervention designed for mixed neurological populations seems plausible and may provide a solution to current implementation challenges. This umbrella review aims to summarise the totality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke and to identify the commonalities and differences between interventions that are effective for each disease to inform the development of an intervention for mixed diagnoses. Methods: This umbrella review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Electronic databases and grey literature will be searched. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTS) and studies investigating the effects of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions on falls outcomes among people with MS, PD and stroke will be included. Methodological quality of included reviews will be assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessments, Development and Evaluation framework will be used to rate the quality of evidence. A summary of evidence table and narrative synthesis will be utilised to clearly indicate the findings. Discussion: This umbrella review presents a novel and timely approach to synthesise existing falls literature to identify effective non-pharmacological interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke. Of importance, this umbrella review will use a robust methodology to explore the key differences and similarities in effective interventions for individuals with these neurological diseases to facilitate the development of an intervention for mixed neurological groups.

Medication usage and falls in people with multiple sclerosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 995-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Comber ◽  
Gillian Quinn ◽  
Chris McGuigan ◽  
Rose Galvin ◽  
Susan Coote
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Medication Usage ◽  
Conflicting Evidence ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Risk Factors For Falls ◽  
Acting Muscle

There is a need to identify modifiable risk factors for falls in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) to enable the design of successful falls prevention interventions. There is conflicting evidence regarding the association between medication use and occurrence of falls in MS. A total of 101 people with MS had medications classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Classification system and number of falls prospectively monitored for 3 months. No association was noted between number of medications and falls. The use of genitourinary and sex hormones (odds ratio (OR) = 5.154, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.427–18.609, p = 0.012) and centrally acting muscle relaxant (OR = 5.181, 95% CI = 1.546–17.364, p = 0.008) medications were associated with an increased odds of being a faller.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke: protocol for an umbrella review

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Nicola O'Malley ◽  
Amanda M. Clifford ◽  
Laura Comber ◽  
Susan Coote
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Umbrella Review ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Background: Falls are common among people with neurological diseases and have many negative physical, psychosocial and economic consequences. Implementation of single-diagnosis falls prevention interventions is currently problematic due to lack of participants and resources. Given the similarities in falls risk factors across stroke, Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the development of an intervention designed for mixed neurological populations seems plausible and may provide a pragmatic solution to current implementation challenges. This umbrella review aims to summarise the totality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke and identify the commonalities and differences between effective interventions for each disease to inform the development of an evidence-based intervention that can be tailored for people with mixed diagnoses. Methods: This umbrella review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. 15 electronic databases and grey literature will be searched. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and studies investigating the effects of non-pharmacological falls prevention interventions on falls outcomes among people with MS, PD and stroke will be included. Methodological quality of included reviews will be assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessments, Development and Evaluation framework will be used to rate the quality of evidence. A summary of evidence table and narrative synthesis will be utilised to clearly indicate the findings. Discussion: This umbrella review presents a novel and timely approach to synthesise existing falls literature to identify effective non-pharmacological interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke. Of importance, a robust methodology will be used to explore the differences and similarities in effective interventions for individuals with these neurological conditions to facilitate the development of an intervention for these mixed neurological groups.

scholarly journals Participation as an Outcome in Multiple Sclerosis Falls-Prevention Research

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Finlayson ◽  
Elizabeth Peterson ◽  
Patricia N. Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Group Process ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Prevention Research ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Prevention Intervention ◽  
Inaugural Meeting

Selecting the outcomes for an intervention trial is a key decision that influences many other aspects of the study design. One of the major tasks during the 3-day inaugural meeting of the International MS Falls Prevention Research Network was to identify the key outcomes for the falls-prevention intervention that was being designed by the Network members for testing across their multiple sites. Through a nominal group process, meeting participants described how engagement in important, meaningful everyday activities, beyond traditional basic and instrumental activities of daily living, should be a long-term outcome of a successful falls-prevention intervention for people with MS. Post-meeting work, which involved literature reviews and comparisons of definitions of major constructs identified during the meeting discussions, led to the consensus recommendation of including participation as a long-term outcome in MS falls-prevention interventions. Participation reflects involvement in a life situation. This article explains the rationale for this recommendation and presents four measures that have the potential for use in tracking long-term participation outcomes in MS falls-prevention research.

scholarly journals Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for evaluating mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Nicola O'Malley ◽  
Susan Coote ◽  
Amanda M Clifford
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Core Outcome ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Outcome Set ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Background: Given the high incidence of falls and their associated negative effects, the development of effective falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's Disease (PD) and stroke is a priority. Currently the implementation of condition-specific falls prevention interventions is challenging in the community due to lack of participants and resources. Given the similarities in falls risk factors across stroke, PD and MS, the design of mixed-diagnosis interventions for groups comprising of people with these three neurological conditions may solve these implementation challenges. Having a core outcome set (COS) for evaluating these interventions would enable the comparison and combination of data, thereby facilitating progress in this research area. Therefore, the aim of this research study is to develop a COS for evaluating mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke. Methods: This will be a mixed-methods, international, multi-perspective Delphi consensus study with five stages. Stage one will involve the identification of potential outcomes through a systematic literature search, patient focus groups, and consultation with our Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) panel. The second stage will be the development of the Delphi survey using the outcomes elicited from stage one. Stage three will be the prioritisation of outcomes using a two-round online Delphi survey involving patients, clinicians, researchers and policy-makers/service-planners. The fourth stage will be to identify and recommend outcome measures and definitions. The final stage will be a consensus meeting with representatives from each stakeholder group to agree upon the final COS. Discussion: Adoption of this COS in future trials investigating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke will facilitate the comparison and combination of research findings. This should translate into improved decision-making by service-planners/policy-makers and clinicians regarding the implementation of evidence-based falls prevention interventions into practice.

scholarly journals Whom to Target for Falls-Prevention Trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Cameron ◽  
Susan Coote ◽  
Jacob J. Sosnoff
Keyword(s):  
Falls Prevention ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Assistive Device ◽  
Prevention Research ◽  
Inaugural Meeting ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prevention Trials ◽  
Review Reports ◽  
Device Use

Effective falls-prevention approaches for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are needed. A significant challenge in studying falls-prevention programs for people with MS is deciding whom to include in trials. This article presents and discusses potential criteria for selecting participants for trials of falls-prevention interventions in MS. This narrative review reports on the inaugural meeting of the International MS Falls Prevention Research Network (IMSFPRN), which was held in March 2014 in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Criteria considered were age, assistive device use, cognition, and fall history. The IMSFPRN reached consensus agreement to recommend that participants of all ages with varying levels of cognitive ability who are able to ambulate with or without assistance and who have a history of falling should be included in their future falls-prevention trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document