scholarly journals HAS-BLED scor system for the assessment of risk of breathing of patients on oral anticoagulant therapy // HAS-BLED skor sistem bodovanja za procjenu rizika od krvarenja pacijenata na oralnoj antikoagulantnoj terapiji

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Daniela Dobrovoljski
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Coagulation Factors ◽  
Heart Rhythm Disorders ◽  
Anticoagulant Drugs

Oral anticoagulant drugs (OALs) are effective agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications. However, despite standardization and application progression, OALs represent a significant clinical problem because they are small-therapeutic medicines that easily interact with food and medicine, which can substantially affect the increased or weakened therapeutic effect. Oral anticoagulants are 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives and vitamin K antagonists, and their pharmacological activity is based on inhibition of the synthesis of coagulation factors in the liver. These drugs are effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction (AIM), heart rhythm disorders by type of atrial fibrillation, stroke prevention, and the like. The most important and clinically commonly undesirable effect of OAL is bleeding. The risk of bleeding is greatest during the introduction of the drug in therapy and for the first few months of the onset of therapy. HAS-BLED scor is a skoring system developed to estimate the 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation and is also used for other indications.

Management of Oral Anticoagulant-associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-125
Author(s):  
Corina Epple ◽  
Thorsten Steiner
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Anticoagulant Activity ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Bleeding Management ◽  
Number Of Patients

Introduction: Oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhages (OAC-ICHs) account for nearly 20% of all ICH and are associated with high mortality. The number of patients with an indication for oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is increasing with the aging population; therefore, despite the improved safety profile of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the number of patients with OAC-ICH will increase. OAT was simplified with the introduction of NOACs, which are easy to handle and show a favorable risk-benefit profile. The rate of ICH is lower than for vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and routine coagulation testing is not required. Nevertheless, OAC-ICH does occur and is still a devastating disease, thus representing the most feared complication in OAT, irrespective of treatment with VKA or NOAC. Purpose: The aim of this article is to address the clinical problem of bleeding management in patients with ICH due to OAC and will consider anticoagulation with NOAC and VKA. Recommendations: Restoring coagulation as soon as possible is the main goal and, therefore, knowledge of the actual coagulation status is essential. In VKA-associated ICH, the international normalized ratio (INR) should be lowered to below 1.3. However, laboratory measurement of anticoagulant activity in NOAC patients is more complex, rendering OAC-ICH treatment more complicated. The best assays are specialized and not widely available, whereas more accessible tests such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time have important limitations. For VKA-ICH, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) should be administered to reverse the INR. For dabigatran-related ICH, 5 g idarucizumab should be administered. For factor Xa inhibitors, PCC is recommended in the absence of andexanet alfa as soon as an OAC-related ICH evolves. Resuming OAC after ICH should be considered, depending on risk factors and a risk-benefit evaluation.

scholarly journals Problem of prescribing anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation on the regional level

2020 ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
M. G. Nazarkina ◽  
V. V. Stolyarova ◽  
D. A. Karpova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Constant Form ◽  
Heart Rhythm Disorders ◽  
The Republic

Introduction. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with heart rhythm disorders accounting for a significant proportion of them. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia that poses a risk of thromboembolic complications and is difficult to treat with ongoing preventive anticoagulant therapy. Aim of the study. To analyze the prescription of anticoagulant therapy to patients with AF on the regional level. Methods and results. The study included 72 patients with the nonvalvular form of AF (from 41 to 82 years old) of the Department of Rhythm and Conductivity Abnormalities of the State Budgetary Institution of the Republic of Mordovia RCH № 4 for 2019. Three groups were singled out depending on the AF form: the first one – patients with the constant form (n = 22), the second one (n = 24) – with the persistent form, the third one (n = 24) – with the paroxysmal form. The risk of thromboembolic complications was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc scale and hemorrhagic complications using the HAS-BLED scale. All patients had a high risk of thromboembolism (index above 2 points), which reflects multiple risk factors and indicates the need for oral anticoagulants (OAC). According to HAS-BLED scale calculations, the risk of haemorrhagic complications was low in most patients (2 or less points) – there was no significant increase in the risk of bleeding, but careful monitoring is required. Analysis of the results revealed that only 54% of patients took OAC, despite the fact that all patients were shown anticoagulant therapy. When analyzing the cases of patients who did not take anticoagulants, it was found that 23% of patients, despite the doctor’s recommendations, refused to take the drugs, 47% of patients justified the inability to control IHR and 30% were unable to purchase expensive new OAC. Conclusion. Despite the recommendations for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation, only 54% were prescribed oral anticoagulants.

The Combination of Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapies: Stay One Step Ahead

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-398
Author(s):  
Fabiana Lucà ◽  
Simona Giubilato ◽  
Stefania Angela Di Fusco ◽  
Angelo Leone ◽  
Stefano Poli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Coronary Syndromes

Antithrombotic drugs, which include antiplatelets and anticoagulants, are effective in prevention and treatment of many cardiovascular disorders such as acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and venous thromboembolism and are among the drugs most commonly prescribed worldwide. The advent of direct oral anticoagulants, which are safer alternatives to vitamin K antagonists and do not require laboratory monitoring, has revolutionized the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. The combination of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy is required in many conditions of great clinical impact such as the coexistence of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, with indication to percutaneous coronary intervention. However, strategies that combine anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies lead to a significant increase in bleeding rates and it is crucial to find the right combination in the single patient in order to optimize the ischemic and bleeding risk. The aim of this review is to explore the evidence and controversies regarding the optimal combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy through the consideration of past dogmas and new perspectives from recent clinical trials and to propose a tailored therapeutic approach, according to specific clinical scenarios and individual patient characteristics. In particular, we separately explored the clinical settings of stable and acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous revascularization in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Which Patients Would Be Willing to Change Anticoagulation From Vitamin-K Antagonists to a New Oral Anticoagulant?

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4318-4318
Author(s):  
Job Harenberg ◽  
Svetlana Marx ◽  
Nadja Abou-Ayash ◽  
Christophe Kremer ◽  
Vera Hoeing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Willingness To Change

Abstract Abstract 4318 New oral anticoagulants have generated promising data on the prophylaxis of systemic and non-systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and prolonged prophylaxis of recurrent events. For patients on chronic treatment with vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) we analysed the motivation and willingness to change the anticoagulation from VKA to new oral anticoagulants. Patients (n=110) on stable treatment with VKA for at least 3 months (indication for anticoagulation: atrial fibrillation or VTE) completed a validated personality inventory (Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R), and a self-developed questionnaire on general attitudes regarding anticoagulant therapy (Q1). Patients were divided in two groups according to the reply to the question weather they were willing to switch to a new oral anticoagulant. Out of these sets of questions 7 questions were identified by means of a logistic regression analysis for the willingness to change anticoagulation with VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. The same patients completed this shortened questionnaire (Q2) (n=85) thereafter. Logistic regression analysis defined the 7 items of the FPI and Q1 questionaires as relevant for willingness of patients to change the medication. The probability to change medication was 98% using the 7 questions (Q2) compared to the 2 comlete questionnaires. The items were: extraversion – introversion scale on the FPI-R consisting of 14 questions, and from Q1: hope for a better quality of life with a new anticoagulant, no scepticism for new drugs, wish of a lack of routine monitoring for dose adjustment, relevance of the practitioners opinion, thoughts in the past of alternatives for anticoagulation, and difficulty to adjust the prothrombin time. Using Q2 85% of patients confirmed to be willing to change the anticoagulant drug compared to Q1 (chi square test p<0.0001). Seven questions were identified and confirmed to identify patients for their willingness to change anticoagulation from VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals 2021 Korean Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-311
Author(s):  
Ki Hong Lee ◽  
Jin-Bae Kim ◽  
Seung Yong Shin ◽  
Boyoung Joung
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Optimal Strategies ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Bleeding Risk

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a strong risk factor for ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. To prevent thromboembolic events in patients with AF, anticoagulation therapy is essential. The anticoagulant strategy is determined after stroke and bleeding risk assessments using the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, respectively; both consider clinical risk factors. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the sole anticoagulant option in AF patients with a prosthetic mechanical valve or moderate-severe mitral stenosis; in all other AF patients VKA or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are therapeutic options. However, antiplatelet therapy should not be used for stroke prevention in AF patients. Anticoagulation is not needed in AF patients with low stroke risk but strongly recommended in those with a with low bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion offers an alternative in AF patients in whom long-term anticoagulation is contraindicated. Surgical occlusion or the exclusion of LAA can be considered for stroke prevention in AF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In this article, we review existing data for stroke prevention and suggest optimal strategies to prevent stroke in AF patients.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients aged 75 years or older: Efficacy and safety balance

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
V V Fomin ◽  
A A Svistunov ◽  
D A Napalkov ◽  
A A Sokolova ◽  
M A Gabitova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Heart Rhythm Disorders ◽  
Prevention Of Thromboembolic Events

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common heart rhythm disorders in the population. Researchers revealed a direct relationship between their incidence and a patient’s age long ago. One of the most challenging issues of clinical practice in patients with AF is anticoagulant therapy used in the so-called very elderly patients aged 75 years and older when age itself is a risk factor for developing both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events due to anticoagulants, regardless of the mechanism of action of the latter. However, scientific data regarding the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events in elderly and senile patients with AF are very scarce and often uninformative. The data from the EURObservational Research Programme-Atrial Fibrillation Registry Pilot Phase (EORP-AF Pilot) and the randomized clinical studies RELY, ROCKET AF, ARISTOTLE, and AVERROES were analyzed to identify the most safe and most effective anticoagulant for elderly patients (over 75 years). Relying on the analyses of literature data, the authors propose an algorithm based on clinical characteristics for choosing the anticoagulant for patients older than 75 years.

scholarly journals New Cancer Diagnosis After Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Raposeiras Roubín ◽  
Emad Abu Assi ◽  
Cristina Barreiro Pardal ◽  
María Cespón Fernandez ◽  
Isabel Muñoz Pousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Background Bleeding is frequent in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with oral anticoagulant therapy, and may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer. We sought to investigate to what extent bleeding represents the unmasking of an occult cancer in patients with AF treated with oral anticoagulants. Methods and Results Using data from CardioCHUVI‐AF (Retrospective Observational Registry of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation From Vigo's Health Area), 8753 patients with AF aged ≥75 years with a diagnosis of AF between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed. Of them, 2171 (24.8%) experienced any clinically relevant bleeding, and 479 (5.5%) were diagnosed with cancer during a follow‐up of 3 years. Among 2171 patients who experienced bleeding, 198 (9.1%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Patients with bleeding have a 3‐fold higher hazard of being subsequently diagnosed with new cancer compared with those without bleeding (4.7 versus 1.4 per 100 patient‐years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.2 [95% CI, 2.6–3.9]). Gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a 13‐fold higher hazard of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (HR, 13.4; 95% CI, 9.1–19.8); genitourinary bleeding was associated with an 18‐fold higher hazard of new genitourinary cancer diagnosis (HR, 18.1; 95% CI, 12.5–26.2); and bronchopulmonary bleeding was associated with a 15‐fold higher hazard of new bronchopulmonary cancer diagnosis (HR, 15.8; 95% CI, 6.0–41.3). For other bleeding (nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary, nonbronchopulmonary), the HR for cancer was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5–3.6). Conclusions In patients with AF treated with oral anticoagulant therapy, any gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or bronchopulmonary bleeding was associated with higher rates of new cancer diagnosis. These bleeding events should prompt investigation for cancers at those sites.

scholarly journals Az edoxabán véralvadásgátló hatásossága és biztonságossága nonvalvuláris pitvarfibrillációban

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (12) ◽  
pp. 466-469
Author(s):  
Andrea Szegedi ◽  
Zoltán Csanádi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Anticoagulant Drugs

Abstract: The significantly increased incidence of stroke and systemic embolisation caused by atrial fibrillation can be prevented by adequately adjusted anticoagulant therapy. Vitamin K antagonists effectively decrease the risk of thromboembolic events but this effect is influenced by many factors. The development of the new direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC) in the last few years provided new opportunities for us to choose the suitable anticoagulant therapy. According to the results of the ENGAGE AF–TIMI 48 and ENSURE-AF multicenter, randomized trials, edoxaban, the recently introduced DOAC is equally effective as the traditional coumarin therapy, nevertheless, it ensures more tolerable anticoagulation for patients suffering from non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(12): 466–469.

scholarly journals Anticoagulant prescribing for atrial fibrillation and risk of incident dementia

Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319672
Author(s):  
Sharon Louise Cadogan ◽  
Emma Powell ◽  
Kevin Wing ◽  
Angel Yun Wong ◽  
Liam Smeeth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Incident Dementia ◽  
First Time

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the association between oral anticoagulant type (direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)) and incident dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsUsing linked electronic health record (EHR) data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in the UK, we conducted a historical cohort study among first-time oral anticoagulant users with incident non-valvular AF diagnosed from 2012 to 2018. We compared the incidence of (1) clinically coded dementia and (2) MCI between patients prescribed VKAs and DOACs using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with age as the underlying timescale, accounting for calendar time and time on treatment, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, clinical comorbidities and medications.ResultsOf 39 200 first-time oral anticoagulant users (44.6% female, median age 76 years, IQR 68–83), 20 687 (53%) were prescribed a VKA and 18 513 (47%) a DOAC at baseline. Overall, 1258 patients (3.2%) had GP-recorded incident dementia, incidence rate 16.5 per 1000 person-years. DOAC treatment for AF was associated with a 16% reduction in dementia diagnosis compared with VKA treatment in the whole cohort (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.98) and with a 26% reduction in incident MCI (adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.84). Findings were similar across various sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsIncident EHR-recorded dementia and MCI were less common among patients prescribed DOACs for new AF compared with those prescribed VKAs.

scholarly journals Safety and differences between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the risk of post-traumatic intrathoracic bleeding after rib fractures in elderly patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Turcato ◽  
Arian Zaboli ◽  
Andrea Tenci ◽  
Giorgio Ricci ◽  
Massimo Zannoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Traumatic Bleeding ◽  
Post Traumatic

Closed chest traumas are frequent consequences of falls in the elderly. The presence of concomitant oral anticoagulant therapy can increase the risk of post-traumatic bleeding even in cases of trauma with non-severe dynamics. There is limited information about the differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in the risk of post-traumatic bleeding. To assess differences in the risk of developing intra-thoracic hemorrhages after chest trauma with at least one rib fracture caused by an accidental fall in patients over 75 years of age taking oral anticoagulant therapy. This study involved data from four emergency departments over two years. All patients on oral anticoagulant therapy and over 75 years of age who reported a closed thoracic trauma with at least one rib fracture were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two study groups according their anticoagulant therapy. Of the 342 patients included in the study, 38.9% (133/342) were treated with direct oral anticoagulants and 61.1% (209/342) were treated with vitamin K antagonist. A total of 7% (24/342) of patients presented intrathoracic bleeding, while 5% (17/342) required surgery or died as a result for the trauma. Posttraumatic intrathoracic bleeding occurred in 4.5% (6/133) of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants and 8.6% (18/209) of patients receiving vitamin K antagonist. Logistic regression analysis, revealed no difference in the risk of intrathoracic haemorrhages between the two studied groups. Direct oral anticoagulants therapy presents a risk of post-traumatic intrathoracic haemorrhage comparable to that of vitamin K antagonist therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document