scholarly journals Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Melmi ◽  
Eric Castet
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Visual Awareness ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Pupillary Response ◽  
Subjective Report ◽  
Vertical Grating ◽  
Pupillary Constriction ◽  
Eye Velocity

It is commonly believed that vision is impaired during saccadic eye movements. However, here we report that some visual stimuli are clearly visible during saccades, and trigger a constriction of the eye's pupil. Participants viewed sinusoid gratings that changed polarity 150 times per second (every 6.67 ms). At this rate of flicker, the gratings were perceived as homogeneous surfaces while participants fixated. However, the flickering gratings contained ambiguous motion: rightward and leftward motion for vertical gratings; upward and downward motion for horizontal gratings. When participants made a saccade perpendicular to the gratings' orientation (e.g., a leftward saccade for a vertical grating), the eye's peak velocity matched the gratings' motion. As a result, the retinal image was approximately stable for a brief moment during the saccade, and this gave rise to an intrasaccadic percept: A normally invisible stimulus became visible when eye velocity was maximal. Our results confirm and extend previous studies by demonstrating intrasaccadic perception using a reflexive measure (pupillometry) that does not rely on subjective report. Our results further show that intrasaccadic perception affects all stages of visual processing, from the pupillary response to visual awareness.

scholarly journals Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Melmi ◽  
Eric Castet
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Visual Awareness ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Pupillary Response ◽  
Subjective Report ◽  
Vertical Grating ◽  
Pupillary Constriction ◽  
Eye Velocity

It is commonly believed that vision is impaired during saccadic eye movements. However, here we report that some visual stimuli are clearly visible during saccades, and trigger a constriction of the eye's pupil. Participants viewed sinusoid gratings that changed polarity 150 times per second (every 6.67 ms). At this rate of flicker, the gratings were perceived as homogeneous surfaces while participants fixated. However, the flickering gratings contained ambiguous motion: rightward and leftward motion for vertical gratings; upward and downward motion for horizontal gratings. When participants made a saccade perpendicular to the gratings' orientation (e.g., a leftward saccade for a vertical grating), the eye's peak velocity matched the gratings' motion. As a result, the retinal image was approximately stable for a brief moment during the saccade, and this gave rise to an intrasaccadic percept: A normally invisible stimulus became visible when eye velocity was maximal. Our results confirm and extend previous studies by demonstrating intrasaccadic perception using a reflexive measure (pupillometry) that does not rely on subjective report. Our results further show that intrasaccadic perception affects all stages of visual processing, from the pupillary response to visual awareness.

scholarly journals Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Melmi ◽  
Eric Castet
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Perception ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Predictive Coding ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Subjective Report ◽  
Vertical Grating ◽  
Retinal Motion ◽  
Pupillary Constriction ◽  
Eye Velocity

It is commonly believed that vision is impaired during saccadic eye movements. However, here we report that some visual stimuli are clearly visible during saccades, and trigger a constriction of the eye's pupil. Participants viewed sinusoid gratings that changed polarity 150 times per second (every 6.67 ms). At this rate of flicker, the gratings were perceived as homogeneous surfaces while participants fixated. However, the flickering gratings contained ambiguous motion: rightward and leftward motion for vertical gratings; upward and downward motion for horizontal gratings. When participants made a saccade perpendicular to the gratings' orientation (e.g., a leftward saccade for a vertical grating), the eye's peak velocity matched the gratings' motion. As a result, the retinal image was approximately stable for a brief moment during the saccade, and this gave rise to an intrasaccadic percept: A normally invisible stimulus became visible when eye velocity was maximal. Our results confirm and extend previous studies by demonstrating intrasaccadic perception using a reflexive measure (pupillometry) that does not rely on subjective report. We suggest that visual perception during saccades is best understood in terms of predictive coding: The retinal motion that occurs during saccades is predictable, offers no evidence for motion in the environment, and is therefore not perceived. But when intrasaccadic visual input violates predictions, a clear intrasaccadic percept arises.

scholarly journals The role of action intentionality and effector in the subjective expansion of temporal duration after saccadic eye movements

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Melcher ◽  
Devpriya Kumar ◽  
Narayanan Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Intentional Binding ◽  
Opposite Pattern ◽  
Motor Action ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Backward Shift ◽  
The Moment

Abstract Visual perception is based on periods of stable fixation separated by saccadic eye movements. Although naive perception seems stable (in space) and continuous (in time), laboratory studies have demonstrated that events presented around the time of saccades are misperceived spatially and temporally. Saccadic chronostasis, the “stopped clock illusion”, represents one such temporal distortion in which the movement of the clock hand after the saccade is perceived as lasting longer than usual. Multiple explanations for chronostasis have been proposed including action-backdating, temporal binding of the action towards the moment of its effect (“intentional binding”) and post-saccadic temporal dilation. The current study aimed to resolve this debate by using different types of action (keypress vs saccade) and varying the intentionality of the action. We measured both perceived onset of the motor action and perceived onset of an auditory tone presented at different delays after the keypress/saccade. The results showed intentional binding for the keypress action, with perceived motor onset shifted forwards in time and the time of the tone shifted backwards. Saccades resulted in the opposite pattern, showing temporal expansion rather than compression, especially with cued saccades. The temporal illusion was modulated by intentionality of the movement. Our findings suggest that saccadic chronostasis is not solely dependent on a backward shift in perceived saccade onset, but instead reflects a temporal dilation. This percept of an effectively “longer” period at the beginning of a new fixation may reflect the pattern of suppressed, and then enhanced, visual processing around the time of saccades.

Visual Fatigue and Saccadic Eye Movement Parameters

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 728-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Megaw ◽  
Tayyar Sen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Tracking Task ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Fatigue ◽  
Movement Parameters

It has been suggested by Bahill and Stark (1975) that visual fatigue can be identified by changes in some of the saccadic eye movement parameters. These include increases in the frequency of occurrence of glissades and overlapping saccades and reductions in the peak velocity and duration of saccades. In their study, fatigue was induced by the same step tracking task that was used to evaluate the changes in saccadic parameters. However, there is evidence that subjects experience extreme feelings of fatigue while performing such a task and that somehow the task is unnatural. The present study was designed to assess whether there are any differences in the various saccadic parameters obtained while subjects perform a step tracking task and a cognitive task involving the comparison of number strings. Both tasks were presented on a VDU screen. The second objective was to establish whether there are any changes in the parameters for either task as a result of prolonged performance. The results showed no major differences in the saccadic eye movements between the two tasks and no consistent changes resulting from prolonged performance.

scholarly journals Contrast sensitivity, V1 neural activity, and natural vision

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Niemeyer ◽  
Michael A. Paradiso
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Brain Area ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Sensitivity ◽  
Natural Image ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Natural Vision ◽  
Common Laboratory

Contrast sensitivity is fundamental to natural visual processing and an important tool for characterizing both visual function and clinical disorders. We simultaneously measured contrast sensitivity and neural contrast response functions and compared measurements in common laboratory conditions with naturalistic conditions. In typical experiments, a subject holds fixation and a stimulus is flashed on, whereas in natural vision, saccades bring stimuli into view. Motivated by our previous V1 findings, we tested the hypothesis that perceptual contrast sensitivity is lower in natural vision and that this effect is associated with corresponding changes in V1 activity. We found that contrast sensitivity and V1 activity are correlated and that the relationship is similar in laboratory and naturalistic paradigms. However, in the more natural situation, contrast sensitivity is reduced up to 25% compared with that in a standard fixation paradigm, particularly at lower spatial frequencies, and this effect correlates with significant reductions in V1 responses. Our data suggest that these reductions in natural vision result from fast adaptation on one fixation that lowers the response on a subsequent fixation. This is the first demonstration of rapid, natural-image adaptation that carries across saccades, a process that appears to constantly influence visual sensitivity in natural vision. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Visual sensitivity and activity in brain area V1 were studied in a paradigm that included saccadic eye movements and natural visual input. V1 responses and contrast sensitivity were significantly reduced compared with results in common laboratory paradigms. The parallel neural and perceptual effects of eye movements and stimulus complexity appear to be due to a form of rapid adaptation that carries across saccades.

Properties of Horizontal Saccades Accompanied by Blinks

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 2895-2902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus G. Rottach ◽  
Vallabh E. Das ◽  
Walter Wohlgemuth ◽  
Ari Z. Zivotofsky ◽  
R. John Leigh
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Stationary Target ◽  
Normal Human ◽  
The Right ◽  
Straight Ahead ◽  
Omnipause Neurons

Rottach, Klaus G., Vallabh E. Das, Walter Wohlgemuth, Ari Z. Zivotofsky, and R. John Leigh. Properties of horizontal saccades accompanied by blinks. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2895–2902, 1998. Using the magnetic search coil technique to record eye and lid movements, we investigated the effect of voluntary blinks on horizontal saccades in five normal human subjects. The main goal of the study was to determine whether changes in the dynamics of saccades with blinks could be accounted for by a superposition of the eye movements induced by blinks as subjects fixated a stationary target and saccadic movements made without a blink. First, subjects made voluntary blinks as they fixed on stationary targets located straight ahead or 20° to the right or left. They then made saccades between two continuously visible targets 20 or 40° apart, while either attempting not to blink, or voluntarily blinking, with each saccade. During fixation of a target located straight ahead, blinks induced brief downward and nasalward deflections of eye position. When subjects looked at targets located at right or left 20°, similar initial movements were made by four of the subjects, but the amplitude of the adducted eye was reduced by 65% and was followed by a larger temporalward movement. Blinks caused substantial changes in the dynamic properties of saccades. For 20° saccades made with blinks, peak velocity and peak acceleration were decreased by ∼20% in all subjects compared with saccades made without blinks. Blinks caused the duration of 20° saccades to increase, on average, by 36%. On the other hand, blinks had only small effects on the gain of saccades. Blinks had little influence on the relative velocities of centrifugal versus centripetal saccades, and abducting versus adducting saccades. Three of five subjects showed a significantly increased incidence of dynamic overshoot in saccades accompanied by blinks, especially for 20° movements. Taken with other evidence, this finding suggests that saccadic omnipause neurons are inhibited by blinks, which have longer duration than the saccades that company them. In conclusion, the changes in dynamic properties of saccades brought about by blinks cannot be accounted for simply by a summation of gaze perturbations produced by blinks during fixation and saccadic eye movements made without blinks. Our findings, especially the appearance of dynamic overshoots, suggest that blinks affect the central programming of saccades. These effects of blinks need to be taken into account during studies of the dynamic properties of saccades.

Impairment of Saccadic Eye Movements by Scopolamine Treatment

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia A. Oliva ◽  
Maria P. Bucci ◽  
Roberto Fioravanti
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Intramuscular Injection ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Random Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Random Time Interval ◽  
Standard Deviations

The effects of Scopolamine on the dynamics of saccadic eye movements, stimulated over a random time interval, have been investigated in humans. A 0.5-mg dose of the drug (intramuscular injection) had various influences on the basic saccadic parameters. For all subjects duration increased and peak velocity decreased, while for 50% of the subjects saccades became hypometric and latency increased. Standard deviations increased consistently too. Moreover, the Scopolamine treatment affected postsaccadic fixation; at the end of many saccades, the eye drifted considerably, but stability was recovered after a few seconds.

scholarly journals Retinally-generated saccadic suppression of a locust looming-detector neuron: investigations using a robot locust

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Santer ◽  
Richard Stafford ◽  
F. Claire Rind
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Saccadic Suppression ◽  
Real Motion ◽  
Early Visual Processing ◽  
Inhibitory Mechanisms ◽  
Model Response ◽  
Detector Model

A fundamental task performed by many visual systems is to distinguish apparent motion caused by eye movements from real motion occurring within the environment. During saccadic eye movements, this task is achieved by inhibitory signals of central and retinal origin that suppress the output of motion-detecting neurons. To investigate the retinally-generated component of this suppression, we used a computational model of a locust looming-detecting pathway that experiences saccadic suppression. This model received input from the camera of a mobile robot that performed simple saccade-like movements, allowing the model's response to simplified real stimuli to be tested. Retinally-generated saccadic suppression resulted from two inhibitory mechanisms within the looming-detector's input architecture. One mechanism fed inhibition forward through the network, inhibiting the looming-detector's initial response to movement. The second spread inhibition laterally within the network, suppressing the looming-detector's maintained response to movement. These mechanisms prevent a loomingdetector model response to whole-field visual stimuli. In the locust, this mechanism of saccadic suppression may operate in addition to centrally-generated suppression. Because lateral inhibition is a common feature of early visual processing in many organisms, we discuss whether the mechanism of retinally-generated saccadic suppression found in the locust looming-detector model may also operate in these species.

scholarly journals Dissociable effects of subliminal incentives on initiation and velocity control of goal-directed eye movements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasko Kilian Hinze ◽  
Ozge Uslu ◽  
Jessica Emily Antono ◽  
Melanie Wilke ◽  
Arezoo Pooresmaeili
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Goal Pursuit ◽  
Cognitive Tasks ◽  
Conscious Awareness ◽  
Velocity Control ◽  
Fixed Amount ◽  
Speed Accuracy ◽  
Monetary Gain

AbstractOver the last decades, several studies have demonstrated that conscious and unconscious reward incentives both affect performance in physical and cognitive tasks, suggesting that goal-pursuit can arise from an unconscious will. Whether the planning of goal-directed saccadic eye movements during an effortful task can also be affected by subliminal reward cues has not been systematically investigated. We employed a novel task where participants had to make several eye movements back and forth between a fixation point and a number of peripheral targets. The total number of targets visited by the eyes in a fixed amount of time determined participants’ monetary gain. The magnitude of the reward at stake was briefly shown at the beginning of each trial and was masked by pattern images superimposed in time. We found that when reward cues were fully visible and thus consciously perceived, higher reward enhanced all saccade parameters. However, a dissociation was observed between the effects of subliminal rewards on saccade initiation and peak velocities. While truly subliminal reward cues did increase the number of saccades, they did not enhance saccades’ peak velocity. Additionally, participants who had reached a truly subliminal level of reward perception showed a decrement in accuracy as a function of reward across all visibility levels, as saccade endpoint error was larger when higher reward incentives were expected. This suboptimal speed-accuracy trade-off did not occur in the supraliminal group. These results suggest that although saccades’ initiation can be triggered by subconscious mechanisms, conscious awareness is required to optimally adjust the velocity and accuracy of eye movements based on the expected rewards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document