scholarly journals Kinetochore-independent chromosome segregation driven by lateral microtubule bundles

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina C Muscat ◽  
Keila M Torre-Santiago ◽  
Michael V Tran ◽  
James A Powers ◽  
Sarah M Wignall
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Chromosome Dynamics ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Independent Segregation ◽  
Main Driver ◽  
Chromosome Associations ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

During cell division, chromosomes attach to spindle microtubules at sites called kinetochores, and force generated at the kinetochore-microtubule interface is the main driver of chromosome movement. Surprisingly, kinetochores are not required for chromosome segregation on acentrosomal spindles in Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes, but the mechanism driving chromosomes apart in their absence is not understood. In this study, we show that lateral microtubule–chromosome associations established during prometaphase remain intact during anaphase to facilitate separation, defining a novel form of kinetochore-independent segregation. Chromosome dynamics during congression and segregation are controlled by opposing forces; plus-end directed forces are mediated by a protein complex that forms a ring around the chromosome center and dynein on chromosome arms provides a minus-end force. At anaphase onset, ring removal shifts the balance between these forces, triggering poleward movement along lateral microtubule bundles. This represents an elegant strategy for controlling chromosomal movements during cell division distinct from the canonical kinetochore-driven mechanism.

scholarly journals Differential requirement for Bub1 and Bub3 in regulation of meiotic versus mitotic chromosome segregation

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Cairo ◽  
Anne M. MacKenzie ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on the proper attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules before anaphase onset. The Ipl1/Aurora B kinase corrects improper attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore components and so releasing aberrant kinetochore–microtubule interactions. The localization of Ipl1 to kinetochores in budding yeast depends upon multiple pathways, including the Bub1–Bub3 pathway. We show here that in meiosis, Bub3 is crucial for correction of attachment errors. Depletion of Bub3 results in reduced levels of kinetochore-localized Ipl1 and concomitant massive chromosome missegregation caused by incorrect chromosome–spindle attachments. Depletion of Bub3 also results in shorter metaphase I and metaphase II due to premature localization of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores, which antagonizes Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation. We propose a new role for the Bub1–Bub3 pathway in maintaining the balance between kinetochore localization of Ipl1 and PP1, a balance that is essential for accurate meiotic chromosome segregation and timely anaphase onset.

scholarly journals The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation

2006 ◽  
Vol 173 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Kline ◽  
Iain M. Cheeseman ◽  
Tetsuya Hori ◽  
Tatsuo Fukagawa ◽  
Arshad Desai
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Stable Complex ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Outer Plate ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

During cell division, kinetochores form the primary chromosomal attachment sites for spindle microtubules. We previously identified a network of 10 interacting kinetochore proteins conserved between Caenorhabditis elegans and humans. In this study, we investigate three proteins in the human network (hDsn1Q9H410, hNnf1PMF1, and hNsl1DC31). Using coexpression in bacteria and fractionation of mitotic extracts, we demonstrate that these proteins form a stable complex with the conserved kinetochore component hMis12. Human or chicken cells depleted of Mis12 complex subunits are delayed in mitosis with misaligned chromosomes and defects in chromosome biorientation. Aligned chromosomes exhibited reduced centromere stretch and diminished kinetochore microtubule bundles. Consistent with this, localization of the outer plate constituent Ndc80HEC1 was severely reduced. The checkpoint protein BubR1, the fibrous corona component centromere protein (CENP) E, and the inner kinetochore proteins CENP-A and CENP-H also failed to accumulate to wild-type levels in depleted cells. These results indicate that a four-subunit Mis12 complex plays an essential role in chromosome segregation in vertebrates and contributes to mitotic kinetochore assembly.

scholarly journals The functions and consequences of force at kinetochores

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florencia Rago ◽  
Iain M. Cheeseman
Keyword(s):  
Recent Work ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Classical Studies ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Chromosome segregation requires the generation of force at the kinetochore—the multiprotein structure that facilitates attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules. This force is required both to move chromosomes and to signal the formation of proper bioriented attachments. To understand the role of force in these processes, it is critical to define how force is generated at kinetochores, the contributions of this force to chromosome movement, and how the kinetochore is structured and organized to withstand and respond to force. Classical studies and recent work provide a framework to dissect the mechanisms, functions, and consequences of force at kinetochores.

scholarly journals Meiosis in Sciara coprophila: structure of the spindle and chromosome behavior during the first meiotic division.

1982 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
D F Kubai
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Serial Sections ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Prophase Nucleus ◽  
Fungus Gnat ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Conical Radiation ◽  
Meiosis I

Light microscope descriptions of meiosis I in males of the fungus gnat Sciara coprophila suggested the presence of a monopolar spindle in which maternal and limited chromosomes move poleward while paternal chromosomes "back away" from the pole. The ultrastructural analysis reported here, based upon serial sections of cells in different stages of meiosis I, shows that the spindle is indeed monopolar with a distinctive differentiation, the polar complex, at one pole. This complex is the focus of a conical radiation of spindle microtubules. Kinetochores of paternal chromosomes face the complex and microtubules associated with these kinetochores run toward the complex. No kinetochore microtubules were discovered on maternal or limited chromosomes. When the position of paternal, maternal, and limited chromosomes is compared at various stages, it is found that limited chromosomes always remain near the polar complex, paternal chromosomes remain far from it and only maternal chromosomes move closer to the pole. Apparently, chromosome segregation does not depend on paternal chromosomes "backing away" from the pole, and the required movement of maternal chromosomes take place in the absence of kinetochore microtubules. In the prophase nucleus, limited and maternal chromosomes are already spatially separate from paternal chromosomes before the spindle forms. Thus, the monopolar spindle functions only to increase the distance between already segregated sets of chromosomes. An extensive system of microtubule-associated membranes outlines the spindle; the possibility that maternal chromosome movement is somehow related to the presence of this membrane is discussed.

scholarly journals CENP-C is a blueprint for constitutive centromere–associated network assembly within human kinetochores

2015 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Klare ◽  
John R. Weir ◽  
Federica Basilico ◽  
Tomasz Zimniak ◽  
Lucia Massimiliano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Binding Interface ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Data Point

Kinetochores are multisubunit complexes that assemble on centromeres to bind spindle microtubules and promote faithful chromosome segregation during cell division. A 16-subunit complex named the constitutive centromere–associated network (CCAN) creates the centromere–kinetochore interface. CENP-C, a CCAN subunit, is crucial for kinetochore assembly because it links centromeres with the microtubule-binding interface of kinetochores. The role of CENP-C in CCAN organization, on the other hand, had been incompletely understood. In this paper, we combined biochemical reconstitution and cellular investigations to unveil how CENP-C promotes kinetochore targeting of other CCAN subunits. The so-called PEST domain in the N-terminal half of CENP-C interacted directly with the four-subunit CCAN subcomplex CENP-HIKM. We identified crucial determinants of this interaction whose mutation prevented kinetochore localization of CENP-HIKM and of CENP-TW, another CCAN subcomplex. When considered together with previous observations, our data point to CENP-C as a blueprint for kinetochore assembly.

The kinesin-like protein CENP-E is kinetochore-associated throughout poleward chromosome segregation during anaphase-A

1996 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 961-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.D. Brown ◽  
K.W. Wood ◽  
D.W. Cleveland
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Initial Alignment ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Spindle Elongation ◽  
Anaphase B

The kinesin-like protein CENP-E transiently associates with kinetochores following nuclear envelope breakdown in late prophase, remains bound throughout metaphase, but sometime after anaphase onset it releases and by telophase becomes bound to interzonal microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Inhibition of poleward chromosome movement in vitro by CENP-E antibodies and association of CENP-E with minus-end directed microtubule motility in vitro have combined to suggest a key role for CENP-E as an anaphase chromosome motor. For this to be plausible in vivo depends on whether CENP-E remains kinetochore associated during anaphase. Using Indian muntjac cells whose seven chromosomes have large, easily tracked kinetochores, we now show that CENP-E is kinetochore-associated throughout the entirety of anaphase-A (poleward chromosome movement), relocating gradually during spindle elongation (anaphase-B) to the interzonal microtubules. These observations support roles for CENP-E not only in the initial alignment of chromosomes at metaphase and in spindle elongation in anaphase-B, but also in poleward chromosome movement in anaphase-A.

scholarly journals A stochastic model of kinetochore–microtubule attachment accurately describes fission yeast chromosome segregation

2012 ◽  
Vol 196 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Gay ◽  
Thibault Courtheoux ◽  
Céline Reyes ◽  
Sylvie Tournier ◽  
Yannick Gachet
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Segregation Behavior ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Yeast Chromosome ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Early Mitosis

In fission yeast, erroneous attachments of spindle microtubules to kinetochores are frequent in early mitosis. Most are corrected before anaphase onset by a mechanism involving the protein kinase Aurora B, which destabilizes kinetochore microtubules (ktMTs) in the absence of tension between sister chromatids. In this paper, we describe a minimal mathematical model of fission yeast chromosome segregation based on the stochastic attachment and detachment of ktMTs. The model accurately reproduces the timing of correct chromosome biorientation and segregation seen in fission yeast. Prevention of attachment defects requires both appropriate kinetochore orientation and an Aurora B–like activity. The model also reproduces abnormal chromosome segregation behavior (caused by, for example, inhibition of Aurora B). It predicts that, in metaphase, merotelic attachment is prevented by a kinetochore orientation effect and corrected by an Aurora B–like activity, whereas in anaphase, it is corrected through unbalanced forces applied to the kinetochore. These unbalanced forces are sufficient to prevent aneuploidy.

scholarly journals The Astrin/SKAP Complex Reduces Friction at the Kinetochore-Microtubule Interface

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miquel Rosas Salvans ◽  
Renaldo Sutanto ◽  
Pooja Suresh ◽  
Sophie Dumont
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Imaging ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Dynamic Microtubule

The kinetochore links chromosomes to spindle microtubules to drive chromosome segregation at cell division. While we know nearly all mammalian kinetochore proteins, how these give rise to the strong yet dynamic microtubule attachments required for function remains poorly understood. Here, we focus on the Astrin-SKAP complex, which localizes to bioriented kinetochores and is essential for chromosome segregation, but whose mechanical role is unclear. Live imaging reveals that SKAP depletion dampens movement and decreases coordination of metaphase sister kinetochores, and increases tension between them. Using laser ablation to isolate kinetochores bound to polymerizing vs depolymerizing microtubules, we show that without SKAP kinetochores move slower on both polymerizing and depolymerizing microtubules, and that more force is needed to rescue microtubules to polymerize. Thus, in contrast to previously described kinetochore proteins that increase grip on microtubules under force, Astrin-SKAP reduces grip, increasing attachment dynamics and force responsiveness and reducing friction. Together, our findings suggest a model where the Astrin-SKAP complex effectively "lubricates" correct, bioriented attachments to help preserve them.

scholarly journals The unconventional kinetoplastid kinetochore: from discovery toward functional understanding

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bungo Akiyoshi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Fundamental Function ◽  
Centromeric Dna ◽  
Eukaryotic Chromosome ◽  
Ndc80 Complex ◽  
Functional Understanding ◽  
Macromolecular Protein ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

The kinetochore is the macromolecular protein complex that drives chromosome segregation in eukaryotes. Its most fundamental function is to connect centromeric DNA to dynamic spindle microtubules. Studies in popular model eukaryotes have shown that centromere protein (CENP)-A is critical for DNA-binding, whereas the Ndc80 complex is essential for microtubule-binding. Given their conservation in diverse eukaryotes, it was widely believed that all eukaryotes would utilize these components to make up a core of the kinetochore. However, a recent study identified an unconventional type of kinetochore in evolutionarily distant kinetoplastid species, showing that chromosome segregation can be achieved using a distinct set of proteins. Here, I review the discovery of the two kinetochore systems and discuss how their studies contribute to a better understanding of the eukaryotic chromosome segregation machinery.

scholarly journals The structural basis for Ulp2 recruitment to the kinetochore

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Quan ◽  
Stephen M. Hinshaw ◽  
Pang-Che Wang ◽  
Stephen C. Harrison ◽  
Huilin Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Centromeric Dna ◽  
Step Process ◽  
Sumo Protease ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

ABSTRACTThe step-by-step process of chromosome segregation defines the stages of the cell division cycle. In eukaryotes, signaling pathways that control these steps converge upon the kinetochore, a multiprotein assembly that connects spindle microtubules to the centromere of each chromosome. Kinetochores control and adapt to major chromosomal transactions, including replication of centromeric DNA, biorientation of sister centromeres on the metaphase spindle, and transit of sister chromatids into daughter cells during anaphase. Although the mechanisms that ensure tight microtubule coupling at anaphase are at least partly understood, kinetochore adaptations that support other cell cycle transitions are not. We report here a mechanism that enables regulated control of kinetochore sumoylation. A conserved surface of the Ctf3/CENP-I kinetochore protein provides a binding site for the SUMO protease, Ulp2. Ctf3 mutations that disable Ulp2 recruitment cause elevated inner kinetochore sumoylation and defective chromosome segregation. The location of the site within the assembled kinetochore suggests coordination between sumoylation and other cell cycle-regulated processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document