scholarly journals Cohesin architecture and clustering in vivo

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siheng Xiang ◽  
Douglas Koshland
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Transcription Regulation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

Cohesin helps mediate sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair, and transcription regulation. We exploited proximity-dependent labeling to define the in vivo interactions of cohesin domains with DNA or with other cohesin domains that lie within the same or in different cohesin complexes. Our results suggest that both cohesin's head and hinge domains are proximal to DNA, and cohesin structure is dynamic with differential folding of its coiled coil regions to generate butterfly confirmations. This method also reveals that cohesins form ordered clusters on and off DNA. The levels of cohesin clusters and their distribution on chromosomes are cell cycle-regulated. Cohesin clustering is likely necessary for cohesion maintenance because clustering and maintenance uniquely require the same subset of cohesin domains and the auxiliary cohesin factor Pds5p. These conclusions provide important new mechanistic and biological insights into the architecture of the cohesin complex, cohesin–cohesin interactions, and cohesin's tethering and loop-extruding activities.

scholarly journals Cohesin in space and time: architecture and oligomerization in vivo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siheng Xiang ◽  
Douglas Koshland
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Transcription Regulation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Coiled Coils ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
And Function

AbstractCohesin helps mediate sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA repair and transcription regulation. Cohesin can tether two regions of DNA and can also extrude DNA loops. We interrogated cohesin architecture, oligomerization state and function of cohesin oligomers in vivo through proximity-dependent labeling of cohesin domains. Our results suggest that the hinge and head domains of cohesin both bind DNA, and that cohesin coiled coils bend, bringing the head and hinge together to form a butterfly conformation. Our data also suggest that cohesin efficiently oligomerizes on and off DNA. The levels of oligomers and their distribution on chromosomes are cell cycle regulated. Cohesin oligomerization is blocked by mutations in distinct domains of Smc3p and Mcd1p, or depletion of Pds5p. This unusual subset of mutations specifically blocks the maintenance of cohesion and condensation, suggesting that cohesin oligomerization plays a critical role in these biological functions.

scholarly journals The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajian Hou ◽  
Chih-Wen Chu ◽  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Kyoko Yokomori ◽  
Hui Zou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Acetyltransferase Activity ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Gain Access

Proper sister chromatid cohesion is critical for maintaining genetic stability. San is a putative acetyltransferase that is important for sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila melanogaster, but not in budding yeast. We showed that San is critical for sister chromatid cohesion in HeLa cells, suggesting that this mechanism may be conserved in metazoans. Furthermore, although a small fraction of San interacts with the NatA complex, San appears to mediate cohesion independently. San exhibits acetyltransferase activity in vitro, and its activity is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vivo. In the absence of San, Sgo1 localizes correctly throughout the cell cycle. However, cohesin is no longer detected at the mitotic centromeres. Furthermore, San localizes to the cytoplasm in interphase cells; thus, it may not gain access to chromosomes until mitosis. Moreover, in San-depleted cells, further depletion of Plk1 rescues the cohesion along the chromosome arms, but not at the centromeres. Collectively, San may be specifically required for the maintenance of the centromeric cohesion in mitosis.

scholarly journals Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (4) ◽  
pp. 729-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Stead ◽  
Cristina Aguilar ◽  
Theresa Hartman ◽  
Melissa Drexel ◽  
Pamela Meluh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Temperature Sensitivity ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosomal Loci

Pds5p and the cohesin complex are required for sister chromatid cohesion and localize to the same chromosomal loci over the same cell cycle window. However, Pds5p and the cohesin complex likely have distinct roles in cohesion. We report that pds5 mutants establish cohesion, but during mitosis exhibit precocious sister dissociation. Thus, unlike the cohesin complex, which is required for cohesion establishment and maintenance, Pds5p is required only for maintenance. We identified SMT4, which encodes a SUMO isopeptidase, as a high copy suppressor of both the temperature sensitivity and precocious sister dissociation of pds5 mutants. In contrast, SMT4 does not suppress temperature sensitivity of cohesin complex mutants. Pds5p is SUMO conjugated, with sumoylation peaking during mitosis. SMT4 overexpression reduces Pds5p sumoylation, whereas smt4 mutants have increased Pds5p sumoylation. smt4 mutants were previously shown to be defective in cohesion maintenance during mitosis. These data provide the first link between a protein required for cohesion, Pds5p, and sumoylation, and suggest that Pds5p sumoylation promotes the dissolution of cohesion.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint restores mitotic fidelity upon loss of sister chromatid cohesion

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Survival ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Shuffling ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Wing Development ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion is essential for faithful mitosis, as premature cohesion loss leads to random chromosome segregation and aneuploidy, resulting in abnormal development. To identify specific conditions capable of restoring defects associated with cohesion loss, we screened for genes whose depletion modulates Drosophila wing development when sister chromatid cohesion is impaired. Cohesion deficiency was induced by knock-down of the acetyltransferase Separation anxiety (San)/Naa50, a cohesin complex stabilizer. Several genes whose function impacts wing development upon cohesion loss were identified. Surprisingly, knockdown of key Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) proteins, Mad2 and Mps1, suppressed developmental defects associated with San depletion. SAC impairment upon cohesin removal, triggered by San depletion or artificial removal of the cohesin complex, prevented extensive genome shuffling, reduced segregation defects and restored cell survival. This counterintuitive phenotypic suppression was caused by an intrinsic bias for efficient chromosome bi-orientation at mitotic entry, coupled with slow engagement of error-correction reactions. We conclude that mitotic timing determines the severity of defects associated with cohesion deficiency. Therefore, although divisions are still error-prone, SAC inactivation enhances cell survival and tissue homeostasis upon cohesion loss.

scholarly journals Scc2/Nipbl hops between chromosomal cohesin rings after loading

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D.P. Rhodes ◽  
Davide Mazza ◽  
Kim A. Nasmyth ◽  
Stephan Uphoff
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Dna Looping ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Single Molecule Tracking ◽  
Loading Function ◽  
Stop And Go ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractThe cohesin complex mediates DNA-DNA interactions both between (sister chromatid cohesion) and within chromosomes (DNA looping) via a process thought to involve entrapment of DNAs within its tripartite ring. It has been suggested that intra- chromosome loops are generated through processive extrusion of DNAs through the lumen of cohesin’s ring. Scc2 (Nipbl) is essential for loading cohesin onto chromosomes but not for maintaining sister chromatid cohesion following DNA replication. It has therefore been assumed that Scc2 is involved exclusively in the cohesin loading process. However, it is possible that the stimulation of cohesin’s ABC-like ATPase by Scc2 also has a post-loading function, for example driving loop extrusion. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking, we show that Scc2 binds dynamically to chromatin, principally through an association with cohesin. Scc2’s movement within chromatin is consistent with a “stop-and-go” or “hopping” motion. We suggest that a low diffusion coefficient, a low stoichiometry relative to cohesin, and a high affinity for chromosomal cohesin enables Scc2 to move rapidly from one chromosomal cohesin complex to another, performing a function distinct from loading.

scholarly journals Hardwired synthetic lethality within the cohesin complex in human cancer cells

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra van der Lelij ◽  
Simone Lieb ◽  
Julian Jude ◽  
Gordana Wutz ◽  
Catarina P. Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Recurrent Mutations ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractRecent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in the cohesin complex in a wide range of human cancers. Here we demonstrate that the most frequently mutated subunit of the cohesin complex, STAG2, displays a strong synthetic lethal interaction with its paralog STAG1. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of STAG2 mutated but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutated bladder cancer model alleviates the dependency on STAG1. Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 act redundantly to support sister chromatid cohesion and cell survival. STAG1 represents a hardwired, context independent vulnerability of cancer cells carrying mutations in the major emerging tumor suppressor STAG2. Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions to target recurrent cohesin mutations in cancer, e.g. by inhibiting STAG1, holds the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.

scholarly journals Synthetic lethality between the cohesin subunits STAG1 and STAG2 in diverse cancer contexts

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra van der Lelij ◽  
Simone Lieb ◽  
Julian Jude ◽  
Gordana Wutz ◽  
Catarina P. Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Recurrent Mutations ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractRecent genome analyses have identified recurrent mutations in the cohesin complex in a wide range of human cancers. Here we demonstrate that the most frequently mutated subunit of the cohesin complex, STAG2, displays a strong synthetic lethal interaction with its paralog STAG1. Mechanistically, STAG1 loss abrogates sister chromatid cohesion in STAG2 mutated but not in wild-type cells leading to mitotic catastrophe, defective cell division and apoptosis. STAG1 inactivation inhibits the proliferation of STAG2 mutated but not wild-type bladder cancer and Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Restoration of STAG2 expression in a mutated bladder cancer model alleviates the dependency on STAG1. Thus, STAG1 and STAG2 support sister chromatid cohesion to redundantly ensure cell survival. STAG1 represents a vulnerability of cancer cells carrying mutations in the major emerging tumor suppressor STAG2 across different cancer contexts. Exploiting synthetic lethal interactions to target recurrent cohesin mutations in cancer, e.g. by inhibiting STAG1, holds the promise for the development of selective therapeutics.

scholarly journals Cohesin recruits the Esco1 acetyltransferase genome wide to repress transcription and promote cohesion in somatic cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (36) ◽  
pp. 11270-11275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadia Rahman ◽  
Mathew J. K. Jones ◽  
Prasad V. Jallepalli
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Eukaryotic Genomes

The cohesin complex links DNA molecules and plays key roles in the organization, expression, repair, and segregation of eukaryotic genomes. In vertebrates the Esco1 and Esco2 acetyltransferases both modify cohesin’s Smc3 subunit to establish sister chromatid cohesion during S phase, but differ in their N-terminal domains and expression during development and across the cell cycle. Here we show that Esco1 and Esco2 also differ dramatically in their interaction with chromatin, as Esco1 is recruited by cohesin to over 11,000 sites, whereas Esco2 is infrequently enriched at REST/NRSF target genes. Esco1’s colocalization with cohesin occurs throughout the cell cycle and depends on two short motifs (the A-box and B-box) present in and unique to all Esco1 orthologs. Deleting either motif led to the derepression of Esco1-proximal genes and functional uncoupling of cohesion from Smc3 acetylation. In contrast, other mutations that preserved Esco1’s recruitment separated its roles in cohesion establishment and gene silencing. We conclude that Esco1 uses cohesin as both a substrate and a scaffold for coordinating multiple chromatin-based transactions in somatic cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document