scholarly journals Cutaneous side effects of molecularly targeted therapies for the treatment of solid tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel I G Cubero ◽  
Beatrice Martinez Zugaib Abdalla ◽  
Jean Schoueri ◽  
Fabio Iazetti Lopes ◽  
Karine Corcione Turke ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Jens Soltau ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Jochen Rentschler ◽  
Christoph Reuter ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho UCHIHIRA ◽  
Takahiro EJIMA ◽  
Takao UCHIHIRA ◽  
Jun ARAKI ◽  
Toshiaki KAMEI

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilgen Gençler ◽  
Müzeyyen Gönül

The incidence of melanoma has recently been increasing. BRAF mutations have been found in 40–60% of melanomas. The increased activity of BRAF V600E leads to the activation of downstream signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which plays a key role as a regulator of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. The use of BRAF inhibitors in metastatic melanoma with BRAF mutation ensures clinical improvement of the disease. Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are two selective BRAF inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Both drugs are well tolerated and successfully used in clinical practice. However, some adverse reactions have been reported in patients in the course of treatment. Cutaneous side effects are the most common adverse events among them with a broad spectrum. Both the case reports and several original clinical trials reported cutaneous reactions during the treatment with BRAF inhibitors. In this review, the common cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation were reviewed.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255716
Author(s):  
Náthali Felícia Mineiro dos Santos Garrett ◽  
Ana Cristina Carvalho da Costa ◽  
Elaine Barros Ferreira ◽  
Giovanni Damiani ◽  
Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis ◽  
...  

Background Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care; however, their cutaneous side effects have not been definitively elucidated. Objective To identify the prevalence of cutaneous toxicity in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy and/or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which encompassed both clinical trials and observational studies describing the dermatological toxicities in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review under the number CRD42018091915. The searches were performed using the CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data Results A total of 9,802 articles were identified in the databases. The final sample comprised 39 studies. The evaluated drugs were ipilimumab, tremelimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab. The results suggest that the most prevalent side effect was grade 1 and 2 pruritus (24%), followed by grade 1 and 2 rash (21%) and grade 1 and 2 vitiligo (10%). Conclusion The most prevalent side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are pruritus, rash, and vitiligo, and they are rated mostly as grades 1 and 2 adverse events. Remarkably, vitiligo is most commonly found in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Y. Chu ◽  
Karolyn A. Wanat ◽  
Christopher J. Miller ◽  
Ravi K. Amaravadi ◽  
Leslie A. Fecher ◽  
...  

1967 ◽  
Vol 123 (7) ◽  
pp. 872-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE M. GOMBOS ◽  
PAUL E. YARDEN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document