scholarly journals Stereotactically-navigated percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) compared to conventional IRE: a prospective trial

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas P. Beyer ◽  
Benedikt Pregler ◽  
Christoph Nießen ◽  
Andreas Schicho ◽  
Michael Haimerl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Percutaneous Ablation ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Needle Placement ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Liver Malignancies ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Purpose.The purpose of this study was to compare CT-navigated stereotactic IRE (SIRE) needle placement to non-navigated conventional IRE (CIRE) for percutaneous ablation of liver malignancies.Materials and Methods.A prospective trial including a total of 20 patients was conducted with 10 patients in each arm of the study. IRE procedures were guided using either CT fluoroscopy (CIRE) or a stereotactic planning and navigation system (SIRE). Primary endpoint was procedure time. Secondary endpoints were accuracy of needle placement, technical success rate, complication rate and dose-length product (DLP).Results.A total of 20 IRE procedures were performed to ablate hepatic malignancies (16 HCC, 4 liver metastases), 10 procedures in each arm. Mean time for placement of IRE electrodes in SIRE was significantly shorter with 27 ± 8 min compared to 87 ± 30 min for CIRE (p< 0.001). Accuracy of needle placement for SIRE was higher than CIRE (2.2 mm vs. 3.3 mm mean deviation,p< 0.001). The total DLP and the fluoroscopy DLP were significantly lower in SIRE compared to CIRE. Technical success rate and complication rates were equal in both arms.Conclusion.SIRE demonstrated a significant reduction of procedure length and higher accuracy compared to CIRE. Stereotactic navigation has the potential to reduce radiation dose for the patient and the radiologist without increasing the risk of complications or impaired technical success compared to CIRE.

scholarly journals Tibiopedal and distal femoral retrograde vascular access for challenging chronic total occlusions: predictors for technical success, and complication rates in a large single-center cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-542
Author(s):  
Gerd Grözinger ◽  
Jan Hallecker ◽  
Ulrich Grosse ◽  
Roland Syha ◽  
Dominik Ketelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tibiopedal and distal femoral access for retrograde crossing of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in Rutherford stage III to VI peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and to determine factors that correlate with technical success. Material and methods One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. Rutherford stages were III, IV, and V/VI in 24%, 8%, and 67% of patients. Inclusion criteria were CTO at the superficial femoral (SFA), popliteal (PA), and/or below-the-knee (BTK) level, and a failed antegrade treatment followed by a distal retrograde approach. The numbers of occluded vascular levels (OVL), lesion length, degree of calcification, technical success rate, complications, and clinical outcome were noted. Results OVL were 1 in 72%, 2 in 20%, and 3 in 8% of patients. CTOs were longer than 20 cm in 45.6% of cases and showed severe calcifications in 50.3%. Target vessels for distal access were the distal SFA/PA in 17% and BTK in 83%. The overall technical success rate was 82%. Severe calcification decreased technical success (p = 0.01) despite lesion length and Rutherford stage. Clinical outcome improved in 123/152 patients with a significant increase of the median ABI (N = 158) from 0.53 (interquartile range 0.39 to 0.61) to 0.85 (0.59 to 1.03; p < 0.001). Complications were reported in 7.6% cases with 2.3% related to the distal vascular access. Conclusion The tibiopedal and distal femoral retrograde access presents a safe and effective treatment option of CTOs at the thigh and/or BTK after a failed antegrade attempt improving clinical outcome. Technical success decreased with lesion’s degree of calcification. Key Points • Safety and effectiveness of the tibiopedal and distal femoral access for retrograde crossing of chronic total occlusion. • Target lesion’s degree of calcification decreases technical success. • Complications related to the distal vascular access were rare.

High technical success rate for liver needle placement with the CT-guide navigation system

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
D.A. Valenti ◽  
T. Cabrera ◽  
L.N. Boucher ◽  
V. Demers ◽  
U. Shreter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Needle Placement ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Single-center comparison of the efficacy and complications of arterial vascular closure devices in interventional radiology

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Elmasri ◽  
Stephen T. Kee ◽  
John M. Moriarty ◽  
Antoinette Gomes ◽  
Edward W. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Manual Compression ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Vascular Closure Devices

Introduction Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are commonly used to achieve hemostasis of arterial access sites, but there is little comparative data on the variety of VCDs currently in clinical use. We reviewed the VCD experience at our institution to determine the safest and most effective VCD. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 907 consecutive arterial procedures in interventional radiology from June 2012 to June 2014 was performed. Five VCDs were used: Angio-Seal (n = 478), FISH (n = 56), Mynx (n = 56), Perclose (n = 61), and Starclose (n = 68). Patients who underwent manual compression (n = 188) without use of VCDs were also studied as a comparison group. Patient demographics and pre-procedural laboratory parameters were recorded. The technical success rate for achievement of hemostasis and complication rates were noted. Results Complete hemostasis rate (aka technical success rate) was 93.5% for Angio-Seal, 83.9% for FISH, 53.6% for Mynx, 73.7% for Perclose, 76.5% for Starclose, and 91.5% for manual compression. The differences among the devices were statistically significant (p<0.001). Fourteen major complications (1.5%) were encountered: nine with Angio-Seal (1.9%), one with Mynx (1.8%), one with Starclose (1.5%), and three with manual compression (1.6%); these differences were not statistically significant. Of the demographic and laboratory parameters studied, none were significantly correlated with hemostasis failure or development of complications. Conclusions In our single-center institutional experience, Angio-Seal is the device with the best technical success rate. Major complications of VCDs were rare, with no statistically significant difference between devices.

Preliminary Dual-Center Experience with the Bolton Treovance Endograft

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 533-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arron Thind ◽  
Dhruv Sarma ◽  
Abdel Kader Allouni ◽  
Feras Abdallah ◽  
David Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Type I ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: To present the performance and safety of the Treovance stent graft for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in a “real-world” patient cohort. Methods: Patients from 2 centers, deemed unfit for open repair, were electively treated with the Treovance endograft. Clinical preoperative, operative, and up to 1-year postoperative follow-up data of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: This study included 46 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (44 male), mean age of 78 years ± 8 standard deviation (SD; range: 58-93 years). All met the manufacturer’s recommended anatomical requirements: average maximum sac diameter 63 mm ± 10 SD (range: 52-86 mm), proximal neck length 29 mm ± 12 SD (range: 11-60 mm), and neck angulation 30° ± 21 SD (range: 0°-70°). Fourteen had moderate to severe iliac tortuosity. A primary technical success rate of 80% was achieved (100% assisted primary technical success rate): 7 patients required adjunctive procedures intraoperatively and 2 successful treatments for type I endoleaks, which occurred within 24 hours postoperatively. There was 100% survival at 1-year follow-up; however, 4 (8.7%) patients required reintervention: 1 for a type I endoleak, 2 for limb stenosis, and 1 for a type II endoleak with an enlarging sac. No other device-related complications were identified. Reintervention and complication rates in hostile versus nonhostile anatomies were not statistically significant ( P = .28 and P = .42, respectively). Conclusion: The Treovance stent graft has a comparable safety profile to other next-generation stent grafts during the first year after endovascular aneurysm repair, which provides a rationale for further interrogation of its outcomes through clinical trials.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of arteriovenous fistula angioplasties performed by nephrologists: report from a Brazilian interventional nephrology center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo P. Franco ◽  
Miguel C. Riella ◽  
Domingos C. Chula ◽  
Marcia T. de Alcântara ◽  
Marcelo M. do Nascimento
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Venous Stenosis ◽  
First Choice

ABSTRACT Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the first choice vascular access for hemodialysis. However, they present a high incidence of venous stenosis leading to thrombosis. Although training in interventional nephrology may improve accessibility for treatment of venous stenosis, there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of this approach performed by trained nephrologists in low-income and developing countries. Methods: This study presents the retrospective results of AVF angioplasties performed by trained nephrologists in a Brazilian outpatient interventional nephrology center. The primary outcome was technical success rate (completion of the procedure with angioplasty of all stenoses) and secondary outcomes were complication rates and overall AVF patency. Findings: Two hundred fifty-six angioplasties were performed in 160 AVF. The technical success rate was 88.77% and the main cause of technical failure was venous occlusion (10%). The incidence of complications was 13.67%, with only one patient needing hospitalization and four accesses lost due to the presence of hematomas and/or thrombosis. Grade 1 hematomas were the most frequent complication (8.2%). The overall patency found was 88.2 and 80.9% at 180 and 360 days after the procedure, respectively. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that AVF angioplasty performed by trained nephrologists has acceptable success rates and patency, with a low incidence of major complications as well as a low need for hospitalization.

scholarly journals Irreversible electroporation (IRE) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a mid-term clinical experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tze Min Wah ◽  
James Lenton ◽  
Jonathan Smith ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
Satinder Jagdev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Renal Dialysis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ct Guided ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT-guided IRE of clinical T1a (cT1a) renal tumours close to vital structures and to assess factors that may influence the technical success and early oncological durability. Methods CT-guided IRE (2015–2020) was prospectively evaluated. Patients’ demographics, technical details/success, Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of complications (I–V) and oncological outcome were collated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine variables associated with complications. The overall 2- and 3-year cancer-specific (CS), local recurrence-free (LRF) and metastasis-free (MF) survival rates are presented using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Thirty cT1a RCCs (biopsy-proven/known VHL disease) in 26 patients (age 32–81 years) were treated with IRE. The mean tumour size was 2.5 cm and the median follow-up was 37 months. The primary technical success rate was 73.3%, where 22 RCCs were completely IRE ablated. Seven residual diseases were successfully ablated with cryoablation, achieving an overall technical success rate of 97%. One patient did not have repeat treatment as he died from unexpected stroke at 4-month post-IRE. One patient had CD-III complication with a proximal ureteric injury. Five patients developed > 25% reduction of eGFR immediately post-IRE. All patients have preservation of renal function without the requirement for renal dialysis. The overall 2- and 3-year CS, LRF and MF survival rates are 89%, 96%, 91% and 87%. Conclusion CT-guided IRE in cT1a RCC is safe with acceptable complications. The primary technical success rate was suboptimal due to the early operator’s learning curve, and long-term follow-up is required to validate the IRE oncological durability. Key Points • Irreversible electroporation should only be considered when surgery or image-guided thermal ablation is not an option for small renal cancer. • This non-thermal technique is safe in the treatment of small renal cancer and the primary technical success rate was 73.3%. • This can be used when renal cancer is close to important structure.

Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Repeat Access and Repeat Closure With an ExoSeal Vascular Closure System in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442110455
Author(s):  
Taira Kobayashi ◽  
Masaki Hamamoto ◽  
Takanobu Okazaki ◽  
Mayu Tomota ◽  
Takashi Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Closure System ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Procedural Success

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided repeat access and repeat closure with an ExoSeal vascular closure system. Methods A total of 123 endovascular therapy (EVT) procedures were performed in 59 patients (65 limbs) with ultrasound-guided repeat access and repeat implantation of an ExoSeal vascular closure system between January 2019 and March 2021. The procedural details and postprocedural outcomes of EVT with repeat access and use of ExoSeal (RE group) were compared with those of EVT with initial use of ExoSeal (IE group) in the same patients. In a subgroup analysis, these outcomes were also compared in early repeat (within 3 months) and late repeat (over 3 months) cases. Results The technical success rate of ultrasound-guided access in the RE group was 100%. The procedural success rate of EVT and deployment success rate of ExoSeal in the RE group were 93% and 94%, respectively, which were not significantly different to those in the IE group. Access site complications in the RE group occurred in 2 cases (2%), again with no significant difference with the IE group. The median puncture, procedural, and hemostasis times in the RE group were 3 [2-5], 36.5 [29-54], and 7 [5-10] min, respectively, which were not significantly longer than those in the IE group. In the RE group, early and late repeat closure was performed in 66 (54%) and 57 (46%) cases, respectively, and there were no significant differences in the technical success of ultrasound-guided access, procedural success of EVT, deployment success of ExoSeal, and access site complication rates in these cases. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided access facilitated higher technical success of repeat access and fewer access site complications in EVT with repeat use of ExoSeal, regardless of the interval between procedures.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of fiducial marker implantation for robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial tracking

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Scher ◽  
Marc Bollet ◽  
Gauthier Bouilhol ◽  
Remi Tannouri ◽  
Imane Khemiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Fiducial Marker ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation Therapy ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Marker Tracking ◽  
All Treatment

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of fiducial marker implantation and tracking in CyberKnife® stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) applied to extracranial locations. Materials and method This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational study to collect the data of all patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy with fiducial marker tracking at extracranial locations, conducted between June 2014 and November 2017. Information regarding the implantation procedure, the types of toxicity related to marker implantation and the number of markers implanted/tracked during treatment were collected. Complication rates were evaluated using the CTCAE v4 [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events] scale. The technical success rate was based on the ability to optimally track the tumor throughout all treatment fractions. Results Out of 2505 patients treated by stereotactic radiation therapy, 25% received treatment with fiducial marker tracking. The total number of implantation procedures was 616 and 1543 fiducial markers were implanted. The implantation-related complication rate was 3%, with 16 Grade 1 events and 4 Grade 2 events. The number of treated patients and the number of implanted markers has gradually increased since the technique was first implemented. The median treatment time was 27 min (range 10–76). 1295 fiducials were effectively tracked throughout all treatment fractions, corresponding to a technical success rate of 84%. The difference between the number of fiducials implanted and those tracked during treatment decreased significantly as the site’s experience increased. Conclusion Fiducial marker implantation and tracking is feasible, well-tolerated, and technically effective technique in SBRT for extracranial tumors.

scholarly journals Evaluation of percutaneous transcatheter embolization for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ZhengZhong Wu ◽  
JunQing Lin ◽  
WeiZhu Yang ◽  
Na Jiang ◽  
Ning Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Transcatheter Embolization ◽  
Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Arterial Blood Gas ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Arterial Blood

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transcatheter embolization (TCE) for the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). Methods Forty-three consecutive patients (n = 17 males; n = 26 females) with 72 untreated PAVMs underwent coil and/or plug embolization between January 2010 and February 2018. The mean patient age was 42 ± 14 years (range 19–71 years). The median size of the feeding artery was 7.9 ± 2.9 mm (range 3.5–14.0 mm). The arterial blood gas level and cardiac function of all patients were analysed. The technical success rate, recanalization rate, and complications were evaluated. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations were scheduled for 12 months after treatment and every 2–4 years thereafter. Results Twenty-five PAVMs were treated with coils alone, twenty-one were treated with plugs alone, and twenty-six were treated with both coils and plugs. The technical success rate was 100%. There were no complications during operation. However, one patient (2.3%) had pulmonary thrombosis and embolism post-operation. The patients’ pre-operative and post-operative PaO2 and SaO2 levels were significantly different (p < 0.01). A comparison of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade before and after embolization in all patients showed a significant decrease in the post-operative grade (p < 0.01). The 72 PAVMs were divided into three groups (coils only group [n = 25], plugs only group [n = 21], and coils/plugs combined group [n = 26]). After 12 months of follow-up, there were seven reperfusion PAVMs in the coil group, seven reperfusion PAVMs in the plug group, and 1 reperfusion PAVM in the combined group. There were significant differences between the two groups and the combined group. Conclusion Percutaneous TCE is safe and effective for the treatment of PAVMs. A combination of coils and vascular plugs may be useful for preventing recanalization after the embolization of PAVMs.

scholarly journals Modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy technique without endoscopic or nasogastric access

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reda Tabashy ◽  
Amira Darwish ◽  
Ashraf Ibrahim ◽  
Mohamed Gad El-Mola
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (MPRG) technique under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance without endoscopic or nasogastric access. Results The study included 24 patients: 10 males and 14 females whose ages ranged from 44 to 80 years old. Ten patients had esophageal cancer and 14 patients had neck cancer. Technical success was achieved in 23 out of the 25 procedures (92%). Two procedures failed (8%) and were converted to the conventional technique by using the nasogastric tube. No major complications were reported. Minor complications were observed in 5 patients (20%): intraperitoneal air and contrast leakage in 4 patients and focal mucosal dissection by the contrast in 1 patient. Conclusion The MPRG has high technical success rate, is safe with no major complications, and is most feasible when endoscopic or nasogastric access cannot be performed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document