scholarly journals Comparing the awareness of and beliefs in sexually transmitted infections among university students in Madagascar and the United States of America

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Reuter ◽  
Shannon McGinnis ◽  
Kim E. Reuter

Young adults have a higher risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than other age groups. This risk may be mediated by their social and cultural setting which can impact young adults’ awareness of, beliefs in, and risk of contracting STIs (including HIV/AIDS). In order to understand how these factors vary among young adults of different cultures, it is important to study these issues on a cross-cultural scale. This study aimed to increase understanding of the relationship between the culture of a place of study and: (1) STI awareness; (2) belief in STIs; and (3) self-reported STI prevalence in the study population. Survey data were collected from university students in Madagascar (n = 242 surveys in 2013) and the United States of America (n = 199 surveys in 2015). Compared to students at the American university, students at the Malagasy university: (1) did not appear to have a conclusively lower awareness of STIs; (2) did not differ in rates of belief in the existence of gonorrhea and syphilis, but had higher rates of disbelief in HIV/AIDS; and (3) were more likely to report having been infected with syphilis and gonorrhea, but not with HIV/AIDS. Students at the Malagasy university also listed different reasons than the students at the American university for why they believed in the existence of STIs. These findings highlight the need for further cross-cultural research to better adapt intervention strategies to different cultural settings.

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley V. Hill ◽  
Natacha M. De Genna ◽  
Maria J. Perez-Patron ◽  
Tamika D. Gilreath ◽  
Carmen Tekwe ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Patrick ◽  
Patrick M. O’Malley ◽  
Lloyd D. Johnston ◽  
Yvonne M. Terry-McElrath ◽  
John E. Schulenberg

1970 ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Lebanese American University

On March 7, 2002 the Institute for Women’s Studies in the Arab World, Lebanese American University along with the Public Affairs Section, Embassy of the United States of America hosted Dr. Miriam Cooke renowned writer and scholar. In her talk, Cooke shared with the audience her experience in writing on controversialsubjects pertaining to women’s issues.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaysh Nazzal Alshammri

This research aims to identify the differences between email negotiation and face-to-face negotiation with respect to negotiation process, negotiation flexibility, face-saving, level of collaboration, and appropriateness for cross-cultural negotiation. The survey questionnaire was distributed to the sales and customer service employees in many business organizations located in different regions of the United States of America. Data from 519 respondents (including both males and females) were analyzed using the one-sample t-test, two sample t-test, and Pearson Correlation. The findings reveal that the characteristics of face-to-face negotiation assist in smoothing the negotiation process more than that of email negotiation. Participants also tend to cooperate more in face-to-face negotiation than in email negotiation. However, participants prefer using email negotiation because they find it more flexible. They also feel that a face-threatening act is less likely to occur in an email negotiation than in a face-to-face negotiation. The findings also show that email negotiation could be more appropriate than face-to-face negotiation for the purpose of cross-cultural negotiation. This is because communicating via email minimizes the influence of culture on the negotiation process. Age and gender do not have any influence on the perspectives of participants regarding email negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation. The findings have significant implications for both business and dispute resolution. They contrast the differences between face-to-face negotiation and email negotiation and identify the situations in which each of these types could be most appropriate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document