scholarly journals Prognostic factors and survival outcomes according to tumor subtype in patients with breast cancer lung metastases

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e8298
Author(s):  
Siying Chen ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Haisheng You ◽  
Yalin Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Sites

Background Reports on the incidence and prognoses of lung metastases when diagnosing breast cancer patients with different subtypes are limited. Our study investigated the effect of molecular sub-typing stratification on the prognoses of lung metastatic breast caner patients. Methods Patients with breast cancer and lung metastases were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results population-based data between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors and prognoses, overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival for patients with breast cancer lung metastases. Results We identified 6,516 patients with lung metastatic breast cancer, representing 1.7% of the entire cohort and 30.4% of the subset with metastatic disease. This included 2,940 hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2− patients, 852 HR+/HER2+ patients, 547 HR−/HER2+ patients and 983 triple-negative patients. The median OS for all lung metastatic patients was 13 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that those lung metastatic breast cancer patients of older age (>80), black race, with poorly differentiated tumors, carcinoma histology, triple-negative subtype, more metastatic sites and no surgery, and no chemotherapy showed significantly poor survival, both overall and breast cancer-specific. Conclusions Our findings show that molecular sub-type and more metastatic sites might have significant influence on the incidence and prognosis of breast cancer lung metastases. We also identified several prognostic factors that could guide therapy selection in the treatment of lung metastatic patients.

Factors associated with mortality after breast cancer metastasis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
S. Y. Jung ◽  
M. Q. Rosenzweig ◽  
S. M. Sereika ◽  
F. Linkov ◽  
A. Brufsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

174 Background: It is generally accepted that patients with breast cancer metastases have poor survival. Metastatic breast cancer patients can be considered a heterogeneous population with a varied clinical course, which underscores the need for accurate prediction of survival based on prognostic factors. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors related to survival in breast cancer patients after diagnosis with metastatic disease. Methods: A total of 557 patients with breast cancer metastasis diagnosis seen at one large urban practice have been followed up between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2008. Demographic, tumor characteristics, clinical factors as predictors of survival were analyzed using Cox regression model. Results: The median survival length was 40 months (range 1-114 months) with 269 (48.3%) alive and 288 (51.7%) dead. This study demonstrated that hypertension, estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, number of metastatic sites, and body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis with metastatic breast cancer were the most relevant prognostic factors for survival after metastasis. Conclusions: Findings of this study may form a foundation for the corpus of knowledge explaining the outcome differences in treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer, potentially helping to create tailored counseling and personalized treatment approaches for this vulnerable group. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Survival impact of primary tumor resection in de novo metastatic breast cancer patients (GEICAM/El Alamo Registry)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Lopez-Tarruella ◽  
M. J. Escudero ◽  
Marina Pollan ◽  
Miguel Martín ◽  
Carlos Jara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

AbstractThe debate about surgical resection of primary tumor (PT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients persists. We explored this approach’s outcomes in patients included in a retrospective registry, named El Álamo, of breast cancer patients diagnosed in Spain (1990–2001). In this analysis we only included de novo MBC patients, 1415 of whom met the study’s criteria. Descriptive, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out. Median age was 63.1 years, 49.2% of patients had single-organ metastasis (skin/soft tissue [16.3%], bone [33.8%], or viscera [48.3%]). PT surgery (S) was performed in 44.5% of the cases. S-group patients were younger, had smaller tumors, higher prevalence of bone and oligometastatic disease, and lower prevalence of visceral involvement. With a median follow-up of 23.3 months, overall survival (OS) was 39.6 versus 22.4 months (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001) in the S- and non-S groups, respectively. The S-group OS benefit remained statistically and clinically significant regardless of metastatic location, histological type, histological grade, hormone receptor status and tumor size. PT surgery (versus no surgery) was associated with an OS benefit suggesting that loco-regional PT control may be considered in selected MBC patients. Data from randomized controlled trials are of utmost importance to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Breast Subtypes and Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients With Initial Bone Metastasis: A Population-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyue Liu ◽  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Caijin Lin ◽  
Lisa Andriani ◽  
Shuning Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

BackgroundMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease and bone is one of the most common metastatic sites. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical features, prognostic factors and benefits of surgery of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases.MethodsFrom 2010 to 2015, 6,860 breast cancer patients diagnosed with initial bone metastasis were analyzed from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and Multivariable analysis were used to identify prognostic factors. A nomogram was performed based on the factors selected from cox regression result. Survival curves were plotted according to different subtypes, metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram.ResultsHormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive patients showed the best outcome compared to other subtypes. Patients of younger age (&lt;60 years old), white race, lower grade, lower T stage (&lt;=T2), not combining visceral metastasis tended to have better outcome. About 37% (2,249) patients received surgery of primary tumor. Patients of all subtypes could benefit from surgery. Patients of bone-only metastases (BOM), bone and liver metastases, bone and lung metastases also showed superior survival time if surgery was performed. However, patients of bone and brain metastasis could not benefit from surgery (p = 0.05). The C-index of nomogram was 0.66. Cutoff values of nomogram point were identified as 87 and 157 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Patients of all groups showed better overall survival when receiving surgery.ConclusionOur study has provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with initial bone metastatic breast cancer and constructed a predicting nomogram with good accuracy. The finding of potential benefit of surgery to overall survival will cast some lights on the treatment tactics of this group of patients.

A phase II study of docetaxel-carboplatin as first line therapy in the patients with visceral metastatic breast cancer: A Bangladesh experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10792-10792
Author(s):  
M. S. Reza ◽  
Q. Chowdhury ◽  
M. A. Hai ◽  
M. A. Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

10792 Background: Metastatic breast cancer is heterogeneous and treatment decisions are influenced by multiple factors. Docetaxel remains as the standard chemotherapy agent in the management of metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a phase II study to examine the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel with carboplatin in the treatment of visceral metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: From July 2000 to December 2004, 32 patients with; histologically/cytologically proven, bidimensionally measurable visceral (pulmonary & hepatic) metastatic breast cancer, age 18–75 years with ECOG performance status 0–3, no prior chemotherapy, life expectancy > 3 months, adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic and hematological values were enrolled. It was an open-labeled, non-randomized, single-centered and prospective study. The patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 at an interval of 3 weeks. Outcome measures were response rates and tolerability was measured by adverse events and laboratory blood values. Results: This study consisted of 30 female and only 2 male patients. Median age was 55 years. 18 patients (56.25%) were presented with pulmonary metastases, where as there were 12 patients (66.67%) with single lung and the remaining 6 patients (33.34%) with bilateral lung metastases.14 patients (43.75%) had hepatic metastases. In total, 168 cycles chemotherapy were administered with a median of 5.25 cycles per patient, and 29/32 patients were evaluable for responses. The overall response was 62.07% with 8 complete responses and 10 partial responses. 6 patients (20.69%) had stable disease and only 5 patients (17.24%) had progressive disease. Grade 3 hematological toxicities were observed as follows: neutropenia (24%) and anemia (15.6%). Some non-hematological toxicities (including nausea, vomiting, fluid retention and peripheral neuropathy) in 15 patients (51.72%) were observed. No severe febrile neutropenia and no fatal events were observed. Conclusions: This phase II study supports the use of docetaxel-carboplatin combination in chemo naïve visceral metastatic breast cancer patients due to its very promising effects with well tolerated toxicities in Bangladeshi population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Coexpression of HER3 as a predictor of survival in HER2-positve breast cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 611-611
Author(s):  
Rupert Bartsch ◽  
Anna Sophie Berghoff ◽  
Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath ◽  
Matthias Preusser ◽  
Guenther G. Steger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Her3 Expression

611 Background: Improved understanding of the pathobiology of the metastatic cascade as well as the identification of new prognostic markers may lead the path to the development of novel targeted agents in breast cancer patients (BC pts). Recently, HER3-expression was postulated as independent risk factor for metastatic spread. Methods: Pts of different BC subtypes (luminal, HER2-amplified, triple-negative) with metastatic disease were identified from a breast cancer data base. Tissue of the primary tumor was retrieved from the local pathology institute. Immunohistochemical staining of estrogen-receptor, progesterone-receptor, and HER2 and HER3 was performed. In HER2 equivocal cases, subsequent FISH analysis was performed. Results: Specimens of 110 pts (36/110 luminal, 35/110 HER2-amplified, 40/110 triple-negative) were available for this analysis. 23/110 (21%) specimens showed strong, complete, membranous staining for HER3 of at least 10% of all tumor cells. HER2/HER3 co-expression was observed in 12/110 (11%) specimens. HER3 showed a statistically significant association with HER2-expression (p=0.02; Chi square test). No correlation was observed for HER3-expression and overall survival (OS), incidence of brain metastases, or time to diagnosis of brain metastases in the entire patient cohort (p>0.05; log rank). In the HER2-amplified subgroup, however, HER3-expression was significantly associated with shorter OS (median 30 vs. 63 months; p=0.02; log rank test) and remained significant when entered into a multivariate model (p=0.02; Cox regression). Conclusions: HER2/HER3 co-expression is significantly associated with impaired OS in pts with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Co-inhibition of HER2 and HER3 or inhibition of HER2/HER3 hetero-dimerization could improve prognosis of this patient population.

Efficacy and safety of metronomic capecitabine and gefitinib in heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1071-1071
Author(s):  
Anantbhushan Ranade ◽  
Kanaka Govind Babu ◽  
Purvish M. Parikh ◽  
Jk Singh ◽  
Manisha Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Visceral Metastasis ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

1071 Background: Metronomic chemotherapy regimens have shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer by antiangiogenic mechanisms. When used metronomically the toxicity profile of capecitabine is low. Triple negative breast cancer is a common problem in India and developing countries. Approximately 30% of triple negative breast cancer express EGFR and its mutation. Methods: Since October 2003 to December 2011 we objectively tested response rates, clinical benefit, and safety of gefitinib and capecitabine administered with a metronomic schedule of 500 mg thrice daily in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with gefitinib 250 mg once daily. 300 patients were screened for EGFR expression. Among 85 enrolled patients with EGFR positivity, 76 were evaluable. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0-2, median age 52 years (range 36-65), bone plus visceral metastasis in 40% of patients. Rest had only visceral metastasis. All the patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The combination was administered for a median duration of 32 weeks (range 12-166). Results: We observed 18 partial responses (PR: 24%), 42 (55%) stable disease (SD). Median time to progression was 53 weeks, (95% CI, range 12-166 weeks). Safety of metronomic capecitabine with gefitinib was excellent. Neither grade 2-4 haematological or clinical side effects were recorded. Only 12 patients experienced grade I (WHO) hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Treatment with metronomic capecitabine and gefitinib was effective and minimally toxic in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals TFF1andTFF3mRNAs Are Higher in Blood from Breast Cancer Patients with Metastatic Disease than Those without

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa H. Elnagdy ◽  
Omar Farouk ◽  
Amal K. Seleem ◽  
Hoda A. Nada
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Level

Introduction. Breast cancer metastasis occurs when tumor cells dissociate from the primary tumor and migrate to distant organs through the peripheral bloodstream or lymphatic drainage. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) originate from primary sites or metastases and circulate in the patients’ bloodstream. Molecular assays for the detection and molecular characterization of CTCs can serve as a liquid biopsy and can represent an alternative to invasive biopsies as a source of tumor tissue in the metastatic patients.Patients and Methods. We analyzed the presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood of 50 breast cancer patients by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to detecttrefoil factor family(TFF)1and3genes.Results. We found significant difference in the level of bothTFF1andTFF3mRNA in the blood of nonmetastatic versus metastatic breast cancer patients (p=0.001 and p= 0.038, respectively).TFF1mRNA was detected at higher levels in 34.6% of metastatic breast cancer patients as compared to 0% of nonmetastatic (p= 0.002). As regardsTFF3mRNA, it was detected at higher levels in 46.2% of metastatic breast cancer patients as compared to 4% of nonmetastatic (p= 0.026). Moreover, we found that the high level of bothTFF1andTFF3mRNA was related to estrogen status of the patients. The detection of high level ofTFF1mRNA in CTCs was associated with bone metastases (77.8%), while that ofTFF3was related to lymph node involvement (75%) and lung metastases (68.8%).Conclusion. The combined measurement of bothTFF1andTFF3mRNA level for differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic breast cancer gave 57.69% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document