Assessment of Patients’ Knowledge of Radiation Exposure during Medical Imaging Procedures at Private Medical Radiography Centres in Ogun State, Nigeria

Introduction: Radiological examinations are commonly requested for patients to aid clinical diagnosis. However, many doctors do not realize how much radiation dosage their patients are exposed to during radiological aim. The main objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of radiation exposure and safety practices among patients undergoing medical imaging in Ado-Odo Local Government Area, in Ogun State of Nigeria. Methodology: A self-administered questionnaire was used for the study. Results: More than half of the respondents 216(69.7%) were female, more than one-quarter 153(49.4) of the respondents were aged 20-29 years, More than half 186(60.0%) of the respondent are single. More than half 204(66.4%) of the respondents have heard about radiation exposure. Majority 232(74.8%) of the respondents agree that radiation hazard do come only from medical radiations. More than half 21(68.7%) of the respondents agree that they do take note of radiation warning sign, majority 236(76.1%) of the respondents agree that they know the wrong use of dose of ionizing radiation can lead to mortality, 217(70.0%) of the respondents agree that inappropriate safety measure on ionizing radiation can result into cancer Conclusion: This study notes that majority of the literature on awareness and knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation was carried out among health workers, whereas there is limited information from patients who undergo the procedure. This accounts for the paucity of local studies to compare our results with. In future, studies could compare the radiation awareness among patients presenting at health facilities from public and private, as well as differences in awareness levels of self-presenting and prescribed patients

Download Full-text

Radiation Hazard, Safety, Control and Protection

Faridpur Medical College Journal ◽

10.3329/fmcj.v14i2.48188 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 100-103

Author(s):

Md Hafizur Rahman

Keyword(s):

Nuclear Medicine ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Radiation Protection ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Paediatric Population ◽

Radiation Hazard ◽

X Rays ◽

Safety Control ◽

Radiological Procedures

The field of Radiology and Nuclear medicine has advanced from era of X-rays to today's modern imaging techniques, most of which use the ionizing radiation. With the benefits of better diagnosis and treatment, it has caused manifold increase in radiation exposure to the patients and the radiology and nuclear medicine personnel. Many studies done till date have clearly documented the harmful effects of ionizing radiation from radiation exposure, especially cancer. This is more important in paediatric population as their tissues are more radiosensitive, and they have more years to live. Diagnostic and therapeutic radiological procedures including nuclear medicine are integral part of modern medical practices, exposing both patients and medical staff to ionizing radiation. Without proper protective measures, this radiation causes many negative health effects. Hence, proper knowledge and awareness regarding the radiation hazards and radiation protection is mandatory for health professionals, especially the nuclear medicine and radiology professionals. International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) has recommended two basic principles of radiation protection, justification of the practice and optimization of protection. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jul 2019;14(2): 100-103

Download Full-text

Assessment of the Knowledge of CT Scanner Operators on the Use of Dose Reduction Software Called Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) During a CT Scan

10.21203/rs.3.rs-754054/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Eddy Fotso Kamdem ◽

Odette Ngano Samba ◽

Serge Abogo ◽

Joshua Tambe ◽

Jean Claude Mballa Amougou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Imaging ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Radiation Protection ◽

Ct Scanner ◽

Wrong Answer ◽

Public And Private ◽

Potential Risks ◽

Radiology Technicians ◽

Public And Private Hospitals

Abstract Objectif : Evaluate the knowledge of medical imaging technicians on the use of dose reduction software and the concept of patient radiation protection.Materials and methods : Descriptive and analytical transversal study from January 1 to December 1, 2020, conducted in the radiology and medical imaging services of Cameroon's public and private hospitals with a CT scanner. It was the first study on this topic that was conducted in Cameroon. This study was conducted from a questionnaire distributed to all medical imaging technicians in 10 country hospitals relating to the notions of dose reduction software and patient radiation protection.Results: 80 questionnaires were distributed and analyzed. The average age of medical imaging technicians was 30 years old. There were 32 women and 48 men. Most of the medical imaging technicians worked in private centers (n = 6). 75% of medical imaging technicians had been in practice for more than 5 years. 75% of medical imaging technicians gave the wrong answer regarding the use of dose reduction software. Finally, only a third of the practitioners had received training in patient radiation protection.Conclusion : Although the majority of medical imaging technicians declares to take into account the dangers related to ionizing radiation during examinations, a broader dissemination of patient radiation protection training and the use of dose reduction software, particularly during the initial curriculum. Radiology technicians could be one of the solutions to improve the knowledge of hospital practitioners in patient radiation protection. However, the use of ionizing radiation, however, need to know and take into account the potential risks of radio-induced cancer linked to high X-ray doses.

Download Full-text

An Assessment of Final-Year Medical Students and Interns Awareness of Radiation Exposure to Common Diagnostic Imaging Procedures

Advances in Radiology ◽

10.1155/2014/426909 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Seife Teferi Dellie ◽

Daniel Admassie ◽

Yenework Ewnetu

Keyword(s):

Medical Students ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Diagnostic Imaging ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Addis Ababa ◽

Imaging Procedures ◽

Emit Radiation ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Radiation Awareness ◽

Radiological Procedures

Objectives. To evaluate the level of knowledge about the radiation exposure to diagnostic imaging procedures among the final-year medical students and interns and to suggest how education could be improved. Material and Methods. All 355 final-year medical students and interns from Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa were included in the study. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of their actual knowledge on ionizing radiation and on their preferred method of learning. All questions were in multiple choice formats ranging from 4 to 7 choices. The obtained data were analyzed using statistical software. Results. A total of 343 completed questionnaires were received. Up to 78.9% of respondents underestimated or do not know the radiation dose from commonly requested radiological procedures. Surprisingly, 245 (71.4%) and 254 (79.3%) students incorrectly believed that ultrasound and MRI, respectively, emit ionizing radiation or they do not know if they emit radiation or not. Both interns and medical students did not have significant difference (P=0.56) in their knowledge of ionizing radiation. A combination of tutorials or workshops (29.7%) and learning modules (19.8%) combined were their first and last preferred methods of teaching for future radiation awareness, respectively. Conclusion. This study has clearly shown that awareness of ionizing radiation from diagnostic imaging is lacking among senior medical students and interns. The results highlight the need for improved education to minimize unnecessary exposure of patients.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbid Medical Conditions on Ionizing Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Medical Imaging in Adults

Journal of the American College of Radiology ◽

10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.009 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 58-63 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Daniel Strauchler ◽

Katherine Freeman ◽

Todd S. Miller

Keyword(s):

Socioeconomic Status ◽

Medical Imaging ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Medical Conditions ◽

Ionizing Radiation Exposure ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Pelatihan Proteksi dan Keselamatan Radiasi Sebagai Dasar Penguatan Kompetensi Bagi Pekerja Radiasi di RSUD KRMT Wongsonegoro Semarang

10.53862/ssi.v1.062021.004 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Supriyati Supriyati ◽

Keyword(s):

Patient Safety ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Health Workers ◽

Radiation Hazard ◽

Radiation Hazards ◽

Laboratory Installation ◽

Catheterization Laboratory ◽

Orthopedic Surgeons ◽

Urological Surgery ◽

Primary Modality

Radiology installation is one of the supporting elements in a hospital whose primary function is to establish a diagnosis. Following its function, there are modalities of both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Understanding a primary modality that uses ionizing radiation is necessary to create patient safety. Several other health workers participate in carrying out a radiology modality using both ionizing and non-ionizing aircraft modalities. Relates to the use of radiology equipment in other installations, for example, urological surgery installations held by urological surgeons, orthopedic surgeons in central surgical facilities, neurosurgeons specializing in the use of surgical support C arms, heart and vascular specialists. Blood in the catheterization laboratory installation, as well as the supporting nurses in each of these rooms. Understanding radiation and the basics of protection to ensure the safety and security of radiation protection or radiation hazards that the use of these modalities may cause. Keywords: modality, radiation hazard

Download Full-text

Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging

10.1093/med/9780190223700.003.0050 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Christoph I. Lee

Keyword(s):

Medical Imaging ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Low Dose ◽

Additional Information ◽

Radiation Induced Cancer ◽

Radiation Induced ◽

Effective Doses ◽

Study Methodology ◽

Ionizing Radiation Exposure

This chapter, found in the radiation exposure from medical imaging section of the book, provides a succinct synopsis of a key study examining low-dose ionizing radiation exposure and radiation-induced cancer risks. This summary outlines the study methodology and design, major results, limitations and criticisms, related studies and additional information, and clinical implications. The study reported that a substantial proportion of the nonelderly US population is exposed to medium to very high annual effective doses from medical imaging procedures. Strategies ensuring the appropriate use of medical imaging associated with ionizing radiation should be developed and adopted widely. In addition to outlining the most salient features of the study, a clinical vignette is included in order to provide relevant clinical context.

Download Full-text

Perception of Radiation Exposure and Risk among Patients, Medical Students, and Referring Physicians at a Tertiary Care Community Hospital

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal ◽

10.1016/j.carj.2012.05.002 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 64 (3) ◽

pp. 208-212 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Michelle L. Ricketts ◽

Mark O. Baerlocher ◽

Murray R. Asch ◽

Andy Myers

Keyword(s):

Medical Students ◽

Medical Imaging ◽

Ionizing Radiation ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Community Hospital ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Care Community ◽

The Public ◽

Referring Physicians ◽

To Receive

Background It is important for physicians to be aware of the radiation doses as well as the risks associated with diagnostic imaging procedures that they are ordering. Methods A survey was administered to patients, medical students, and referring physicians from a number of specialties to determine background knowledge regarding radiation exposure and risk associated with commonly ordered medical imaging tests. Results A total of 127 patients, 32 referring physicians, and 30 medical students completed the survey. The majority of patients (92%) were not informed of the radiation risks associated with tests that they were scheduled to receive and had false perceptions about the use of radiation and its associated risks. Physicians and medical students had misconceptions about the use of ionizing radiation in a number of radiologic examinations; for example, 25% and 43% of physicians and medical students, respectively, were unaware that interventional procedures used ionizing radiation, and 28% of physicians were unaware that mammography used ionizing radiation. Computed tomographies and barium studies were thought to be associated with the least ionizing radiation among physicians. Conclusion There is a need for educating the public, medical students, and referring physicians about radiation exposure and associated risk so that (1) patients receiving multiple medical imaging tests are aware of the radiation that they are receiving and (2) physicians and future physicians will make informed decisions when ordering such tests to limit the amount of radiation that patients receive and to promote informed consent among patients.

Download Full-text