scholarly journals Optimization of Real-time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Dengue Virus

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kaunara A. Azizi ◽  
Arnold J. Ndaro ◽  
Athanasia Maro ◽  
Adonira Saro ◽  
Reginald A. Kavishe
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Dengue Virus ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Aims: This study was set to optimize conditions for real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of dengue virus by using rapid and simple nucleic acid extraction method. Methodology: One step and two step real time RT-PCR were evaluated in different PCR thermocyclers. Extraction of viral RNA was done by using a simple boom method. Results: The real time RT-PCR technique was successfully optimized using simple and rapid method for purification of nucleic acid, ‘boom method’. The technique works better when performed in a two-step procedure and can works well with all range of real time PCR machines. The optimized real time RT-PCR used in the present study is a valuable and reliable technique for routine diagnosis of dengue. Further investigation on the cost effectiveness in adopting this technique for routine screening and monitoring of the dengue infection should be done.

scholarly journals Optimization Of Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction For Detection Of Dengue Virus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaunara Ally Azizi ◽  
Arnold J Ndaro ◽  
Athanasia Maro ◽  
Adonira T Saro ◽  
Reginald Kavishe
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Dengue Virus ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Virus Infections ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Objective Rapid and accurate laboratory confirmatory is very essential for control measures of dengue virus infections. However, many cases of dengue virus infections in most of the hospitals remain undiagnosed due to presence of other febrile illnesses with overlapping symptoms and lack of specificity in most of laboratory diagnostic methods. This study was set to optimize conditions for real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of dengue virus by using rapid and simple nucleic acid extraction method.Results The real time RT-PCR technique was successfully optimized using simple and rapid method for purification of nucleic acid, ‘boom method’. The technique works better when performed in a two-step procedure and can works well with all range of real time PCR machines. The optimized real time RT-PCR used in the present study is a valuable and reliable technique for routine diagnosis of dengue. Further investigation on the cost effectiveness in adopting this technique for routine screening and monitoring of the dengue infection should be done.

scholarly journals Use of immunodot blot and multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in dengue virus detection in macerates of Aedes aegypti larvae

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Aline T.A. Chagas ◽  
Michelle D. Oliveira ◽  
Jose M.S. Mezencio ◽  
Eduardo A.M. Silva ◽  
Leandro L. Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Dengue Virus ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Denv Serotypes ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Pcr Techniques

The <em>Dengue virus</em> is the main arbovirus that affects man in terms of morbidity and mortality. The detection of the virus is very important for epidemiological surveillance, so here we propose to standardize and compare the immunodot blot (IDB) and multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (M-RT-PCR) techniques to detect and characterize the dengue virus (DENV) serotypes in samples of <em>Aedes aegypti</em> larvae. Thus, the IDB and M-RT-PCR techniques were standardized using macerated samples of larvae collected in nature. The use of monoclonal antibodies in IDB has not shown great results, but DENV detection through this method was possible using polyclonal antibodies. The distinction of serotypes 1, 2 and 3 was carried out by M-RT-PCR.

scholarly journals IDENTIFICATION OF DENGUE VIRUS SEROTYPES AT THE DR. SOETOMO HOSPITAL SURABAYA IN 2016 AND ITS CORRELATION WITH NS1 ANTIGEN DETECTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Jeine Stela Akualing ◽  
Aryati Aryati ◽  
Puspa Wardhani ◽  
Usman Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Dengue Virus ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Ribonucleic Acid ◽  
Rna Virus ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Ns1 Antigen ◽  
Dengue Virus Serotypes ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Serotipe virus dengue yang beredar terus mengalami perubahan dan berbeda di setiap daerah. Pergeseran serotipe maupun genotipedi dalamnya, mempengaruhi terjadinya wabah dengue di berbagai negara. Perbedaan serotipe diduga bernasab dengan deteksi antigen(Ag) non-structural 1 (NS1), namun belum banyak penelitian yang mendukung hal tersebut. Penelitian potong lintang dikerjakan sejakFebruari-Agustus 2016 dan didapatkan 60 subjek infeksi virus dengue (IVD) dan 25 non-IVD. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus denguediperiksa di semua subjek menggunakan Simplexa Dengue Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)termasuk identifikasi serotipe virus dengue dan pemeriksaan NS1 menggunakan uji cepat NS1 Panbio. Perbedaan perbandingan variabelkategorikal dianalisis dengan uji Fisher Exact. Kenasaban antara serotipe dengan deteksi Ag NS1 dianalisis dengan Chi-Kuadrat. RNAvirus dengue terdeteksi di 43 dari 60 subjek IVD (71,7%). Serotipe terbanyak adalah DENV-3 (62,8%). Pergeseran dominasi serotipetelah terjadi di Surabaya, sebelumnya dari DENV-2 ke DENV-1 dan sekarang DENV-3, kemungkinan akibat mobilitas pejamu, transporvirus dan faktor geografis. Kepekaan uji cepat NS1 75% dan kekhasan 100%. Persentase deteksi NS1 antar serotipe berbeda bermakna(p=0,002). Deteksi NS1 lebih rendah pada DENV-1 dibandingkan DENV-2 (p=0,007) ataupun DENV-3 (p=0,003). Serotipe virusdengue bernasab dengan deteksi NS1 (p=0,005). Ciri serotipe maupun genotipe virus dengue kemungkinan mempengaruhi sekresiNS1. Telah terjadi pergeseran serotipe virus dengue di pasien IVD di Surabaya sehingga diperlukan surveillance berkesinambunganuntuk memperkirakan terjadinya wabah. Serotipe bernasab dengan deteksi NS1. Salah satu penyebab hasil negatif palsu NS1 adalahperbedaan serotipe.

scholarly journals Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Virgilio Paradiso ◽  
Simona De Summa ◽  
Daniela Loconsole ◽  
Vito Procacci ◽  
Anna Sallustio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Immunoglobulin M ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

BACKGROUND Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for the identification of viral nucleic acid is the current standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but technical issues limit its utilization for large-scale screening. Serological immunoglobulin M (IgM)/IgG testing has been proposed as a useful tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 exposure. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to compare the results of the rapid serological VivaDiag test for SARS-CoV-2–related IgM/IgG detection with those of the standard RT-PCR laboratory test for identifying SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. METHODS We simultaneously performed both serological and molecular tests with a consecutive series of 191 symptomatic patients. The results provided by a new rapid serological colorimetric test for analyzing IgM/IgG expression were compared with those of RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection. RESULTS Of the 191 subjects, 70 (36.6%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 based on RT-PCR results, while 34 (17.3%) tested positive based on serological IgM/IgG expression. Additionally, 13 (6.8%) subjects tested positive based on serological test results, but also tested negative based on RT-PCR results. The rapid serological test had a sensitivity of 30% and a specificity of 89% compared to the standard RT-PCR assay. Interestingly, the performance of both assays improved 8 days after symptom appearance. After 10 days had passed since symptom appearance, the predictive value of the rapid serological test was higher than that of the standard molecular assay (proportion of positive results: 40% vs 20%). Multivariate analysis showed that age &gt;58 years <i>(P</i>&lt;.01) and period of &gt;15 days after symptom onset (<i>P</i>&lt;.02) were significant and independent factors associated with serological test positivity. CONCLUSIONS The rapid serological test analyzed in this study seems limited in terms of usefulness when diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it may be useful for providing relevant information on people’s immunoreaction to COVID-19 exposure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document