A knowledge organization framework for influencing tourism-centered place-making

PurposeThis study demonstrates the synthesis of a knowledge organization framework from tourist reviews and an ontological model with its implementation in graph database, which is based on this framework. The aim is to influence place-making outcomes at tourist destinations.Design/methodology/approachThe faceted classification approach has been used for generating and validating the framework based on online reviews about urban tourism parks. The framework was used to develop an ontology using Protégé ontology editor that was implemented using GraphDB.FindingsThree fundamental facet categories, namely Component, Aspect and Outcome, each consisting of several sub-facets, were synthesized from the analyses of the reviews. Besides helping in constructing the ontology, the analysis also helped in calculating an importance-score for the reviews that helped in ranked information retrieval.Research limitations/implicationsThe analyses of the reviews were done manually and may carry human bias. But it is robust as it is based on a canonical faceted methodology.Practical implicationsIt is envisaged that this study will help tourist destination planners in decision-making by easing the utilization of tourist generated reviews by the knowledge management systems they use. Opinions of tourists will be induced in destination planning thereby helping in the production of quality “places.”Originality/valueThe presented faceted framework aims to specifically aid knowledge organization pertaining to online reviews related to tourist destinations. The focus is on organizing knowledge to facilitate tourism development for better place-making outcomes, which is an important area of research though it has little contributions.

Migrating a complex classification scheme to the semantic web: expressing the Integrative Levels Classification using SKOS RDF

PurposeThe Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) is a comprehensive “freely faceted” knowledge organization system not previously expressed as SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System). This paper reports and reflects on work converting the ILC to SKOS representation.Design/methodology/approachThe design of the ILC representation and the various steps in the conversion to SKOS are described and located within the context of previous work considering the representation of complex classification schemes in SKOS. Various issues and trade-offs emerging from the conversion are discussed. The conversion implementation employed the STELETO transformation tool.FindingsThe ILC conversion captures some of the ILC facet structure by a limited extension beyond the SKOS standard. SPARQL examples illustrate how this extension could be used to create faceted, compound descriptors when indexing or cataloguing. Basic query patterns are provided that might underpin search systems. Possible routes for reducing complexity are discussed.Originality/valueComplex classification schemes, such as the ILC, have features which are not straight forward to represent in SKOS and which extend beyond the functionality of the SKOS standard. The ILC's facet indicators are modelled as rdf:Property sub-hierarchies that accompany the SKOS RDF statements. The ILC's top-level fundamental facet relationships are modelled by extensions of the associative relationship – specialised sub-properties of skos:related. An approach for representing faceted compound descriptions in ILC and other faceted classification schemes is proposed.

A review of public datasets in question answering research

Recent years have seen an increase in the number of publicly available datasets that are released to foster research in question answering systems. In this work, we survey the available datasets and also provide a simple, multi-faceted classification of those datasets. We further survey the most recent evaluation results that form the current state of the art in question answering research by exploring related research challenges and associated online leaderboards. Finally, we provide a discussion around the existing online challenges and provide a wishlist of datasets whose release could benefit question answering research in the future.

Faceted classification in support of diversity: the role of concepts and terms in representing religion

The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.

Multiplicity of Research Programs in the Biological Systematics: A Case for Scientific Pluralism

Biological diversity (BD) explored by biological systematics is a complex yet organized natural phenomenon and can be partitioned into several aspects, defined naturally with reference to various causal factors structuring biota. These BD aspects are studied by particular research programs based on specific taxonomic theories (TTs). They provide, in total, a framework for comprehending the structure of biological systematics and its multi-aspect relations to other fields of biology. General principles of individualizing BD aspects and construing TTs as quasi-axiomatics are briefly considered. It is stressed that each TT is characterized by a specific combination of interrelated ontological and epistemological premises most adequate to the BD aspect a TT deals with. The following contemporary research programs in systematics are recognized and characterized in brief: phenetic, rational (with several subprograms), numerical, typological (with several subprograms), biosystematic, biomorphic, phylogenetic (with several subprograms), and evo-devo. From a scientific pluralism perspective, all of these research programs, if related to naturally defined particular BD aspects, are of the same biological and scientific significance. They elaborate “locally” natural classifications that can be united by a generalized faceted classification.

Multiplicity of Research Programs in the Biological Systematics: a Case for Scientific Pluralism

Biological diversity (BD) explored by the biological systematics is a complexly organized natural phenomenon and can be partitioned in several aspects defined with references to various causal factors structuring biota. These BD aspects are studied by particular research programs based on specific taxonomic theories (TT). They provide in total a framework for comprehending the structure of the biological systematics and its multi-aspect relations to other fields of biology. General principles of individualizing BD aspects and construing TT as quasi-axiomatics are briefly considered. It stressed that each TT is characterized by a specific combination of interrelated ontological and epistemological premises most adequate to the BD aspect a TT deals with. The following contemporary research programs in systematics are recognized and characterized in brief: phenetic, rational (with several subprograms), numerical, typological (with several subprograms), biosystematic, biomorphic, phylogenetic (with several subprograms), evo-devo. From a scientific pluralism perspective, all these research programs related to particular naturally defined BD aspects are of the same biological and scientific significance and no one of them can pretend to take a privileged position. They elaborate “locally” natural classifications that can be united by a kind of generalized faceted classification.

FORMATION OF INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING BY FIXED ASSETS OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES

Introduction. In today's market conditions, skillful and careful organization of the process of management and accounting in the agricultural sector of the economy becomes an essential factor in the efficient and rational use of fixed assets. Therefore, well-organized management and accounting of fixed assets at agricultural enterprises should be a holistic, unified system of interconnected, mutually agreed ways and methods. Methods. The methodological basis of scientific work is the following methods of cognition of economic phenomena. The following methods are applied, in particular: theoretical comparison – to build a facet-hierarchical classification model of fixed assets; tabular and graphic method – in order to visually display factual information; method of expert evaluations – in the development of methodological provisions for evaluating the choice and implementation of information technology for the management and accounting of fixed assets; abstract and logical, causal relations, description, concretization, formalization – for the formation of a system of management accounting and documenting the movement of fixed assets. Results. A comprehensive system of accounting for fixed assets at agricultural enterprises is proposed on the basis of generalized views of scientists on the organization of the management process, which provides maximum efficiency in the use of fixed assets with minimal costs for their maintenance and service. The key components and principles of the process of management and accounting of fixed assets, which became a prerequisite for building a classification of information on certain grounds, were determined. A faceted classification of fixed assets of an agricultural enterprise to assess the quality of their use is developed for this purpose. Discussion. The submitted proposals will improve the quality of management accounting of fixed assets through the development of its promising components, in particular, on the basis of facet-hierarchical classification of analytical display of information about their objects at all stages of the life cycle. An important achievement in this regard will be the creation of software products that allow you to quickly process information and respond instantly to the needs of management. Accordingly, work on their creation requires appropriate research in the future. Keywords: management, accounting, fixed assets, agricultural enterprises, organizational and information system, faceted classification.