dopant deactivation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (47) ◽  
pp. 52929-52936
Author(s):  
Hao Zeng ◽  
Tsunaki Takahashi ◽  
Takehito Seki ◽  
Masaki Kanai ◽  
Guozhu Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Pandey ◽  
Kristof Paredis ◽  
Thomas Hantschel ◽  
Chris Drijbooms ◽  
Wilfried Vandervorst

Abstract Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy is a well-established technique for obtaining quantitative two- and three-dimensional carrier profiles in semiconductor devices with sub-nm spatial resolution. However, for sub-100 nm devices, the use of focused ion beam becomes inevitable for exposing the region of interest on a sample cross section. In this work, we investigate the impact of the focused ion beam milling on spreading resistance analysis and we show that the electrical effect of the focused ion beam extends far beyond the amorphous region and depends on the dopant concentration, ion beam energy, impact angle, and current density. For example, for dopant concentrations between 1.0 × 1020 and 1.5 × 1016 cm−3 we observe dopant deactivation at least between 23 and 175 nm for a glancing 30 keV ion beam. Further, we show that dopant deactivation is caused by defect diffusion during milling and is not directly impacted by the presence of Gallium in the sample. Later, we also discuss potential ways to mitigate these effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
pp. 085105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan K. Prüßing ◽  
Gerry Hamdana ◽  
Dominique Bougeard ◽  
Erwin Peiner ◽  
Hartmut Bracht

Author(s):  
M. T. Bjork ◽  
K. E. Moselund ◽  
H. Schmid ◽  
H. Ghoneim ◽  
S. Karg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document