Cadmium Removal from Giant Squid (Dosidicus gigas) Hydrolysate in Fixed-Bed Columns Packed with Iminodiacetic Resin: Tools for Scaling up the Process

Giant squid hydrolysate (GSH) elaborated from different batches from a fishing company was evaluated for cadmium removal. Fixed-bed column packed with iminodiacetic resin as adsorbent was used. GSH solution at different cadmium concentrations were fed in the fixed-bed column and breakthrough curves were evaluated. A high degree of metal removal from the solution was achieved and the saturation point (Ce/C0 ≤ 0.8) was achieved more quickly at higher concentrations of cadmium. The maximum capacity of adsorption (q0) was obtained using the Thomas model, where 1137.4, 860.4, 557.4, and 203.1 mg g−1 were achieved using GSH with concentrations of 48.37, 20.97, 12.13, and 3.26 mg L−1, respectively. Five cycles of desorption of the resin with HCl (1 M) backflow and regeneration with NaOH (0.5 M) were also evaluated, where no significant differences (p-value > 0.05) were observed between each cycle, with an average of 935.9 mg g−1 of qmax. The in-series columns evaluated reached a total efficiency of 90% on average after the third column in GSH with a cadmium concentration of 20.97 mg L−1. This kind of configuration should be considered the best alternative for cadmium removal from GSH. Additionally, the chemical composition of GSH, which was considered a quality parameter, was not affected by cadmium adsorption.

Sulfidation of Zero-valent Iron Nanoparticles for Environmental Remediation

<p>The ability of nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) to remove environmental contaminants, from heavy metals to polyhalogenated hydrocarbons, has been well established. However, the reactivity of nZVI towards contaminants is hampered due to competing for side reactions with oxygen and water. Sulfidemodified nZVI (S-nZVI) has become a viable option as S-nZVI has been shown to reduce organic compounds such as trichloroethylene faster than nZVI while also maintaining an increased resistance to oxidation by water. The Fulton group has established that nZVI supported on a naturally occurring microsilicate (Microsilica600, or “misi”), from a Rotorua geothermal deposit, is capable of removing nitrates from water. This material, or nZVI@misi, minimises the potential bioaccumulation path that nZVI has, and is easier to handle than unsupported nZVI. This research investigated the effect of sulfidation of nZVI@misi (or S-nZVI@misi) on the reactivity towards the degradation of a variety of different potential contaminants. S-nZVI@misi was synthesised using sodium thiosulfate for sulfidation. Increasing the concentration of the reagent and sulfidation time from 3 hours to 24 hours resulted in high percentages of sulfur-to-iron (S/Fe) for each material. This increase in S/Fe had a significant impact on the removal of cadmium and chromium as with higher the percentage of S/Fe, the faster the removal of these species occurred. Compared to pristine nZVI@misi, S-nZVI@misi was significantly faster at removing both cadmium and chromium. However, sulfidation of nZVI@misi proved to reduce the rate of 4-nitrophenol reduction and prevent nitrate reduction from occurring. Experimental analysis also showed that cadmium removal was faster with S-nZVI supported by FeOOH-coated microsilica, compared to material supported by un-coated microsilica. Therefore, we have synthesised supported S-nZVI that quickly removes cadmium and chromium from solution compared to standard supported nZVI.</p>

Sulfidation of Zero-valent Iron Nanoparticles for Environmental Remediation

<p>The ability of nano-sized zero-valent iron (nZVI) to remove environmental contaminants, from heavy metals to polyhalogenated hydrocarbons, has been well established. However, the reactivity of nZVI towards contaminants is hampered due to competing for side reactions with oxygen and water. Sulfidemodified nZVI (S-nZVI) has become a viable option as S-nZVI has been shown to reduce organic compounds such as trichloroethylene faster than nZVI while also maintaining an increased resistance to oxidation by water. The Fulton group has established that nZVI supported on a naturally occurring microsilicate (Microsilica600, or “misi”), from a Rotorua geothermal deposit, is capable of removing nitrates from water. This material, or nZVI@misi, minimises the potential bioaccumulation path that nZVI has, and is easier to handle than unsupported nZVI. This research investigated the effect of sulfidation of nZVI@misi (or S-nZVI@misi) on the reactivity towards the degradation of a variety of different potential contaminants. S-nZVI@misi was synthesised using sodium thiosulfate for sulfidation. Increasing the concentration of the reagent and sulfidation time from 3 hours to 24 hours resulted in high percentages of sulfur-to-iron (S/Fe) for each material. This increase in S/Fe had a significant impact on the removal of cadmium and chromium as with higher the percentage of S/Fe, the faster the removal of these species occurred. Compared to pristine nZVI@misi, S-nZVI@misi was significantly faster at removing both cadmium and chromium. However, sulfidation of nZVI@misi proved to reduce the rate of 4-nitrophenol reduction and prevent nitrate reduction from occurring. Experimental analysis also showed that cadmium removal was faster with S-nZVI supported by FeOOH-coated microsilica, compared to material supported by un-coated microsilica. Therefore, we have synthesised supported S-nZVI that quickly removes cadmium and chromium from solution compared to standard supported nZVI.</p>

Effect of Soil Washing with Ferric Chloride on Cadmium Removal and Soil Structure

In China, arable soils contaminated with cadmium (Cd) threaten human health. Ferric chloride (FeCl3) is a highly efficient agent that can remove Cd from contaminated soils. However, it is unknown whether FeCl3 damages the soil structure and consequently affects crop growth. In this study, we investigated the impacts of Cd extraction by FeCl3 on the structure of a paddy soil on the basis of comparisons of control (without washing agents) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) treatments. According to our results, the removal efficiency increased with the decrease in soil initial pH, as adjusted by FeCl3. However, the low pH of 2.0 caused a partial loss of soil mineral components, with an Al release of 4.4% in the FeCl3-treated soil versus 1.3% in the HCl-treated soil. In contrast, the amount of released Al was less than 0.2% in the control and in the FeCl3 treatments with initial pH values of 3.0 and 4.0. The washing agents caused soil TOC loss of 27.1%, 17.5%, and 2.76% in the pH 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 FeCl3 treatments, compared with 15.5% in the initial pH 2.0 HCl treatment. The use of FeCl3 represents an optimum tradeoff between removal efficiency and the loss of soil components to restore Cd-polluted soils by adjusting the initial pH to 3.0 with the addition of FeCl3. Under this condition, the amount of Al loss was less than 0.2%, and the extraction efficiency reached 40.3%, compared to an efficiency of 39.7% with HCl at an initial pH of 2.0. In conclusion, FeCl3 could effectively remove Cd from contaminated soil.