diabetes autoantibodies
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 66-OR
Author(s):  
LINA MERJANEH ◽  
LAWRENCE M. DOLAN ◽  
CYNTHIA SUERKEN ◽  
RALPH DAGOSTINO ◽  
GIUSEPPINA IMPERATORE ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A369-A370
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Cristiano ◽  
Kristine Grdinovac ◽  
Rajib Bhattacharya

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become an integral part of oncologic treatment, and their role is rapidly evolving. Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), which blocks PD-L1 from binding to PD-1, allowing the T cell to activate. While nivolumab has been shown to improve outcomes in certain malignancies, anti-PD-1 therapy can cause multiple endocrinopathies, including autoimmune diabetes (AD). Case: Here we present a 60-year-old male with a past medical history of end-stage liver disease secondary to hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After undergoing transarterial chemoembolization for HCC, nivolumab was initiated. The patient initially tolerated the immunotherapy well. However, after three cycles, the patient acutely developed nausea, vomiting, lethargy and confusion. On presentation, he was afebrile, blood pressure of 85/46 mmHg, and a heart rate of 92 bpm. Exam was significant for abnormal mentation, and diffuse guarding of the abdomen. Laboratory workup showed hyperglycemia (1,178 mg/dL), positive serum ketones (beta-hydroxybutyrate 11.4 mmol/L), anion gap metabolic acidosis (AG 31, CO2 7 mmol/L), anemia, thrombocytopenia, acute kidney injury, leukocytosis, and elevated lipase. He was admitted to the intensive care unit, and further workup for acute pancreatitis was unrevealing. C-peptide was low (0.8 ng/mL) with corresponding hyperglycemia (1,055 mg/dL). GAD-65, islet cell, and insulin antibodies were undetectable. Hemoglobin A1c was 8.0%. Blood sugars from the previous one and a half years were in normal range. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with DKA and AD secondary to anti-PD-1 therapy. Discussion: This case is representative of AD secondary to nivolumab. While there have been many cases of AD reported after nivolumab, this is the fifth case that has been reported in a patient being treated for HCC. Our patient presented acutely in DKA with no prior diagnosis of diabetes. His antibody testing was undetectable, C-peptide was low in the context of hyperglycemia, and he continued to require insulin therapy until his passing. Prior case reports have demonstrated that the majority of patients with AD related to anti-PD-1 therapy present in DKA, while less than half have detectable diabetes autoantibodies. Specific haplotypes and diabetes autoantibodies have been postulated as risk factors for AD secondary to anti-PD-1 therapy. However, this does not explain the pathology behind a number of patients who have neither of these risk factors. While AD is a rare complication of nivolumab (<1%), this case identifies the need for patients and clinicians to be aware of and discuss the risk of AD after starting nivolumab. Future research is needed to identify risk factors for patients at highest risk of developing AD related to anti-PD-1 therapy and reporting every case encountered is the first step.


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Hamed ◽  
M Samy ◽  
H Mahmoud ◽  
N Yehia

Abstract Background Type 1 DM is sub-divided into type 1A (immune-mediated) and type 1B (other forms of type 1 DM that include virus-triggered autoimmune response, genetic factors and idiopathic). It is widely recognized that the presence of two or more auto-antibodies has a high sensitivity and specificity for rapid progression to insulin dependency within 5 years. It is hypothesized that the difficult glycemic control among some type 1 diabetic patients is attributed to the presence of diabetes-autoantibodies. Aim This study was designed to assess the relationship between the presence of diabetes autoantibodies and the poor glycemic control developed by patients who receive more than 100 insulin units per day and yet they are not controlled i.e. HbA1c > 7%, elevated plasma glucose level on frequent monitoring although they are non-obese and strictly stuck to healthy diet and exercise, and whether the number of positive autoantibodies affect the glycemic control or not. Methods This study was conducted on 60 patients 30 males and 30 females, they were all subjected to full history taking, anthropometric measurements, clinical examination and laboratory assessment in the form of C-peptide, fasting blood glucose, 2 hours post-prandial blood glucose, HbA1c level, serum GADA level, serum ICA level and serum IAA level. The patients were classified according to presence of diabetes autoantibodies into two groups; Group I consisted of 6 patients (10%) with negative auto-antibodies and Group II consisted of 54 patients (90%) with positive auto-antibodies, Group II was further classified according to the number of positive diabetes autoantibodies into 3 sub-groups, Group II a: Formed of 9 patients with 1 positive autoantibody (16.7% of the study population). Group II b: Formed of 12 patients with 2 positive autoantibodies (22.2% of the study population) and Group II c: Formed of 33 patients with 3 positive autoantibodies (61.1% of the study population). Results HbA1c level was significantly higher in group II than group I (11.85 ± 1.61% vs. 8.52 ± 0.41%, p = 0.000). Similarly it was higher in group IIc than group IIb than group IIa (12.25 ± 1.48% vs. 11.57 ± 1.59% vs. 10.78 ± 1.73%, p = 0.038).Moreover HbA1c was significantly higher in patients with positive GADA, patients with positive ICA and those with positive IAA than those with negative GADA, negative ICA and negative IAA (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.012 respectively). The total number of insulin units per day was significantly higher in group II than group I (109.83 ± 7.77 U/day vs. 100.83 ± 1.83 U/day, p = 0.007). The duration of diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in group I than group II (10.17 ± 1.94 years vs. 8.11 ± 2.20 years, p = 0.033). By doing the multivariate regression analyses we found that HbA1c level, total number of insulin units per day and the duration of developing diabetes mellitus were significant predictive factors for the presence of diabetes autoantibodies (p = 0.007, p = 0.033 and p = 0.043 respectively). Conclusion The presence of diabetes autoantibodies affect the glycemic control represented by HbA1c level; also it affects the total number of insulin units per day used by the patients; the more the presence of diabetes autoantibodies, the higher the HbA1c level, the more insulin units required by patients to control their glycemic state.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Trébissou Aïssé Florence Judith ◽  
Sanogo Mamadou ◽  
Sibailly Pascal ◽  
Ankotché Amos ◽  
Lokrou Adrian ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. S119
Author(s):  
M. Wurm ◽  
K. Konrad ◽  
T. Kapellen ◽  
D. Kieninger ◽  
K. Laubner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document