module identification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

100
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
pp. 1788-1788
Author(s):  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Yanan Ma ◽  
Yunping Chen ◽  
Haiming Sun ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagai Levi ◽  
Nima Rahmanian ◽  
Ran Elkon ◽  
Ron Shamir

Active module identification (AMI) is an essential step in many omics analyses. Such algorithms receive a gene network and a gene activity profile as input and report subnetworks that show significant over-representation of accrued activity signal ("active modules"). Such modules can point out key molecular processes in the analyzed biological conditions. We recently introduced a novel AMI algorithm called DOMINO, and demonstrated that it detects active modules that capture biological signals with markedly improved rate of empirical validation. Here, we provide an online server that executes DOMINO, making it more accessible and user-friendly. To help the interpretation of solutions, the server provides GO enrichment analysis, module visualizations, and accessible output formats for customized downstream analysis. It also enables running DOMINO with various gene identifiers of different organisms. The server is available at http://domino.cs.tau.ac.il. Its codebase is available at https://github.com/Shamir-Lab.


Author(s):  
Olga Lazareva ◽  
Jan Baumbach ◽  
Markus List ◽  
David B Blumenthal

Abstract In network and systems medicine, active module identification methods (AMIMs) are widely used for discovering candidate molecular disease mechanisms. To this end, AMIMs combine network analysis algorithms with molecular profiling data, most commonly, by projecting gene expression data onto generic protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks. Although active module identification has led to various novel insights into complex diseases, there is increasing awareness in the field that the combination of gene expression data and PPI network is problematic because up-to-date PPI networks have a very small diameter and are subject to both technical and literature bias. In this paper, we report the results of an extensive study where we analyzed for the first time whether widely used AMIMs really benefit from using PPI networks. Our results clearly show that, except for the recently proposed AMIM DOMINO, the tested AMIMs do not produce biologically more meaningful candidate disease modules on widely used PPI networks than on random networks with the same node degrees. AMIMs hence mainly learn from the node degrees and mostly fail to exploit the biological knowledge encoded in the edges of the PPI networks. This has far-reaching consequences for the field of active module identification. In particular, we suggest that novel algorithms are needed which overcome the degree bias of most existing AMIMs and/or work with customized, context-specific networks instead of generic PPI networks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Zhengkui Lin ◽  
Xiaofeng Lin ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Qian Zhao ◽  
...  

AbstractTo further improve the effect of gene modules identification, combining the Newman algorithm in community detection and K-means algorithm framework, a new method of gene module identification, GCNA-Kpca algorithm, was proposed. The core idea of the algorithm was to build a gene co-expression network (GCN) based on gene expression data firstly; Then the Newman algorithm was used to initially identify gene modules based on the topology of GCN, and the number of clusters and clustering centers were determined; Finally the number of clusters and clustering centers were input into the K-means algorithm framework, and the secondary clustering was performed based on the gene expression profile to obtain the final gene modules. The algorithm took into account the role of modularity in the clustering process, and could find the optimal membership module for each gene through multiple iterations. Experimental results showed that the algorithm proposed in this paper had the best performance in error rate, biological significance and CNN classification indicators (Precision, Recall and F-score). The gene module obtained by GCNA-Kpca was used for the task of key gene identification, and these key genes had the highest prognostic significance. Moreover, GCNA-Kpca algorithm was used to identify 10 key genes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): CDC20, CCNB1, EIF4A3, H2AFX, NOP56, RFC4, NOP58, AURKA, PCNA, and FEN1. According to the validation, it was reasonable to speculate that these 10 key genes could be biomarkers for HCC. And NOP56 and NOP58 are key genes for HCC that we discovered for the first time.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Emilie Ann Ramsahai ◽  
Vrijesh Tripathi ◽  
Melford John

Background: The DREAM Challenge evaluated methods to identify molecular pathways facilitating the detection of multiple genes affecting critical interactions and processes. Dysregulation of pathways by well-known driver genes is often found in the development and progression of cancer. We used the gene interaction networks provided and the scoring rounds to test disease module identification methods to nominate candidate driver genes in these modules. Method: Our algorithm calculated the proportion of the whole network accessible in two steps from each node in a combined network, which was defined as a 2-reach gene value. Genes with high 2-reach values were used to form the center of star cover clusters. These clusters were assessed for significant modules. Within these modules we identified novel candidate driver genes, by considering the parent-child relationship of well-known driver genes. Disturbance to such driver genes or their upstream parents, can lead to disruption of highly regulated signals affecting the normal functions of cells. We explored these parents as a potential source for candidate driver genes. Results:  An initial list of 57 candidate driver genes was identified from 13 significant modules. Analysis of the parent-child relationships of well-known driver genes in these modules prioritized PRKDC, YWHAB, GSK3B, and PPP1CB. Conclusion: Our method incorporated the simple m-reach topology metric in disease module identification and its relationship with known driver genes to identify candidate genes. The four genes shortlisted have been highlighted in recent publications in the literature, which supports the need for further wet lab experimental investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document