retinal determination
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 1)

BMC Genomics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Gainett ◽  
Jesús A. Ballesteros ◽  
Charlotte R. Kanzler ◽  
Jakob T. Zehms ◽  
John M. Zern ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Arachnids are important components of cave ecosystems and display many examples of troglomorphisms, such as blindness, depigmentation, and elongate appendages. Little is known about how the eyes of arachnids are specified genetically, let alone the mechanisms for eye reduction and loss in troglomorphic arachnids. Additionally, duplication of Retinal Determination Gene Network (RDGN) homologs in spiders has convoluted functional inferences extrapolated from single-copy homologs in pancrustacean models. Results We investigated a sister species pair of Israeli cave whip spiders, Charinus ioanniticus and C. israelensis (Arachnopulmonata, Amblypygi), of which one species has reduced eyes. We generated embryonic transcriptomes for both Amblypygi species, and discovered that several RDGN homologs exhibit duplications. We show that duplication of RDGN homologs is systemic across arachnopulmonates (arachnid orders that bear book lungs), rather than being a spider-specific phenomenon. A differential gene expression (DGE) analysis comparing the expression of RDGN genes in field-collected embryos of both species identified candidate RDGN genes involved in the formation and reduction of eyes in whip spiders. To ground bioinformatic inference of expression patterns with functional experiments, we interrogated the function of three candidate RDGN genes identified from DGE using RNAi in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum. We provide functional evidence that one of these paralogs, sine oculis/Six1 A (soA), is necessary for the development of all arachnid eye types. Conclusions Our work establishes a foundation to investigate the genetics of troglomorphic adaptations in cave arachnids, and links differential gene expression to an arthropod eye phenotype for the first time outside of Pancrustacea. Our results support the conservation of at least one RDGN component across Arthropoda and provide a framework for identifying the role of gene duplications in generating arachnid eye diversity.


Author(s):  
Guilherme Gainett ◽  
Jesús A. Ballesteros ◽  
Charlotte R. Kanzler ◽  
Jakob T. Zehms ◽  
John M. Zern ◽  
...  

AbstractArachnids are important components of cave ecosystems and display many examples of troglomorphisms, such as blindness, depigmentation, and elongate appendages. Little is known about how the eyes of arachnids are specified genetically, let alone the mechanisms for eye reduction and loss in troglomorphic arachnids. Additionally, paralogy of Retinal Determination Gene Network (RDGN) homologs in spiders has convoluted functional inferences extrapolated from single-copy homologs in pancrustacean models. Here, we investigated a sister species pair of Israeli cave whip spiders (Arachnopulmonata, Amblypygi, Charinus) of which one species has reduced eyes. We generated the first embryonic transcriptomes for Amblypygi, and discovered that several RDGN homologs exhibit duplications. We show that paralogy of RDGN homologs is systemic across arachnopulmonates (arachnid orders that bear book lungs), rather than being a spider-specific phenomenon. A differential gene expression (DGE) analysis comparing the expression of RDGN genes in field-collected embryos of both species identified candidate RDGN genes involved in the formation and reduction of eyes in whip spiders. To ground bioinformatic inference of expression patterns with functional experiments, we interrogated the function of three candidate RDGN genes identified from DGE in a spider, using RNAi in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum. We provide functional evidence that one of these paralogs, sine oculis/Six1 A (soA), is necessary for the development of all arachnid eye types. Our results support the conservation of at least one RDGN component across Arthropoda and establish a framework for investigating the role of gene duplications in arachnid eye diversity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Valencia ◽  
Roberto Feuda ◽  
Dan O. Mellott ◽  
Robert D. Burke ◽  
Isabelle S. Peter

ABSTRACTOne of the signatures of evolutionarily related cell types is the expression of similar combinations of transcription factors in distantly related animals. Here we present evidence that sea urchin larvae possess bilateral clusters of ciliary photoreceptors that are positioned in the oral/anterior apical neurogenic domain and associated with pigment cells. The expression of synaptotagmin indicates that the photoreceptors are neurons. Immunostaining shows that the sea urchin photoreceptors express an RGR/GO-opsin, opsin3.2, which co-localizes with tubulin on immotile cilia on the cell surface. Furthermore, orthologs of several transcription factors expressed in vertebrate photoreceptors are expressed in sea urchin ciliary photoreceptors, including Otx, Six3, Tbx2/3, and Rx, a transcription factor typically associated with ciliary photoreceptors. Analysis of gene expression during sea urchin development indicates that the photoreceptors derive from the anterior apical neurogenic domain. Thus, based on location, developmental origin, and transcription factor expression, sea urchin ciliary photoreceptors are likely homologous to vertebrate rods and cones. However, we found that genes typically involved in eye development in many animals, including pax6, six1/2, eya, and dac, are not expressed in sea urchin ciliary photoreceptors. Instead, all four genes are co-expressed in the hydropore canal, indicating that these genes operate as a module in an unrelated developmental context. Thus, based on current evidence, we conclude that at least within deuterostomes, ciliary photoreceptors share a common evolutionary origin and express a shared regulatory state that includes Rx, Otx, and Six3, but not transcription factors that are commonly associated with the retinal determination circuit.


Author(s):  
Máximo Sánchez-Aragón ◽  
Julia Cantisán-Gómez ◽  
Carlos M. Luque ◽  
Catarina Brás-Pereira ◽  
Carla S. Lopes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 6479-6487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinhua Zheng ◽  
Qian Liu ◽  
Ming Yi ◽  
Shuang Qin ◽  
Kongming Wu

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (23) ◽  
pp. 5846-5853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjin Zhu ◽  
Sneha Palliyil ◽  
Chen Ran ◽  
Justin P. Kumar

Paired box 6 (Pax6) is considered to be the master control gene for eye development in all seeing animals studied so far. In vertebrates, it is required not only for lens/retina formation but also for the development of the CNS, olfactory system, and pancreas. Although Pax6 plays important roles in cell differentiation, proliferation, and patterning during the development of these systems, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, Pax6 also functions in a range of tissues, including the eye and brain. In this report, we describe the function of Pax6 in Drosophila eye-antennal disc development. Previous studies have suggested that the two fly Pax6 genes, eyeless (ey) and twin of eyeless (toy), initiate eye specification, whereas eyegone (eyg) and the Notch (N) pathway independently regulate cell proliferation. Here, we show that Pax6 controls eye progenitor cell survival and proliferation through the activation of teashirt (tsh) and eyg, thereby indicating that Pax6 initiates both eye specification and proliferation. Although simultaneous loss of ey and toy during early eye-antennal disc development disrupts the development of all head structures derived from the eye-antennal disc, overexpression of N or tsh in the absence of Pax6 rescues only antennal and head epidermis development. Furthermore, overexpression of tsh induces a homeotic transformation of the fly head into thoracic structures. Taking these data together, we demonstrate that Pax6 promotes development of the entire eye-antennal disc and that the retinal determination network works to repress alternative tissue fates, which ensures proper development of adult head structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document