outer magnetosphere
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

167
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Fujita ◽  
Takashi Tanaka

Abstract The geomagnetic variations of the preliminary impulse (PI) of the sudden commencement (SC) are known to show a time delay of the peak displacement and longer duration time in the higher latitudes in the pre-noon and post-noon sectors of the polar region. This peculiar behavior of the PI geomagnetic variation is associated with temporal deformation of the ionospheric PI field-aligned current (FAC) distribution into a crescent shape; its lower-latitude edge extends toward the anti-sunward direction, and its higher-latitude edge almost stays on the same longitude near noon. Numerical simulations revealed that the deformation of the FAC distribution is derived from different behaviors of the two PI current systems. The first current system consists of the FAC connected to the PI FAC in the lower latitude side of the ionosphere, the cross-magnetopause current, and the magnetosheath current (type L current system). The cross-magnetopause current is the inertia current generated in the acceleration front of the solar wind due to the sudden compression of the magnetosheath. Thus, the longitudinal speed of the type L current system in the ionosphere is the solar wind speed in the magnetosheath projected into the ionosphere. In contrast, the PI current system connected to the PI FAC at higher latitude (type H current system) consists of the upward/downward FAC in the pre-noon/post-noon sector, respectively, and dawn-to-dusk field-perpendicular current (FPC) along the dayside magnetopause. The dawn-to-dusk FPC moves to the higher latitudes in the outer magnetosphere over time. The FAC of the type H current system is converted from the FPC due to convergence of the return FPC heading toward the sunward direction in the outer magnetosphere; the return FPC is the inertia current driven by the magnetospheric plasma flow associated with compression of the magnetopause behind the front region of the accelerated solar wind. The acceleration front spreads concentrically from the subsolar point. Consequently, as the return FPC is converted to the FAC of the type H current system, it does not move much in the longitudinal direction over time because the dawn-to-dusk FPC of the type H current system moves to the higher latitudes. Therefore, the high-latitude edge of the PI current distribution in the ionosphere moves only slightly. Finally, we clarified that the FPC-FAC conversion of the type L current system mainly occurs in the region where the Alfvén speed starts to increase toward the Earth. A region with a steep gradient of the Alfvén speed like the plasmapause is not always necessary for conversion from the FPC to the FAC. We also suggest the possible field-aligned structure of the standing Alfvén wave that may occur in the PI phase.


2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (1) ◽  
pp. L7
Author(s):  
Andrei M. Beloborodov

Abstract We examine the possibility that fast radio bursts (FRBs) are emitted inside the magnetosphere of a magnetar. On its way out, the radio wave must interact with a low-density e ± plasma in the outer magnetosphere at radii R = 109–1010 cm. In this region, the magnetospheric particles have a huge cross section for scattering the wave. As a result, the wave strongly interacts with the magnetosphere and compresses it, depositing the FRB energy into the compressed field and the scattered radiation. The scattered spectrum extends to the γ-ray band and triggers e ± avalanche, further boosting the opacity. These processes choke FRBs, disfavoring scenarios with a radio source confined at R ≪ 1010 cm. Observed FRBs can be emitted by magnetospheric flare ejecta transporting energy to large radii.


Author(s):  
Xing‐Yu Li ◽  
Zhi‐Yang Liu ◽  
Qiu‐Gang Zong ◽  
Xu‐Zhi Zhou ◽  
Yi‐Xin Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulf Wave ◽  

Author(s):  
Gábor Tóth ◽  
Yuxi Chen ◽  
Zhenguang Huang ◽  
Bart Holst
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazue Takahashi ◽  
Turc Turc ◽  
Emilia Kilpua ◽  
Naoko Takahashi ◽  
Andrew Dimmock ◽  
...  

<p>Observational studies have demonstrated that ULF waves excited in the ion foreshock are a main source of Pc3-4 ULF waves detected in the magnetosphere. However, quantitative understanding of the propagation of the waves is not easy, because the waves are generated through a kinetic process in the foreshock, pass through the turbulent magnetosheath, and propagate as fast mode waves and couple to shear Alfven waves within the magnetosphere.  Recent advancement of hybrid numerical simulations of foreshock dynamics motivated us to analyze observational data from multiple sources and compare the results with simulation results. We have selected the time interval 1000-1200 UT on 20 July 2016, when the THEMIS, GOES, and Van Allen Probe spacecraft covered the solar wind, foreshock, magnetosheath, and magnetosphere. The EMMA magnetometers (L=1.6-6.5) were located near noon. We found that the spectrum of the magnetic field magnitude (Bt) in the foreshock exhibits a peak near 90 mHz, which agrees with the theoretical prediction assuming an ion beam instability in the foreshock.  A similar Bt spectrum is found in the dayside outer magnetosphere but not in the magnetosheath or in the nightside magnetosphere.  On the ground, a 90 mHz spectral peak was detected in the H component only at L=2-3. The numerical simulation using the VLASIATOR code shows that the foreshock is formed on the prenoon sector but that the effect of the upstream waves in the magnetosphere is most pronounced at noon. The Bt spectrum of the simulated waves in the outer magnetosphere exhibits a peak at 90 mHz, which is consistent with the observation.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 032902
Author(s):  
Chen Shi ◽  
Jinsong Zhao ◽  
Chaoyan Huang ◽  
Tieyan Wang ◽  
Malcolm W. Dunlop

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (12) ◽  
pp. 10257-10269 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Fuselier ◽  
J. Mukherjee ◽  
M. H. Denton ◽  
S. M. Petrinec ◽  
K. J. Trattner ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 5707-5716 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Vines ◽  
R. C. Allen ◽  
B. J. Anderson ◽  
M. J. Engebretson ◽  
S. A. Fuselier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 4137-4156 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Matsui ◽  
C. J. Farrugia ◽  
J. Goldstein ◽  
R. B. Torbert ◽  
M. R. Argall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document