Treatment of Plexiform Neurofibromas with MEK Inhibitors: First Results with a New Therapeutic Option

Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibromas (PN) are peripheral nerve sheath tumors that can significantly affect the quality of life. Until recently, surgery was the only treatment for these tumors. However, in most cases, surgery cannot achieve complete tumor removal and carries a high risk of postoperative deficits. Therefore, the recent approval of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib for the treatment of NF1-associated PN provides a long-awaited novel therapeutic option. Here, we report our experience with MEK inhibitor treatment in 12 pediatric NF1 patients with inoperable symptomatic PN. Eight patients received trametinib (median therapy duration 12.13 months and range 4–29 months), and four patients received selumetinib (median therapy duration 6.25 months and range 4–11 months). Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 6 months of treatment was available for seven trametinib patients (median tumor volume reduction of 26.5% and range 11.3–55.7%) and two selumetinib patients (21.3% tumor volume reduction in one patient and +3% tumor volume change in the other one). All patients reported clinical benefits such as improved range of motion or reduced disfigurement. Therapy-related adverse events occurred in 58.3% of patients and mainly consisted of skin toxicity, paronychia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Two patients discontinued trametinib treatment after 14 and 29 months when severe skin toxicity occurred and no further reduction of tumor size was observed. In one patient, discontinuation of therapy resulted in a 27.2% tumor volume increase as demonstrated on volumetric MRI 6 months later. Our data show that MEK inhibition is a novel therapeutic approach for inoperable PN with promising results and a manageable safety profile.

NIMG-08. A MULTI-CENTER RADIOMICS-BASED MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1-ASSOCIATED PLEXIFORM NEUROFIBROMAS AND MALIGNANT PERIPHERAL NERVE SHEATH TUMORS

BACKGROUND Several MRI features are proposed to distinguish between plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), including tumor size, margins, and degree of heterogeneity. However, most of these features are descriptive in nature, subject to intra-/interrater variability, and based on small single-institution studies. The goal of this study was to identify radiomic features that can differentiate between NF1-associated PNF and MPNST. METHODS 31 MPNSTs and 24 PNFs from five centers were segmented on short TI inversion recovery sequences using a semi-automated segmentation software (3DQI). Standard pre-processing was performed, including N4 bias field correction, intensity normalization (using a mean of 120 SI and standard deviation of 80 SI), and resampling to 1 mm3 voxel resolution. 1688 radiomic features were extracted from the tumor region of interest using PyRadiomics, an open-source Python radiomics package. To classify tumors as PNF or MPNST, we implemented the Boruta algorithm and correlation removal for selection of important features. A Random Forest model was built using the top ten selected features. Five-fold cross-validation was performed and repeated 100 times. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and confidence intervals. RESULTS The top ten features included in the model were five intensity features, two shape features, and three texture features. The model demonstrated an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI 0.882-0.899), sensitivity of 0.744, specificity of 0.847, and accuracy of 0.802 (95% CI 0.792-0.813). CONCLUSIONS Our machine learning model demonstrated high performance in classifying tumors as either PNF or MPNST in NF1 individuals. Inclusion of additional tumors for model training and testing on an independent dataset are underway. Ultimately, our model may enable improved differentiation between PNF and MPNST compared to descriptive MRI features, permit early patient risk stratification, and improve patient outcomes.

The clinico-pathologic profile of primary and recurrent orbital/periorbital plexiform neurofibromas (OPPN)

To evaluate and compare the clinical and histopathological profile of primary and recurrent orbital-periorbital plexiform neurofibromas (OPPN) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. We retrospectively evaluated 43 primary or recurrent neurofibroma (NF) specimens from 26 patients (2002 to 2018) at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Demographics, clinical presentation, and surgical intervention data were collected. Histopathological specimens were studied with hematoxylin-eosin, Alcian blue, and immunohistochemical markers; S-100, CD44, CD117, smooth muscle actin (SMA), neurofilament, and Ki-67. Of the 43 NFs specimens, 20 were primary and 23 recurrent tumors. For primary NF, the ratio of plexiform to the diffuse type was 13:7, however in recurrent tumors was 3:8 after the first recurrence, and 1:5 after multiple recurrences. Of the 17 patients with primary tumors that had paired recurrent tumors, 12/17 (70.6%) primary NFs were plexiform and 5/17 (29.4%) were diffuse. However, when tumors recurred, 13/17 tumors (76.5%) were diffuse and only 4/17 tumors (23.5%) had a plexiform pattern. The odds of a tumor having a diffuse pattern in recurrent NF was significantly higher than the plexiform pattern [OR = 7.8 (95% confidence interval 1.69:36.1) P = 0.008]. Primary plexiform NFs underwent an excision at a significantly younger age than the diffuse type. Recurrent NFs had significantly higher CD44, CD117, and neurofilament labeling (P = 0.02, P = 0.01 and P<0.001 respectively) but had significantly decreased Alcian blue, and S-100 labeling (P = 0.03, and P = 0.02 respectively) compared to primary tumors. SMA and Ki-67 proliferation index were not different between primary and recurrent NFs (P = 0.86, and P = 0.3 respectively). There appears to be a high risk for primary plexiform NFs to develop a diffuse histologic pattern when they recur. Immunohistochemical staining suggests a role of mast cells (CD117) and expression of infiltration makers (CD44) in the transformation of plexiform tumors to the diffuse phenotype.

A Review of Selumetinib in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1–Related Plexiform Neurofibromas

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of selumetinib, a novel MEK inhibitor, for the treatment of plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Data Sources: An English-based literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted using the terms selumetinib AND neurofibromatosis from inception to August 1, 2021. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant prescribing information, abstracts, and articles identified through the search were considered for inclusion in this review. Data Synthesis: The open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II SPRINT trial demonstrated clinically significant improvements in PN-related complications. Of 50 symptomatic patients, 68% experienced a partial response, with a median change in tumor volume of −27.9% from baseline. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 years was 84%. Additionally, clinically meaningful improvements were seen on patient- and parent-reported assessments evaluating pain, range of motion, disfigurement, and quality of life. Overall, the adverse effect profile for selumetinib appears mild and manageable. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Selumetinib is the first FDA-approved treatment for inoperable PN in patients with NF1, demonstrating that MEK inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy. Studies are ongoing to assess the effect of selumetinib on other NF1-associated tumor types and to determine the optimal dosing schedule and treatment duration. Cost and treatment burden must be considered when selecting selumetinib therapy. Conclusion: Selumetinib exhibits impressive antitumor activity and sustained clinical benefit in patients lacking other viable treatment options. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal age of initiation, treatment duration, and overall cost-effectiveness of selumetinib.

Whole-body MRI Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis type 1 Patients Younger than 3 Years Old and the Genetic Contribution to Disease Progression

Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common human genetic disease with age-dependent phenotype progression. The overview of clinical and radiological findings evaluated by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in NF1 patients <3 years old assessed with a genetic contribution to disease progression is presented herein.Methods: This study included 70 clinically or genetically diagnosed NF1 patients who received WBMRI before 3 years old. Clinical, genetic, and radiologic features were collected by retrospective chart review. In NF1+, widely spread diffuse cutaneous neurofibromas, developmental delay, autism, seizure, cardiac abnormalities, hearing defect, optic pathway glioma, severe plexiform neurofibromas (>3 cm in diameter, disfigurement, accompanying pain, bony destruction, or located para-aortic area), brain tumors, nerve root tumors, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, moyamoya disease, and bony dysplasia were included.Results: The age at WBMRI was 1.6 ± 0.7 years old, and NF1 mutations were found in 66 patients (94.3%). Focal areas of signal intensity (FASI) were the most common WBMRI finding (66.1%), followed by optic pathway glioma (15.7%), spine dural ectasia (12.9%), and plexiform neurofibromas (10.0%). Plexiform neurofibromas and NF1+ were more prevalent in familial case (28.7% vs 5.7%, p = 0.030; 71.4% vs 30.2%, p = 0.011). Follow-up WBMRI was conducted in 42 patients (23 girls and 19 boys) after 1.21 ± 0.50 years. FASI and radiologic progression were more frequent in patients with mutations involving GTPase activating protein-related domain (77.8% vs 52.4%, p = 0.047; 46.2% vs 7.7%, p = 0.029).Conclusions: WBMRI provides important information for the clinical care for young pediatric NF1 patients. As NF1 progresses in even these young patients, and is related to family history and the affected NF1 domains, serial evaluation with WBMRI should be assessed based on the clinical and genetic features for the patients’ best care.

Resolution of the Expert council on the problems of diagnosis and treatment of patients with plexiform neurofibromas

Плексиформная нейрофиброма (ПНФ) — доброкачественная опухоль периферической нервной системы.

REiNS: Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment

Objective:Assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PNs).Methods:An IRB-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting, September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PNs, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, 2 questions).Results:30 practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. 26/30 respondents had access to whole-body (WB)-MRI. The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PNs was no imaging (adults: 57% (17/30); children: 50% (15/30)), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% (6/30); children: 26.7% (8/30)). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PNs was regional MRI (adults: 90% (27/30); children: 93% (28/30)), followed by WBMRI (adults: 20% (6/30); children: 36.7% (11/30)). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PNs (37% (11/30)).Conclusions:More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known/visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PNs and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.

Epidemiological and clinical burden associated with plexiform neurofibromas in pediatric neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1): a systematic literature review

Purpose Patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1) and associated plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) often have a high burden of illness owing to debilitating symptoms of these tumors and limited management options. To investigate this complex disease, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on the epidemiology of pediatric NF-1 and associated PNs, the burden of illness, and outcomes of surgical resection of these tumors. Methods Searches of MEDLINE and Embase (from database inception to October 2019) and conference proceedings (2017–2019) were performed to identify relevant studies. The review methodology was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results Twenty studies were identified. Evidence confirmed NF-1 is rare but that occurrence may differ geographically. Only limited data on the birth incidence of NF-1 were identified. Prevalence estimates for pediatric NF-1 varied from one per 960 individuals (aged 17 years) to one per 5681 children (aged < 16 years) across five large registry/surveillance studies (each involving > 19,000 individuals). The prevalence of associated PNs was 0–29.6%. PNs carried increased mortality risk in pediatric NF-1 in both studies that explored this potential association. Patients with PNs reported high use of analgesics. The complication rate post-surgery for PNs was around 17–19%. The recurrence rate (18–68%) was dependent on the extent of excision achieved during surgery. Conclusions Data suggest NF-1 is a rare disease with increased morbidity and mortality in children with associated PNs. Surgical outcomes for PNs are often poor. These findings suggest significant unmet needs in patients with NF-1-associated PNs.