Improving the Diagnosis of Abusive Abdominal Trauma

Background/Objective: Abusive abdominal trauma (AAT) in children when missed can be fatal. In addition, differentiating from accidental trauma is essential in evaluating for other injuries and protecting from continued inflicted injuries. Abdominal CT remains the gold standard study to evaluate for abdominal injuries. Our purpose is to identify findings in presentation, clinical evaluation, the abdominal CT, and other imaging that can improve the diagnosis of abusive abdominal trauma. Methods: A retrospective (2011-2020) study compared children younger than 3 years that had abdominal CT scans for abusive trauma to those with accidental blunt abdominal trauma. Demographic information, clinical presentation, physical exam findings, final diagnoses, lab values, and imaging studies were collected. Descriptive analysis and Fisher’s exact test were used to determine significance of findings. Results: 226 (125 male, average age 11 months) patients had AAT and 90 (48 male, average age 18 months) patients had accidental trauma. 30 patients in the abusive group and 19 patients in the accidental group had positive CT. Most (70%) children with AAT and positive CT had no explanation for the trauma. Fall injury was reported in 27% of abusive (88.9% younger than 1 years) and 32% (83.3% older than 1 year) of accidental trauma. Retinal hemorrhage, abdominal bruising, subdural hematoma, and rib fractures were significantly (p<0.05) more common in the abusive group. In addition, 13 (43%) of patients with AAT and positive CT had rib fractures while none were detected on CT in the accidental group. Conclusions: In children younger than 3 years with abdominal trauma that present with a history of a fall or unknown injury, abusive abdominal trauma should be suspected. These children should subsequently be evaluated for other injuries. Children should be evaluated for nonaccidental trauma if rib fractures are visualized on abdominal CT, as these were only seen in AAT.

Recognition and Management of Nonaccidental Esophageal Perforation

Nonaccidental trauma is a common pediatric concern that often goes unrecognized. Although most patients present with bruising, burns, fractures, and head trauma, it is critical that physicians be able to diagnose and treat atypical presentations such as pharyngeal and esophageal trauma. In this report, we describe the presentation and management of a 5-week-old girl with an inflicted esophageal perforation.

Nonaccidental Trauma Managed with Open Spinal Fixation and Instrumentation and a Review of the Literature

Nonaccidental trauma (NAT), causing spinal injury is rare and occurs in up to 3% of cases. Management of these injuries is typically conservative, and thus surgical management is not widely reported in the literature. In this case report, we presented three patients to review the effectiveness of spinal instrumentation and posterior fusion in pediatric patients due to NAT. All patients recovered well and were neurologically intact at last follow-up with no postprocedural complications noted. Spinal arthrodesis is a safe, effective way to manage spinal injuries due to NAT in cases of fracture-dislocation, distraction injuries, as well as cases involving neurologic compromise.

Sixteen Fractures in a Seven-Month-Old Child Caused by Nonaccidental Trauma

Definition of physical child abuse is used to refer to a casualty injured by the caregiver. Health-care professionals providing medical care are responsible for detecting and reporting child abuse. A 7-month-old pediatric patient was referred to us from an outer center with the diagnosis of multiple fractures (14 different bones in 16 different anatomical regions). Skeletal pathologies were evaluated after exclusion of head and abdomen injuries in the emergency department. This child with fractures in 16 different anatomical regions of 14 different bones in her body is alive and does not have an intracranial injury. The number of fractures was too high to be explained even by major trauma. If child abuse is suspected, relevant authorities should be notified immediately. Medical records must be meticulously done as they can contribute to the possible court process. Our case, which contains almost all of the history and physical examination and risk factors of typical child abuse, is instructive enough to guide any health-care professional who may encounter this issue. The threshold in deciding on reporting of child abuse should be low. Every suspicious case should be reported in order to prevent repetitive abuse.

Evaluation of nonaccidental trauma in infants presenting with skull fractures: a retrospective review

OBJECTIVE Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is one of the leading causes of serious injury and death among young children in the United States, with a high proportion of head injury. Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety of discharge of infants with isolated skull fractures (ISFs); however, these same studies have noted that those infants with suspected abuse should not be immediately discharged. The authors aimed to create a standardized protocol for evaluation of infants presenting with skull fractures to our regional level I pediatric trauma center to best identify children at risk. METHODS A protocol for evaluation of NAT was developed by our pediatric trauma committee, which consists of evaluation by neurosurgery, pediatric surgery, and ophthalmology, as well as the pediatric child protection team. Social work evaluations and a skeletal survey were also utilized. Patients presenting over a 2-year period, inclusive of all infants younger than 12 months at the time of presentation, were assessed. Factors at presentation, protocol compliance, and the results of the workup were evaluated to determine how to optimize identification of children at risk. RESULTS A total of 45 infants with a mean age at presentation of 5.05 months (SD 3.14 months) were included. The most common stated mechanism of injury was a fall (75.6%), followed by an unknown mechanism (22.2%). The most common presenting symptoms were swelling over the fracture site (25 patients, 55.6%), followed by vomiting (5 patients, 11.1%). For the entire population of patients with skull fractures, there was suspicion of NAT in 24 patients (53.3% of the cohort). Among the 30 patients with ISFs, there was suspicion of NAT in 13 patients (43.3% of the subgroup). CONCLUSIONS Infants presenting with skull fractures with intracranial findings and ISFs had a substantial rate of concern for the possibility of nonaccidental skull fracture. Although prior studies have demonstrated the relative safety of discharging infants with ISFs, it is critical to establish an appropriate standardized protocol to evaluate for infants at risk of abusive head trauma.