36 Background: Intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer are main histological types of gastric cancer, based on Lauren’s classification, which account for 34–47% and 46–57%, respectively. Patients (pts) with intestinal gastric cancer have better prognosis. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of apatinib between the two intestinal gastric cancer, based on data from post-marketing Phase IV study (Ahead-G201). Methods: The single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial enrolled advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction after failure of ≥2 lines of chemotherapy. Data of pts with intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer were collected and compared. Results: As of 2017/7/10, 96 intestinal and 104 diffuse pts were recruited. Differences in age (64 vs. 55 yrs), gender (male: 77.1% vs. 57.7%) and disease duration ( > 12 months: 71.3% vs. 56.7%) were detected. Between intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer, there was no discrepancy in incidences of adverse events (AEs) (78.1% vs. 73.1%) and Grade ≥3 AEs (41.7% vs. 38.5%). The incidences of typical AEs associated anti-angiogenesis drugs were also comparable (hypertension 26.0% vs. 16.4%; proteinuria 14.6% vs. 20.2%; hand-foot-skin reaction 16.7% vs. 9.6%). No statistical difference was observed in best overall response rate (12.8% vs. 14.3%) and disease control rate (76.0% vs. 64.3%). Survival benefit in pts with intestinal gastric cancer was detected (progression free survival: 5.52 vs. 2.76 months, p = 0.036; overall survival: 8.11 vs. 4.70 months, p = 0.047). However, the multivariable Cox regression model analysis showed that histological type was not independently prognostic factors for survival, indicating that clinical benefit of pts with intestinal gastric cancer was influenced by other factors. Conclusions: Compared with diffuse gastric cancer, pts intestinal gastric cancer have more clinical benefit after treated by apatinib. However, histological type based on the Lauren’s classification was not independently prognostic factors for survival, which needs to be further analyzed, considering the small sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.