Identification of the most specific markers to differentiate primary pulmonary carcinoma from metastatic gastrointestinal carcinoma to the lung

Background A number of biomarkers have the potential of differentiating between primary lung tumours and secondary lung tumours from the gastrointestinal tract, however, a standardised panel for that purpose does not exist yet. We aimed to identify the smallest panel that is most sensitive and specific at differentiating between primary lung tumours and secondary lung tumours from the gastrointestinal tract. Methods A total of 170 samples were collected, including 140 primary and 30 non-primary lung tumours and staining for CK7, Napsin-A, TTF1, CK20, CDX2, and SATB2 was performed via tissue microarray. The data was then analysed using univariate regression models and a combination of multivariate regression models and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Univariate regression models confirmed the 6 biomarkers’ ability to independently predict the primary outcome (p < 0.001). Multivariate models of 2-biomarker combinations identified 11 combinations with statistically significant odds ratios (ORs) (p < 0.05), of which TTF1/CDX2 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.983, 0.960–1.000 95% CI). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 75.7, 100, 100, and 37.5% respectively. Multivariate models of 3-biomarker combinations identified 4 combinations with statistically significant ORs (p < 0.05), of which CK7/CK20/SATB2 had the highest AUC (0.965, 0.930–1.000 95% CI). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 85.1, 100, 100, and 41.7% respectively. Multivariate models of 4-biomarker combinations did not identify any combinations with statistically significant ORs (p < 0.05). Conclusions The analysis identified the combination of CK7/CK20/SATB2 to be the smallest panel with the highest sensitivity (85.1%) and specificity (100%) for predicting tumour origin with an ROC AUC of 0.965 (p < 0.001; SE: 0.018, 0.930–1.000 95% CI).

Evaluation of P40 and Napsin A in the Differential Diagnosis of Non Small Cell Bronchogenic Carcinoma on Small Lung Biopsies

BACKGROUND :- Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality over word wide, Although the pathological diagnosis of lung carcinoma is limited as only small specimen available for diagnosis.the availability of targeted therapies has created a need for precise subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma . Several recent studies have demonstrated that the use of Immunohistochemical markers can be helpful in differentiating lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) from lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) not on surgically resected material but also on small biopsy samples and cytology. AIM (1) To classify the non small cell lung carcinoma into major categories like squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and adenocarcinoma (LAC) and other categories by applying immunohistochemicalmarker like p40 (truncated p63) and Napsin A (2) To analyse the sensitivity and specificity of p40 and Napsin A in light of histomorphology and/or other relevant immunohistochemical markers available, using appropriate statistical tests. Material and methods:- This study was a one and half year (18 months) prospective study from Jan 2017 to June 2018, conducted in department of pathology on patients attending the outpatient and inpatient department of TB and respiratory disease, a total of 210 bronchoscopic guided biopsies / transthoracic (CT/MRI /guided) small tissue biopsies from the patients suspected of lung malignancy were incorporated in the study. 20 corresponding resection specimens (wedge resection and lobectomy) were also included in the study for correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings on small biopsies. RESULTS:-In our study IHC for both p40 and napsin –A aided in subtyping of 71.9% cases of non small cell lung carcinoma and this diagnostic accuracy was found to be statistically significant with p-value < 0.05.,on statistical analysis we found that napsin-A had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 80%. Also, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were seen to be 88.0% and 81.8% respectively.

α-Fetoprotein-Producing Endometrial Carcinoma Is Associated With Fetal Gut-Like and/or Hepatoid Morphology, Lymphovascular Infiltration, TP53 Abnormalities, and Poor Prognosis: Five Cases and Literature Review

The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of α-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing endometrial carcinoma (AFP+ EC) are poorly understood. From 284 cases of endometrial carcinoma in our pathology archive, we identified five cases (1.8%) of AFP+ EC with fetal gut–like (4/5) and/or hepatoid (2/5) morphology. All cases exhibited lymphovascular infiltration. In addition, 24 cases of endometrial carcinoma with elevated serum AFP levels were retrieved from the literature. The patient age ranged from 44 to 86 years (median: 63). Of 26 cases whose FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage and follow-up information was available (mean follow-up 24 months), 15 were stage I or II and 11 were stage III or IV. Even in stage I or II disease, death or relapse occurred in more than half of the patients (8/15). Detailed analysis of our five cases revealed that, on immunohistochemistry, AFP+ EC was positive for SALL4 (4/5), AFP (3/5), and HNF1β (4/5) in &gt;50% of neoplastic cells and negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors (5/5), PAX8 (4/5), and napsin A (5/5). Four cases exhibited aberrant p53 immunohistochemistry and were confirmed to harbor TP53 mutations by direct sequencing. No mutation was found in POLE, CTNNB1, or KRAS. In conclusion, AFP+ EC merits recognition as a distinct subtype of endometrial carcinoma, which occurs in 1.8% of endometrial carcinoma cases, are associated with TP53 abnormalities, exhibit lymphovascular infiltration, and can show distant metastasis even when treated in early stage.

Cytomorphologic findings of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma/carcinoma: Report of two cases

Introduction/Objective SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma/carcinoma is a highly aggressive neoplasm characterized by SMARCA4 (chromatin remodeling complex) deficiency. It affects mostly smokers (85%) with a broad age range of presentation (mean age: 50 years). Most patients present with advanced disease and extensive involvement of thoracic structures. The cytomorphologic features of this entity have not been fully described. Methods/Case Report A 59-year-old female, former smoker, with a prior history of lung adenocarcinoma, presented with a new 2.8 cm right infrahilar nodule concerning for recurrence. The second patient, a 54-year-old male who is a smoker, presented with an 8.0 cm right perihilar mass extending into the right lung and mediastinum with encasement of the right main pulmonary artery. Cytologically, the smears from both aspirates were comprised of single cells and loosely cohesive clusters of ovoid to spindle cells with scant to moderate cytoplasm, stippled chromatin, and focally prominent nucleoli. Numerous mitotic figures were appreciated. Necrosis was present within the smear background. The cell block sections showed tumor cells arranged in glandular and focal papillary architecture with a myxoid background. In one case, intermediate to large-sized cells with focal cytoplasmic clearing and patchy extracellular metachromatic material were also noted. Rhabdoid morphology was not appreciated. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were at least focally positive for vimentin, TLE-1, SALL4, CK AE1/AE3 and TTF-1, while being negative for CK7, CK20, Napsin-A, SOX-10, p40 and neuroendocrine markers. Both tumors showed SMARCA4 (BRG1) loss of expression. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) N/A Conclusion While the cytomorphologic findings of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas/carcinomas are not specific, the FNA diagnosis should be considered for any poorly differentiated neoplasm involving the lungs or mediastinum which should prompt an appropriate immunocytochemical work-up that includes SMARCA4/BRG1 assessment

Cancer of unknown primary in a mare: case report and comparative pathology review

A 25-y-old Percheron mare was admitted to the teaching hospital because of lethargy and intractable dyspnea. Thoracoabdominal ultrasound examination identified severe peritoneal effusion, mild bilateral pleural effusion, and a diffuse pulmonary nodular pattern. Cytology of peritoneal fluid revealed a hypercellular sample with clusters of neoplastic polygonal cells and admixed macrophages. Euthanasia was followed by postmortem examination; marked bi-cavitary effusion was present, and innumerable up to 4-cm diameter, round-to-floriform nodules were diffusely evident throughout serosal surfaces as well as the pulmonary and hepatic parenchyma. Disseminated adenocarcinoma, predominantly affecting lung and liver with widespread serosal implantation, was confirmed on light microscopy. Neoplastic cells had strong immunolabeling for pancytokeratin and lacked immunoreactivity to vimentin, napsin A, and Pax8. Cytokeratin 7 and thyroid transcription factor-1 were non-contributory given absent and inconsistent internal control reactivity, respectively. Such results, combined with the lack of a major mass that would indicate a primary site, were supportive of carcinoma of unknown primary site, which remains a conundrum in human oncology, and is poorly explored in veterinary medicine, mainly as a result of clinical and diagnostic limitations.

Esophageal metastases from primary lung cancer: a case report

Background Primary lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers. The common metastatic sites are the liver, bones, brain, adrenal glands and central nervous system. However, gastrointestinal metastases, particularly esophageal metastases, from lung cancer are rare. There are no cases of esophageal metastases from lung cancer which refer to its particular treatment. Case presentation We report a case of esophageal metastases from lung cancer. The patient was a 55-year-old Han Chinese man who first attended our hospital due to dry cough and was diagnosed with late-stage lung cancer. Three months later, the patient complained of dysphagia. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and pathological examination of the biopsy specimen was performed to confirm the lesion was metastases from lung cancer. Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), cytokeratin 7 (CK-7) and napsin A were positive by immunohistochemistry examination. These results reconfirmed the diagnosis of esophageal metastases from lung cancer. Conclusions Esophageal metastasis from lung cancer is very rare. It may be alleviated with personalized chemotherapy. In addition, molecular targeted therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may be reasonable.