The presence of inversions is important in the evolution and cultivar differentiation of wheats, Even though we can't have conclusive cytological proof of the presence of inversions in wheat, we can use the indirect way of screening paracentric inversions through chromosome configuration at anaphase I and II. This work presents the comparison of 'Chinese Spring' structure (with respect to the presence of inverted segments) to (i) 52 homozygous wheat lines obtained in the progenies of the cross between a wheat × Agropyron intermedium substitution line and Aegilops speltoides homoeologous pairing promotor and (ii) three wheat cultivars ('Vilmorin 27', 'Ducat', and 'Tormes') that were used in developing the above mentioned lines. The three cultivars present inverted segments relative to 'Chinese Spring' structure. Some of these inverted segments are possibly maintained in some of the lines studied. Four of them show the primitive structure of 'Chinese Spring' even though none of the wheat parents had it. Finally, other lines show new structure that could have been due to the Aegilops speltoides effect, but the method used did not allow us to reach a definite conclusion on this point. It is interesting to emphasize that the use of this homoeologous pairing promotor led to a chromosomal structure that was not so different from that existing in wheats.Key words: pairing (homoeologous), hybridization (interspecific), gene transfer, Triticum, Agropyron, Aegilops.